I am running Mojarra 2.2.0.
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>client</param-value>
</context-param>
The managed bean action method is-
public void action() {
HttpSession session = (HttpSession) FacesContext.getCurrentInstance()
.getExternalContext().getSession(false);
System.out.println(session.getId()); // not null for stateful views
}
For stateless views session.getId() throws NPE
For views which are not stateless-
Firing a GET request, there is JSESSIONID=340041C96D5AA446D761C3602F54A76D
I read it here that-
For client side state saving mechanism, JSF won't create the session
and will store the view state in a hidden input field with the name
javax.faces.ViewState in the form whenever necessary.
Further, it's mentioned here that
JSF will indeed autocreate the session because the JSF view state has
to be stored over there. If you set the JSF state saving method to
client instead of server, then it won't be stored in session and hence
no session needs to be created
I think the above line is a source for trouble for me.
If you set the JSF state saving method to client instead of server,
then it won't be stored in session // FULLY AGREED
and
hence no session needs to be created. // This confuses because for
client side saving mechanism, a session id gets generated by the
servlet container & hence there is a session associated with the
request.
In reference to the discussion which I had with BalusC in this question,
I created a HttpSessionListener-
#WebListener
public class MyHttpSessionListener implements HttpSessionListener {
public void sessionCreated(HttpSessionEvent event) {
Thread.dumpStack();
}
public void sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent event) {
}
}
See below attached screenshots(these 2 screenshots are for version 2.0.3, there must have been an old bug due to which the session was getting created)-
Libraby (Mojarra 2.2.0)-
When does JSF creates a session
Eaiest way to naildown this is creating a HttpSessionListener, putting a debug breakpoint on sessionCreated() method and inspecting the call stack who needed to get the session for the first time (and thus implicitly needs to create it).
In below example you will see a chain of getSession() calls in the call stack. You will see that FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.renderView() method is the one calling it for the first time.
After you click on FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.renderView() line in debugger's call stack, you will get into its source code (Maven will load source code automatically, otherwise you need to manually attach it).
You see, when server side state saving is enabled and the view to render is not transient (stateless), then JSF will implicitly create the session, just to ensure it's created on time in order to save the view (if the session was created later, e.g. during render response phase, you would otherwise risk exceptions like this Adding <h:form> causes java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot create a session after the response has been committed).
You'll in the source code also immediately see that when the state saving method is set to client, or when the view is stateless as in <f:view transient="true">, then JSF won't anymore implicitly create the session. Older JSF versions may do that as you figured, but this is to be accounted as a bug and ought to be fixed in a newer version.
If you would like to ensure statelessness and avoid accidental/unforeseen session creation, then you could just throw new IllegalStateException() inside sessionCreated() method. When that happens, you just have to look in call stack who's responsible for creating the session and then fix/change the code to not do that anymore.
what does it puts in a session map?
Under the covers, ExternalContext#getSessionMap() delegates to HttpSession#setAttribute()/getAttribute()/removeAttribute(). You can listen on those methods using a HttpSessionAttributeListener.
In below example you will see that ViewScopeContextManager.getContextMap() line calls SessionMap#put() method in order to put something in the session map. When you unfold the event argument, you will see the session attribute name and value, which is com.sun.faces.application.view.activeViewContexts and an empty ConcurrentHashMap respectively.
Indeed, I was using a #Named #ViewScoped which was referenced by an value expression on the particular page (you see EL resolver and Weld resolver further down in call stack). When you click ViewScopeContextManager.getContextMap() line in call stack, you'll see that it was just preparing a map in session scope in order to store view scoped beans.
That's just one example. There are more things which could be stored in the session. Using a debugger this way and inspecting the associated source code will tell a lot about the Why.
Related
I'm working on a JSF webapp which purpose is to wrap a command-line program.
One of its main functionality is the ability to share a session between users (eg. for courses purpose), so that when an input is sent to an instance of the application, the output sent to every subscriber for this session.
As a result of this design, the webapp is mainly composed of a view-scoped bean which will request a controller of the command-line application.
