I'm running an Azure Function app on Consumption Plan and I want to monitor the amount of instances currently running. Using REST API endpoint of format
https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscr}/resourceGroups/{rg}
/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/{appname}/instances?api-version=2015-08-01
I'm able to retrieve the instances. However, the result doesn't match the information that I see in Application Insights / Live Metrics Stream.
For example, right now App Insights shows 4 servers online, while API call returns just one (the GUID of this 1 instance is also among App Insights guids).
Who can I trust? Is there a better way to get instance count (e.g. from App Insights)?
UPDATE: It looks like data from REST API are wrong.
I was sending 10000 messages to the queue, logging each function call with respective instance ID which processed the request.
While messages keep coming in and the backlog grows, instance count from REST API seems to be correct (scaled from 1 to 12). After sending stops, the reported instance count rapidly goes down (eventually back to 1, while processors are still busy).
But based on the speed and the execution logs I can tell that the actual instance count kept growing and ended up at 15 instances at the moment of last message processed.
UPDATE2: It looks like SDK refuses to report more than 20 servers. The metric flats out at 20, while App Insights kept steady growth and is already showing 41.
Who can I trust? Is there a better way to get instance count (e.g. from App Insights)?
Based on my understanding we need to use Rest API endpoint to retrieve the instance, App Insights could be configured for multiple WebApps, so the number of servers online in the App Insights may be for multiple WebApps.
Updated:
Based on my test, the number of the application insight may be not real time.
During my test if the WebApp Function scale out then I could get multiple instances with Rest API, and I also can check the number of servers online in the App Insights.
https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourcegroup}/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/{functionname}/instances?api-version=2016-08-01
But after I finished the test, I could get the number of the instance with Rest API is 1, based on my understanding, it is right result.
At the same time I check it in the Application Insight the number of the servers online is the max number during my test.
And after a while, the number of server online in the application insight also became 1.
So If we want to get the number of intance for Azure function, my suggestion is that using REST API to do that.
Update2：
According to the DavidEbbo mentioned that the REST API is not always reliable.
Unfortunately, the REST API is not always reliable. Specifically, when a Function App scales across multiple scale units, only the instances from the 'home' scale unit are reflected. You probably will not see this in a smallish test, but likely will if you start scaling out widely (say over 20 instances).
Related
We have a service which pings our EP1 Premium service and yesterday we received 3 client side timeout errors after 2 minutes of waiting. When opening the trace in App insights, these requests which time out are not even logged and have no trace of ever being received Azure side, and therefore stay unanswered. By looking at the metrics provided in the Azure Functions app, I found out that 1-2 minutes after the request has been sent, the app loses all its ability to work as its Total App Domains falls to 0 as well as all connections, threads and so on and this state lasts until the next request is received, therefore "skipping" the request that happened beforehand. This is a big issue as I need to make sure requests get answered in a timely manner.
The client service sent HTTP requests to the Azure Functions app expecting an answer, only to time out while the Azure-side doesn't have any record of ever receiving the request.
I believe this issues is related to Consumption Plan of Azure Functions called Cold Start behaviour. The "skipping" mechanism is explained below:
Apps may scale to zero when idle, meaning some requests may have additional latency at startup. The consumption plan does have some optimizations to help decrease cold start time, including pulling from pre-warmed placeholder functions that already have the function host and language processes running.https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-scale#cold-start-behavior
Please also consider of having look on this article, which explains the behaviour. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/understanding-serverless-cold-start/
In some 1-5% of our requests, we are seeing slow communication between APIs (REST API requests). Both APIs are developed by us and hosted on Azure, each app service on its own app service plan in the same region, P1v2 tier.
What we are seeing on application insights is that POST or GET requests on origin API can take a few seconds to execute, while real execution time on destination API is only a few milliseconds.
Examples (first line POST request on origin, second execution time on destination API): slow req 1, slow req 2
Our best guess is that the time difference is lost in communication between components. We don't have an explanation for it since the payload is really small and in most cases, communication takes less than 5 milliseconds.
We dismiss the possible explanation it could be due to component cold start since it happens during constant load and no horizontal scaling was performed.
Do you have any idea what might cause it or how to do additional analysis in order to discover it?
If you're running multiple sites on the App Service Plan, then enable the "Always On" setting for your web app > All Settings > Application Settings > Click on Always On
See here for details: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-configure/
When Always On is off, the site is shut down after 20 minutes of inactivity to free up resources for any additional websites that might be using the same App Service Plan.
The amount of information it needs to collect, process and then present itself requires some time, and involve internal calls as well, that is why considering the server load and usage, it takes around 6 to 7 seconds sometimes even more.
To Troubleshoot that latency, try this steps, provided by Microsoft.
Our existing system uses App Services with API controllers.
This is not a good setup because our scaling support is poor, its basically all or nothing
I am looking at changing over to use Azure Functions
So effectively each method in a controller would become a new function
Lets say that we have a taxi booking system
So we have the following
Taxis
GetTaxis
GetTaxiDrivers
Drivers
GetDrivers
GetDriversAvailableNow
In the app service approach we would simply have a TaxiController and DriverController with the the methods as routes
How can I achieve the same thing with Azure Functions?
