I have made three different applications in j JHipster with monolithic. I need to merge these applications. I know that by using micro-services my quest can be easy but the current requirement is to do the merging with the monolithic pattern only.
I need to merge two applications with another or main application. I am using MySQL as database. I don't know where I need to change and how. Please help me out, I am a newbie in this scenario.
i tried to create a java file for setter getter methods and and a dao file for three databases and now in the main class file and am trying to take every dao file as an array of object and integrate it and put it into the third db.is it possible.i wanted to show the code bt,since i am new not able to maintain the coding standards to show.
by this i way i tried to involve three databases in a single scenario and want to complete my query through CRUD model.
as you already pointed out, the proper way of merging here would be using the microservice option, which you cannot take, as you are forced to use monolithic architecture...
almost automatic merge
if you did not changed anything to your code, after generating the entities, you just can put the contents of your applications .jhipster directory into one, and run yo jhipster --with-entities to regenerate the entities in one application. You should keep in mind, you will have to take a look at your main/resource/config/liquibase folder, to set the migration ids properly.
manual merge
For this you should be more experienced in the underlying technologies, as you will have to:
recreate your entity classes
recreate zour DAO/Repositories
(maybe) recreate your services, or service implementations
recreate your REST controllers
do a proper liquibase migration
provide some tests
migrate the frontend code, by adding states, components, templates etc..
the most of these things you just can copy paste already generated code.
For more information, you should ask more precise, what is not working, if you already tried something...
Related
I want to create a workflow automation where an activity comes in and user can setup a multilevel workflow.
For frontend i am using https://reactflow.dev
How to structure things in nodejs backend. Things like database, accessing control flow statements, statements which requires crons.
You also may want to have a look at node-red.
It's an open-source product that does exactly that.
There's a set of built-in nodes.
You can develop your own nodes, or import 3rd party ones. Which are stored in NPM.
You can also just create a node with javascript or typescript code in it, on the fly.
You should check Flumejs: https://flume.dev/
https://flume.dev/docs/quick-start/
Also you should see this code sandbox example. Try to read the code
and all the dependencies: https://codesandbox.io/s/node-based-code-generation-test-forked-ll9flz?file=/src/App.tsx
I hope you find this helpful.
i'm newbie in JHipster and i'm trying to figure this, when i create a new entity JHipster generates several files, angular, html and java classes, now if i want a common code for all this generated code i must edit each time that i use the yeoman generator? what i want is:
Custom Index template, and pages, is secure to edit them?.
Customize the entity tables, entity forms using angular, maybe extending yeoman generators
Customize generate java classes, maybe i think using AOP
So i need to edit each time for each generated code? and is a good practice this or what i want? for clarify more i want to use a Custom Bootstrap/angular Dashboard template like Minovate, i see how to customize bootstrap in the documentation but not about what i'm asking for, Thanks.
JHipster is just a code generator, once generated the code is yours.
For angular screens I would say do as much as you can in CSS/SASS.
But it's very likely that you will need to build some screen mixing several entities and change the structure of entity screens.
So you should rather consider them as a starting point and do your own stuff in another folder so that it does not get overwritten by next re-generations.
This way you can still update your entity definitions in .jhipster folder and re-run yo jhispter:entity <entity name> on the entities you modified.
Customising java Entities is usually much simpler and you can easiliy achieve this by merging generated code with git and defining your service classes.
AOP seems overkill here.
Extending a yeoman generator is a lot of work.
I suggest to use some VSC (git, subversion or whatever you like) have a branch dedicated to plain jhipster generated code and another one where you make customization.
Eventually regenerate on jhipster branch and merge back on yours.
You should at least reduce manual intervention.
Is it possible to turn off Entity Framework using the web.config? In the application I'm developing we have the following environments
Development
Continuous Integration
Integration Testing
Production
The Integration Testing and Production databases are managed by a database administrator, so we have to send them a script to make changes to the database.
I've spent hours Googling and looking through old projects, and I can't find how to do this or remember if we ever turned off migrations on the old projects in the first place.
From the lack of information I'm doubting if what I'm asking is needed or possible, but there is something in the back of my head that's annoying me about this so I thought I'd ask the experts.
The easiest method is to simply delete the dbo._MigrationHistory table from these environments. If that table doesn't exist, then only an "initial" migration can ever be generated against that database, which will fail if someone tries to actually apply it to a database with existing tables.
You could set the database initializer in the config file as described at the bottom here, so you can have an updating initializer in the environments you want
Is it possible using EF6 Code First and MVC5 to put all the models, views, and controllers that involve ASP.Identity into its own class library project. So that over multiple web applications you could use that same DLL and already have all the views / controllers / models and be using the same security database for multiple applications?
