This question already has an answer here:
Node.js plans to support import/export ES6 (ECMAScript 2015) modules
(1 answer)
Closed 5 years ago.
I am looking at a NodeJS project, which is downloaded from GitHub. It has a main file, server.js, which uses the ES6 module import syntax like this:
import express from 'express';
import bodyParser from 'body-parser';
import fs from 'fs';
import { search } from './lib/words';
I have NodeJS version 4.6.0 installed, which is pretty old, and I do not think it supports this syntax. Instead, it should be like:
var express = require(express)
var bodyParser = require('body-parser')
...
However I can run this project correctly without error, which I think shows that NodeJS supports this syntax, but the NodeJS documentation never specifies such module syntax. What is the reason we can use it here? Thank you for help.
When you run npm start, the start script in the package.json is run, meaning that start.js gets executed.
start.js uses babel-register to transpile the new ES6 syntax (including the imports) to plain ES5 JavaScript that Node understands on the fly. The .babelrc shows that the es2015 preset is being used, which converts ES2015 (ES6) code to normal ES5 JS.
The particular transformer that matters to you is transform-es2015-modules-commonjs, which will transform import to require as expected.
Related
We are developing a project that uses commonjs. When node-fetch is updated to v3.x, jest complains that:
import fetch, { RequestInfo, RequestInit, Response } from 'node-fetch';
SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module
npm run build succeeds.
If I use node --experimental-vm-modules node_modules/.bin/jest instead of jest, I get:
Must use import to load ES Module
I did some reading, it appears that we need to migrate our project to be an ESM as well. But it does not appear to be easy.
So the question is: when a dependency becomes pure ESM, how do we handle that in our code?
FYI, our project is: https://gitlab.com/tezgraph/tezgraph
I'm new to nodejs.
I see we are using
const http = require('http')
instead of import . I found of that is because nodejs is older than es6
why node uses require not import?
However, I can use arrow functions. which is es6. how it is possible?
Thanks
It's finally happened: nearly 4 years after the import keyword was introduced in ES6, Node.js introduced experimental support for ES6 imports and exports. In Node.js 12, you can use import and export in your project if you do both of the below items.
1) Add the --experimental-modules flag when running Node.js
2) Use the .mjs extension or set "type": "module" in your package.json.
This package.json is very important. The type: "module" property tells Node.js to treat .js files as ESM modules. In other words, {"type":"module"} tells Node.js to expect import and export statements in .js files.
You can run file like this
node --experimental-modules index.js
This question already has answers here:
Node.js - SyntaxError: Unexpected token import
(16 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I'm trying to get the hang of ES6 imports in Node.js and am trying to use the syntax provided in this example:
Cheatsheet Link
I'm looking through the support table, but I was not able to find what version supports the new import statements (I tried looking for the text import/require). I'm currently running Node.js 8.1.2 and also believe that since the cheatsheet is referring to .js files it should work with .js files.
As I run the code (taken from the cheatsheet's first example):
import { square, diag } from 'lib';
I get the error:
SyntaxError: Unexpected token import.
Reference to library I'm trying to import:
//------ lib.js ------
export const sqrt = Math.sqrt;
export function square(x) {
return x * x;
}
export function diag(x, y) {
return sqrt(square(x) + square(y));
}
What am I missing and how can I get node to recognize my import statement?
Node.js has included experimental support for ES6 support.
Read more about here: https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v13.x/api/esm.html#esm_enabling.
TLDR;
Node.js >= v13
It's very simple in Node.js 13 and above. You need to either:
Save the file with .mjs extension, or
Add { "type": "module" } in the nearest package.json.
You only need to do one of the above to be able to use ECMAScript modules.
Node.js <= v12
If you are using Node.js version 9.6 - 12, save the file with ES6 modules with .mjs extension and run it like:
node --experimental-modules my-app.mjs
You can also use npm package called esm which allows you to use ES6 modules in Node.js. It needs no configuration. With esm you will be able to use export/import in your JavaScript files.
Run the following command on your terminal
yarn add esm
or
npm install esm
After that, you need to require this package when starting your server with node. For example if your node server runs index.js file, you would use the command
node -r esm index.js
You can also add it in your package.json file like this
{
"name": "My-app",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Some Hack",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1",
"start": "node -r esm index.js"
},
}
Then run this command from the terminal to start your node server
npm start
Check this link for more details.
I just wanted to use the import and export in JavaScript files.
Everyone says it's not possible. But, as of May 2018, it's possible to use above in plain Node.js, without any modules like Babel, etc.
Here is a simple way to do it.
