Assign Web App to an existing service plan in ARM template - azure

I'm trying to attach existing service plan to a new Web App in Azure Resource Manager template. The Service Plan is already up and running and not part of that arm template

You've probably figured this out by now, but incase someone else clicks into this thread as I did I'll post this.
You can use the resourceId function to reference the exisiting Service Plan.
Then simply use this in the properties for serverFarmId in the template.
"properties": {
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
}
So basicalliy exactly what Fei Han example shows, but you need to remove the dependsOn (and of course the Service Plan resource).

My service plan was in a different resource group so I also have to provide RG name
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('plangroup',
'Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
Source

I'm trying to attach Web service plan to a new Web App in Auzre Resource Manager template. The Service Plan is not created by the same template
You said the service plan is not created, is it not an existing service plan? If you’d like to deploy both app service plan and web app to Azure via Azure PowerShell with Resource Manager template, please refer to the following ARM template.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "F1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
},
"webSiteName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
}
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
}
}
]
}

Related

Deploy a web app and custom domain using bicep template

While deploying it to azure portal it's showing an error microsoft.web/serverforms
I have tried to deploy a web app and custom domain to azure portal using arm template. I want to deploy a web app with custom domain.
I have deploy a web app with custom domain using below Steps.
open Azure portal and search for custom deployment as use the below code.
Thanks #akhilthomsa011 for arm template.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2019-04-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"location": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"metadata": {
"description": "Location for all resources."
}
},
"webAppName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "The name of the web app that you wish to create."
}
},
"customHostname": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "The custom hostname that you wish to add."
}
},
"existingKeyVaultId": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "",
"metadata": {
"description": "Existing Key Vault resource Id for the SSL certificate, leave this blank if not enabling SSL"
}
},
"existingKeyVaultSecretName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "",
"metadata": {
"description": "Key Vault Secret that contains a PFX certificate, leave this blank if not enabling SSL"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"appServicePlanName": "[concat(parameters('webAppName'),'-asp-', uniquestring(resourceGroup().id))]",
"certificateName": "[concat(parameters('webAppName'),'-cert')]",
"enableSSL": "[not(empty(parameters('existingKeyVaultId')))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"apiVersion": "2019-08-01",
"name": "[variables('appServicePlanName')]",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('appServicePlanName')]"
},
"sku": {
"name": "P1",
"tier": "Premium",
"size": "1",
"family": "P",
"capacity": "1"
}
},
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"apiVersion": "2019-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('webAppName')]",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverFarms', variables('appServicePlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('webAppName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverFarms', variables('appServicePlanName'))]"
}
},
{
"condition": "[variables('enableSSL')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/certificates",
"apiVersion": "2019-08-01",
"name": "[variables('certificateName')]",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', parameters('webAppName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"keyVaultId": "[parameters('existingKeyVaultId')]",
"keyVaultSecretName": "[parameters('existingKeyVaultSecretName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverFarms', variables('appServicePlanName'))]"
}
},
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/hostnameBindings",
"name": "[concat(parameters('webAppName'), '/', parameters('customHostname'))]",
"apiVersion": "2019-08-01",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/certificates', variables('certificateName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"sslState": "[if(variables('enableSSL'), 'SniEnabled', json('null'))]",
"thumbprint": "[if(variables('enableSSL'), reference(resourceId('Microsoft.Web/certificates', variables('certificateName'))).Thumbprint, json('null'))]"
}
}
]
}
Fill the details as shown below and click on review + Create.
After deployed to azure portal the go to app service and -> custom domain as below.
Reference taken from Git-Hub.

