I am using Spring Cloud ZUUL as gateway to all downstream services.
I now have a NodeJS based service which I also route using Spring Cloud ZUUL and Spring Cloud SideCar.
The NodeJS based service references some static content, images,css and also javascript.
When ZUUL is routing the request to NodeJS via the SideCar, I see the static content and javasript files are not been downloaded.
The url for them points to the host and port of ZUUL instance, instead of the host and port of the actual downstream service. So, it seems like I need to add some configuration to route to the static resources within the downstream app, in this case, NodeJS app or something similar.
Can someone help me with the right way to approach this issue.
active blocking sensitive headers
routes:
node-service:
sensitiveHeaders: Cookie,Set-Cookie
Related
Is it possible to include a separate Azure App Service as part of another App Service?
For example lets say that I have a website called www.mycompany.com hosted in its own Azure App Service. I have another Azure App Service that I want to make it accessible by going to a specific URL in the first App Service.
So in other words when a request comes to www.mycompany.com/eu/ I want the content of this endpoint (/eu) to be served from the other app service. Would a load balancer work? The reason I want to do this is because the /eu endpoint has grown too big and I would like to separate that from the main site and host it on a separate app service. I hope my question is clear.
Thanks in advance.
For this purpose you could use Application Gateway.
In a certain sense it resembles a load balancer (it is a L7 LB indeed) as you indicated, but the product provides many additional features.
The following image, extracted from the product documentation, explains how it works:
Basically, as outlined in the aforementioned docs, when describing how an Application Gateway accepts a request (note they mention WAF in the explanation, an optional security threat prevention system):
Before a client sends a request to an application gateway, it
resolves the domain name of the application gateway by using a Domain
Name System (DNS) server. Azure controls the DNS entry because all
application gateways are in the azure.com domain.
The Azure DNS returns the IP address to the client, which is the
frontend IP address of the application gateway.
The application gateway accepts incoming traffic on one or more
listeners. A listener is a logical entity that checks for
connection requests. It's configured with a frontend IP address,
protocol, and port number for connections from clients to the
application gateway.
If a web application firewall (WAF) is in use, the application
gateway checks the request headers and the body, if present,
against WAF rules. This action determines if the request is valid
request or a security threat. If the request is valid, it's routed
to the backend. If the request isn't valid and WAF is in Prevention
mode, it's blocked as a security threat. If it's in Detection mode,
the request is evaluated and logged, but still forwarded to the
backend server.
The routing to one backend or another can be based on URL Paths:
You can find an example of this configuration in this related Microsoft article.
In your use case, you will need to define two backends, one for every App Service, and define routing rules as appropriate.
As indicated before, your DNS should point to the Application Gateway: it will handle the routing to one or other App Service based on the route, /eu/* or /*, provided by the client.
The order of the routes is important: once a rule is matched, it will be the one processed.
Application Gateway is a regional service: Azure Front Door leverages a similar functionality (and much more) globally.
Please, consider review the associated costs of these services.
I am answering my own question to hopefully help others in the same situation. This was simply done using a reverse proxy. This article explains everything you need to set it up - https://ruslany.net/2014/05/using-azure-web-site-as-a-reverse-proxy/
I'm not entirely new to MS Azure, but I am new to its API Management Service. I am trying to get an understanding of how the routing works between the client, the APIMS, and the backend APIs, but somehow can't seem to find what I'm looking for within Microsoft's documentation.
So here's what we have and what I understand:
We have multiple APIs that we host on Azure as App Services. And those APIs are added to the APIMS, which we are using as a gateway. The APIMS's Inbound policies on each API specifies the backend service as that App. But that's all I know.
So when a client, say an application running on someone's computer, sends a request to one of those APIs, how does its request URL end up routing through the gateway? And how does that all relate?
the request URL is made up as follows:
[name of your APIM service].azure-api.net/[name of api]/[api method]/[querystring]
example:
https://myapimanager.azure-api.net/myapi/getstudent?id=1
https://myapimanager.azure-api.net/myotherapi/getsomethingelse?name=bubbles
Using the App Engine Flexible Environment, I'm preparing to deploy an Angular 4 client and am looking into Cloud Endpoints to handle my node.js/express microservices as it seems to simplify securing and authenticating endpoint requests, and I wanted to clarify a few things:
Do I use cloud-endpoints as an API Gateway which routes requests to the individual microservice backends or are the microservices supposed to be built as individual endpoints-apps themselves?
