I'm using a graph extension to post data to the Journal Transaction screen in another company context using the following:
using (PXLoginScope ls = new PXLoginScope(companylogin))
The problem is that I want to query Account from the target company in order to get the accountID using the accountCD of the source company. I've tried putting the BQL to select from Account under the PXLoginScope - but it doesn't seem to matter... it fetches records from the main company the graph extension is written in instead of the login scope of the other company. Is there a way to use BQL in one company to get records from another company?
By design, inside PXLoginScope the framework executes all BQL queries inside the context of the PXLoginScope company. It does not matter inside what company context a BLC instance was initialized. The actual company context comes into play only during the time BQL queries are executed.
With that said, there is no way to request data from multiple companies at the same time. The recommended approach is to pre-fetch all necessary data from the source company before your code enters PXLoginScope for the target company.
Since no one posted an answer to this, I'm assuming there's no way to do this within Acumatica.
My solution was to create a view that fetches records for all companies, with an accompanying DAC so that I can use BQL to query and filter based on company.
Related
I am trying to help a colleague out. I created a query in IBM Maximo 7.6, it is in the work orders table but I added a sub query that pulls from the workflow table and filters for anything in Work Flow.
My question is: On the start center, is there anyway to modify the results set so that we can pull fields from work order and work flow? I have work number, status, and vehicle. Basically, is it possible to bring in what inbox the work order is in, on the results set, in graphical form. So, put together a bar graph based on the inbox?
Any direction would be great, thank you!
First, you need to make sure there is a Relationship on the WORKORDER object in Database Configuration that will find the workflow record you want to see info from for a given work order. Once you've done that, these instructions show you, step by step, how to create Report Object Structure (ROS) (an Object Structure "Consumed By" Reporting), how to grant access to the ROS, and then how to use the ROS in a Result Set portlet to access data in related objects.
We are trying to insert about 100k users in Liferay. Is there a way to have this all updated in one batch commit, instead of making separate calls to add each user?
It think yes it's possible.
Build a custom remote service entity like BulkUserServiceUtil.addUsers, within it call the standard method UserLocalServiceUtil.addUser for each user.
Returning from the BulkUserServiceUtil method the transaction is committed.
#sandeep:
Yes, Liferay not provide us to add/update bulk users, because after user creation some table affected in that and also user indexed, but if you want to do that I have two suggestions :
Take a reference of REINDEX option of articles: in that case you can create a batch of counter range with some sort of value and update/add that batch, but the thing is Liferay internally call addUser default. So its iterative way which you can use.
Without Service : Create some custom script and directly hit the DB for once. which create users but in that case you have to take care of other liferay tables which need to be insert the userID or respective data.
We use a construction software, Viewpoint. We need a report to print the GL Accounts associated only with the user running the report. I was wondering if anyone had any ideas on how I could easily and efficiently achieve this? My "last-resort alternative" is just creating separate reports for each GL that pulls only that GL's info.
It depends on how the accounts are associated to the user. If there is a link, you can simply create a user parameter that asks for the user name. Then in the record select of the report you only pull accounts that match the user name in the parameter.
So, for example your parameter is called {?userName}. In the Record Select the formula would something like {Accounts.Salesman} = {?userName}, where {Accounts.Salesman} would be the field that links the user with the account.
You can get the current user name and use it to filter the records in your report. There are 2 ways to do this :
create a parameter, hide it and automatically fill the value. You
will need a special viewer for this scenario. Let me know if this is
what would you prefer I can give you some links. If you leave the
parameter visible the user can insert any value and view any records
use an UFL . For example this one:
http://www.viksoe.dk/code/u2lwin32.htm provides a function LoginName
which will return currently logged user. There are other UFLs which
support similar functionality, check if your company is already
using something . This one is free. You need to register the UFL on
each system which will run the report . Once registered the
available functions will become available for formulas.
I personally prefer the viewer solution because it is more flexible and will cover other scenarios too. However if you need just the username UFL will be a better approach.
can anybody please let me know how can I map field from Product to Order Product and Product to Quote Product in CRM 2011.
CRM doesnt allow us to direct map.
You can't map these using attribute mappings.
One way around this is to write plugins on the PreCreate so that at least when you save the record it populates the data on save.
For plugin reference, the Quote Product entity is called quotedetail and the Order Product entity is called salesorderdetail.
Another other way around this, if you only need it firing on the UI, is create some javascript that triggers during onload of the form and populates this data for you.
If you want a no code method you could fire a workflow on create of the Order/Quote product and populate the fields from the product using an update. Only downside to this is the workflow runs asynchronously so you cannot predict when this mapping data will hit the record.
Finally, if you want another no code way to achieve this, and you don't mind investing a little money in a Formula Rules Engine tool I'd recommend looking into Formula Manager by xRM Consultancy and North 52 (Link to Formula Manager). This allows you to set up formulas on both the UI and Server Side which would do all of this mapping for you.
If you want a no code method you could fire a workflow on create of the Order/Quote product and populate the fields from the product using an update. The only downside to this is the workflow runs asynchronously so you cannot predict when this mapping data will hit the record.
I have a custom entity Partnership in which I have one lookup field contacts.
now I want to add the name field value of the partnership from contact fullname in time of creation of Partnership.
is it possible with the help of pre-existing configuration settings,(without plugin or web resource)
Thanks.
Without using a plug-in or web resource you have a couple options.
1- You can configure the mappings between the 2 entities by going to the Entity (contact) -> Relationship -> Mappings -> and add a new mapping there. For this to work though, you will need to create the child record from the subgrid of the contact, and if the contact changes it won't update the values. So it may or may not be an ideal solution for you.
2- You can create a workflow rule that runs on create and/or update of the Partnership record that pulls the value from the parent contact onto the partnership record. The downside of this is that workflows are async so you won't see the update for a few seconds and refresh the Partner record.
Hope this helps.
If you want to be able to click the "New Partnership" button in the CRM ribbon, then select a contact, and have the name of the contact, be used to populate another field on the form, you will have to use JavaScript. There is no configurable way of doing it.
If you'd like the value to be populated before it is saved in the CRM database, you could use JavaScript, or a custom Plugin. If you'd like the value to be updated after the record is created, you could use a workflow.
You'll have to use one of those three methods to populate the field. The real question I have though, is why are you bothering to populate the field in the first place? You can add the full Contact name to any view, so I don't see a real big reason to include it.