Azure ARM deploy App Service Plan based on input parameters

I'm trying to create an ARM template that contains a App Service Plan and an App Service, but where the App Service Plan only will be created if an optional parameter with reference to an existing App Service Plan is not set.
So the ARM should either create an App Service Plan for the App Service, of just use the existing App Service Plan that is given as an parameter.
How is that possible to do?
SOLUTION
Here is the finale ARM template that works
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"currentServiceplanId": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "",
"metadata": {
"description": "Optional. Use an existing serviceplan for deployment"
}
},
"serviceplanSkuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "B1",
"allowedValues": [
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and capacity. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"prefix": "setup05",
"serviceplanName": "[concat(variables('prefix'), 'serviceplan')]",
"serviceplanId": "[variables('serviceplanIdSelector')[string(equals(length(parameters('currentServiceplanId')), 0))]]",
"serviceplanIdSelector": {
"true": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('serviceplanName'))]",
"false": "[parameters('currentServiceplanId')]"
},
"api-appName": "[concat(variables('prefix'), 'api-app')]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "[variables('serviceplanName')]",
"condition": "[equals(length(parameters('currentServiceplanId')), 0)]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('serviceplanSkuName')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('serviceplanName')]",
"numberOfWorkers": 1
}
},
{
"name": "[variables('api-appName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('serviceplanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('api-appName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[variables('serviceplanId')]"
}
}
],
"outputs": {
"ApiDefaultHostname": {
"value": "[reference(variables('api-appName')).defaultHostName]",
"type": "string"
},
"ApiAppName": {
"value": "[variables('api-appName')]",
"type": "string"
}
}
}
In your case you should add a dependsOn property to the webApp:
dependsOn: [
"[variables('serviceplanName')]"
]
This way it will wait for it to finish if it needs to be created.

Deploy two Azure App Services to the same App Service Plan using idempotent ARM TEMPLATE

