Blockly Example of Multiple Workspaces - blockly

I'm attempting to create a platform that allows students to play code challenges head-to-head using blockly. I'm imagining something like:
The documentation mentions "Multiple workspaces" with block factory, but I feel like I might be reinventing the wheel here, so before I get started, does something like this already exist? Ideally, hooked up to app engine so students could grab code from any other student and test to see how their code compares?

Yes, it exists! We use this in the Developer Tools to give both an editor and the preview. Two demos to look at are the Multi-Playground (src) and the Mirrored Workspaces (src).
You'll notice in the multi-playground, we just call Blockly.inject(..) on each div:
function start() {
// ...
startBlocklyInstance('VertStartLTR', false, false, 'start', toolbox);
startBlocklyInstance('VertStartRTL', true, false, 'start', toolbox);
startBlocklyInstance('VertEndLTR', false, false, 'end', toolbox);
startBlocklyInstance('VertEndRTL', true, false, 'end', toolbox);
startBlocklyInstance('HorizontalStartLTR', false, true, 'start', toolbox);
startBlocklyInstance('HorizontalStartRTL', true, true, 'start', toolbox);
startBlocklyInstance('HorizontalEndLTR', false, true, 'end', toolbox);
startBlocklyInstance('HorizontalEndRTL', true, true, 'end', toolbox);
}
function startBlocklyInstance(suffix, rtl, horizontalLayout, position,
toolbox) {
options.rtl = rtl;
options.toolbox = toolbox;
options.horizontalLayout = horizontalLayout;
options.toolboxPosition = position;
Blockly.inject('blocklyDiv' + suffix, options);
}

Related

RethinkDB pub/sub ReqlPermissionError

I'm using Publish-Subscribe with RethinkDB.
For exchange I use one db named 'RPI_messages' with three tables:
Connector_messages
MAC_messages
Orders
I want to introduce some basic authentication on producer and consumer sides like this:
r.db('rethinkdb').table('users').insert({id: 'lis', password: 'somepassword'})
r.db('rethinkdb').table('users').insert({id: 'rpi', password: 'someotherpassword'})
r.db('RPi_messages').grant('lis', {read: false, write: true, config: true}) //producer
r.db('RPi_messages').grant('rpi', {read: true, write: false, config: true}) //consumers
r.db('rethinkdb').table('permissions')
shows this:
{
"database": "RPi_messages" ,
"id": [
"lis" ,
"007928e5-c654-4311-b3aa-a834c62dcf88"
] ,
"permissions": {
"config": true ,
"read": false ,
"write": true
} ,
"user": "lis"
}
Problem:
When I try to publish or to subscribe to exchange it throws an exception:
ReqlPermissionError: User `lis` does not have the required `config` permission in:
r.db_create('RPi_messages')
rethinkdb.errors.ReqlPermissionError: User `rpi` does not have the required `config` permission in:
r.db_create('RPi_messages')
Does this mean that my users need to have global permissions?
Any help greatly appreciated.
So, with fairly bit of try and error I made it work.
For anyone else: You need config permission on global scope for every user in your pub-sub system like this:
r.grant('lis', {read: false, write: false, config: true});
r.grant('rpi', {read: false, write: false, config: true});
...and following permissions on table(s) or, in my case, on database scope:
r.db('RPi_messages').grant('lis', {read: true, write: true, config: true}); //publisher
r.db('RPi_messages').grant('rpi', {read: true, write: false, config: true}); //sunscriber
Correct me if I'm wrong but this doesn't look very secure to me. Those permissions are needed because Exchanger class in rethink's pub-sub system looks if exchange table exists and creates on if it doesn't. Which means that anyone who gets one of your client subscriber devices can create as many tables in your db as they want.

Suppressing nightwatchjs warnings in terminal output

I'm using nightwatchjs to run my test suite, and I would like to remove the warning messages being outputted to my terminal display.
At the moment, I'm getting loads of these (admittedly genuine) warning messages whilst my scripts are running and it's making the reading of the results harder and harder.
As an example;
Yes they are valid messages, but it's not often possible for me to uniquely pick out each individual element and I'm not interested in them for my output.
So, I'd like to know how I can stop them from being reported in my terminal.
Below is what I've tried so far in my nightwatch.conf.js config file;
desiredCapabilities: {
browserName: 'chrome',
javascriptEnabled : true,
acceptSslCerts: true,
acceptInscureCerts: true,
chromeOptions : {
args: [
'--ignore-certificate-errors',
'--allow-running-insecure-content',
'--disable-web-security',
'--disable-infobars',
'--disable-popup-blocking',
'--disable-notifications',
'--log-level=3'],
prefs: {
'profile.managed_default_content_settings.popups' : 1,
'profile.managed_default_content_settings.notifications' : 1
},
},
},
},
but it's still displaying the warnings.
Any help on this would be really appreciated.
Many thanks.
You can try setting detailed_output property to false in the configuration file. This should stop these details from printing in the console.
You can find a sample config file here.
You can find relevant details available under Output Settings section of official docs here.
Update 1: This looks like a combo of properties which controls this and the below combo works for me.
live_output: false,
silent: true,
output: true,
detailed_output: false,
disable_error_log: false,