Do I host the Angular 4 app statically (server agnostic), and make endpoint requests directly to the Gateway/microservice from the ng client, or is the app hosted through a server framework (e.g. node.js/express) which then passes on the request along to the Gateway/microservice
Endpoints is an API gateway, but it currently only routes to a single backend. On Flex, it's whatever app you deploy. The Endpoints proxy sits in front of your backend, transparently to the client, and the client requests will pass through the gateway. See the docs for how to set up your Flexible environment.
In conjunction with a dispatch.yaml directive to handle routing, you can use GCE as a gateway to multiple microservices running as services in a given project.
You can call the services directly or proxy through a server.
I have some doubts about which is the most appropiate way to allow access to my company backend services from public Clouds like AWS or Azure, and viceversa. In our case, we need an AWS app to invoke some HTTP Rest Services exposed in our backend.
I came out with at least two options:
The first one is to setup an AWS Virtual Private Cloud between the app and our backend and route all traffic through it.
The second option is to expose the HTTP service through a reverse proxy and setup IP filtering in the proxy to allow only income connections from AWS. We don´t want the HTTP Service to be public accesible from the Internet and I think this is satisfied whether we choose one option or another. Also we will likely need to integrate more services (TCP/UDP) between AWS and our backend, like FTP transfers, monitoring, etc.
My main goal is to setup a standard way to accomplish this integration, so we don't need to use different configurations depending on the kind of service or application.
I think this is a very common need in hybrid cloud scenarios so I would just like to embrace the best practices.
I would very much appreciate it any kind of advice from you.
Your option #2 seems good. Since you have a AWS VPC, you can get an IP to whitelist by your reverse proxy.
There is another approach. That is, expose your backends as APIs which are secured with Oauth tokens. You need some sort of an API Management solution for this. Then your Node.js app can invoke those APIs with the token.
WSO2 API Cloud allows your to create these APIs in the cloud and run the api gateway in your datacenter. Then the Node.js api calls will hit the on-prem gateway and it will validate the token and let the request go to the backend. You will not need to expose the backend service to the internet. See this blog post.
https://wso2.com/blogs/cloud/going-hybrid-on-premises-api-gateways/
I'd like to implement micro service architecture on CF (run.pivotal.io) and have problems with creating my private backend services.
As I see I have to options at deployment: with and without route.
With route my services becomes public which is ok for my public site and my public REST API, but I don't want it for my backend services.
Without route I don't see how should I do service discovery.
What I found already:
Use VCAP_APPLICATION env variable and create my own service discovery (or use something like Eureka) based on that. Does this give me always a valid IP:PORT? No matter what DEA my app is running it is reachable on this IP:PORT by other apps on other DEAs?
Register my backend app as a service and bind it, than use VCAP_SERVICES. I'd like to do this but only found documentation about registering services outside CF. Is there a simple way to bind my own app as a service?
So what would be really nice is to be able to mark an app as private but still assign a host and domain to it, so (only) my other apps could call it though CF load balancers but it would be protected from the public.
Answers inline...
As I see I have to options at deployment: with and without route.
This depends on the Cloud Foundry installation and how it's configured. On PWS, you cannot talk directly between application instances. It's a security restriction. You have to go through the router.
With route my services becomes public which is ok for my public site and my public REST API, but I don't want it for my backend services.
The best you can do here is to add application level (or container level, if you prefer) security to prevent unauthorized access.
If you don't want to do password based authentication, you could do IP based filtering. On PWS, we just added a service with Statica. You can use that to send your outbound traffic through a proxy which will assign a static IP to that traffic. You could then restrict access to your app to only the Statica IPs.
Without route I don't see how should I do service discovery.
If you remove the route, you can't sent traffic to the app.
Use VCAP_APPLICATION env variable and create my own service discovery (or use something like Eureka) based on that. Does this give me always a valid IP:PORT? No matter what DEA my app is running it is reachable on this IP:PORT by other apps on other DEAs?
You'd probably need to use this enhancement. It was added to support this type of deployment. However this will only work on Cloud Foundry installation where the networking restrictions between application instances have been relaxed. Normally you cannot talk directly between instances.
Register my backend app as a service and bind it, than use VCAP_SERVICES. I'd like to do this but only found documentation about registering services outside CF. Is there a simple way to bind my own app as a service?
You can create a "user provided" service. Look at the cf cups command. It lets you create a service with an arbitrary set of parameters and data. This could contain the URLs for your services. Once you create the service, you can bind it to any number of apps.