We have a multi-tenant web app running in Azure App Services. Occasionally, we need to bind a new custom domain. Unfortunately, this causes the app to recycle - as I'm guessing the web.config is altered.
Is there any way to do this without a recycle?
I'm not 100% sure if this will avoid recycle but might be worth giving it a try.
You could associate a traffic manager with your app and then do the domain assignment on the traffic manager.
Traffic manager will work even if you have a single endpoint and might give you the indirection you need.
Related
I have a web application that is currently running on IIS in 3 Azure VMs. I have been working to make my application App-Services friendly, but would like to test the migration to App-Services in a safe / controlled environment.
Would it be possible to spin up the App-Service and use an Azure Load Balancer to redirect a percentage of traffic off the VM and onto the App-Service?
Is there any other technology that would help me get there?
You might be able to achieve this if you are using an App Service Environment and an internal load balancer
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/environment/app-service-environment-with-internal-load-balancer
However, based on your description of your current setup I don't believe there is an ideal solution for this as a standard load balancer only allows for the backend ports to map to VMs. Using an Application Gateway might be another option as well
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/
I would suggest you make use of the deployment and production slots available that comes a Web App. Once you have the webapp running in the dev slots, test the site to ensure all works as expected. Once it does, switch it to the production slot and reroute all traffic from the VMs to the App Service.
All in all, running an app on a Web App is quite simple. Microsoft takes away the need to manage the VM settings so you can simply deploy and run. I don't see you having any issues simply migrating. The likelihood for issues is small. You can also minimalism it by performing the migration during off hours in case you need to make any changes.
There is also some Web App migration guidance you might find useful
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/azure/dotnet-howto-choose-migration?view=azure-dotnet
I have a wordpress site hosted on Azure. Call it, mysite.com. I'd also like to develop a separate .net app and host it at subsite.mysite.com. How can I do this without having to pay for 2 separate Azure sites?
There are ways to achieve what you require. However, key point here is to understand the Azure App Service. Because, in Azure app service, you never pay (your concern is having to pay, not having to maintain) for a single site!
If you take a closer look at the App Service Pricing model, you will see that even with the free (like in Free lunch) tier, you get to host 10 applications in your hosting plan. But you need custom domain, then you go to Shared plan, you already can host 100 web sites within it, all with your custom domain/s.
Next you will have to learn a bit about what is Top Level Domain, what is Domain, what is Sub Domain, what is A DNS Record and what is C-Name DNS record, because these are all thing you need to understand in order to properly configure your sites.
And finally read the article on how to configure custom domain for Azure App Service.
Remember. With Azure App Service, you are paying for a hosting environment (or service plan), not for a single web site!
I have a custom domain www.abc.com configured for web app webapp-a, and I'd like to transfer it to webapp-b without downtime.
If I try to add the domain to webapp-b, I am getting
The host name www.abc.com is already assigned to another Azure website: webapp-a
It there a way to let webapp-a continues to serve the requests, until the DNS cache expires?
Edit: The domain has IP based SSL binding, and the DNS is caching the virtual IP.
I faced the same issue, and was able to solve it in a tricky way.
I created new App Service Plan (previously known as Web Hosting Plan), and assigned "new" Web App to it (you can do it via new portal, or you can create Service Plan during Web App creation).
Then, I was able to assign the same host name to Web Apps in different hosting plans.
Thinking about this, I feel it logical: most probably Service Plan is mapped to physical IIS machine, and you cannot have two sites with the same host name in the same IIS for the obvious reason.
After migration from one DNS to another is done, you can remove unused Service Plan (as you basically pay for each separately).
According to a blog post by the Azure App Service Team in June 2017, it would appear that Azure now supports adding the same custom domain to multiple web apps:
There are scenarios where a customer would like to add the same hostname to multiple web apps in the same subscription, having a geo distributed website is one example. Our custom hostname feature allows you to bypass validation for hostnames that have already been validated. You only need to verify domain ownership when you add a hostname for the first time. For all other apps in the same subscription, you can add the same hostname without creating any DNS records.
You can read the entire blog post at https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/appserviceteam/2017/06/21/custom-hostnames-with-app-service/. The quote above was taken from the Adding the same custom hostname to multiple web apps section.
