We are created a WebSites and want to add in native IOS App. We created a Mac Server and connected to the Visual Studio. Now we want to add a website to Web View. We add a Web View in Main.Storyboard form. and Code File is written on ViewControler.CS Form which is given below but when we debug this code then showing blank on emulator please help anyone.
public partial class ViewController : UIViewController
{
public ViewController(IntPtr handle) : base(handle)
{
}
public override void ViewDidLoad()
{
vwDisplay = new UIWebView(View.Bounds);
View.AddSubview(vwDisplay); string url = "http://google.com";
vwDisplay.LoadRequest(new NSUrlRequest(new NSUrl(url)));
base.ViewDidLoad();
// Perform any additional setup after loading the view, typically from a nib.
}
public override void DidReceiveMemoryWarning()
{
base.DidReceiveMemoryWarning();
// Release any cached data, images, etc that aren't in use.
}
}
Update your plist file by adding the below code.
<key>NSAppTransportSecurity</key>
<dict>
<key>NSAllowsArbitraryLoads</key>
<true/>
</dict>
Add UIWebView as webVeiew directly from designer and give it bounds of full screen.
And use the below code in viewDidLoad.
webVeiew.LoadRequest(new NSUrlRequest(new NSUrl("http://www.google.com")));
Related
Previous question for context (the previous question was going nowhere, so I created this new one to start fresh): Unable to Create New MVC Widget in Kentico 12
I'm trying to create a widget called "Image with Summary". For now, I'm just trying to add a single property to it (a summary property that will have a rich text editor).
It isn't appearing as a widget option when I add a new widget to page builder:
From this, you can see that I have page builder configured properly (there is already a "Rich text" widget added), you can see that adding widgets is possible (the "Rich text" widget comes from a NuGet package that I installed called "Kentico.EMS12.MvcComponents.Widget.RichText"), and you can see that I only have two widgets available ("Form" and "Rich text"), neither of which are the widget I'm trying to add.
I need your help figuring out why my new widget is not appearing in this dialog.
Here is the Solution Explorer in Visual Studio showing all the files I've created for this new widget:
Here is what my properties class looks like:
// ImageWithSummaryProperties.cs
namespace RhythmAgency.KenticoWebsite.Widgets.ImageWithSummary
{
using Kentico.PageBuilder.Web.Mvc;
public class ImageWithSummaryProperties : IWidgetProperties
{
public string Summary { get; set; }
}
}
Here is what my view model looks like:
// ImageWithSummaryViewModel.cs
namespace RhythmAgency.KenticoWebsite.Widgets.ImageWithSummary
{
public class ImageWithSummaryViewModel
{
public string Summary { get; set; }
}
}
Here is what my controller looks like:
// ImageWithSummaryController.cs
using System.Web.Mvc;
using Kentico.PageBuilder.Web.Mvc;
using RhythmAgency.KenticoWebsite.Widgets.ImageWithSummary;
[assembly: RegisterWidget(
identifier: "Rhythm.ImageWithSummary",
controllerType: typeof(ImageWithSummaryController),
name: "Image with Summary",
Description = "An image with summary text.",
IconClass = "icon-l-img-3-cols-3")]
namespace RhythmAgency.KenticoWebsite.Widgets.ImageWithSummary
{
public class ImageWithSummaryController : WidgetController<ImageWithSummaryProperties>
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
var properties = GetProperties();
return PartialView("Widgets/_Rhythm.ImageWithSummary", new ImageWithSummaryViewModel()
{
Summary = properties.Summary
});
}
}
}
Here is what my view looks like:
#* _Rhythm.ImageWithSummary.cshtml *#
#using Kentico.PageBuilder.Web.Mvc
#using RhythmAgency.KenticoWebsite.Widgets.ImageWithSummary
#using Kentico.Components.Web.Mvc.InlineEditors
#model ImageWithSummaryViewModel
#if (Context.Kentico().PageBuilder().EditMode)
{
Html.Kentico().RichTextEditor(nameof(ImageWithSummaryProperties.Summary), null);
}
else
{
<div class="fr-view">
#Html.Raw(Html.Kentico().ResolveRichText(Model.Summary))
</div>
}
I wouldn't focus too much on the view file, as I'm not even able to add the widget to the page builder, so the view has never even had a chance to be called.
Here's my home view file:
#* Views/Home/Index.cshtml *#
#using Kentico.PageBuilder.Web.Mvc
#using Kentico.Web.Mvc
<h1>Rhythm Agency</h1>
#Html.Kentico().EditableArea("main")
I'm really at a loss as to why this widget isn't appearing in the list of available widgets to add to the page section. Here's some extra context:
I'm on Kentico 12.0.77.
I've tried a widget without a controller and now one with a controller.
As you can see, I have the widget registration (as an assembly attribute) in the controller class file.
The frontend of the site renders the rich text widget just fine.
I didn't see any relevant issues in the error log.