PROBLEM
How to deploy two different Azure App Services to the same App Service plan when using VSTS idempotent continuous integration / continuous deployment processes.
ENVIRONMENT
I have written two ARM TEMPLATES each of which deploy a web application to Azure App Service.
In order to deploy an App Service an Service Plan must be created first.
The ARM TEMPLATES currently create a unique Service Plan each for each Web App.
I am using VSTS Release Definitions to deploy on each successful VSTS build. i.e releases are designed to be idempotent.
Currently each web app has its own Resource Group which includes it own App Service Plan. Ideally each web app has its own Resource Group, App Service Plan can be in its own Resource Group however (if this is possible).
The template below is an example of one of the templates used to deploy the Web App service to an App Service Plan.
It shows the creation of the App Service Plan using the naming conversion:
appname-Plan-q2dkkaaaaaaaa
This is created using:
Seven Character identifier "appname" defined in the ARM parameters files.
Resource identifier "plan".
Resource Group name , which comes from random named Storage Account name "q2dkkaaaaaaaa" when it was created.
i.e
"hostingPlanName": "[concat(parameters('appName'),'-Plan-', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]",
EXAMPLE
{
"parameters": {
"appName": {
"type": "string",
"maxLength": 7,
"metadata": {
"description": "The name of the app that you wish to create."
}
},
"appServicePlanSku": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "Standard",
"metadata": {
"description": "The Service Plan SKU"
}
},
"appServicePlanWorkerSize": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "0",
"metadata": {
"description": "The App Service Plan Worker Size (?)"
}
},
"appServicePlanSkuCode": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "S1",
"metadata": {
"description": "The App Service Plan SKU Code"
}
},
"appServicePlanNumWorkers": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "2",
"metadata": {
"description": "The Number of App Service Workers."
}
},
"variables": {
"webAppName": "[concat(parameters('appName'),'-wa-', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]",
"hostingPlanName": "[concat(parameters('appName'),'-Plan-', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]",
"stageSlotName": "stageSlot",
"devSlotName": "devSlot"
}
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2016-09-01",
"name": "[variables('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('hostingPlanName')]",
"workerSizeId": "[parameters('appServicePlanWorkerSize')]",
"numberOfWorkers": "[parameters('appServicePlanNumWorkers')]"
},
"sku": {
"Tier": "[parameters('appServicePlanSku')]",
"Name": "[parameters('appServicePlanSkuCode')]"
},
"dependsOn": []
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"name": "[variables('webAppName')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"kind": "webapp",
"tags": {
"Environment": "production",
"displayName": "WebAppService"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('hostingPlanName'))]",
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webAppName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms',variables('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "slotConfigNames",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('webAppName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "slotConfigNames"
},
"properties": {
"appSettingNames": []
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('stageSlotName')]",
"type": "slots",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('webAppName'))]"],
"properties": {},
"resources": []
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('devSlotName')]",
"type": "slots",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('webAppName'))]"],
"properties": {},
"resources": []
}
]
}
]
}
QUESTION
I am attempting to execute two ARM TEMPLATES (similar to the above example) to deploy two different Web Apps to the same Service Plan.
Its clear that both of these Web Apps must call the same central resource to ensure they both deploy to same App Service resource name and execute any changes.
If the App Service plan exists = deploy web app.
If the App Service plan does not exist = create service plan then deploy web app.
If the App Service plan is changed = deploy the service plan change (e.g Tier change) then deploy the web app.
Taking the environmental description above into consideration , what options do I have to get this working?
VSTS Global parameter in the Release Definition maybe ?
ARM TEMPLATES call a PowerShell script that creates the app service plan ?
Keen to follow best practice.
I hope the above is described in enough detail. Sorry if something has been missed. Thank you.
SOLUTION
The solution in my case was to create three templates:
Template 1 to create the app service plan. This ARM template is stored in a BLOB container and is accessible to the release pipeline via a SAS URI.
Template 2 to create web app A. This template uses LINKED TEMPLATE features to call and execute the shared template.
Template 3 to create web app B. This template uses LINKED TEMPLATE features to call and execute the shared template.
RESULT
Both web apps are then published to the same server farm, sharing the
instances.
The idempotent nature of the deployment is maintained.
Single point of truth for any app service plan deployment and any amendments.
Money saved on number of server farms required.
EXAMPLE
Shared Service Plan - ARM Template example of a shared service plan:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"planLabel": {
"defaultValue": "shared-service-plan",
"type": "string"
}
},
"variables": {
"servicePlanName": "[concat(parameters('planLabel'),'-Plan-', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"comments": "Creates an App Service Plan on the Standard (S1) SKU.",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"sku": {
"name": "S1",
"tier": "Standard",
"size": "S1",
"family": "S",
"capacity": 2
},
"kind": "app",
"name": "[variables('servicePlanName')]",
"apiVersion": "2016-09-01",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('servicePlanName')]"
},
"dependsOn": []
}
],
"outputs": {
"servicePlanResourceId": {
"type": "string",
"value": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', variables('servicePlanName'))]"
},
"servicePlanName":{
"type": "string",
"value": "[variables('servicePlanName')]"
},
"resourceGroupName":{
"type": "string",
"value": "[resourceGroup().name]"
}
}
}
Web App A - ARM Template Example containing LINKED TEMPLATE:
{
"$schema": "http://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"servicePlanLabel": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "The base name for the App Service Plan to be used in the linked template."
},
"defaultValue": "plan"
},
"appServicePlanResourceGroup": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"Description": "The name of the Resource Group the shared App Service Plan will be deployed to."
},
"defaultValue": "group"
},
"appServicePlanTemplateUri": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "The URI to the App Service Plan linked template in BLOB"
}
}
},
"variables": {},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2017-05-10",
"name": "appServicePlanTemplate",
"type": "Microsoft.Resources/deployments",
"resourceGroup": "[parameters('appServicePlanResourceGroup')]",
"properties": {
"mode": "Incremental",
"templateLink": {
"uri": "[parameters('appServicePlanTemplateUri')]",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0"
},
"parameters": {
"planLabel": {
"value": "[parameters('servicePlanLabel')]"
}
}
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"name": "[variables('webAppName')]",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"kind": "webapp",
"tags": {
"Environment": "production",
"displayName": "App"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId(parameters('appServicePlanResourceGroup'), 'Microsoft.Resources/deployments', 'appServicePlanTemplate')]"
],
"properties": {}
}
}
}
Hope this is useful to someone.
Thanks
Scott
REF
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/blob/master/articles/azure-resource-manager/resource-group-linked-templates.md
Your requirement is default supported by ARM template. Basically if an ARM template encounters a resource which is exist, it will update the resource if the properties do not match. Otherwise it will create the resource using the properties which you set in ARM template.