This should help in scenarios such as this where you want to transfer a custom domain name from one web app to another. You can simply add the same custom domain name to both web apps, add any required SSL bindings, and then change the DNS to point to the new web app. As the DNS change propagates, traffic should gradually move over to the new web app without any downtime.
I've tested this myself in the North Europe region and had no problems. Both web apps were in different App Service Plans. I have not tested this scenario with both web apps in the same App Service Plan. Bear in mind that if you're using IP addresses/A records in your DNS, you'd need both web apps to have different IP addresses for the DNS to be able to differentiate between your web apps.
Try assigning the domain to Azure Traffic Manager and have the traffic manager forward the request to the second site. Azure Traffic Manager and Web Apps are two different systems so you might be able to assign the same domain name to a web app and a traffic manager.
Once the DNS cache has expired remove the domain from the old Azure web app and add it to the new one, then finally delete the Traffic Manager account.
Option 2
Set the TTL to something very small, say 5 seconds (I believe your hostname provider should let you set that up), wait for the new TTL to propagate through all the caches. Then switch the custom domain from one app to another, and set the TTL back to it's original value.
This will result in just a few seconds of downtime for any customers, but if you do it at a low-traffic time the effect shouldn't be too bad.
I have a single-instance nodejs web app hosted on Azure Cloud Services. I'm having a problem with it right now that sometimes causes node to crash and the role to restart. While I'm trying to hunt down this problem, is it possible to configure the cloud service to serve a static page when the role is not available?
With only a single instance of your web role, there's really not much you can do when your app is down (or rebooting), regarding redirection to a static web page. This could be done at the dns level, and you could take advantage of something like Traffic Manager to redirect requests somewhere else (perhaps to a single-page website somewhere, such as Azure Websites). There's really no "right" answer as to where you'd redirect, or how you'd do it, but aside from having multiple role instances running, there's really no way to have a static landing-page area for your requests.
just starting to explore Azure and I am still a bit confused regarding the purposes of web roles vs worker roles. In the solution I'm working on mobile apps (iPhone, Android, Windows etc) will be accessing our server product via a REST api. So there is really no public facing web site for our service (as in web pages).
This made me think that I don't need a web role but instead have one or worker roles listening on our http endpoints. I have created a prototype along these lines. When from a mobile device I do I an http post to the endpoint, I get no response back. And I see nothing in the Azure logs that indicate that indeed my worker role was started or is running and responding to it.
Is this an appropriate approach? Is there something I need to do in setup code because I don't have a web role? I read in another thread that web roles run in IIS but worker roles don't.
Thanks for bearing with me. I am still getting to grips with Azure and so have a little difficulty formulating the right question.
You don't need to have a web role in your azure deployment. As you read, a web role has IIS, and your web site is hosted in it. A worker role is basically a plain old W2K8 server without IIS. Honestly, I haven't RDP'd to a worker role instance, so I'm not 100% sure that you don't have IIS or not.
But you don't need a web role in order to expose a WCF service. Here's a nice example (although the background color needs some work) that shows you how to do this.
Good luck! I hope this helps.
Adding to what David Hoerster said: You can host up to 25 externally-facing endpoints (each with its own port number) on any role type, with each endpoint being http, https, or tcp. With a Web Role and IIS, a web application typically grabs an endpoint mapped to port 80. In your case, you'll be creating your own endpoints on your specific ports. You're responsible for creating your ServiceHost (or whatever you're using to host your service) and binding it to one of your endpoints. To do this, you'll need to either map each endpoint explicitly to a specific internally-facing port, or inspect the endpoint's properties to discover which port has been dynamically assigned to it, for you to bind to (might this be the issue you're running into with your prototype code?).
If you're looking for the benefits IIS offers when hosting your endpoint, you're better off with a Web Role, as it's going to be much easier for you to do this since a Web Role enables IIS by default (and it's easy to add WCF services to a Web Role from Visual Studio).
Even if you were to self-host your endpoints, you could still use a Web Role, but now you'd be carrying the extra memory baggage of a running, yet unused, IIS service.