It has also been chosen to identify a session with the URL fragment (eg. mydomain/myapp/#SESSIONID), so that anyone using the URL with the same fragment will share inputs and outputs, using its own instance of the view-scoped bean but sharing the same controller
In order to push results to all subscribers, I'm using Primefaces Push. Results are primarily text that has to be appened to the webapp's terminal, but some commands lead to the programmatic creation of a JSF component.
In order to handle this, I just render these components to a string that I send to all subscribers.
Then, I realized that in order to handle ajax requests from components (and from every subscriber), the associated UIComponent needs to be added to the UIViewRoot in the context of (don't know how to express this) each view-scope bean.
As a matter of fact, I first tried to bind a "common container" (a UIForm) to a property of the view scoped bean, in which I would put the programmatically created components, but I obviously had to face the chicken/egg issue #BalusC talks about in his blog, because the component was added again on each ajax request. Setting javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING to false didn't help either (I'm using MyFaces 2.2.5)
So, as somewhat of a workaround, when the controller needs to create a new component, it basically adds the id of the component to the data pushed (in a HashMap converted to Json), and all subscribers will trigger (back) a remoteCommand to its own instance of the view-scoped bean, in order to update the "common container" from its own UIViewRoot.
This does work, but I don't like this way of doing it!
So:
would it be possible to handle this kind of sharing between view-scope beans (with the same name) which are stored in different HTTP sessions? I'm refering to this answer from #BalusC... maybe playing with javax.faces.ViewState - would it even be possible?
Is there a "magical" scope for my currently-view-scoped bean I could use?
Shall I rather use a completely different design?
Thanks!
If you want share data between all your application users you can use application scope.
If you still want to use view scope, you can connect your view scope with another application scope like this:
ApplicationView appView = BeanUtil.findBean("applicationView", FacesContext.getCurrentInstance());
import javax.faces.context.FacesContext;
public class BeanUtil {
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T> T findBean(String beanName, FacesContext context) {
return (T) context.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(context,
"#{" + beanName + "}", Object.class);
}
}
Is it possible to navigate to another page/view from the constructor of the managed bean? I want this redirection if any exception occurred. I have tried many ways:
Try-1:
getFacesContext().responseComplete();
getFacesContext().getApplication().getNavigationHandler().handleNavigation(getFacesContext(), null, "gotoPartError");
getFacesContext().renderResponse();
Try-2:
getServletResponse().sendRedirect("partError.jspx")
Try-3:
getFacesContext().responseComplete();
getFacesContext().getExternalContext().redirect(getServletRequest().getContextPath() + "/pages/partError.jspx");
Try-4:
RequestDispatcher dispatcher = getServletRequest().getRequestDispatcher("partError.jspx");
dispatcher.forward(getServletRequest(), getServletResponse());
Try-5:
FacesContext context = getFacesContext();
UIViewRoot newPage = context.getApplication().getViewHandler().createView(context, "/partError.jspx");
context.setViewRoot(newPage);
context.renderResponse();
Try-6:
ControllerContext.getInstance().getCurrentViewPort().setViewId("partError");
Try-7:
Exception Handler in adfc-config.xml
Try-8:
Custom service handler defined in /.adf/META-INF/services/oracle.adf.view.rich.context.Exceptionhandler which extends oracle.adf.view.rich.context.Exceptionhandler
Try-9:
By extending JSF Life Cycle
None of them worked. For all the cases I received
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot forward after response has been committed
Is not really possible in JSF 1.2? As I am using ADF 11.1.1.6.0, which uses JSF 1.2, some of the above "Try" contains ADF Faces ways.
I need anyway, that can be JSF 1.2 or ADF Faces, to navigate to error page. The only way I got success is the use of javascript, executed from backend, to open the error page in the _self window in case of error, but I don't really like it.
Any pointer in this matter would be very helpful.
It's easier to solve a problem if the cause of the problem is understood. A good exception tells basically already everything about the cause of the problem.
Look closer:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot forward after response has been committed
The response has been committed. This is a point of no return. Perhaps you failed to understand what it means that a response has been committed (which has the consequence that you also failed to understand the exception itself).