I'm using the default section.
When I call EditableArea, you can see I do not place any restrictions on the widgets that can be used.
I'm using the free edition of Kentico. I doubt that's a factor, but mentioning it just in case (the "benefits of upgrading your license" link is currently a 404).
I don't see any errors in Chrome's console.
I've read various instructions for creating widgets like 10 times. No idea what I'm missing.
I'm using Chrome on Windows 10.
I was previously calling the widget "Image Summary Section", but I renamed it on the off chance "Section" was a reserved word.
EDIT:
Somebody is curious as to why this and the previous question are different, so this edit clarifies that. The previous question was about a widget I was attempting to implement using just a properties class. This newer question uses a different approach (namely, using a controller), which is an alternative way of implementing widgets in Kentico.
EDIT #2:
Somebody recommended I put the widget registration assembly attribute in the App_Start folder, which I did, but it didn't help:
So why this is failing to work is still a mystery.
For the controller and widget to be recognized you need to put your controller in the '/Controllers' folder. I have my widget controllers located in the '/Controllers/Widgets' folder.
I had issues which included not having added the suffix 'Controller' in the class name and issues with the widget controller not being in the '/Controllers' folder.
Also you aren't working in an seperate project? Because this would need you to use the following in the 'AssemblyInfo.cs'
using CMS;
[assembly: AssemblyDiscoverable]
And make sure you have enabled the page builder feature in your kentico project. For example:
protected void Application_Start()
{
...
// Gets the ApplicationBuilder instance
// Allows you to enable and configure Kentico MVC features
ApplicationBuilder builder = ApplicationBuilder.Current;
// Enables the preview feature
builder.UsePreview();
// Enables the page builder feature
builder.UsePageBuilder();
...
}
I want to add an other item in the admin menu in a portlet.
For example, add an item "Organization" between Apparence and Configuration.
Is it possible ??
However, i tested a new configuration page in the Configuration menu.
So i add in portlet.xml :
<init-param>
<name>config-jsp</name>
<value>/html/foo/configuration.jsp</value>
</init-param>
in liferay-portlet.xml :
<configuration-action-class>com.projecto.ec.config.ConfigurationActionFooImpl</configuration-action-class>
and my ConfigurationActionPrenalyticImpl looks like this :
public class ConfigurationActionPrenalyticImpl implements ConfigurationAction {
#Override
public void processAction(PortletConfig portletConfig, ActionRequest actionRequest, ActionResponse actionResponse) throws Exception {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
#Override
public String render(PortletConfig portletConfig, RenderRequest renderRequest, RenderResponse renderResponse) throws Exception {
return "/html/preanalytic/configuration.jsp";
}
}
But i don't know how to init correctly this page with some content like in a doView or doEdit.
I'd say it is possible, but is none of the standard extension paths that you typically would go within Liferay. A standard way would be to either implement the JSR-286 "edit" mode or contribute another configuration page to the Liferay-specific configuration.
I've never seen the extension you're intending to do in the wild, and I'm assuming that it would require some poking in the internals. It's most likely not well documented. Given that 6.x is the last release that does not use OSGi (and everything will change with Liferay 7 / DXP), I'm not sure if I should recommend going this way.
I'm using the BTProgressHUD Xamarin component in an app that is built using MvvmCross. I'm currently working on the iOS version of the app. My ViewModels make several web service calls and expose an 'IsBusy' property, which the associated views are binding to, in order to show or hide the progress spinner. This is pretty much the way things are set up in the N=34 MvvmCross sample (https://github.com/MvvmCross/NPlus1DaysOfMvvmCross/tree/master/N-34-Progress) as well.
The problem is that in some cases a ViewModel must automatically call a service as soon as it is created. I tried to make the call in the Start() function of the ViewModel, but I noticed that the BTProgressHUD spinner does not show up on top of the view. I suspect that the problem is that BTProgressHUD must be displayed only after a view has been made visible, and probably this is not the case when ViewModel.Start() runs.
Has anyone encountered this before? Is there a simple way to run code in the ViewModel after the view has been made visible?
Thanks.
Is there a simple way to run code in the ViewModel after the view has been made visible?
The N=42 video - http://slodge.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/n42-is-my-viewmodel-visible-can-i-kill.html - introduces an IVisible interface that you can add to your ViewModel - it's your job to call this from your View - but this is easy to do on each platform. For example,, on iOS it is done using ViewDidAppear/ViewDidDisappear in https://github.com/MvvmCross/NPlus1DaysOfMvvmCross/blob/master/N-42-Lifecycles/Lifecycle.Touch/Views/FirstView.cs
protected IVisible VisibleViewModel
{
get { return base.ViewModel as IVisible; }
}
public override void ViewDidAppear(bool animated)
{
base.ViewDidAppear(animated);
VisibleViewModel.IsVisible(true);
}
public override void ViewDidDisappear(bool animated)
{
base.ViewDidDisappear(animated);
VisibleViewModel.IsVisible(false);
}
In my app, one scene having the popup dialog which consists of some fields and buttons. If you click on the button then I want to dismiss the popup dialog as well as update the some fields in the scene. Indirectly I want to refresh scene. is it possible?