Python iterate over all possible combinations on boolean variables

I have 6 booleas variables in a dict and I want to run my code on all all their possible iteration.
so I have:
params["is_A"] = True/False
params["is_B"] = True/False
...
and then for all possible combinations, I want to call
my_func(params)
What is the best way to do so?
itertools.product can generate all the combinations:
import itertools
names = 'is_A is_B is_C is_D is_E is_F'.split()
def my_func(params):
print(params)
for p in itertools.product([True,False],repeat=6):
params = dict(zip(names,p))
my_func(params)
Output:
{'is_A': True, 'is_B': True, 'is_C': True, 'is_D': True, 'is_E': True, 'is_F': True}
{'is_A': True, 'is_B': True, 'is_C': True, 'is_D': True, 'is_E': True, 'is_F': False}
...
{'is_A': False, 'is_B': False, 'is_C': False, 'is_D': False, 'is_E': False, 'is_F': True}
{'is_A': False, 'is_B': False, 'is_C': False, 'is_D': False, 'is_E': False, 'is_F': False}

ftpPublish declarative pipeline

I have the following pipeline:
pipeline {
agent any
stages {
... building stuff...
stage('push to develop'){
when {
branch 'develop'
}
steps {
ftpPublisher paramPublish: [ parameterName: "" ], alwaysPublishFromMaster: true, masterNodeName: master, continueOnError: false, failOnError: false, publishers: [
[configName: 'cp-front', usePromotionTimestamp: false, useWorkspaceInPromotion: false, verbose: true, transfers: [
[asciiMode: false, cleanRemote: false, excludes: '', flatten: false, makeEmptyDirs: false, noDefaultExcludes: false, patternSeparator: '[, ]+', remoteDirectorySDF: false, removePrefix: '', sourceFiles: '**/*']
]]
]
}
}
}
}
Unfortunately, this throws:
groovy.lang.MissingPropertyException: No such property: master for
class: groovy.lang.Binding at
groovy.lang.Binding.getVariable(Binding.java:63) at
org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SandboxInterceptor.onGetProperty(SandboxInterceptor.java:264)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$6.call(Checker.java:288)
at
org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedGetProperty(Checker.java:292)
at
org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedGetProperty(Checker.java:268)
at
org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedGetProperty(Checker.java:268)
at
com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.sandbox.SandboxInvoker.getProperty(SandboxInvoker.java:29)
at
com.cloudbees.groovy.cps.impl.PropertyAccessBlock.rawGet(PropertyAccessBlock.java:20)
at WorkflowScript.run(WorkflowScript:22)
Which gives me about 0 idea what is going on. Any pointers?
master (an object, property) is not equal to 'master' - which is an instance of String. Maybe you made a simple mistake?

Choosing download location for youtube-dl python

I'm using youtube-dl for a discord bot in python and it works fine, however it downloads the files to the root directory of the project. Since it will be downloading LOTS of videos, I would prefer for it to download to a directory inside of the root. How do I do this?
These are my current options:
ytdl_format_options = {
'format': 'bestaudio/best',
'outtmpl': '%(extractor)s-%(id)s-%(title)s.%(ext)s',
'reactrictfilenames': True,
'noplaylist': True,
'nocheckcertificate': True,
'ignoreerrors': False,
'logtostderr': False,
'quiet': True,
'no_warnings': True,
'default_search': 'auto',
'source_addreacs': '0.0.0.0', # bind to ipv4 since ipv6 addreacses cause issues sometimes
'output': r'youtube-dl'
}
ffmpeg_options = {
'before_options': '-nostdin',
'options': '-vn'
}
Set an output template containing slashes in the outtmpl option:
ytdl_format_options = {
'outtmpl': 'somewhere/%(extractor_key)s/%(extractor)s-%(id)s-%(title)s.%(ext)s',
...
}
Output templates can have lots of fields (including playlist IDs, license, format name/bitrates, album name & much more, depending on what the video website you're using supports). For more information, refer to the youtube-dl documentation of output templates. All fields can be used as directory or file names.

Resources