Create the below files, run, and see the output for yourself.
Also don't forget to see Explanation below.
File myfile.mjs
function myFunc() {
console.log("Hello from myFunc")
}
export default myFunc;
File index.mjs
import myFunc from "./myfile.mjs" // Simply using "./myfile" may not work in all resolvers
myFunc();
Run
node --experimental-modules index.mjs
Output
(node:12020) ExperimentalWarning: The ESM module loader is experimental.
Hello from myFunc
Explanation:
Since it is experimental modules, .js files are named .mjs files
While running you will add --experimental-modules to the node index.mjs
While running with experimental modules in the output you will see: "(node:12020) ExperimentalWarning: The ESM module loader is experimental.
"
I have the current release of Node.js, so if I run node --version, it gives me "v10.3.0", though the LTE/stable/recommended version is 8.11.2 LTS.
Someday in the future, you could use .js instead of .mjs, as the features become stable instead of Experimental.
More on experimental features, see: https://nodejs.org/api/esm.html
Using Node.js v12.2.0, I can import all standard modules like this:
import * as Http from 'http'
import * as Fs from 'fs'
import * as Path from 'path'
import * as Readline from 'readline'
import * as Os from 'os'
Versus what I did before:
const
Http = require('http')
,Fs = require('fs')
,Path = require('path')
,Readline = require('readline')
,Os = require('os')
Any module that is an ECMAScript module can be imported without having to use an .mjs extension as long as it has this field in its package.json file:
"type": "module"
So make sure you put such a package.json file in the same folder as the module you're making.
And to import modules not updated with ECMAScript module support, you can do like this:
// Implement the old require function
import { createRequire } from 'module'
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url)
// Now you can require whatever
const
WebSocket = require('ws')
,Mime = require('mime-types')
,Chokidar = require('chokidar')
And of course, do not forget that this is needed to actually run a script using module imports (not needed after v13.2):
node --experimental-modules my-script-that-use-import.js
And that the parent folder needs this package.json file for that script to not complain about the import syntax:
{
"type": "module"
}
If the module you want to use has not been updated to support being imported using the import syntax then you have no other choice than using require (but with my solution above that is not a problem).
I also want to share this piece of code which implements the missing __filename and __dirname constants in modules:
import {fileURLToPath} from 'url'
import {dirname} from 'path'
const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)
const __dirname = dirname(__filename)
If you are using the modules system on the server side, you do not need to use Babel at all. To use modules in Node.js ensure that:
Use a version of node that supports the --experimental-modules flag
Your *.js files must then be renamed to *.mjs
That's it.
However and this is a big however, while your shinny pure ES6 code will run in an environment like Node.js (e.g., 9.5.0) you will still have the craziness of transpilling just to test. Also bear in mind that Ecma has stated that release cycles for JavaScript are going to be faster, with newer features delivered on a more regular basis. Whilst this will be no problems for single environments like Node.js, it's a slightly different proposition for browser environments. What is clear is that testing frameworks have a lot to do in catching up. You will still need to probably transpile for testing frameworks. I'd suggest using Jest.
Also be aware of bundling frameworks. You will be running into problems there.
Use:
"devDependencies": {
"#babel/core": "^7.2.0",
"#babel/preset-env": "^7.2.0",
"#babel/register": "^7.0.0"
}
File .babelrc
{
"presets": ["#babel/preset-env"]
}
Entry point for the Node.js application:
require("#babel/register")({})
// Import the rest of our application.
module.exports = require('./index.js')
See How To Enable ES6 Imports in Node.js
You may try esm.
Here is some introduction: esm
Using the .mjs extension (as suggested in the accepted answer) in order to enable ECMAScript modules works. However, with Node.js v12, you can also enable this feature globally in your package.json file.
The official documentation states:
import statements of .js and extensionless files are treated as ES modules if the nearest parent package.json contains "type": "module".
{
"type": "module",
"main": "./src/index.js"
}
(Of course you still have to provide the flag --experimental-modules when starting your application.)
Back to Jonathan002's original question about
"... what version supports the new ES6 import statements?"
based on the article by Dr. Axel Rauschmayer, there is a plan to have it supported by default (without the experimental command line flag) in Node.js 10.x LTS. According to node.js's release plan as it is on 3/29, 2018, it's likely to become available after Apr 2018, while LTS of it will begin on October 2018.
