We have created a screen and graph that stores custom information about a given serial number for an inventory item (INItemLotSerial).
I'm looking to be able to display the current location of the serial number, based on the location of the most recent transaction. (Ideally I'd also like to be able display if the serial number is currently in inventory, but that's probably a different question.)
Here is my view on the graph:
public PXSelect<INTranSplit, Where<INTranSplit.lotSerialNbr, Equal<Optional<INItemLotSerial.lotSerialNbr>>,
And<INTranSplit.inventoryID, Equal<Optional<INItemLotSerial.inventoryID>>>>, OrderBy<Desc<INTranSplit.createdDateTime>>> InventoryLocation;
And my field on the page:
<px:PXSegmentMask Enabled="False" AllowEdit="False" runat="server" ID="CstPXSegmentMask5" DataField="InventoryLocation.LocationID" ></px:PXSegmentMask>
I'm expecting the field to grab the first record and ignore the rest.
However, when I look at the generated SQL in a SQL Trace, Acumatica appears to be adding its own Order By fields:
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT [INTranSplit].[DocType], [INTranSplit].[TranType], [INTranSplit].[RefNbr], [INTranSplit].[LineNbr], [INTranSplit].[POLineType], [INTranSplit].[TransferType], [INTranSplit].[ToSiteID], [INTranSplit].[ToLocationID], [INTranSplit].[SplitLineNbr], [INTranSplit].[TranDate], [INTranSplit].[InvtMult], [INTranSplit].[InventoryID], [INTranSplit].[SubItemID], [INTranSplit].[CostSubItemID], [INTranSplit].[CostSiteID], [INTranSplit].[SiteID], [INTranSplit].[LocationID], [INTranSplit].[LotSerialNbr], [INTranSplit].[ExpireDate], [INTranSplit].[Released], [INTranSplit].[UOM], [INTranSplit].[Qty], [INTranSplit].[BaseQty], [INTranSplit].[MaxTransferBaseQty], [INTranSplit].[OrigPlanType], [INTranSplit].[IsFixedInTransit], [INTranSplit].[PlanID], [INTranSplit].[TotalQty], [INTranSplit].[TotalCost], [INTranSplit].[AdditionalCost], ( CASE WHEN ( [INTranSplit].[TotalQty] = .0) THEN .0 ELSE ( [INTranSplit].[TotalCost] / [INTranSplit].[TotalQty]) END), [INTranSplit].[CreatedByID], [INTranSplit].[CreatedByScreenID], [INTranSplit].[CreatedDateTime], [INTranSplit].[LastModifiedByID], [INTranSplit].[LastModifiedByScreenID], [INTranSplit].[LastModifiedDateTime], [INTranSplit].[tstamp], [INTranSplit].[UsrQtyForQC], [INTranSplit].[UsrQtyCoded], [INTranSplit].[UsrQtyCompleted] FROM INTranSplit INTranSplit WHERE (INTranSplit.CompanyID = 2) AND [INTranSplit].[LotSerialNbr] = #P0 AND [INTranSplit].[InventoryID] = #P1
ORDER BY [INTranSplit].[DocType], [INTranSplit].[RefNbr], [INTranSplit].[LineNbr], [INTranSplit].[SplitLineNbr], [INTranSplit].[CreatedDateTime] DESC OPTION(OPTIMIZE FOR UNKNOWN) /* IN.21.00.00 */',N'#P0 nvarchar(100),#P1 int',#P0=N'EOSC52270005',#P1=16067
which are causing a different record to be returned first, rather than the most recent one.
How do I convince Acumatica to run the BQL I'm asking for and drop the extra order by fields? Or is there an entirely different approach to displaying the most recent transaction location that would be preferable?
What I would recommend doing in this particular situation if you need specialized filtering is using the IEnumerable sort
public IEnumerable inventoryLocation()
{
PXView select = new PXView(this, true, InventoryLocation.View.BqlSelect);
Int32 totalrow = 0;
Int32 startrow = PXView.StartRow;
List<object> result = select.Select(PXView.Currents, PXView.Parameters, PXView.Searches,
PXView.SortColumns, PXView.Descendings, PXView.Filters, ref startrow, PXView.MaximumRows, ref totalrow);
INTranSplit latest = null;
if (result.Count > 0)
{
//We need to perform a custom order in order to get to the latest record.
latest = result.First() as INTranSplit;
foreach (INTranSplit row in result)
{
if (latest.CreatedDateTime.Value < row.CreatedDateTime.Value)
{
latest = row;
}
}
}
return new List<object> { latest };
}
Where you would grab all the records, get the first record, and then look to find the latest record.
Cheers!
Related
I have a smart search page that shows all the products on the page with some smart search filters that narrows down the products on some criterias (Let's say for example Filter1 has Option1, Option2 and Option3).
What I am trying to accomplish is to have a link on a seperate page that links to the product page, but when the user clicks on that link some of the search filters gets set (For example Filter1 would have Option2 selected).
