I am currently trying to create a script with error handling.
Basically the script tests the ssh connection with this command :
ssh -o BatchMode=yes $machine uname -a
There is 3 potential situation that i want to handle :
SSH works just fine without password
SSH is blocked because the machine isn't in the known_hosts file in .ssh
SSH is blocked because the machine isn't in the known_hosts file in .ssh AND it requires a password to continue (which means the id_rsa.pub isn't in the authorized_keys file in .ssh
I have on main script that is calling an expect script here is what the main script looks like :
ssh -o BatchMode=yes ${machine} uname -a &> temp-file.txt 2>&1
# Here we test the ssh connection just once and we store the output of the command in a temp file
if [ $? -eq 255 ]
# If the ssh didn't work
then
if grep -q "Host key verification failed." temp-file.txt
# If the error message is "Host key verification failed."
then
expect script-expect-knownhosts.exp ${machine} 2>&1 >/dev/null
And here is the script-expect-knownhosts.exp file in which i tried to make a condition :
#!/usr/bin/expect -f
set machine [lindex $argv 0]
# Here we state that the first argument used with the command will be the $machine variable
set prompt "#|%|>|\$ $"
set timeout 60
spawn ssh $machine
# We do a ssh on the machine
set prompt "#|%|>|\$ $"
expect {
"Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? " {send "yes\r";exp_continue}
# If he asks for a yes/no answer, then answer yes to add the machine to the known_hosts file
-exact "Password: " {send -- "^C";exp_continue}
# If he asks for a password, then send a CTRL + C
-re $prompt {send "exit\r";exp_continue}
# If the prompt shows up (if after the yes/no question, we don't need to put a password in) then type exit
}
So here is what happens when i execute the expect script with a machine in case number 2 (works just fine):
spawn ssh machine
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
machine:~ # exit
deconnection
Connection to machine closed.
And here is what happens when i execute the expect script with a machine in case number 3 :
spawn ssh machine
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
Password:
And it stays stuck on Password until i manually do a CTRL + C
In cases 2 and 3 you don't need exp_continue because you are stopping the connection process.
For case 2, I don't think you really want to send a control-C. When you do this interactively, typing control-C has the effect of sending a signal to kill the process you are interacting with. What you really want is to stop the ssh process, so instead of send -- "^C";exp_continue you should just do close.
I need to create a bash script that will remotely run another script on a batch of machines. To do so I am passing a script through SSH.
ssh -p$port root#$ip 'bash -s' < /path/to/script/test.sh
I thought it would use my RSA keys but I am getting error:
"Enter password: ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'#'localhost' (using password: YES)"
I tried using sshpass to no avail. So my next solution was using expect. I have never used expect before and I'm positive my syntax is way off.
ssh -p$port root#$ip 'bash -s' < /path/to/script/test.sh
/usr/bin/expect <<EOD
expect "password"
send "$spass\n"
send "\n"
EOD
I have root access to all machines and ANY solution will do as long as the code remains within bash. Just keep in mind that this will be done in a loop with global variables ($spass, $ip, $port, etc) passed from a parent script.
You are doing it wrong in two means:
If you want expect to interact with ssh, you need to start ssh from expect script and not before.
If you put the script (/path/to/script/test.sh) to stdin of ssh, you can't communicate with the ssh process any more.
You should rather copy the script to remote host using scp and then run it.
Expect script might look like this:
/usr/bin/expect <<EOF
spawn ssh -p$port root#$ip
expect "password"
send "$Spass\r"
expect "$ "
send "/path/to/script/on/remote/server/test.sh\r"
expect "$ "
interact
EOF
#!/usr/bin/expect
#Replace with remote username and remote ipaddress
spawn /usr/bin/ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no username#IPAddress
#Replace with remote username and remote ipaddress
expect "username#IPAddress's password: "
#Provide remote system password
send "urpassword\n"
#add commands to be executed. Also possible to execute bash scripts
expect "$ " {send "pwd\n"} # bash command
expect "$ " {send "cd mytest\n"}
expect "$ " {send "./first.sh\n"} # bash scripts
expect "$ " {send "exit\n"}
interact
I am looking to script something in batch which will need to run remote ssh commands on Linux. I would want the output returned so I can either display it on the screen or log it.
I tried putty.exe -ssh user#host -pw password -m command_run but it doesn't return anything on my screen.
Anyone done this before?
The -m switch of PuTTY takes a path to a script file as an argument, not a command.
Reference: https://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/latest/htmldoc/Chapter3.html#using-cmdline-m
So you have to save your command (command_run) to a plain text file (e.g. c:\path\command.txt) and pass that to PuTTY:
putty.exe -ssh user#host -pw password -m c:\path\command.txt
Though note that you should use Plink (a command-line connection tool from PuTTY suite). It's a console application, so you can redirect its output to a file (what you cannot do with PuTTY).
A command-line syntax is identical, an output redirection added:
plink.exe -ssh user#host -pw password -m c:\path\command.txt > output.txt
See Using the command-line connection tool Plink.
