Array full of regex, match to string, return path - node.js

Still very much a beginner, Just editing to make a little more sense
Here is an example payload.
{
"Status":
{
"result":[
{
"LastUpdate":"2017-09-07 06:47:09",
"Type":"2",
"Value":"' s the inside temperature",
"idx":"4"
}
],
"status":"OK",
"title":"GetUserVariable"
},
"Devices":
{
"28":
{
"rid":"28",
"regex":"(the )?(AC|(Air( )?(Con)?(ditioner)?))( Power)?( )?$/i"
},
"71":
{
"rid":"71",
"regex":"(the )?inside temp/i"
}
}
}
I want to filter the "Devices" array down to entires that match Status.result[0].Value.
I have the follow code working, but it is in working in reverse, it returns the matching string, not the filtered array, just not sure how to reverse it.
var devices = msg.payload.Devices;
var request = [ msg.payload.Status.result[0].Value ];
var matches = request.filter(function (text) {
return devices.some(function (regex) {
var realregex = new RegExp(regex, "i");
return realregex.test(text);
});
});
msg = { topic:"Inputs", payload: { devices:devices, request:request } };
msg2 = { topic:"Output", payload: { matches:matches } };
return [ [ msg, msg2 ] ];
Thanks,
Wob

Related

writefilesync not writing all variables to a json file

I have this code:
circular = () => { //fix circular stuff for json.stringify
seen = new WeakSet();
return (key, value) => {
if (typeof value === 'object' && value !== null) {
if (seen.has(value)) {
return;
}
seen.add(value);
}
return value;
};
};
var gameon = 1;
var fighter1 = {"userid":"97","username":"john","items":{},"ailments":{}};
var fighter2 = {"userid":"91","username":"james","items":{},"ailments":{}};
var resume = 30;
all = {gameon:gameon,fighter1:fighter1,fighter2:fighter2,resume:resume,inturn:fighter1,outturn:fighter2};
fs.writeFileSync(file,JSON.stringify(all,circular()),{encoding:'utf8',flag:'w'});
I expect to have the next output written to file:
{
"gameon":1,
"fighter1":{
"userid":"97",
"username":"john",
"items": {},
"ailments":{}
},
"fighter2":{
"userid":"91",
"username":"james",
"items":{},
"ailments":{}
},
"resume":"",
"inturn":{
"userid":"97",
"username":"john",
"items":{},
"ailments":{}
},
"outturn":{
"userid":"91",
"username":"james",
"items":{},
"ailments":{}
}
but this is what I get instead:
{
"gameon":1,
"fighter1":{
"userid":"97",
"username":"john",
"items":{},
"ailments":{}
},
"fighter2":{
"userid":"91",
"username":"james",
"items":{},
"ailments":{}
},
"resume":""
}
Please notice how the string truncates after "resume" like it couldn't read the variables fighter1 and fighter2 despite it could do it for the first iteration.
Why is that?
Thank you.