By default, the HTTP response is written to a buffer which is flushed every ~2KB, depending on server configuration. A flush of the response buffer causes the written bytes being actually sent from server to client. Once that happens for the first time, a response is considered committed. This is a point of no return. The server cannot take the already written bytes back from the client in case the server actually needs to change the response afterwards.
If you have some code which potentially needs to change the response, then you should be invoking it before the response is committed.
In your particular case, the managed bean is apparently constructed in the midst of the JSF render response phase during generating the HTML output. A part of the generated HTML output has already been sent to the client (so, the response is committed). You're apparently referencing the request scoped bean relatively late in the JSF page, or the response buffer is relatively small, or the HTML <head> is relatively large which causes a flush already before the <body> starts, etcetera.
You really need to invoke the code before the render response phase. In JSF 1.2, you can use the <f:view beforePhase> for this.
E.g.
<f:view beforePhase="#{bean.navigate}">
with
public void navigate(PhaseEvent event) {
if (event.getPhaseId() == PhaseId.RENDER_RESPONSE) {
// Do here your job which should run right before the RENDER_RESPONSE.
}
}
Then your Try-1 and Try-3 will work (you can however leave those responseComplete() and renderResponse() lines away, they are implicitly already taken care of).
Try-2 and Try-4 are poor. You should avoid having javax.servlet.* imports in your backing bean. Try-5 is clumsy. Try-6, Try-7 and Try-8 are beyond my scope. Try-9 is doable, but extremely clumsy.
I have a problem but do not know exactly for what I should look. I do not think I'm the first one has this problem!
It is a Java SE application with JSF & Co, basic frameworks.
The application can be submitted comments to threads. I write a comment and then I open another thread (another Browser-Tab) so the comment is posted in the newly opened thread.
I have a ManagedBean with the attribute "selectedThread". The error results from the fact that the property is replaced by the newer one. How can I fix this problem?
I have several of ideas, but all produce the same problem.
Thank you!
#ManagedBean
#SessionScoped
public class ViewBean {
private Thread selectedThread = new Thread(); //Current opened Threas
private String threadId=""; //ThreadId read out from Database by Id convert to Object
private Comment selectedThreadComment = new Comment(); //Comment to be made
Working/Failure steps:
Open:thread_detail.xhtml?id=10
ThreadId and selected Trip setted
Write a comment (selectedThreadComment setted)
Open:thread_detail.xhtml?id=11
Commit Comment
Comment is understandably persisted for id 11 instead of id 10.
It does not matter which Scope i use. There must be a way to save the Comment according to which site is opened.
I hope now my problem is better-defined!
It sounds like as if the scope of the managed bean is too broad for the data it holds. The symptoms indicate that the managed bean is been placed in the session scope, while the data it holds is specific to a single HTTP request or a single view. A session scoped managed bean instance lives as long as the browser session is established. It is been shared across all requests/views within the same session. Any change initiated by one window/tab would get reflected in another window/tab in the same session.
You should then be placing the bean in the request or the view scope instead if it holds solely request or view scoped data. If you have some data which should surely be kept in the session scope, e.g. the logged-in user, then you should split the current session scoped managed bean out into two managed beans, each in the right scope. The session scoped one is then to be used to hold the data representing the logged-in user and the request/view scoped one is then to be used to hold the data representing the submitted form data and/or the view state. You can use #ManagedProperty to inject the session scoped one into the request/view scoped one.
See also:
How to choose the right bean scope?
How do servlets work? Instantiation, sessions, shared variables and multithreading (to better understand "under the hoods" working of JSF request/session/application scope)
I have a session scoped managed bean, with a property current. If I have a method
public void resetCurrent() {
current = new Configuration();
}
in the bean, it gets called automatically every time I navigate to a new page in the application. Is this normal behavior? I am not calling the method anywhere in the code.
Considering that this approach to reset the session bean properties is, to say the least, less than ideal, which would be the right way to accomplish it?
Thank you.
JSF doesn't do that. It's your code which does that. Your view or another bean or maybe the bean itself is calling it. Putting a debug breakpoint on that line or adding Thread.dumpStack() should give you insights in who's calling it by reading the call stack. Or just rename the method to something else and check if you don't see compilation errors during build or get EL exceptions during runtime which should pinpoint the callers.