I'm not sure if that is possible with out of the box solution, but with simple tweaks inside SearchFilter.ascx.cs, you can make a workaround. File is placed under CMSWebParts/SmartSearch/SearchFilter.ascx.cs. You should change method 'GetSelectedItems' to take a look into query string for filter value (see snippet bellow):
/// <summary>
/// Gets selected items.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="control">Control</param>
/// <param name="ids">Id's of selected values separated by semicolon</param>
private string GetSelectedItems(ListControl control, out string ids)
{
ids = "";
string selected = "";
//CUSTOM: retrive value for query string
var customFilter = QueryHelper.GetString("customFilter", "");
// loop through all items
for (int i = 0; i != control.Items.Count; i++)
{
//CUSTOM: ----START-----
if (!RequestHelper.IsPostBack())
{
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(customFilter))
{
if (control.Items[i].Text.Equals(customFilter, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase))
{
control.Items[i].Selected = true;
}
}
}
//CUSTOM: ----END-----
if (control.Items[i].Selected)
{
selected = SearchSyntaxHelper.AddSearchCondition(selected, control.Items[i].Value);
ids += ValidationHelper.GetString(i, "") + ";";
}
}
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(selected) && (control.SelectedItem != null))
{
selected = control.SelectedItem.Value;
ids = control.SelectedIndex.ToString();
}
return selected;
}
And your hyperlink will look like this: /Search-result?searchtext=test&searchmode=anyword&customfilter=coffee
With this modifications, you can send only one value in filter, but if you need more then one value, you can send them and customize it however suits you best. Also, you can send filter name (in case that you have multiple filters) and then add check in method above.
I will recommend you not to modify kentico files. Instead of that, clone default filter web part and make modifications there, because withing next upgrade of project, you will lose your changes. I checked this in Kentico 11.
For Smart Search Filters:
if turn off auto-post back option -then web part control ID should become a query string parameter that you can use.
This above will form something like:
/Smart-search-filter.aspx?searchtext=abc&searchmode=anyword&wf=2;&ws=0;&wa=0
P.S. I suggest you to take a look at the corporate site example: look the smart search filter web part: /Examples/Web-parts/Full-text-search/Smart-search/Smart-search-filter. It is working example you can use it as starting point.
Is there an eloquent way, more or less, to get the last displayed record in a grid in Acumatica? Let's say even if they do all the sorting and rearranging, is there a way for example when pressing a button on a grid to get the last record? Basically, I would like to copy that record as a new one.
Create a PXAction for your button.
Inside the PXAction iterate in your data view until the last record.
For example, if the name of your Data view Bound to your grid is YzLines, and object type in the grid line (DAC) is Yz, then it can be:
Yz lastLine;
foreach (Yz line in YzLines.Select())
lastLine = line;
To get to the last record you can also use .Last() or .LastOrDefault().
If you need the last record according to client sorting, you should implement a data view delegate, it looks like this:
protected virtual IEnumerable yzLines()
{
PXSelectBase<Yz> cmd =
new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Yz, ...>(this);
int startRow = PXView.StartRow; //Get starting row of the current page
int totalRows = 0;
foreach (PXResult<Yz> res in
cmd.View.Select(null, null,
PXView.Searches,
ARDocumentList.View.GetExternalSorts(),//Get sorting fields
ARDocumentList.View.GetExternalDescendings(),//Get sorting direction
ARDocumentList.View.GetExternalFilters(),//Get filters
ref startRow,
PXView.MaximumRows, //Get count of records in the page
ref totalRows))
{
//processing of records
}
PXView.StartRow = 0;//Reset starting row
}
I am trying to copy data from one list to other list (both lists are on different sites) along with lookup columns. But, I am getting an error for lookup field as:
Value does not fall within the expected range
Code works and data gets copied for other non-lookup fields. I tried every possible way including increasing List View Lookup Threshold and all possible ways of code but still error persists at ExecuteQuery().
Below is my code for lookup field:
if (field is FieldLookup && field.InternalName == "Country")
{
var CountryLookup = (item.FieldValues["Country"] as FieldLookupValue).LookupValue.ToString();
var CountryLookupId = (item.FieldValues["Country"] as FieldLookupValue).LookupId.ToString();
FieldLookupValue flvRDS = new FieldLookupValue();
flvRDS.LookupId = int.Parse(CountryLookupId);
itemToCreate["Country"] = flvRDS;
itemToCreate.Update();
destContext.ExecuteQuery();
}
Help is really appreciated.
I assume item is the new ListItem you're trying to create on your target list.
But you're never in fact reading any value from field here! So basically, you're trying to set your new FieldLookup.LookupId with the item["Country"].LookupId, which should logically be empty at this moment.