Elasticsearch node js point in time search_phase_execution_exception

const body = {
query: {
geo_shape: {
geometry: {
relation: 'within',
shape: {
type: 'polygon',
coordinates: [$polygon],
},
},
},
},
pit: {
id: "t_yxAwEPZXNyaS1wYzYtMjAxN3IxFjZxU2RBTzNyUXhTUV9XbzhHSk9IZ3cAFjhlclRmRGFLUU5TVHZKNXZReUc3SWcAAAAAAAALmpMWQkNwYmVSeGVRaHU2aDFZZExFRjZXZwEWNnFTZEFPM3JReFNRX1dvOEdKT0hndwAA",
keep_alive: "1m",
},
};
Query fails with search_phase_execution_exception at onBody
Without pit query works fine but it's needed to retrieve more than 10000 hits
Well, using PIT in NodeJS ElasticSearch's client is not clear, or at least is not well documented. You can create a PIT using the client like:
const pitRes = await elastic.openPointInTime({
index: index,
keep_alive: "1m"
});
pit_id = pitRes.body.id;
But there is no way to use that pit_id in the search method, and it's not documented properly :S
BUT, you can use the scroll API as follows:
const scrollSearch = await elastic.helpers.scrollSearch({
index: index,
body: {
"size": 10000,
"query": {
"query_string": {
"fields": [ "vm_ref", "org", "vm" ],
"query": organization + moreQuery
},
"sort": [
{ "utc_date": "desc" }
]
}
}});
And then read the results as follows:
let res = [];
try {
for await (const result of scrollSearch) {
res.push(...result.body.hits.hits);
}
} catch (e) {
console.log(e);
}
I know that's not the exact answer to your question, but I hope it helps ;)
The usage of point-in-time for pagination of search results is now documented in ElasticSearch. You can find more or less detailed explanations here: Paginate search results
I prepared an example that may give an idea about how to implement the workflow, described in the documentation:
async function searchWithPointInTime(cluster, index, chunkSize, keepAlive) {
if (!chunkSize) {
chunkSize = 5000;
}
if (!keepAlive) {
keepAlive = "1m";
}
const client = new Client({ node: cluster });
let pointInTimeId = null;
let searchAfter = null;
try {
// Open point in time
pointInTimeId = (await client.openPointInTime({ index, keep_alive: keepAlive })).body.id;
// Query next chunk of data
while (true) {
const size = remained === null ? chunkSize : Math.min(remained, chunkSize);
const response = await client.search({
// Pay attention: no index here (because it will come from the point-in-time)
body: {
size: chunkSize,
track_total_hits: false, // This will make query faster
query: {
// (1) TODO: put any filter you need here (instead of match_all)
match_all: {},
},
pit: {
id: pointInTimeId,
keep_alive: keepAlive,
},
// Sorting should be by _shard_doc or at least include _shard_doc
sort: [{ _shard_doc: "desc" }],
// The next parameter is very important - it tells Elastic to bring us next portion
...(searchAfter !== null && { search_after: [searchAfter] }),
},
});
const { hits } = response.body.hits;
if (!hits || !hits.length) {
break; // No more data
}
for (hit of hits) {
// (2) TODO: Do whatever you need with results
}
// Check if we done reading the data
if (hits.length < size) {
break; // We finished reading all data
}
// Get next value for the 'search after' position
// by extracting the _shard_doc from the sort key of the last hit
searchAfter = hits[hits.length - 1].sort[0];
}
} catch (ex) {
console.error(ex);
} finally {
// Close point in time
if (pointInTime) {
await client.closePointInTime({ body: { id: pointInTime } });
}
}
}

NodeJS String.replace() problem while filtering

I can't modify the filtering parameter with
String.replace()
I can get the filtering keys from the URL as an object but its badly fromatted from me.
Filtering: {{URL}}/api/v1/bootcamps?averageCost[lt]=10000
Current format: { averageCost: { lt: '10000' } }
Right fromat: { averageCost: { $lt: '10000' } }
So I tried to convert it as a String and replace that value. But that value can be: lt, lte, gt, gte, in but it has some problem because the line after the .replace() method doesnt executed and of course the catch block cathes the error...
My code snippet:
try {
console.log(req.query);
const queryStr = JSON.stringify(req.query);
console.log(queryStr); //thats the last thing I get
queryStr = queryStr.replace(
/\b(gt|gte|lt|lte|in)\b/g,
match => `$${match}`
);
console.log(queryStr); // I dont get this
const bootcamps = await Bootcamp.find();
res.status(200).json({
succes: true,
count: bootcamps.length,
data: bootcamps
});
} catch (err) {
return res.status(404).json({ succes: false });
}
To replace it correctly you should use something like this:
let queryStr = '{ "averageCost": { "lt": "10000" }, "test": { "gt": "12345"} }';
const regex = /\b(gt|gte|lt|lte|in)\b/g;
queryStr = queryStr.replace(regex, '$$' + "$1"); // <-- here is the correct replace
This will replace queryStr with:
{ "averageCost": { "$lt": "10000" }, "test": { "$gt": "12345"} }
JSFiddle https://jsfiddle.net/c52z8ewr/
If you need the object back just do JSON.parse(queryStr)
You can also Try This
const queryCpy = { ...this.query };
// console.log(queryCpy, 'before filter');
console.log(queryCpy, 'after filter');
let queryString = JSON.stringify(queryCpy);
queryString = queryString.replace(
/\b(gt|gte|lt|lte)\b/g,
(rep) => `$${rep}`,
);
console.log(queryString, 'after filter');
If want an object in return do:
const bootcamps = await Bootcamp.find(JSON.parse(queryStr));

