How to wire linux shell (sh) script to test with ping if host is reachable?
I guess there could be solution that uses grep but maybe ping provides that option by itself?
I am more into getting a whitelisting a successful ping operation that reached the host then checking if there was any error. I don't care about the reason of ping not succeeding in reaching a host.
I would like to limit ping attempts count and maximum amount of time to reach the host so the script does not waits too long for ping trying to reach a host.
dt=$(date +%d)
cksize=50
echo "Start $(date)"
while IFS= read -r sn
do
echo "*************************************************"
echo "Begin checking NODES client: $sn"
if ping -c 1 "$sn" -i 5 > /dev/null
then
echo "$sn node up"
else
echo "$sn node down"
fi
done < server_list
parallel -j0 --timeout 15 'ping -c 5 -i 0.2 {} >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo {} up || echo {} down' ::: freenetproject.org debian.org no-such.domain {1..254}.2.3.4
You can do it like this. It will do it in parallel for all hosts.
#!/bin/bash
for server in 'google.com' 'github.com' 'fakeserver.com'
do
{ ping -o "$server" &>/dev/null && echo "$server is UP" || echo "$server is DOWN" ; } &
done
wait
Regards!
I have following IP in a server
192.168.1.1
192.168.1.2
192.168.1.3
192.168.1.4
I need to know if those IP are being used or not?
I could find using lsof but it's too slow
for ip in ${server_ip_list[#]}; do
lsof -i #$ip &>/dev/null && echo "$ip is used" || echo "$ip is unused"
done
Below command is faster but I need to specify port and protocol
true &>/dev/null </dev/tcp/192.168.1.1/80 && echo used || echo unused
I'm looking for a faster command using which I can determine if the IP is used regardless of protocol or port.
I'd appreciate if anyone could help with a solution or links where I can read about it.
Maybe you could use command ping to check if specific ip is being used (not disable ICMP in firewall). If you think for or while loop operation is too slow, you could try to use command parallel to execute command simultaneously.
Code sample like
ip_check(){
ip="$1"
ping -c 1 -W 1 "$ip" &> /dev/null
if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
echo 'used'
else
echo 'unused'
fi
}
export -f ip_check
cat ip_file.txt | parallel -k -j 0 ip_check 2> /dev/null
This is my first bash script using some resources I found online. I think there is a better way to write this perhaps using some other form of conditionals (if then vs control operators).
It is a script that basically checks if a host is up or down (check if it is ping-able). You dump all the ip addresses you want into a file, then run the script calling on the file. The text file looks like this:
8.8.8.8
4.8.8.8
4.4.4.4
127.0.0.1
The actual script looks like this. Is the 2>&1 necessary because it worked without. I had to play around with the brackets a lot.
#!/bin/bash
while read line
do
A=$(ping -c 1 $line)
((echo $A | grep "64 bytes") > /dev/null 2>&1 && (echo "UP - "$line)) || echo "DOWN - "$line
done < $1
Thank you!
You can do it entirely without brackets:
while read -r address; do
ping -c 1 $address >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "UP - $address" || echo "DOWN - $address"
done < file
The >/dev/null 2>&1 redirects both STDOUT and STDERR to /dev/null meaning that whatever ping outputs won't be printed to your terminal.
You can then use the && and || operators to echo a message in case of success (ping exits with 0) or failure (ping exits with >0)
You could use if..then..else if you prefer:
while read -r address; do
if ping -c 1 $address > /dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "UP - $address"
else
echo "DOWN - $address"
fi
done < file
arco444 has the right answer. Some other notes
with the form A && B || C, if A succeeds then B executes; if B fails, C will execute. That will not occur for if A; then B; else C; fi
proper indentation is extremely helpful to identify errors (none here, but in general)
Use better variable names: $ip is more meaningful than $line
variables go inside the quotes
parentheses introduce subshells, which will reduce performance. Use only when necessary
I have a file containing multiple hosts and IPs in the format above:
alpha, 192.168.1.1
beta, 192.168.1.2
gamma, 192.168.1.3
I am trying to create a script that says something like:
"Pinging hostname alpha"
ping 192.168.1.1
and jump to the next ip in the list.
I don't want the entire script, just some suggestions.
Thanks,
Alex
If you add a comma to the input field separator, it'll help parse the lines:
IFS=$IFS,
while read name ip; do
echo -n "Pinging hostname $name..."
ping -c2 "$ip" &>/dev/null && echo success || echo fail
done < /tmp/hosts
I'd read in the lines with read. You'll probably also want to give ping an option telling it how many times to ping. The default on most Linux systems for example is to ping forever, which doesn't seem like it would work well in your situation.