Ideally, I would have 2 function apps - Taxis and Drivers with functions inside for each
The problem with that approach is that 2 function apps means 2 config settings, and if that is expanded throughout the system its far too big a change to make right now
Some of our routes are already quite long so I cant really add the "controller" name to my function name because I will exceed the 32 character limit
Has anyone had similar issues migrating from App Services to Azure Functions>
Paul
The problem with that approach is that 2 function apps means 2 config
settings, and if that is expanded throughout the system its far too
big a change to make right now
This is why application setting is part of the release process. You should compile once, deploy as many times you want and to different environments using the same binaries from the compiling process. If you're not there yet, I strongly recommend you start by automating the CI/CD pipeline.
Now answering your question, the proper way (IMHO) is to decouple taxis and drivers. When requested a taxi, your controller should add a message to a Queue, which will have an Azure Function listening to it, and it get triggered automatically to dequeue / process what needs to be processed.
Advantages:
Your controller response time will get faster as it will pass the processing to another process
The more messages in the queue / more instances of the function to consume, so it will scale only when needed.
Http Requests (from one controller to another) is not reliable (unless you implement properly a circuit breaker and a retry policy. With the proposed architecture, if something goes wrong, the message will remain in the queue or it won't get completed by the Azure function and will return to the queue.
I have an Azure function with ServiceBusTrigger which will post the message content to a webservice behind an Azure API Manager. In some cases the load of the (3rd party) webserver backend is too high and it collapses returning error 500.
I'm looking for a proper way to implement circuit breaker here.
I've considered the following:
Disable the azure function, but it might result in data loss due to multiple messages in memory (serviceBus.prefetchCount)
Implement API Manager with rate-limit policy, but this seems counter productive as it runs fine in most cases
Re-architecting the 3rd party webservice is out of scope :)
Set the queue to ReceiveDisabled, this is the preferred solution, but it results in my InputBinding throwing a huge amount of MessagingEntityDisabledExceptions which I'm (so far) unable to catch and handle myself. I've checked the docs for host.json, ServiceBusTrigger and the Run parameters but was unable to find a useful setting there.
Keep some sort of responsecode resultset and increase retry time, not ideal in a serverless scenario with multiple parallel functions.
Let API manager map 500 errors to 429 and reschedule those later, will probably work but since we send a lot of messages it will hammer the service for some time. In addition it's hard to distinguish between a temporary 500 error or a consecutive one.
Note that this question is not about deciding whether or not to trigger the circuitbreaker, merely to handle the appropriate action afterwards.
Additional info
Azure functionsV2, dotnet core 3.1 run in consumption plan
API Manager runs Basic SKU
Service Bus runs in premium tier
Messagecount: 300.000
I have an Azure function app triggered by an HttpRequest. The function app reads the request, tosses one copy of it into a storage table for safekeeping and sends another copy to a queue for further processing by another element of the system. I have a client running an ApacheBench test that reports approximately 148 requests per second processed. That rate of processing will not be enough for our expected load.
My understanding of function apps is that it should spawn as many instances as is needed to handle the load sent to it. But this function app might not be scaling out quickly enough as it’s only handling that 148 requests per second. I need it to handle at least 200 requests per second.
I’m not 100% sure the problem is on my end, though. In analyzing the performance of my function app I found a LOT of 429 errors. What I found online, particularly https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-resource-manager/resource-manager-request-limits, suggests that these errors could be due to too many requests being sent from a single IP. Would several ApacheBench 10K and 20K request load tests within a given day cause the 429 error?
However, if that’s not it, if the problem is with my function app, how can I force my function app to spawn more instances more quickly? I assume this is the way to get more throughput per second. But I’m still very new at working with function apps so if there is a different way, I would more than welcome your input.
Maybe the Premium app service plan that’s in public preview would handle more throughput? I’ve thought about switching over to that and running a quick test but am unsure if I’d be able to switch back?
Maybe EventHub is something I need to investigate? Is that something that might increase my apparent throughput by catching more requests and holding on to them until the function app could accept and process them?
Thanks in advance for any assistance you can give.
You dont provide much context of you app but this is few steps how you can improve
If you want more control you need to use App Service plan with always on to avoid cold start, also you will need to configure auto scaling since you are responsible in this plan and auto scale is not enabled by default in app service plan.
Your azure function must be fully async as you have external dependencies so you dont want to block thread while you are calling them.
Look on the limits. Using host.json you can tweek it.
429 error means that function is busy to process your request, so probably when you writing to table you are not using async and blocking thread
Function apps work very well and scale as it says. It could be because request coming from Single IP and Azure could be considering it DDOS. You can do the following
AzureDevOps Load Test
You can load test using one of the azure service . I am very sure they have better criteria of handling IPs. Azure DeveOps Load Test
Provision VM in Azure
The way i normally do is provision the VM (windows 10 pro) in azure and use JMeter to Load test. I have use this method to test and it works fine. You can provision couple of them and subdivide the load.
Use professional Load testing services
If possible you may use services like Loader.io . They use sophisticated algos to run the load test and provision bunch of VMs to run the same test.
Use Application Insights
If not already you must be using application insights to have a better look from server perspective. Go to live stream and see how many instance it would provision to handle the load test . You can easily look into events and error logs that may be arising and investigate. You can deep dive into each associated dependency and investigate the problem.