I'm trying to modify a variable passed in an argument in a native function like this:
var MyVar = 'foo';
myNativeFunc(MyVar);
and inside my native, I can read the content of MyVar, with :
std::string(duk_to_string(ctx, 0));
but, I need to modify the value of this variable inside native function.
what is the best way for does it? (I can't use the return statement) thanks.
That's not possible as it would implement pass-by-reference (which is not supported in JS). Read also the answer to the question Pass Variables by Reference in Javascript
So, either pass in an object reference and change the object properties or use a return value.
Related
Here, my question is, we use define function in php to define the
contant globally but how can i achive same thing in nodejs
in php:
define(nameofthecontant, value);
in nodejs how to?
var dataBaseInfo = result.databaseInfo;
// global.DB_HOST = dataBaseInfo['DB_HOST'];
for(var keys in dataBaseInfo) {
global.keys = dataBaseInfo[keys];
}
i have data in result.databaseInfo from database xml file and m trying to create global contant using for loop, its not working
This is how you can define a variable in the global namespace:
global.nameofthecontant = value
This is something that you don't want to do in node.js though. Your question possibly is a duplicate of this question: node.js global variables?
Change your code from this:
global.keys = dataBaseInfo[keys];
to this:
global[keys] = dataBaseInfo[keys];
When you want to access or assign a property and the property name is in a variable, you use the obj[variableName] syntax.
You could also use Object.assign here if you just want to copy a bunch of properties from one object to another:
Object.assign(global, databaseInfo);
As others have said, it is usually frowned upon to use globals in this way in node.js. Instead, you would typically expose these constants in a module and then just require in the module in any other module that wants to access the constants. This makes your code more modular and makes each module more self-contained.
I had declared and used a global variable in ssjs library as below:
var backendDoc:NotesDocument = null;
function savedata () {
print (backendDoc.getItemValueString("fieldname")); // crash here
}
I assigned a document object to it in the Edit button just after changing docuemnt mode from read to edit:
backendDoc = document1.getDocument(); // get backend document from datasource called document1
The code in above function return error NotesDocument.getItemValueString("string")) null. Apparently, the backendDoc is null.
Any ideas how to assign value and use global variable in ssjs library? Thanks in advance
There are 2 problems with your code:
as Michael pointed out: you should use a scoped variable. Global variables in script libraries are actually application global (think applicationScope) and might be unloaded any time if memory gets tight (behavior of them depends on the XPages version)
You can't use NotesObjects here. Between the calls the C Object that backs the JS object is released and your object becomes invalid.
You can either store the NoteId in a scoped variable and retrieve the NotesDocument every time or actually use a JSON structure to keep the values you are interested in and only read/write when actually needed (load/save event). Hope this helps
I think you have to use a scoped variable in which you store the universalid of the document. This can then be used at any script to initialize the backend document.
From a ssjs you can set a scoped variable using the put method and the get method to read the variable. Example to set and read a scoped variable in session scope :
sessionScope.put(“myvar“,“myvalue“)
sessionScope.get(“myvar“)
To learn more about scoped variables watch this
http://notesin9.com/index.php/2009/11/07/episode-4-intro-to-scoped-variables/
Can a variable be named with a string or character array, in any language? Basically I want something like:
Var_String = "varname"
Var_String as double
And then I could fill the double varname.
If it helps im trying to make a program that can declare variables on the fly, while running. Even if thats not possible, I am open to workarounds even if they're impractical, although I would prefer that workarounds be in VB6, C++, or PHP, because I know those languages already, but they dont have to be.
Javascript is completely capable of declaring variable names on the fly. A javascript object can be treated "associatively" as a dictionary. Observe:
var testyObject = function()
{
Awesome = "hello";
};
var myObject = new testyObject();
alert(myObject.Awesome); // creates an alert window that says hello
alert(myObject['Awesome']); // the same as above
myObject[myObject.Awesome] = "woo!"; // We just created a property on the object with the name "hello"
alert(myObject.hello); // creates an alert window that says "woo!"
I also believe you can add them to your immediate scope rather than as properties on other objects by using this["whatever you want it named"] = "woo!"; but I'm not certain, someone can correct me on that if such does not work.