Unable to write item(s) to DynamoDB table utilizing DocumentClient - Nodejs

I'm absolutely brand new to DynamoDb and I'm trying to simply write an object from a NodeJS Lambda. Based on what I've read and researched I should probably be using DocumentClient from the aws-sdk. I also found the following question here regarding issues with DocumentClient, but it doesn't seem to address my specific issue....which I can't really find/pinpoint unfortunately. I've set up a debugger to help with SAM local development, but it appears to be only providing some of the errors.
The code's implementation is shown here.
var params = {
TableName: "March-Madness-Teams",
Item: {
"Id": {"S": randstring.generate(9)},
"School":{"S": team_name},
"Seed": {"S": seed},
"ESPN_Id": {"S": espn_id}
}
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(params))
dynamodb.put(params, (error,data) => {
if (error) {
console.log("Error ", error)
} else {
console.log("Success! ", data)
}
})
Basically I'm scrubbing a website utilizing cheerio library and cherry picking values from the DOM and saving them into the json object shown below.
{
"TableName": "March-Madness-Teams",
"Item": {
"Id": {
"S": "ED311Oi3N"
},
"School": {
"S": "BAYLOR"
},
"Seed": {
"S": "1"
},
"ESPN_Id": {
"S": "239"
}
}
}
When I attempt to push this json object to Dynamo, I get errors says
Error MultipleValidationErrors: There were 2 validation errors:
* MissingRequiredParameter: Missing required key 'TableName' in params
* MissingRequiredParameter: Missing required key 'Item' in params
The above error is all good in well....I assume it didn't like the fact that I had wrapped those to keys in strings, so I removed the quotes and sent the following
{
TableName: "March-Madness-Teams",
Item: {
"Id": {
"S": "ED311Oi3N"
},
"School": {
"S": "BAYLOR"
},
"Seed": {
"S": "1"
},
"ESPN_Id": {
"S": "239"
}
}
}
However, when I do that...I kind of get nothing.
Here is a larger code snippet.
return new Promise((resolve,reject) => {
axios.get('http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology')
.then(html => {
const dynamodb = new aws.DynamoDB.DocumentClient()
let $ = cheerio.load(html.data)
$('.region').each(async function(index, element){
var preregion = $(element).children('h3,b').text()
var region = preregion.substr(0, preregion.indexOf('(') - 1)
$(element).find('a').each(async function(index2, element2){
var seed = $(element2).siblings('span.rank').text()
if (seed.length > 2){
seed = $(element2).siblings('span.rank').text().substring(0, 2)
}
var espn_id = $(element2).attr('href').split('/').slice(-2)[0]
var team_name = $(element2).text()
var params = {
TableName: "March-Madness-Teams",
Item: {
"Id": randstring.generate(9),
"School":team_name,
"Seed": seed,
"ESPN_Id": espn_id
}
}
console.log(JSON.stringify(params))
// dynamodb.put(params)
// .then(function(data) {
// console.log(`Success`, data)
// })
})
})
})
})
Can you try without the type?
Instead of
"School":{"S": team_name},
for example, use
"School": team_name,
From your code, I can see the mis promise on the dynamodb request. Try to change your lines :
dynamodb.put(params).then(function(data) {
console.log(`Success`, data)
})
to be :
dynamodb.put(params).promise().then(function(data) {
console.log(`Success`, data)
})
you can combine with await too :
await dynamodb.put(params).promise().then(function(data) {
console.log(`Success`, data)
})
exports.lambdaHandler = async (event, context) => {
const html = await axios.get('http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology')
let $ = cheerio.load(html.data)
const schools = buildCompleteSchoolObject(html, $)
try {
await writeSchoolsToDynamo(schools)
return { statusCode: 200 }
} catch (error) {
return { statusCode: 400, message: error.message }
}
}
const writeSchoolsToDynamo = async (schools) => {
const promises = schools.map(async school => {
await dynamodb.put(school).promise()
})
await Promise.all(promises)
}
const buildCompleteSchoolObject = (html, $) => {
const schools = []
$('.region').each(loopThroughSubRegions(schools, $))
return schools
}
const loopThroughSubRegions = (schools, $) => {
return (index, element) => {
var preregion = $(element).children('h3,b').text()
var region = preregion.substr(0, preregion.indexOf('(') - 1)
$(element).find('a').each(populateSchoolObjects(schools, $))
}
}
const populateSchoolObjects = (schools, $) => {
return (index, element) => {
var seed = $(element).siblings('span.rank').text()
if (seed.length > 2) {
seed = $(element).siblings('span.rank').text().substring(0, 2)
}
var espn_id = $(element).attr('href').split('/').slice(-2)[0]
var team_name = $(element).text()
schools.push({
TableName: "March-Madness-Teams",
Item: {
"Id": randstring.generate(9),
"School": team_name,
"Seed": seed,
"ESPN_Id": espn_id
}
})
}
}
I know this is drastically different from what I started with but I did some more digging and kind of kind of worked to this...I'm not sure if this is the best way, but I seemed to get it to work...Let me know if something should change!
Oh I understand what you want.
Maybe you can see the code above works, but there is one concept you have to improve here about async - await and promise especially on lambda function.
I have some notes here from your code above, maybe can be your consideration to improve your lambda :
Using await for every promise in lambda is not the best approach because we know the lambda time limitation. But sometimes we can do that for other case.
Maybe you can change the dynamodb.put method to be dynamodb.batchWriteItem :
The BatchWriteItem operation puts or deletes multiple items in one or more tables.
Or If you have to use dynamodb.put instead, try to get improve the code to be like so :
const writeSchoolsToDynamo = async (schools) => {
const promises = schools.map(school => {
dynamodb.put(school).promise()
})
return Promise.all(promises)
}