Solution
https://www.npmjs.com/package/babel-register
// This is to allow ES6 export syntax
// to be properly read and processed by node.js application
require('babel-register')({
presets: [
'env',
],
});
// After that, any line you add below that has typical ES6 export syntax
// will work just fine
const utils = require('../../utils.js');
const availableMixins = require('../../../src/lib/mixins/index.js');
Below is definition of file *mixins/index.js
export { default as FormValidationMixin } from './form-validation'; // eslint-disable-line import/prefer-default-export
That worked just fine inside my Node.js CLI application.
I don't know if this will work for your case, but I am running an Express.js server with this:
nodemon --inspect ./index.js --exec babel-node --presets es2015,stage-2
This gives me the ability to import and use spread operator even though I'm only using Node.js version 8.
You'll need to install babel-cli, babel-preset-es2015, and babel-preset-stage-2 to do what I'm doing.
This question already has answers here:
Node.js - SyntaxError: Unexpected token import
(16 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I'm trying to get the hang of ES6 imports in Node.js and am trying to use the syntax provided in this example:
Cheatsheet Link
I'm looking through the support table, but I was not able to find what version supports the new import statements (I tried looking for the text import/require). I'm currently running Node.js 8.1.2 and also believe that since the cheatsheet is referring to .js files it should work with .js files.
As I run the code (taken from the cheatsheet's first example):
import { square, diag } from 'lib';
I get the error:
SyntaxError: Unexpected token import.
Reference to library I'm trying to import:
//------ lib.js ------
export const sqrt = Math.sqrt;
export function square(x) {
return x * x;
}
export function diag(x, y) {
return sqrt(square(x) + square(y));
}
What am I missing and how can I get node to recognize my import statement?
Node.js has included experimental support for ES6 support.
Read more about here: https://nodejs.org/docs/latest-v13.x/api/esm.html#esm_enabling.
TLDR;
Node.js >= v13
It's very simple in Node.js 13 and above. You need to either:
Save the file with .mjs extension, or
Add { "type": "module" } in the nearest package.json.
You only need to do one of the above to be able to use ECMAScript modules.
Node.js <= v12
If you are using Node.js version 9.6 - 12, save the file with ES6 modules with .mjs extension and run it like:
node --experimental-modules my-app.mjs
You can also use npm package called esm which allows you to use ES6 modules in Node.js. It needs no configuration. With esm you will be able to use export/import in your JavaScript files.
Run the following command on your terminal
yarn add esm
or
npm install esm
After that, you need to require this package when starting your server with node. For example if your node server runs index.js file, you would use the command
node -r esm index.js
You can also add it in your package.json file like this
{
"name": "My-app",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Some Hack",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1",
"start": "node -r esm index.js"
},
}
Then run this command from the terminal to start your node server
npm start
Check this link for more details.
I just wanted to use the import and export in JavaScript files.
Everyone says it's not possible. But, as of May 2018, it's possible to use above in plain Node.js, without any modules like Babel, etc.
Here is a simple way to do it.
Create the below files, run, and see the output for yourself.
Also don't forget to see Explanation below.
File myfile.mjs
function myFunc() {
console.log("Hello from myFunc")
}
export default myFunc;
File index.mjs
import myFunc from "./myfile.mjs" // Simply using "./myfile" may not work in all resolvers
myFunc();
Run
node --experimental-modules index.mjs
Output
(node:12020) ExperimentalWarning: The ESM module loader is experimental.
Hello from myFunc
Explanation:
Since it is experimental modules, .js files are named .mjs files
While running you will add --experimental-modules to the node index.mjs
While running with experimental modules in the output you will see: "(node:12020) ExperimentalWarning: The ESM module loader is experimental.
"
I have the current release of Node.js, so if I run node --version, it gives me "v10.3.0", though the LTE/stable/recommended version is 8.11.2 LTS.
Someday in the future, you could use .js instead of .mjs, as the features become stable instead of Experimental.
More on experimental features, see: https://nodejs.org/api/esm.html
Using Node.js v12.2.0, I can import all standard modules like this:
import * as Http from 'http'
import * as Fs from 'fs'
import * as Path from 'path'
import * as Readline from 'readline'
import * as Os from 'os'
Versus what I did before:
const
Http = require('http')
,Fs = require('fs')
,Path = require('path')
,Readline = require('readline')
,Os = require('os')
Any module that is an ECMAScript module can be imported without having to use an .mjs extension as long as it has this field in its package.json file:
"type": "module"
So make sure you put such a package.json file in the same folder as the module you're making.