You can read more about associative arrays at http://www.quirksmode.org/js/associative.html
The usual way to do something like this is called a hash. You store name/value pairs and given the name, can look up its value. You can generally define them to store any sort of object. In fact, in some languages, objects themselves are essentially hashes with a few extra properties.
You can find more information on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table
I'm working on a C++ Metro style app and have to pass a string by reference (somehow). At first, I passed the String^ which doesn't work because strings are immutable how I have found out.
What would be a proper way to pass a string by reference?
Edit: OK, it seems that it's not that easy since the answers and comments suggest to use return values. But as far as I think this is not applicable in my situation: In this Metro app I have two pages and a string should be "shared" across those two pages.
So in the main page I do this in a click event:
this->Frame->Navigate(newPage, this->TestString);
In the OnNavigatedTo event of the second page I convert the second parameter to a String^ and change it. Then I use this->Frame->GoBack() to navigate back to the first page. There I'd like to have access to the changed string. Unfortunately, GoBack() doesn't allow to pass any parameters as far as I know.
You can use a tracking reference:
void ModifyTheParameter(String^% value) {
value = gcnew String("Blah");
}
That would modify the original variable you passed in as parameter (see MSDN for more info and examples). It would then be used just as any other method taking a String^ parameter.
But if possible, avoid using tracking references as parameters. I'd recommend just returning a String^ and assigning that to the original variable.
Yet another possibility: You could just create some kind of View-agnostic DataModel that contains your String (and possibly other data that you work with). You could then pass that DataModel to your method. Since the DataModel variable isn't changed (just a property of it), you wouldn't need to pass a reference to it.
See below an example of a function f which takes as a parameter a reference to a std::string.
std::string someString;
void f(std::string& s);
f(someString);
I am making a simple debugger window in ActionScript for myself where I can add and remove variables I want to track. I was to be able to add variables to the list by just doing something like
DebuggerMonitor.trackVar(variable).
My question is, is there any way I can turn "variable" itself (the name, not the value) into a String to be added into a text field?
Depending on how "intelligent" your debugger should be, you could just pass the name along:
DebuggerMonitor.trackVar( variable, "variable" );
since obviously, when used in a context like this, the name should be known at the time you are writing the program.
You can also do some reflection magic to get instance variable names, but it won't work for temp variables (their names are dropped at compilation time):
public function getVariableName( instance:*, match:* ):String {
var typeDescription:XML = describeType( instance );
var variables:XMLList = typeDescription..variable;
var accessors:XMLList = typeDescription..accessor;
for each(var variable:XML in variables)
if(matchesXMLName( instance, variable, match ))
return variable.#name;
for each(var accessor:XML in accessors)
if(matchesXMLName( instance, accessor, match ))
return accessor.#name;
return "No name found.";
}
private function matchesXMLName( instance:*, xml:XML, match:* ):Boolean {
return match == instance[xml.#name.toString()];
}
var varName:String = getVariableName ( myObject, variable );
Using reflections like this will also be quite costly, if used often - you will have to think of a way to cache the type descriptions.
I recommend you check out the as3commons reflections package - there is a lot of useful functionality in there...
Short answer - No :(
You can access the type name but not individual instance names, as these are lost at run-time.
There is a confusion caused by the keyword 'var' because it is used to create several types of bindings.
Lexical bindings (the keyword 'var' was used inside a function).
Dynamic bindings (the keyword 'var' was used to declare a class' field).
Lexical bindings are interpreted by the compiler at compile time as addresses of the registers of the registers space occupied by the function. The names given to lexical bindings perish at this time and it is not possible to restore them at runtime - therefore you can't get the "name" of the variable.
Dynamic bindings are a kind of "public API" of the objects that declare them, they may be accessed from the code that was not compiled together with the code that created them, this is why, for the purpose of reflection the names of these bindings are stored in compiled code. However, ActionScript has no way of referencing LHS values, so you cannot, even if you know the name of the variable and the object declaring it, pass it to another function. But you can look it up in the debugger or by calling describeType on the object declaring the variable. Note that describeType will not show information on private variables even if you are calling it from the scope of the object in question.