You could use AWK:
$ awk '{print "Pinging hostname "$1; system("ping -c 3 "$2) }' ips
Pinging hostname alpha,
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
You can also remove that comma if is it important to you:
$ awk '{sub(/,/,"");print "Pinging hostname "$1; system("ping -c 3 "$2) }' ips
Pinging hostname alpha
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
I might be a bit late to the party, but how about fping? Use -f to read from a file (requires sudo), or pipe the file with < (as suggested on the man page). It won't tell you "pinging alpha", but it will quickly tell you whether or not you can get in touch with the hosts.
Script for hosting 100+ hosts in same scheme like 192.168.xx.xxx
#!/bin/bash
for i in `seq ${2} ${3}`
do
ping -c 1 ${1}.${i} > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "${1}.${i} responded."
else
echo "${1}.${i} did not respond."
fi
done
command to ping the host
bash test.sh 192.168.1 0 100
Try this
#!/bin/bash
IPLIST="path_to_the_Ip_list_file"
for ip in $(cat $IPLIST)
do
ping $ip -c 1 -t 1 &> /dev/null
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
echo $ip ping faild;
else
echo $ip ping passed;
fi
done
How can I write a Linux Bash script that tells me which computers are ON in my LAN?
It would help if I could give it a range of IP addresses as input.
I would suggest using nmap's ping-scan flag,
$ nmap -sn 192.168.1.60-70
Starting Nmap 4.11 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2009-04-09 20:13 BST
Host machine1.home (192.168.1.64) appears to be up.
Host machine2.home (192.168.1.65) appears to be up.
Nmap finished: 11 IP addresses (2 hosts up) scanned in 0.235 seconds
That said, if you want to write it yourself (which is fair enough), this is how I would do it:
for ip in 192.168.1.{1..10}; do ping -c 1 -t 1 $ip > /dev/null && echo "${ip} is up"; done
..and an explanation of each bit of the above command:
Generating list of IP addresses
You can use the {1..10} syntax to generate a list of numbers, for example..
$ echo {1..10}
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(it's also useful for things like mkdir {dir1,dir2}/{sub1,sub2} - which makes dir1 and dir2, each containing sub1 and sub2)
So, to generate a list of IP's, we'd do something like
$ echo 192.168.1.{1..10}
192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 [...] 192.168.1.10
Loops
To loop over something in bash, you use for:
$ for thingy in 1 2 3; do echo $thingy; done
1
2
3
Pinging
Next, to ping.. The ping command varies a bit with different operating-systems, different distributions/versions (I'm using OS X currently)
By default (again, on the OS X version of ping) it will ping until interrupted, which isn't going to work for this, so ping -c 1 will only try sending one packet, which should be enough to determine if a machine is up.
Another problem is the timeout value, which seems to be 11 seconds on this version of ping.. It's changed using the -t flag. One second should be enough to see if a machine on the local network is alive or not.
So, the ping command we'll use is..
$ ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
--- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
Checking ping result
Next, we need to know if the machine replied or not..
We can use the && operator to run a command if the first succeeds, for example:
$ echo && echo "It works"
It works
$ nonexistantcommand && echo "This should not echo"
-bash: nonexistantcommand: command not found
Good, so we can do..
ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1 && echo "192.168.1.1 is up!"
The other way would be to use the exit code from ping.. The ping command will exit with exit-code 0 (success) if it worked, and a non-zero code if it failed. In bash you get the last commands exit code with the variable $?
So, to check if the command worked, we'd do..
ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1;
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
echo "192.168.1.1 is up";
else
echo "ip is down";
fi
Hiding ping output
Last thing, we don't need to see the ping output, so we can redirect stdout to /dev/null with the > redirection, for example:
$ ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1 > /dev/null && echo "IP is up"
IP is up
And to redirect stderr (to discard the ping: sendto: Host is down messages), you use 2> - for example:
$ errorcausingcommand
-bash: errorcausingcommand: command not found
$ errorcausingcommand 2> /dev/null
$
The script
So, to combine all that..
for ip in 192.168.1.{1..10}; do # for loop and the {} operator
ping -c 1 -t 1 192.168.1.1 > /dev/null 2> /dev/null # ping and discard output
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then # check the exit code
echo "${ip} is up" # display the output
# you could send this to a log file by using the >>pinglog.txt redirect
else
echo "${ip} is down"
fi
done
Or, using the && method, in a one-liner:
for ip in 192.168.1.{1..10}; do ping -c 1 -t 1 $ip > /dev/null && echo "${ip} is up"; done
Problem
It's slow.. Each ping command takes about 1 second (since we set the -t timeout flag to 1 second). It can only run one ping command at a time.. The obvious way around this is to use threads, so you can run concurrent commands, but that's beyond what you should use bash for..
