{
"wrapper": "section",
"className": "row",
"hideExpression":"function($viewValue, $modelValue, scope){ return (scope.model['Application__c']['Years1__c'] && (parseFloat(scope.model['Application__c']['Years1__c']+'x.'+scope.model['Application__c']['Months1__c'])+parseFloat(scope.model['Application__c']['Years__c']+'.'+scope.model['Application__c']['Months__c']))>2); }" ,
"fieldGroup": [ {
"key": "Application__c.City_Prev1__c",
"type": "alphabet",
"hideExpression":"function($viewValue, $modelValue, scope){ return !scope.model['Application__c']['Years1__c'] }" ,
"className": "col-xs-7 col-sm-6 col-md-5 col-lg-5",
"templateOptions": {
"label": "City",
"required": true,
"maxlength": 20,
"objectName": "Application__c",
"fieldName": "City_Prev1__c"
}
}]
}
In the above formly json, how can make hide expression as a function or how can I call a function from outside
Please refer the link below
**Function constructor **
The Function constructor creates a new Function object. Calling the constructor directly can create functions dynamically, but suffers from security and performance issues similar to eval.
Related
I am trying to add multiple models in the same time using aws CDK when one of the models is referencing the other one.
Ex:
"Gender": {
"contentType": "application/json",
"modelName": "GenderModel",
"schema": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"Not Specified",
"Male",
"Female",
"Non-Binary"
],
"schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#",
"title": "GenderModel"
}
},
and
"Requirements": {
"contentType": "application/json",
"modelName": "RequirementsModel",
"schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"gender": {
"ref": "https://apigateway.amazonaws.com/restapis/${Token[TOKEN.791]}/models/GenderModel"
}
},
"required": [
"gender",
],
"additionalProperties": false,
"schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#",
"title": "RequirementsModel"
}
},
When i deploy this fails with
Model reference must be in canonical form
From what i can see this fails because the GenderModel does not exists. If i first add the GenderModel in the stack and then i add the RequirementsModel and deploy again it works just fine because the GenderModel was previously created. If i want to create both of the models in the same time it will fail.
I tried to make sure the order of addModel call is correct but it seems it does not work.
Solution Found
Seems like you have to add explicitly specify the dependency.
modelB.node.addDependency(modelA)
This will avoid the error and add the models in the correct order
The problem is https://apigateway.amazonaws.com/restapis/${Token[TOKEN.791]}/models/GenderModel, specifically the ${Token[TOKEN.791]} part. When the API is not created, at CloudFormation synthetisation time, id is not known and placeholder value used - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cdk/latest/guide/tokens.html
You can use the Ref intristic function to compose model by the reference
const getModelRef = (api: RestApi, model: Model): string =>
Fn.join(
'',
['https://apigateway.amazonaws.com/restapis/',
api.restApiId,
'/models/',
model.modelId]);
I use an API that returns a response with the following structure:
{
"data": [
{
"id": "id-1",
"type": "objectType",
"attributes": { ... },
"links":
"linksDataAndMetadate": {...}
}, ...
],
"links":
"thisLink": "some url",
"thatLink": "another url"
}
We use jsonapi-serializer package in our code base for serialization/deseiralization, but when I use it to deserialize the response, the outer links part (the ones that includes "thisLink" and "thatLink") overwrites the "links" field inside the object attributes. Is there a way to use the package so that it will have a different behavior?
I have the following JSON response for my REST endpoint:
{
"response": {
"status": 200,
"startRow": 0,
"endRow": 1,
"totalRows": 1,
"next": "",
"data": {
"id": "workflow-1",
"name": "SampleWorkflow",
"tasks": [
{
"id": "task-0",
"name": "AWX",
"triggered_by": ["task-5"]
},
{
"id": "task-1",
"name": "BrainStorming",
"triggered_by": ["task-2", "task-5"]
},
{
"id": "task-2",
"name": "OnHold",
"triggered_by": ["task-0", "task-4", "task-7", "task-8", "task9"]
},
{
"id": "task-3",
"name": "InvestigateSuggestions",
"triggered_by": ["task-6"]
},
{
"id": "task-4",
"name": "Mistral",
"triggered_by": ["task-3"]
},
{
"id": "task-5",
"name": "Ansible",
"triggered_by": ["task-3"]
},
{
"id": "task-6",
"name": "Integration",
"triggered_by": []
},
{
"id": "task-7",
"name": "Tower",
"triggered_by": ["task-5"]
},
{
"id": "task-8",
"name": "Camunda",
"triggered_by": ["task-3"]
},
{
"id": "task-9",
"name": "HungOnMistral",
"triggered_by": ["task-0", "task-7"]
},
{
"id": "task-10",
"name": "MistralIsChosen",
"triggered_by": ["task-1"]
}
]
}
}
}
I am using rest-assured with a groovy gpath expression for an extraction as follows:
given()
.when()
.get("http://localhost:8080/workflow-1")
.then()
.extract()
.path("response.data.tasks.findAll{ it.triggered_by.contains('task-3') }.name")
which correctly gives me [Mistral, Ansible, Camunda]
What I am trying to achieve is to find the task names that are triggered by the InvestigateSuggestions task. But I don't know for sure that the taskId I have to pass in to contains() is task-3; I only know its name i.e. InvestigateSuggestions. So I attempt to do:
given()
.when()
.get("http://localhost:8080/workflow-1")
.then()
.extract()
.path("response.data.tasks.findAll{
it.triggered_by.contains(response.data.tasks.find{
it.name.equals('InvestigateSuggestions')}.id) }.name")
which does not work and complains that the parameter "response" was used but not defined.