Merging json text into single dto

is there a mechanism in servicestack.text to merge two json strings into a single dto?
The use case is merging complex settings from multiple sources into a single settings file
i.e.
{ "blah": { "params": { "default": "bar", "misc": "0", } } }
and
{ "blah": { "params": { "value": "val", "misc": "1", } } }
becomes
{ "blah": { "params": { "default": "bar", "value": "val", "misc": "1", } } }
Thanks
Be careful of the trailing comma's as it's not valid JSON. But you can use the dynamic API of ServiceStack's JSON Serializer to do this:
var json1 = "{\"blah\":{\"params\":{\"default\":\"bar\", \"misc\": \"0\" } } }";
var json2 = "{\"blah\":{\"params\":{\"value\":\"val\", \"misc\": \"1\" } } }";
var jsonObj = JsonObject.Parse(json1);
var jsonParams =jsonObj.Object("blah").Object("params");
foreach (var entry in JsonObject.Parse(json2).Object("blah").Object("params"))
{
jsonParams[entry.Key] = entry.Value;
}
var to = new { blah = new { #params = jsonParams } };
to.ToJson().Print();
Which will output:
{"blah":{"params":{"default":"bar","misc":"1","value":"val"}}}
Well, if you don't ever going to use JsonArrays, solution above could be written in recursive way:
public static JsonObject Merge(JsonObject #this, JsonObject that) {
foreach (var entry in that) {
var exists = #this.ContainsKey (entry.Key);
if (exists) {
var otherThis = JsonObject.Parse(#this.GetUnescaped (entry.Key));
var otherThat = JsonObject.Parse(that.GetUnescaped (entry.Key));
#this [entry.Key] = Merge (otherThis, otherThat).ToJson ();
} else {
#this [entry.Key] = entry.Value;
}
}
return #this;
}

Resources