I used the following code.Here what I did is, I get the controller of that scene and then update the field using id. but it doesn't work.
URL location = AdmincontrolController.class.getResource("admincontrol.fxml");
FXMLLoader fxmlLoader = new FXMLLoader();
fxmlLoader.setLocation(location);
fxmlLoader.setBuilderFactory(new JavaFXBuilderFactory());
try {
Parent root = (Parent) fxmlLoader.load(location.openStream());
AdmincontrolController controller = fxmlLoader.getController();
System.out.println("AdmincontrolController: "+controller);
controller.setEmail(item.getEmail());
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Add_loginController.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
Scenario:
scene
Popup - If we clicks on the add then we need to dismiss that dialog and change the email text on the previous scene.
As Alexander mentioned above, updating the underlying text property of the object you are using to display the email should Just Work. You need to make sure that you are working with the property (see Oracle Java FX Property Tutorial for more info). As a concrete example:
FXML
<Text fx:id="email" />
<TextField fx:id="emailInput" />
<Button onAction="#doSetEmail" text="Set Email"/>
In your controller, use the #FXML annotation to inject concrete instances of objects and set the handler to adjust the text:
Controller
#FXML
Text email;
#FXML
TextField emailInput;
#FXML
public void doSetEmail(ActionEvent ae) {
email.setText(emailInput.getText());
}
Alternatively, you could just bind the email text property to the email label property so that changes would automatically get propagated:
email.textProperty().bind(emailInput.textProperty());
You could do this in your controller initialize() method.
Now, the caveat to all this working depends on how you are handling the event and what you are doing in this. You still haven't posted the code for that as requested by the first answer, so you may be having issues there. Namely, if you are starting threads and then trying to update UI elements on the JavaFX thread from a worker thread, then you can get into trouble (potentially) with things not updating. This depends substantially on the structure of your objects, and you have not given enough information to comment in any meaningful way on that.
chooks
Everytime you have the Feeling that you manually want to update a Scene you should probably use a backgroundWorker Thread to do the work.
This way your UI Thread can use the time to update Labels etc.
JavaFX is built so that you don't need to directly call the scene update routine. All you need - update properties of scene components, and they will be updated on the nearest pulse.
So, all you need is to update properties. Or, is there any real trouble?
refreshing scene its not possible without closing...but if you can do class level declaration for control..i.e make them static its may work...
try this..
make a function in main file.
MainPanel.java
public static void SetMail(String email)
{
txtmail.setText(email);
}
LoginPanel.java
btnclear.setOnAction(new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() {
#Override
public void handle(ActionEvent t) {
MainPanel.SetMail(txtEmail.getText());
}
});
What I'm looking to do is have 2 views of an orchard page.
The first will include headers and footers, the second just the main body content.
The reason is so that we can maintain the body in one place, and it will be used either as a stand alone site, or just embedded within another.
I'm thinking that it would be done by accessing the page using a different route, or appending a querystring parameter.
Any other options are welcomed.
The method I am about to describe is arguably a hack and may go against some of the intentions of the creators of Orchard, but it will get the job done.
Orchard uses the ThemeFilter with the Themed attribute to decide whether the current controller action's output will be 'themed' --- i.e., be displayed with headers and footers. The controller used by Orchard to display content items has this attribute enabled, which is why content items are displayed themed. What you are asking to do is to suppress this 'themed' mode based on the presence of a query string parameter.
ThemeFilter kicks in at a very early stage of the page request and applies itself by setting a value in the current request's http context.
ThemeFilter.cs:
public static void Apply(RequestContext context) {
// the value isn't important
context.HttpContext.Items[typeof (ThemeFilter)] = null;
}
This class does not provide a way of unApplying this value. If you are willing to modify the Orchard source code, you may add this method yourself:
public static void Unapply(RequestContext context) {
context.HttpContext.Items.Remove(typeof (ThemeFilter));
}
Then you can simply create your own action filter that checks for the existence of a query string and then call this method if appropriate, something like:
using System.Web.Mvc;
using Orchard.Mvc.Filters;
using Orchard.Themes;
namespace Demo {
public class UnthemeFilter : FilterProvider, IActionFilter {
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) {
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext) {
if (filterContext.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request["unthemed"] != null) {
ThemeFilter.Unapply(filterContext.RequestContext);
}
}
}
}
Now by adding ?unthemed=true, you will be able to suppress the theming.
If you are unwilling or unable to modify the Orchard source code, it is still possible to do the same thing by directly removing the typeof (ThemeFilter) from the HTTP context in your filter. However, this breaks encapsulation and should probably be avoided in object-oriented programming.