I am a bit confused about the interpretation of word2vec output vectors!
If I want to predict the most probable word that will appear after a specific word(w1), can I use the most nearest word to w1?
I mean, a word having the shortest distance from w1 can be interpreted as the next word with the highest probability?
If I want to predict the most probable word that will appear after a specific word(w1),
This is called language modeling
can I use the most nearest word to w1?
I mean, a word having the shortest distance from w1 can be interpreted as the next word with the highest probability?
no: the nearest word to w1 is the most semantically close word to w1.
Related
I am trying to calculate the emotion of paragraphs by measuring the emotion of its individual sentences. But this ends in vectors of varying length, as a paragraph might be as short as 1 sentence or as long as 30 sentences. how would you suggest converting these vectors to scalars?
The first option is taking average, but this biases the results: It turns out shorter paragraphs have a higher score and longer ones a score around the mean.
The second option is summing up the values, but this biases the results again, as longer paragraph will have bigger scores
The third option is using a method used in VADER, which is summing up and then normalizing, but I could not find a reliable resource that explains how the results are normalized. The only thing I found is the following formula from VADER code:
norm_score = score / math.sqrt((score * score) + alpha)
VADER sets alpha to 15, but how this number should be changed and based on what? Also , where does this normalization method come from?
Using Word embeddings ,I am calculating the similarity distance between 2 paragraphs where distance between 2 paragraphs is the sum of euclidean distances between vectors of 2 words ,1 from each paragraph.
The more the value of this sum, the less similar 2 documents are-
How can I assign prefernce/weights to certain words while calculating this similarity distance.
It sounds like you've improvised your own paragraph-to-paragraph distance measure based on doing (lots of?) word-to-word distances.
Are you picking the words for each word-to-word comparison randomly, and doing it a lot to find the overall difference?
One naive measure that works better-than-nothing is to average all words in a paragraph to get a single vector for the paragraph. You could conceivably overweight words there quite easily by assigning each word a weight, default 1.0 (for normal average), but larger to overweight words.
Another more sophisticated comparison based on word-vectors is "Word Mover's Distance" - it essentially considers each word to be a "pile of meaning", and then finds the minimal pairwise "moves" to tranform one paragraph (as a bag-of-words) to another. (It's available in Python gensim as wmdistance(), and other libraries.) It's quite a bit more expensive to calculate, though, especially as a function of text word count.
I am new to language processing and sorry if this might look a very basic question.
Given a training sequence, for example: "aaabbcddecbbaaaaabbabbbabccddbbcdaaaaaa" (the real sequence is much longer), I can use the recurrent neural networks such as LSTM to learn patterns and dependencies in the sequence to generate next characters (a single character or several characters). For example, feeding a sample sequence "aaabb" will generate "c". It is worth mentioning, that my alphabet contains only 6 ordered characters {a,b,c,d,e,f}
My question is: how to compute probability of a particular combination of next characters? For example, given a sequence "aabcdcbbaa" what will be the probability of obtaining "cc" ?
Many thanks in advance!
UPD
While writing the question, I realised that the the probability of a combination of the next characters might be computed as a "tensor product" of a single characters. What I mean is: given a test sample, the LSTM outputs a vector (through the softmax function) with probabilities of each character and then these probabilities are converted into a single character (the most probable outcome). For example: the sequence "aabcdcbbaa" will generate a 6-dim vector p1 = (0.1, 0.07, 0.23, 0.15, 0.31, 0.14) which corresponds to characters (a, b, c, d, e, f). Then by using each of these characters we can compute the probabilities of the next (the second) character p2. Then by multiplying these two probability vectors p1Xp2 we can compute the joint probability of obtaining two characters: aa, ab, ac, ad,....
Am I correct?
I know, the original cosine similarity, when applied to representation of two documents by frequency of specific words, do not measure word order. I now see a whole bunch of papers applying cosine similarity to representation of pairs of sentences formed by words vectors. I assume they flatten the token# x embedding length matrix of each sentence to a long vector whose length is token# x embedding length of the original sentence. So "I love you" and "you love me(normalized to "I") would not yield 1 in this new way of applying cosine similarity whereas the old way would yield 1. Am I correct? Thanks for any enlightening answer.
Exactly!
"I love you" and "you love me(normalized to "I") would not yield 1 in this new way of applying cosine similarity whereas the old way would yield 1.
this modification is done:
A slight modification is made for sentence
representation. Instead of using indexing words from a text collection, a set of words
that appear in the sentence pair is used as a feature set. This is done to reduce the
degree of data sparseness in sentence representation
The standard TF-IDF similarity
(simTFIDF,vector) is defined as cosine similarity between vector representation of two
sentences.
you can read more here
This paper contains confusion matrices for spelling errors in a noisy channel. It describes how to correct the errors based on conditional properties.
The conditional probability computation is on page 2, left column. In footnote 4, page 2, left column, the authors say: "The chars matrices can be easily replicated, and are therefore omitted from the appendix." I cannot figure out how can they be replicated!
How to replicate them? Do I need the original corpus? or, did the authors mean they could be recomputed from the material in the paper itself?
Looking at the paper, you just need to calculate them using a corpus, either the same one or one relevant to your application.
In replicating the matrices, note that they implicitly define two different chars matrices: a vector and an n-by-n matrix. For each character x, the vector chars contains a count of the number of times the character x occurred in the corpus. For each character sequence xy, the matrix chars contains a count of the number of times that sequence occurred in the corpus.
chars[x] represents a look-up of x in the vector; chars[x,y] represents a look-up of the sequence xy in the matrix. Note that chars[x] = the sum over chars[x,y] for each value of y.
Note that their counts are all based on the 1988 AP Newswire corpus (available from the LDC). If you can't use their exact corpus, I don't think it would be unreasonable to use another text from the same genre (i.e. another newswire corpus) and scale your counts such that they fit the original data. That is, the frequency of a given character shouldn't vary too much from one text to another if they're similar enough, so if you've got a corpus of 22 million words of newswire, you could count characters in that text and then double them to approximate their original counts.