And with Plink, you can actually provide the command directly on its command-line:
plink.exe -ssh user#host -pw password command > output.txt
Similar questions:
Automating running command on Linux from Windows using PuTTY
Executing command in Plink from a batch file
You can also use Bash on Ubuntu on Windows directly. E.g.,
bash -c "ssh -t user#computer 'cd /; sudo my-command'"
Per Martin Prikryl's comment below:
The -t enables terminal emulation. Whether you need the terminal emulation for sudo depends on configuration (and by default you do no need it, while many distributions override the default). On the contrary, many other commands need terminal emulation.
As an alternative option you could install OpenSSH http://www.mls-software.com/opensshd.html and then simply ssh user#host -pw password -m command_run
Edit: After a response from user2687375 when installing, select client only. Once this is done you should be able to initiate SSH from command.
Then you can create an ssh batch script such as
ECHO OFF
CLS
:MENU
ECHO.
ECHO ........................
ECHO SSH servers
ECHO ........................
ECHO.
ECHO 1 - Web Server 1
ECHO 2 - Web Server 2
ECHO E - EXIT
ECHO.
SET /P M=Type 1 - 2 then press ENTER:
IF %M%==1 GOTO WEB1
IF %M%==2 GOTO WEB2
IF %M%==E GOTO EOF
REM ------------------------------
REM SSH Server details
REM ------------------------------
:WEB1
CLS
call ssh user#xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
cmd /k
:WEB2
CLS
call ssh user#xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
cmd /k
Lets assume the script i want to write ssh to 1.2.3.4 and then invokes
ls.
The problem is that when the line "ssh 1.2.3.4" is invoked, a password is
Required, hence, the flow is stopped, even when i fill the password,
The script wont continue.
How can i make the script continue after the password is given?
Thx!
You want to do public key authentication. Here are some resources which should get you going.
http://magicmonster.com/kb/net/ssh/auto_login.html
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/research/groups/vision/doc/auto/ssh/ssh_public_key_authentication.html
I would post a couple more links, but I don't have enough reputation points. ;) Just google on "SSH automated login" or "SSH public key authentication" if you need more help.
Actually you're trying to run ls locally but you have an ssh session opened. So it won't run ls until the session is opened. If you want to run ls remotely, you should use
ssh username#host COMMAND
Where command is the command you want to run. Ssh session will finish as soon as the command is invoked and you can capture its output normally.
I would suggest you to use RSA authentication method for script that needs ssh.
I just tried this script:
#!/bin/sh
ssh vps1 ls
mkdir temp
cd temp
echo test > file.txt
And it works. I can connect to my server and list my home. Then, locally, it creates temp dir, cd into it and then creates file.txt with 'test' inside.
write simple login bash script named login_to and give exec permissions (chmod 744 login_to)
#!/bin/bash
if [ $1 = 'srv1' ]; then
echo 'srv1-pass' | pbcopy
ssh root#11.11.11.11
fi
if [ $1 = 'foo' ]; then
echo 'barbaz' | pbcopy
ssh -t dux#22.22.22.22 'cd ~/somedir/someotherdir; bash'
fi
now use it like this
login_to srv1
login_to foo
When asked for password, just pate (ctrl+v or command+v) and you will be logged in.
I am trying to write a shell script that creates some directories on a remote server and then uses scp to copy files from my local machine onto the remote. Here's what I have so far:
ssh -t user#server<<EOT
DEP_ROOT='/home/matthewr/releases'
datestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)
REL_DIR=$DEP_ROOT"/"$datestamp
if [ ! -d "$DEP_ROOT" ]; then
echo "creating the root directory"
mkdir $DEP_ROOT
fi
mkdir $REL_DIR
exit
EOT
scp ./dir1 user#server:$REL_DIR
scp ./dir2 user#server:$REL_DIR
Whenever I run it I get this message:
Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.
And the script just hangs forever.
My public key is trusted on the server and I can run all the commands outside of the script just fine. Any ideas?
Try ssh -t -t(or ssh -tt for short) to force pseudo-tty allocation even if stdin isn't a terminal.
See also: Terminating SSH session executed by bash script
From ssh manpage:
-T Disable pseudo-tty allocation.
-t Force pseudo-tty allocation. This can be used to execute arbitrary
screen-based programs on a remote machine, which can be very useful,
e.g. when implementing menu services. Multiple -t options force tty
allocation, even if ssh has no local tty.
Also with option -T from manual
Disable pseudo-tty allocation
Per zanco's answer, you're not providing a remote command to ssh, given how the shell parses the command line. To solve this problem, change the syntax of your ssh command invocation so that the remote command is comprised of a syntactically correct, multi-line string.
There are a variety of syntaxes that can be used. For example, since commands can be piped into bash and sh, and probably other shells too, the simplest solution is to just combine ssh shell invocation with heredocs:
ssh user#server /bin/bash <<'EOT'
echo "These commands will be run on: $( uname -a )"
echo "They are executed by: $( whoami )"
EOT
Note that executing the above without /bin/bash will result in the warning Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. Also note that EOT is surrounded by single-quotes, so that bash recognizes the heredoc as a nowdoc, turning off local variable interpolation so that the command text will be passed as-is to ssh.
