Azure data factory copy activity performance tuning - azure

Question

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/data-factory-load-sql-data-warehouse. According this link with 1000 DWU and polybase I should get 200MBps throughput. But I am getting 4.66 MBps. I have added user in xlargerc resource class to achieve best possible throughput from azure sql datawarehouse.
Below is the Pipeline JSON.
{
"name": "UCBPipeline-Copy",
"properties": {
"description": "pipeline with copy activity",
"activities": [
{
"type": "Copy",
"typeProperties": {
"source": {
"type": "BlobSource"
},
"sink": {
"type": "SqlDWSink",
"allowPolyBase": true,
"writeBatchSize": 0,
"writeBatchTimeout": "00:00:00"
},
"cloudDataMovementUnits": 4
},
"inputs": [
{
"name": "USBBlob_Concept
}
],
"outputs": [
{
"name": "AzureDW_Concept"
}
],
"policy": {
"timeout": "01:00:00",
"concurrency": 1
},
"scheduler": {
"frequency": "Day",
"interval": 1
},
"name": "AzureBlobtoSQLDW_Concept",
"description": "Copy Activity"
}
],
"start": "2017-02-28T18:00:00Z",
"end": "2017-03-01T19:00:00Z",
"isPaused": false,
"hubName": "sampledf1_hub",
"pipelineMode": "Scheduled"
}
}
Input dataset :
{
"name": "AzureBlob_Concept",
"properties": {
"published": false,
"type": "AzureBlob",
"linkedServiceName": "AzureZRSStorageLinkedService",
"typeProperties": {
"fileName": "conceptTab.txt",
"folderPath": "source/",
"format": {
"type": "TextFormat",
"columnDelimiter": "\t"
}
},
"availability": {
"frequency": "Day",
"interval": 1
},
"external": true,
"policy": {}
}
}
output dataset:
{
"name": "AzureDW_Concept",
"properties": {
"published": false,
"type": "AzureSqlDWTable",
"linkedServiceName": "AzureSqlDWLinkedService",
"typeProperties": {
"tableName": "concept"
},
"availability": {
"frequency": "Day",
"interval": 1
}
}
}
is anything is missing in the configuration?

Answer 1

I took a look on runId "e98ac557-a507-4a6e-8833-978eff1723c3", which should belong to your Copy Activity. From our service logs, the source file is not large enough (270 MB in your case), so that the service call latency would make the throughput not good enough. You could try loading bigger files to have better throughput.