How do I iterate over the outer collection from inside the findAll closure to find the correct id to pass into contains() ??
You can make use of a dirty secret, the restAssuredJsonRootObject. This is undocumented (and subject to change although it has never change as far as I can remember in the 7 year+ lifespan of REST Assured).
This would allow you to write:
given()
.when()
.get("http://localhost:8080/workflow-1")
.then()
.extract()
.path("response.data.tasks.findAll{
it.triggered_by.contains(restAssuredJsonRootObject.response.data.tasks.find{
it.name.equals('InvestigateSuggestions')}.id) }.name")
If you don't want to use this "hack" then you need to do something similar to what Michael Easter proposed in his answer.
When it comes to generating matchers based on the response body the story is better. See docs here.
I'm not sure if this is idiomatic but one approach is to find the id first and then substitute into another query:
#Test
void testCase1() {
def json = given()
.when()
.get("http://localhost:5151/egg_minimal/stacko.json")
// e.g. id = 'task-3' for name 'InvestigateSuggestions'
def id = json
.then()
.extract()
.path("response.data.tasks.find { it.name == 'InvestigateSuggestions' }.id")
// e.g. tasks have name 'task-3'
def tasks = json
.then()
.extract()
.path("response.data.tasks.findAll{ it.triggered_by.contains('${id}') }.name")
assertEquals(['Mistral', 'Ansible', 'Camunda'], tasks)
}
In my logic app, I have a JSON object (parsed from an API response) and it contains an object array.
How can I find a specific element based on attribute values... Example below where I want to find the (first) active one
{
"MyList" : [
{
"Descrip" : "This is the first item",
"IsActive" : "N"
},
{
"Descrip" : "This is the second item",
"IsActive" : "N"
},
{
"Descrip" : "This is the third item",
"IsActive" : "Y"
}
]
}
Well... The answer is in plain sight ... There's a FILTER ARRAY action, which works on a JSON Object (from PARSE JSON action).. couple this with an #first() expression will give the desired outcome.
You can use the Parse JSON Task to parse your JSON and a Condition to filter for the IsActive attribute:
Use the following Schema to parse the JSON:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"MyList": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"Descrip": {
"type": "string"
},
"IsActive": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"required": [
"Descrip",
"IsActive"
]
}
}
}
}
Here how it looks like (I included the sample data you provided to test it):
Then you can add the Condition:
And perform whatever action you want within the If true section.
json configuration:
{
"moduleconfigs": {
"create": [
{
"key": "Committed",
"type": "horizontalInput",
"templateOptions": {
"label": "Committed"
}
},
{
"key": "Uncommitted",
"type": "horizontalInput",
"templateOptions": {
"label": "Uncommitted"
}
},
{
"key": "Line",
"type": "horizontalInput",
"templateOptions": {
"label": "Line"
}
},{
"key": "Total",
"type": "horizontalInput",
"templateOptions": {
"label": "Total"
},
"expressionProperties":{
"value": function($viewValue, $modelValue, scope){
return scope.model.lineFill+scope.model.uncommitedBPD+scope.model.commitedBPD;
}
}
}
]
}
}
html:
<form>
<formly-for model="vm.myModel" fields="vm.myFields"></formly-form> </form>
I am new to angular formly. I am creating form using angular formly json. Total field should display sum of values provided in Committed+Uncommitted+Line fields. i am using expressionProperties but is not working.
I'm guessing you've moved on from this issue... however...
You are doing two things wrong.
First (1): They key value in the formly field configuration object is setting the value by that name on the model.
So your first field configuration object is:
{
"key": "Committed",
"type": "horizontalInput",
"templateOptions": {
"label": "Committed"
}
},
Then later you try to access that value using the key commitedBPDso you'll always get undefined.
Basically formly is setting the value input in that field on the model object with the key of Committed you need to change the key to match.
Second (2): I could be wrong but I don't think you can use an expression property to set the value like that. Formly will automatically respect value changes on the model so you're better off putting on onChange on the other formly field configuration objects that does the parsing and addition something like this:
{
"key": "Committed",
"type": "horizontalInput",
"templateOptions": {
"label": "Committed"
"onChange": addTotal
}
}...
function addTotal() {
//You have access to the model here because it's in your controller
// NOTE: the parseInput function you'll have to write yourself
vm.model.Total = parseInput(vm.model.Committed) + ...
}
All in all your biggest problem is trying to access the values from the model object with the wrong key
Yes, updating the model does not change form.input.value
The only way I've found is like this:
item.fieldGroup['Import'].formControl.setValue(333.33)