"Python threads - a first example" explains how to use the Python threading module to write a multi-threaded ping'er.. Although at that point, I would once again suggest using nmap -sn..
In the real world, you could use nmap to get what you want.
nmap -sn 10.1.1.1-255
This will ping all the addresses in the range 10.1.1.1 to 10.1.1.255 and let you know which ones answer.
Of course, if you in fact want to do this as a bash exercise, you could run ping for each address and parse the output, but that's a whole other story.
Assuming my network is 10.10.0.0/24, if i run a ping on the broadcast address like
ping -b 10.10.0.255
I'll get an answer from all computers on this network that did not block their ICMP ping port.
64 bytes from 10.10.0.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.0.12: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.000 ms
64 bytes from 10.10.0.71: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.000 ms
So you just have to extract the 4th column, with awk for example:
ping -b 10.10.0.255 | grep 'bytes from' | awk '{ print $4 }'
10.10.0.12:
10.10.0.6:
10.10.0.71:
10.10.0.95:
Well, you will get duplicate, and you may need to remove the ':'.
EDIT from comments :
the -c option limits the number of pings
since the script will end, we can also limit ourself on unique IPs
ping -c 5 -b 10.10.0.255 | grep 'bytes from' | awk '{ print $4 }' | sort | uniq
There is also fping:
fping -g 192.168.1.0/24
or:
fping -g 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.255
or show only hosts that are alive:
fping -ag 192.168.1.0/24
It pings hosts in parallel so the scan is very fast. I don't know a distribution which includes fping in its default installation but in most distributions you can get it through the package manager.
Also using the "ping the broadcast address" method pointed out by chburd, this pipe should do the trick for you:
ping -c 5 -b 10.11.255.255 | sed -n 's/.* \([0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\).*/\1/p' | sort | uniq
Of course, you'd have to change the broadcast address to that of your network.
Just for fun, here's an alternate
#!/bin/bash
nmap -sP 192.168.1.0/24 > /dev/null 2>&1 && arp -an | grep -v incomplete | awk '{print$2}' | sed -e s,\(,, | sed -e s,\),,
If you're limiting yourself to only having the last octet changing, this script should do it. It should be fairly obvious how to extend it from one to multiple octets.
#! /bin/bash
BASE=$1
START=$2
END=$3
counter=$START
while [ $counter -le $END ]
do
ip=$BASE.$counter
if ping -qc 2 $ip
then
echo "$ip responds"
fi
counter=$(( $counter + 1 ))
done
ip neighbor
arp -a
Arpwatch
As other posters pointed out, nmap is the way to go, but here's how to do the equivalent of a ping scan in bash. I wouldn't use the broadcast ping, as a lot of systems are configured not to respond to broadcast ICMP nowadays.
for i in $(seq 1 254); do
host="192.168.100.$i"
ping -c 1 -W 1 $host &> /dev/null
echo -n "Host $host is "
test $? -eq 0 && echo "up" || echo "down"
done
#!/bin/bash
#Get the ip address for the range
ip=$(/sbin/ifconfig eth0 | grep 'inet addr:' | cut -d: -f2 | awk '{ print $1}' | cut -d"." -f1,2,3)
# ping test and list the hosts and echo the info
for range in $ip ; do [ $? -eq 0 ] && ping -c 1 -w 1 $range > /dev/null 2> /dev/null && echo "Node $range is up"
done
Although an old question, it still seems to be important (at least important enough for me to deal with this). My script relies on nmap too, so nothing special here except that ou can define which interface you want to scan and the IP Range is created automagically (at least kind of).
This is what I came up with
#!/bin/bash
#Script for scanning the (local) network for other computers
command -v nmap >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "I require nmap but it's not installed. Aborting." >&2; exit 1; }
if [ -n ""$#"" ]; then
ip=$(/sbin/ifconfig $1 | grep 'inet ' | awk '{ print $2}' | cut -d"." -f1,2,3 )
nmap -sP $ip.1-255
else
echo -e "\nThis is a script for scanning the (local) network for other computers.\n"
echo "Enter Interface as parameter like this:"
echo -e "\t./scannetwork.sh $(ifconfig -lu | awk '{print $2}')\n"
echo "Possible interfaces which are up are: "
for i in $(ifconfig -lu)
do
echo -e "\033[32m \t $i \033[39;49m"
done
echo "Interfaces which could be used but are down at the moment: "
for i in $(ifconfig -ld)
do
echo -e "\033[31m \t $i \033[39;49m"
done
echo
fi
One remark: This script is created on OSX, so there might be some changes to linux environments.
