I want including Responsive file manager on my CI project (using as Stand-alone file manager).
When I try:
$this->load->helper(array('path'));
$this->load->file('filemanager/dialog.php');
I have error:
Fatal error: Cannot redeclare is_really_writable() (previously
declared in C:\xampp\htdocs\myapp\system\core\Common.php:91) in
C:\xampp\htdocs\cms\filemanager\include\utils.php on line 890
The same error is when I try function include or require. Please help.
This errors says your function is already defined ; which can mean :
you have the same function defined in two files or you have the same
function defined in two places in the same file or the file in which
your function is defined is included two times (so, it seems the
function is defined two times)
To help with the third point, a solution would be to use include_once instead of include when including your functions.php file -- so it cannot be included more than once.
Related
help my code keeps giving me a name error for my lyrics value, for context the external file contains a single character
I have tried editing the external files as well as alternate ways to open the file in hand
this is the code snippet which is relevant:
with open("lyrics" ,"r") as lyrics:
lyrics=lyrics.read()
while counter>=1:
print(lyrics.read([0])," ",lyrics.read([-0]))
I am working with minko and managed to compile MINKO SDK properly for 3 platforms (Linux, Android, HTML5) and build all tutorials / examples. Moving on to create my own project, I followed the instructions on how to use the existing skeleton project, then using an existing example project.
(I believe there is an error in the skeleton code at this line :
auto sceneManager = SceneManager::create(canvas->context()); //does not compile
where as the example file look like this :
auto sceneManager = SceneManager::create(canvas); //compile and generate binary
I was able to do so by modifying premake5.lua (to include more plugins) and calling script/solution_gmake_gcc.sh
to generate the make solution a week ago. Today, I tried to make a new project in a new folder but calling
script/solution_gmake_gcc.sh and script/clean failed with this error:
minko-master/skel_tut/mycode/premake5.lua:3: attempt to index global 'minko' (a nil value)
Now at premake5.lua line 3 there is this line : minko.project.solution(PROJECT_NAME),
however sine i am not familiar with lua at all, can anyone shed any light on the issue ?
What is supposed to be declared here, why is it failing suddenly... ?
(I can still modify,compile and run the code but i can't for example add more plug-ins)
PS: weirdly enough, the previously 'working' project is also failing at this point.
Thanks.
PROJECT_NAME = path.getname(os.getcwd())
minko.project.application("minko-tutorial-" .. PROJECT_NAME)
files { "src/**.cpp", "src/**.hpp", "asset/**" }
includedirs { "src" }
-- plugins
minko.plugin.enable("sdl")
minko.plugin.enable("assimp")
minko.plugin.enable("jpeg")
minko.plugin.enable("bullet")
minko.plugin.enable("png")
--html overlay
minko.plugin.enable("html-overlay")
Assuming that's indeed your project premake5.lua file (please us the code tags next time), you should have include "script" at the beginning of the file:
https://github.com/aerys/minko/blob/master/skeleton/premake5.lua#L1
If you don't have this line, it will not include script/premake5.lua which is in charge of including the SDK build system files that defines everything inside the minko Lua namespace/table. That's why you get that error.
I think you copy pasted one of the examples/tutorials premake5.lua file instead of modifying the one provided by the skeleton. The premake conf file of the examples/tutorials are different since they are included from the SDK premake files. But your app premake5.lua does the "opposite": it includes the SDK conf files rather than being included by them.
The best practice is to edit your app's copy of the skeleton's premake5.lua (instead of copy/pasting one from the examples/tutorials).
(I believe there is an error in the skeleton code at this line :
That's possible. Our build server doesn't test the skeleton code. That's a mistake we will fix ASAP to make sure it works properly.
script/solution_gmake_gcc.sh and script/clean failed with this error:
minko-master/skel_tut/mycode/premake5.lua:3: attempt to index global 'minko' (a nil value)
Could you copy/paste your premake5.lua file?
Also, what's the value you set for the MINKO_HOME env var? Maybe you've moved the SDK...
Note that instead of setting a global MINKO_HOME env var, you can also set the corresponding LUA constant at the very begining of your premake5.lua file.
This only occurs in our application which is a ton of code and not something I can put up, nor something anyone would be willing to slog through. So all I can do is describe the error.
We are building our typescript with --amd and have a ton of recursive references between files. It all is working fine until I put this one call in a function:
var di = new moduleDocIterator.DocIterator(null);
With this, the initial load of the main .ts (.js actually) file gives me the null or undefined reference exception on setting up __extends at the top of the generated .js file.
Both the file this call is in and the file moduleDocIterator references have nothing static in them except a couple of strings. The generated .js creates the object for each class but nothing that looks like it is actually executing.
And none of this code is called at the time this happens. This is just the initial load of everything asked for via requireJS.
How do I figure out why it's unhappy?
Suppose I have all of foo.js, foo.coffee, and foo.jsonin the same directory, and I say require './foo' from another (coffeescript) file in that location, what rule governs which one will be loaded?
A short experiment (using require.resolve './foo') would seem to indicate that the javascript file wins over the other two.
Indeed, looking at require.extensions it looks like .js being mentioned there as the first item—but then, object attribute names are inherently unordered in javascript, right?, so any name added to that property could potentially re-order the entries—could that lead to another resolution order?
Just wondering, as i couldn't find any documentation. it does become relevant when you do (and maybe you shouldn't) coffee --compile route/to/directory.
.js is loaded first (this also means that it's better to use full name.json for your fixture instead of name as it could be shadowed by name.js)
From "modules" documentation:
If the exact filename is not found, then node will attempt to load the required filename with the added extension of .js, .json, and then .node.
Also, read name resolution algorithm in pseudo-code:
LOAD_AS_FILE(X)
1. If X is a file, load X as JavaScript text. STOP
2. If X.js is a file, load X.js as JavaScript text. STOP
3. If X.node is a file, load X.node as binary addon. STOP
After (1,2,3) extensions set in require.extensions are checked in the order they a set (for CoffeScript, require("coffe-script") installs .coffee handler).
The behavior in V8 is to iterate over named properties in the order they were originally assigned, so I would expect .js to always be first.
This post references that behavior
I'm trying to wrap code that requires two *.db4o data files for easy use. I've added the data files to my eclipse .classpath by placing the files in ${project_dir}/res/ and adding the line:
<classpathentry kind="src" path="res"/>
to my .classpath.
I then defined a default constructor to my wrapper class that takes no arguments but goes and finds the paths to the *.db4o files (the paths are required by the compiled code I'm using to set things up). My approach for getting the paths is:
String datapath = ClassLoader.getSystemResource("resource_name").getPath();
This works great when I debug/run my code in eclipse. However when I export it as a jar, I can see that the *.db4o files are in the jar, as well as my compiled code, but the path returned to "datapath" is of the form:
datapath = ${pwd}/file:${absolute_path_to_jar}!/{resource_name}
Is there something about the resource being inside of the jar that prevents an absolute path from working? Also, why is the behavior different simply because the code and resources live in a jar file? One last note is that while my application is intended for wider use (from PIG, python, etc. code) I'm testing it from Matlab which is where I'm getting the odd value assigned to "datapath".
Thanks in advance for any responses.
getSystemResource() returns URL to resource. If your resource is zipped in a jar file then the URL will point into it (with the "!" notation). getPath() returns the "path" part of the URL, not always an actual file path. URL can be one of many things, not just a file.