Considering that this approach to reset the session bean properties is, to say the least, less than ideal, which would be the right way to accomplish it?
Depends on the functional requirements. For example, if the bean is supposed to hold view scoped data, then put it in the view scope instead. Or if it is supposed to hold session scoped data (e.g. logged-in user) and you're basically logging out, then rather invalidate the session.
Let's say I've got a register page & a register confirm page. I enter user
details into the register page, navigate to the register confirm page where
I can return back to the register page if there are any mistakes.
I'm going to use view parameters to make the registration data available
from the register page to the confirm page, and vice versa.
Supposing there are 20 items of data to be moving from page to page, that's
a lot of view parameters and a lot of setPropertyActionListeners, especially
as all the data is going to end up nicely packaged in a User object.
So what I want to do is input the data on the register page into the
properties of a User record and send a reference to it to the register
confirm page. What gave me an idea was seeing the BalusC WeakHashMap
converter. This is a JSF converter which has a static weak hash map and
generates a uuid as the value for a map entry and the object reference as
the key. So by specifying this as a converter for f:viewParam you send
the uuid in the query string.
This works fine. The issue I have is that on the register page I have to
get an instance of a User class with new. Then I can do:
<h:inputText value="#{bean.user.firstname}"/>
(etc...), and pass the user instance as a view parameter. It works fine from
the register to the confirm page. The issue is that when I perform the
reverse, sending the user reference back to the register page from the
confirm page I absolutely cannot prevent the register page backing bean
from re-instantiating the user object, after the setter has been called
as a result of the view parameter.
So the converter does it's job and retrieves the User object from the
hash map, calls setUser() in the backing bean, and then I see the
constructor for the User class firing.
I've tried calling new User() from the bean constructor, in #PostConstruct,
in a preRenderView (also checking if an ajax request), but nothing I try
prevents the work of the view parameter from getting wiped out if new is
involved. I'm sure there's a simple solution but I just can't see it right
now.
I'd be grateful for any suggestions for how to solve this problem.
The issue I have is that on the register page I have to get an instance of a User class with new.
So what code is initially creating this new User instance then? If you do this in the preRenderView handler, then you can simply check for null, can't you?
If the view parameter and converter haven't done their job, user would still be null and you create a new instance. The bean constructor and #PostConstruct won't do you any good here, since they both run before the view parameter does its thing, but the preRenderView event is guaranteed to run after it.
#ManagedBean
public class Bean {
private User user;
public void onPreRenderView() {
if (user == null) {
user = new User();
}
}
}
(Something to additionally consider is that the conversation scope already does exactly what you're trying to do here. This is part of CDI not JSF, but if you're running in a Java EE 6 Web Profile compliant AS (JBoss AS 6 or 7, Glassfish V3, Resin 4, ...) you already have it. Otherwise it's just an extra jar.)
After several attempts over more than a year to find a solid long term solution
to this problem, at last! I've found one. The solution comes in the form of the
Apache Myfaces CDI extensions project, aka Myfaces CODI.
This provides additional scopes such as the #ViewAccessScoped which ensures that
if a bean is referenced by a page then it is available for that page. Also
provided is support for conversation groups. In the scenario where I want to
pass an object reference from a register page to a register confirm page, the
confirm page can just access the registerView bean directly on the next request.
Alternatively you can #Inject one bean into another and access it on the next
request, or use f:setPropertyActionListener from the source page.
Myfaces CODI works fine with Mojarra and also with ajaxified component libraries
such as primefaces. The concept is similar to what is provided by Jboss Seam,
though I've found the additional scope support to be better thought out and I've
tested this on glassfish 3.1.1 with no problems.
If you're using #ManagedBean and scope annotations from the javax.faces.bean
package in your code, codi intercepts these annotations and uses it's own
CDI based versions, so you can convert to CDI simply by adding codi as a
dependency to your project and not changing any code.
For me this is like moving from black and white TV to colour TV, I wish I'd
found this stuff sooner.
CODI documentation