We have several web applications with separate databases and one security database that handles all of them, and we weren't sure how to keep this model now that we're moving to EF6 Code First and MVC5.
If it is possible could someone point me to a tutorial of something similar or give me a basic outline of steps to go through?
Or if there is a better way to achieve my goal, of having one set of code to handle ASP.NET-Identity security that I can plug that dll into multiple web applications and get the same logic and databases?
Or is this not a good idea in general?
Very open to suggestion and advice. I appreciate it.
Yes it is. We do this with every project that we have. The structure is very simple. Just create a class library project to your solution, add EF to the project, then reference the class library from your main project.
If using Code First Migrations be sure to select the class library project as the default project in the Package Manager console when running migrations or adding migrations.
Here is a pseudo solution structure for your solution
MySolution
- MyWebApp
reference: MyDAL
-MyDAL
reference: EF6
The advantage that I find to this is that you can then reference the "DAL" class library from say a companion console application or windows form application, or a companion website, even in a different solution, and they will use the same code base.
For example:
MySolution
- MyWebApp
reference: MyDAL
- MyDAL
reference: EF6
- MyOtherWebApp
reference: MyDAL
NOTE: Your data context will look for its connection string in the Web.config or App.config in the startup project. NOT the class library. This can be confusing at first... But once you think about how .NET compiles the application together into the final package, it makes sense.
If you're talking about creating one class library for an entire data layer shared between multiple projects, then that's easy enough. You can move all your models, your context, etc. into a class library and run migrations using the class library project. The other projects will just reference that class library and not have migrations of their own.
However, if you're talking about multiple databases and associated data layers, where project Foo has its own models, context and migrations and project Bar has its own models, context and migrations, while the class library has just the IdentityUser and IdentityDbContext, things get a little more complicated. You won't be able to combine any of these contexts. So in your Foo project you'd have to instantiate your context for Foo and your Identity context if you need to work with both. It's not a problem, per se, but it's something to be aware of.
I'm new to Haskell and Snap and I want to write a simple bug-tracking application. I set up a Snap project using $ snap init and it works. The problem is that I don't know how to go any further.
I want to create a snaplet Tickets that uses a database to store bug reports, and use that snaplet in my main web application.
I read the documentation about snaplets but I couldn't figure out where to put their source code (in the /snaplets directory, I suppose? If so, how do I load them?). Could anybody point me in the right direction?
Are you sure you need to create a separate snaplet for Tickets? The snaplet infrasructure is meant for reusable components such as session management, authentication, database access, admin panels, user management, etc.
Are you going to be using your Tickets self-contained module across multiple web applications? If so, then by all means go ahead and create a snaplet.
In any case, it sounds to me like you are at least in part asking how to organize a project with multiple "modules" or "parts" while using snap. I'll try to address this below. Please let me know if you feel I have missed the mark.
Assuming you don't need to create a separate snaplet for Tickets:
For functionality specific to a single site, I think you would be better off creating a few modules and developing the code for the functionality right inside your current application's package and module hierarchy. Here are a few points on how I have been organizing my snap projects of late:
I put my database-related code under modules in MyApp.DB.
namespace. You could have a MyApp.DB.Tickets that contains all
database calls needed for operation on your Tickets module.
I put all UI-related functionality under MyApp.UI. namespace. You
could put a MyApp.UI.Tickets module that contains your Handlers,
your Splices, your Forms and so on.
To handle forms, I use the excellent digestive-functors library. You may find this blog post helpful if you don't know them already.
I usually have a shared UI helper library under MyApp.UI.Helpers where I place common code used across all/most UI modules.
I usually have a shared Form helper library under MyApp.UI.Forms
Any code tangential to the fact that my application exposes a Web UI goes outside the MyApp.UI. namespace. So if my application needs to perform some offline analyses, I may put them under the MyApp.Analysis. namespace.
Once you define and export your Handlers under MyApp.UI.Tickets, you can go to your Site.hs file and wire them into your application at specific routes.
For inspiration on how to handle database connections, you can check out the postgresql-simple snaplet.
However, if you do need to create a snaplet:
A snaplet is simply a stand-alone application that uses the Snap.Snaplet infrastructure, (typically) has its own .cabal file and (typically) is its own Haskell package. Snap then gives you a way to embed or nest this re-usable, self-contained application in yet another snap application. Think a hierarchy of Russian dolls.
Assuming you performed something similar to what I described in the section above, you are now 95% ready to convert to a snaplet. Just name your application snaplet-tickets, expose a SnapletInit using makeSnaplet and use nestSnaplet in another snap application to include this reusable piece of functionality right there.