Here's a method I use to retrieve a lookup field ListItem from a value, feel free to modify it to fit your need, since I don't know how you want to retrieve it (SPList is an alias for Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.List).
private ListItem GetLookupItem(FieldLookup lookupField, string lookupValue)
{
string mappingField = lookupField.LookupField;
Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.List lookupList = Context.Web.Lists.GetById(new Guid(lookupField.LookupList));
Context.Load(lookupList);
Context.ExecuteQuery();
ListItemCollection libListItems = lookupList.GetItems(CamlQuery.CreateAllItemsQuery());
Context.Load(libListItems, items => items.Include(
itemlookup => itemlookup.Id,
itemlookup => itemlookup[mappingField]));
Context.ExecuteQuery();
foreach (ListItem mappedItem in libListItems)
{
object mappedField = mappedItem[mappingField];
if (mappedField != null && mappedField.ToString().Equals(lookupValue))
return mappedItem;
}
return null;
}
Now that you have the corresponding ListItem, you can set your item.LookupId with its Id:
if (field is FieldLookup && field.InternalName == "Country")
{
FieldLookupValue flvRDS = new FieldLookupValue();
flvRDS.LookupId = GetLookupItem(field as FieldLookup, "France").Id; // here, dunno how you get your country's name
itemToCreate["Country"] = flvRDS;
itemToCreate.Update();
destContext.ExecuteQuery();
}
Feel free to add some more previous code if you want an answer more suited for your specific issue.
I have the follwing objects
objItem (id,name,qty) - list<items>
objSel(selId) - list<int>
objSel.selId is the selected item id of objItem.
How to write the LINQ query to change item qty to 0 if the items are not selected and return objItem.
Your pseudo-code is quite confusing, but I suspect you want something like:
List<Item> items = ...;
List<int> selectedIds = ...;
foreach (var item in items.Where(x => !selectedIds.Contains(x.Id)))
{
item.Quantity = 0; // Property name adjusted for readability and convention
}
For more efficiently, use HashSet<int> for the selected IDs instead.
Note that it's not the LINQ query which performs the change - the query just gives the items which require changing. While you can abuse LINQ to change data, it's a bad idea to do so. The clue is in the word "query" - it's about asking a question. What you do with the answer to that question is a different matter.
Running thru examples of Enterprise Library 5.0 and when I use ExecuteNonQuery to run an update sproc, it returns 2. The update is based on ProductID, the table's Primary Key (yes, I checked, and it is unique).
Here is the simple sproc:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[UpdateProductsTable]
#ProductID int,
#ProductName varchar(50) = NULL,
#CategoryID int = NULL,
#UnitPrice money = NULL
AS
BEGIN
UPDATE Products
SET
ProductName = #ProductName,
CategoryID = #CategoryID,
UnitPrice = #UnitPrice
WHERE ProductID = #ProductID
END
Executing this sp in SSMS shows "1 rows" in bottom right hand corner of the query results window, and a return value of 0 in the grid. Clicking on the messages tab shows
(1 row(s) affected)
(1 row(s) affected)
(1 row(s) affected)
not sure why I'm seeing this 3 times here, but I don't believe that is the issue.
Here is the code calling the sp:
public static void Exec_Update_Query()
//updates a column of a single row, checks that the update succeeded, and then update it again to return it to the original value
{
string oldName = "Chai";
string newName = "Chai Tea";
SqlDatabase defaultDB = EnterpriseLibraryContainer.Current.GetInstance<Database>() as SqlDatabase;
// Create command to execute the stored procedure and add the parameters.
DbCommand cmd = defaultDB.GetStoredProcCommand("UpdateProductsTable");
defaultDB.AddInParameter(cmd, "ProductID", DbType.Int32, 1);
defaultDB.AddInParameter(cmd, "ProductName", DbType.String, newName);
defaultDB.AddInParameter(cmd, "CategoryID", DbType.Int32, 1);
defaultDB.AddInParameter(cmd, "UnitPrice", DbType.Currency, 18);
// Execute the query and check if one row was updated.
int i = defaultDB.ExecuteNonQuery(cmd);
if (i == 1)
{
// Update succeeded.
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("ERROR: Could not update just one row.");
}
// Change the value of the second parameter
defaultDB.SetParameterValue(cmd, "ProductName", oldName);
// Execute query and check if one row was updated
if (defaultDB.ExecuteNonQuery(cmd) == 1)
{
// Update succeeded.
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("ERROR: Could not update just one row.");
}
}
I'm using int i to view the return value from the method and it returns 2. Any ideas why this would be? This is Enterprise Libarary 5.0 in VS2010 running against SQL 2005. Pretty straightforward but perplexing.
If I recall correctly, the result of any triggers that fire as a result of your commands will also be included in the returned row count. Most likely, this is your issue.
EDIT: Documentation
From MSDN SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery:
When a trigger exists on a table being inserted or updated, the return value includes the number of rows affected by both the insert or update operation and the number of rows affected by the trigger or triggers.