If you want to provide a list of hosts it can be done with nmap, grep and awk.
Install nmap:
$ sudo apt-get install nmap
Create file hostcheck.sh like this:
hostcheck.sh
#!/bin/bash
nmap -sP -iL hostlist -oG pingscan > /dev/null
grep Up pingscan | awk '{print $2}' > uplist
grep Down pingscan | awk '{print $2}' > downlist
-sP: Ping Scan - go no further than determining if host is online
-iL : Input from list of hosts/networks
-oG : Output scan results in Grepable format, to the given filename.
/dev/null : Discards output
Change the access permission:
$ chmod 775 hostcheck.sh
Create file hostlist with the list of hosts to be checked (hostname or IP):
hostlist (Example)
192.168.1.1-5
192.168.1.101
192.168.1.123
192.168.1.1-5 is a range of IPs
Run the script:
./hostcheck.sh hostfile
Will be generated files pingscan with all the information, uplist with the hosts online (Up) and downlist with the hosts offline (Down).
uplist (Example)
192.168.1.1
192.168.1.2
192.168.1.3
192.168.1.4
192.168.1.101
downlist (Example)
192.168.1.5
192.168.1.123
Some machines don't answer pings (e.g. firewalls).
If you only want the local network you can use this command:
(for n in $(seq 1 254);do sudo arping -c1 10.0.0.$n & done ; wait) | grep reply | grep --color -E '([0-9]+\.){3}[0-9]+'
Explanations part !
arping is a command that sends ARP requests. It is present on most of linux.
Example:
sudo arping -c1 10.0.0.14
the sudo is not necessary if you are root ofc.
10.0.0.14 : the ip you want to test
-c1 : send only one request.
&: the 'I-don't-want-to-wait' character
This is a really useful character that give you the possibility to launch a command in a sub-process without waiting him to finish (like a thread)
the for loop is here to arping all 255 ip addresses. It uses the seq command to list all numbers.
wait: after we launched our requests we want to see if there are some replies. To do so we just put wait after the loop.
wait looks like the function join() in other languages.
(): parenthesis are here to interpret all outputs as text so we can give it to grep
grep: we only want to see replies. the second grep is just here to highlight IPs.
hth
Edit 20150417: Maxi Update !
The bad part of my solution is that it print all results at the end. It is because grep have a big enough buffer to put some lines inside.
the solution is to add --line-buffered to the first grep.
like so:
(for n in $(seq 1 254);do sudo arping -c1 10.0.0.$n & done ; wait) | grep --line-buffered reply | grep --color -E '([0-9]+\.){3}[0-9]+'
#!/bin/bash
for ((n=0 ; n < 30 ; n+=1))
do
ip=10.1.1.$n
if ping -c 1 -w 1 $ip > /dev/null 2> /dev/null >> /etc/logping.txt; then
echo "${ip} is up" # output up
# sintax >> /etc/logping.txt log with .txt format
else
echo "${ip} is down" # output down
fi
done
The following (evil) code runs more than TWICE as fast as the nmap method
for i in {1..254} ;do (ping 192.168.1.$i -c 1 -w 5 >/dev/null && echo "192.168.1.$i" &) ;done
takes around 10 seconds, where the standard nmap
nmap -sP 192.168.1.1-254
takes 25 seconds...
Well, this is part of a script of mine.
ship.sh 🚢 A simple, handy network addressing 🔎 multitool with plenty of features 🌊
Pings network, displays online hosts on that network with their local IP and MAC address
It doesn't require any edit. Needs root permission to run.
GOOGLE_DNS="8.8.8.8"
ONLINE_INTERFACE=$(ip route get "${GOOGLE_DNS}" | awk -F 'dev ' 'NR == 1 {split($2, a, " "); print a[1]}')
NETWORK_IP=$(ip route | awk "/${ONLINE_INTERFACE}/ && /src/ {print \$1}" | cut --fields=1 --delimiter="/")
NETWORK_IP_CIDR=$(ip route | awk "/${ONLINE_INTERFACE}/ && /src/ {print \$1}")
FILTERED_IP=$(echo "${NETWORK_IP}" | awk 'BEGIN{FS=OFS="."} NF--')
ip -statistics neighbour flush all &>/dev/null
echo -ne "Pinging ${NETWORK_IP_CIDR}, please wait ..."
for HOST in {1..254}; do
ping "${FILTERED_IP}.${HOST}" -c 1 -w 10 &>/dev/null &
done
for JOB in $(jobs -p); do wait "${JOB}"; done
ip neighbour | \
awk 'tolower($0) ~ /reachable|stale|delay|probe/{printf ("%5s\t%s\n", $1, $5)}' | \
sort --version-sort --unique