And to import modules not updated with ECMAScript module support, you can do like this:
// Implement the old require function
import { createRequire } from 'module'
const require = createRequire(import.meta.url)
// Now you can require whatever
const
WebSocket = require('ws')
,Mime = require('mime-types')
,Chokidar = require('chokidar')
And of course, do not forget that this is needed to actually run a script using module imports (not needed after v13.2):
node --experimental-modules my-script-that-use-import.js
And that the parent folder needs this package.json file for that script to not complain about the import syntax:
{
"type": "module"
}
If the module you want to use has not been updated to support being imported using the import syntax then you have no other choice than using require (but with my solution above that is not a problem).
I also want to share this piece of code which implements the missing __filename and __dirname constants in modules:
import {fileURLToPath} from 'url'
import {dirname} from 'path'
const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)
const __dirname = dirname(__filename)
If you are using the modules system on the server side, you do not need to use Babel at all. To use modules in Node.js ensure that:
Use a version of node that supports the --experimental-modules flag
Your *.js files must then be renamed to *.mjs
That's it.
However and this is a big however, while your shinny pure ES6 code will run in an environment like Node.js (e.g., 9.5.0) you will still have the craziness of transpilling just to test. Also bear in mind that Ecma has stated that release cycles for JavaScript are going to be faster, with newer features delivered on a more regular basis. Whilst this will be no problems for single environments like Node.js, it's a slightly different proposition for browser environments. What is clear is that testing frameworks have a lot to do in catching up. You will still need to probably transpile for testing frameworks. I'd suggest using Jest.
Also be aware of bundling frameworks. You will be running into problems there.
Use:
"devDependencies": {
"#babel/core": "^7.2.0",
"#babel/preset-env": "^7.2.0",
"#babel/register": "^7.0.0"
}
File .babelrc
{
"presets": ["#babel/preset-env"]
}
Entry point for the Node.js application:
require("#babel/register")({})
// Import the rest of our application.
module.exports = require('./index.js')
See How To Enable ES6 Imports in Node.js
You may try esm.
Here is some introduction: esm
Using the .mjs extension (as suggested in the accepted answer) in order to enable ECMAScript modules works. However, with Node.js v12, you can also enable this feature globally in your package.json file.
The official documentation states:
import statements of .js and extensionless files are treated as ES modules if the nearest parent package.json contains "type": "module".
{
"type": "module",
"main": "./src/index.js"
}
(Of course you still have to provide the flag --experimental-modules when starting your application.)
Back to Jonathan002's original question about
"... what version supports the new ES6 import statements?"
based on the article by Dr. Axel Rauschmayer, there is a plan to have it supported by default (without the experimental command line flag) in Node.js 10.x LTS. According to node.js's release plan as it is on 3/29, 2018, it's likely to become available after Apr 2018, while LTS of it will begin on October 2018.
Solution
https://www.npmjs.com/package/babel-register
// This is to allow ES6 export syntax
// to be properly read and processed by node.js application
require('babel-register')({
presets: [
'env',
],
});
// After that, any line you add below that has typical ES6 export syntax
// will work just fine
const utils = require('../../utils.js');
const availableMixins = require('../../../src/lib/mixins/index.js');
Below is definition of file *mixins/index.js
export { default as FormValidationMixin } from './form-validation'; // eslint-disable-line import/prefer-default-export
That worked just fine inside my Node.js CLI application.
I don't know if this will work for your case, but I am running an Express.js server with this:
nodemon --inspect ./index.js --exec babel-node --presets es2015,stage-2
This gives me the ability to import and use spread operator even though I'm only using Node.js version 8.
You'll need to install babel-cli, babel-preset-es2015, and babel-preset-stage-2 to do what I'm doing.
As per understanding , Node js uses CommonJS module pattern , and in CommonJS
pattern we use require() to import a node module.
In Angular 2 application development we use #angular/core , #angular/common etc
node modules.
My question is:
Why do we use "import {} from '#angular/core'"[which is ES6 module syntax]
instead of commonJS require() syntax for accessing node modules
in angular2 code files.
The reason for this, is that Angular2 is written in TypeScript.
TypeScript is a superset of ES2015, and wants to be as close to ES2015 suggested syntax as possible. That's why you use the ES2015 import {} from syntax.
However, TypeScript also comes with a built-in transpiler (tsc). Meaning you write TypeScript code, but target a specific EcmaScript version in your tsconfig.json
When targetting ES5 and looking into the transpiled code, you will
clearly see that behind the scenes TypeScript will translate import {} from to require()in the transpiled files.
When targetting ES6, of course in the transpiled code, your imports will be ES2015 imports. Be aware that when targetting ES6, you will need babel to transpile your ES6 modules to ES5 or use System.js to load your ES6 modules in the browser.
Cheers