How to enable profiling for live azure web apps with application insights using an ARM template

My team wants to enable the Application Insights Live Profiler for our Web App using an ARM template. This performance feature of Application Insights is explained at the following link https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-insights/app-insights-profiler. However, I can't find any documentation on how to add the feature using an ARM template. I have tried using the following documentation (https://github.com/CawaMS/EnableProfilerForCompute/blob/master/How%20to%20enable%20Application%20Insights%20Profiler%20on%20Azure%20Compute%20resources.md) as a guide but it is geared towards enabling profiling for a VM and Azure Compute resources as opposed to an App Service.
According to your description, if you want to deploy the web app and enable the application Insights, I suggest you could try below arm template(adding the Microsoft.Insights/components resource in the template).
Template.json
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "F1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and capacity. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2014-04-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Insights/components",
"location": "East US",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-link:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "AppInsightsComponent"
},
"properties": {
"applicationId": "[variables('webSiteName')]"
}
}
]
}
Output:
Result(the web app has been already related with the appInsights)
I was able to locate a Microsoft representative via email who sent me the following response:
Hi,
We are investigating how to automatically enable the Profiler after
it’s installed with the AI site extension on an App Services resource;
Currently there is no workaround for that yet ...
Thanks
-cath

How to create a new resource in Azure ARM templates?

Ok, I've done everything what described here with ARM template - https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-integrate-with-vnet. Except one thing - Enabling VNET Integration with a pre-existing VNET.
Can this be done in ARM templates?
Thanks!
Here is a sample template that might help you. It's modified from this quickstart sample in GitHub
{
"$schema": "http://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of the hosting plan to use in Azure."
}
},
"webSiteName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of the Azure Web app to create."
}
},
"vnetName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of an existing Azure VNet which has a Gateway Subnet already, and is in the resource group you are going to deploy."
}
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "S1",
"allowedValues": [
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "web",
"type": "config",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', parameters('webSiteName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"pythonVersion": "3.4"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('vnetName')]",
"type": "virtualNetworkConnections",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', parameters('webSiteName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"vnetResourceId": "[concat(resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/', parameters('vnetName'))]"
}
}
]
}
]
}
Here are 3 things you should be careful with.
The template starts with a python web app template, and adds a "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections" resource. So, if you are using other programing language, you can start with some other template.
The pre-existing VNet should be in the same resource group you are deploying. If the VNet you are using are not in the same resource group, you should modify the "vnetResourceId" in the "properties" of the "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections".
The VNet you are using should have a Gateway with a Point-to-Site address already. Otherwise, you will not be able integrate you web app to the VNet. For more details, see Configure a Point-to-Site connection to a virtual network using PowerShell
Update: About how I get this info, well, there is not much about this on the net. This template is constructed based on the PowerShell solution and my knowledge about ARM template. The PowerShell solution is available in this article. Another possible way to get an ARM template is to create those resources in one resource group, and export the template of the resource group in the portal. But, for this case, that is not going to work, because resource type "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections" is not supported yet. However, you can still get a look at the REST API by the PowerShell Command Get-AzureRmResource with option -debug.
Get-AzureRmResource -ResourceGroupName <resource group> -ResourceType Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections -Name <web app>/<VNet> -debug -ApiVersion 2015-08-01
You will get the following REST API.
Uri:
https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/<subscription id>/resourceGroups/<resource group>/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/<web app>/virtualNetworkConnections/<VNet>?api-version=2015-08-01
Body:
{
"id": "/subscriptions/<subscription id>/resourceGroups/<resource group>/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/<web app>/virtualNetworkConnections/<VNet>",
"name": "<VNet>",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections",
"location": "<Location>",
"tags": null,
"properties": {
"vnetResourceId": "/subscriptions/<subscription id>/resourceGroups/<resource group>/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/<VNet>"
"certThumbprint": "<Thumbprint>",
"certBlob": "<cert>",
"routes": null,
"resyncRequired": false,
"dnsServers": null
}
}
Skipping some automatically generated values, you will get the template which is quite similar to the one I write:
{
"name": "<VNet>",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/virtualNetworkConnections",
"location": "<Location>",
"properties": {
"vnetResourceId": "/subscriptions/<subscription id>/resourceGroups/<resource group>/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/<VNet>"
}
}

Resources