If you are a fan of pipes, you can rewrite the above as follows:
cat <<'EOT' | ssh user#server /bin/bash
echo "These commands will be run on: $( uname -a )"
echo "They are executed by: $( whoami )"
EOT
The same caveat about /bin/bash applies to the above.
Another valid approach is to pass the multi-line remote command as a single string, using multiple layers of bash variable interpolation as follows:
ssh user#server "$( cat <<'EOT'
echo "These commands will be run on: $( uname -a )"
echo "They are executed by: $( whoami )"
EOT
)"
The solution above fixes this problem in the following manner:
ssh user#server is parsed by bash, and is interpreted to be the ssh command, followed by an argument user#server to be passed to the ssh command
" begins an interpolated string, which when completed, will comprise an argument to be passed to the ssh command, which in this case will be interpreted by ssh to be the remote command to execute as user#server
$( begins a command to be executed, with the output being captured by the surrounding interpolated string
cat is a command to output the contents of whatever file follows. The output of cat will be passed back into the capturing interpolated string
<< begins a bash heredoc
'EOT' specifies that the name of the heredoc is EOT. The single quotes ' surrounding EOT specifies that the heredoc should be parsed as a nowdoc, which is a special form of heredoc in which the contents do not get interpolated by bash, but rather passed on in literal format
Any content that is encountered between <<'EOT' and <newline>EOT<newline> will be appended to the nowdoc output
EOT terminates the nowdoc, resulting in a nowdoc temporary file being created and passed back to the calling cat command. cat outputs the nowdoc and passes the output back to the capturing interpolated string
) concludes the command to be executed
" concludes the capturing interpolated string. The contents of the interpolated string will be passed back to ssh as a single command line argument, which ssh will interpret as the remote command to execute as user#server
If you need to avoid using external tools like cat, and don't mind having two statements instead of one, use the read built-in with a heredoc to generate the SSH command:
IFS='' read -r -d '' SSH_COMMAND <<'EOT'
echo "These commands will be run on: $( uname -a )"
echo "They are executed by: $( whoami )"
EOT
ssh user#server "${SSH_COMMAND}"
I'm adding this answer because it solved a related problem that I was having with the same error message.
Problem: I had installed cygwin under Windows and was getting this error: Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal
Resolution: It turns out that I had not installed the openssh client program and utilities. Because of that cygwin was using the Windows implementation of ssh, not the cygwin version. The solution was to install the openssh cygwin package.
All relevant information is in the existing answers, but let me attempt a pragmatic summary:
tl;dr:
DO pass the commands to run using a command-line argument:
ssh jdoe#server '...'
'...' strings can span multiple lines, so you can keep your code readable even without the use of a here-document:
ssh jdoe#server ' ... '
Do NOT pass the commands via stdin, as is the case when you use a here-document:
ssh jdoe#server <<'EOF' # Do NOT do this ... EOF
Passing the commands as an argument works as-is, and:
the problem with the pseudo-terminal will not even arise.
you won't need an exit statement at the end of your commands, because the session will automatically exit after the commands have been processed.
In short: passing commands via stdin is a mechanism that is at odds with ssh's design and causes problems that must then be worked around.
Read on, if you want to know more.
Optional background information:
ssh's mechanism for accepting commands to execute on the target server is a command-line argument: the final operand (non-option argument) accepts a string containing one or more shell commands.
By default, these commands run unattended, in a non-interactive shell, without the use of a (pseudo) terminal (option -T is implied), and the session automatically ends when the last command finishes processing.
In the event that your commands require user interaction, such as responding to an interactive prompt, you can explicitly request the creation of a pty (pseudo-tty), a pseudo terminal, that enables interacting with the remote session, using the -t option; e.g.:
ssh -t jdoe#server 'read -p "Enter something: "; echo "Entered: [$REPLY]"'
Note that the interactive read prompt only works correctly with a pty, so the -t option is needed.
Using a pty has a notable side effect: stdout and stderr are combined and both reported via stdout; in other words: you lose the distinction between regular and error output; e.g.:
ssh jdoe#server 'echo out; echo err >&2' # OK - stdout and stderr separate
ssh -t jdoe#server 'echo out; echo err >&2' # !! stdout + stderr -> stdout
In the absence of this argument, ssh creates an interactive shell - including when you send commands via stdin, which is where the trouble begins:
For an interactive shell, ssh normally allocates a pty (pseudo-terminal) by default, except if its stdin is not connected to a (real) terminal.
Sending commands via stdin means that ssh's stdin is no longer connected to a terminal, so no pty is created, and ssh warns you accordingly:
Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.
Even the -t option, whose express purpose is to request creation of a pty, is not enough in this case: you'll get the same warning.
Somewhat curiously, you must then double the -t option to force creation of a pty: ssh -t -t ... or ssh -tt ... shows that you really, really mean it.
Perhaps the rationale for requiring this very deliberate step is that things may not work as expected. For instance, on macOS 10.12, the apparent equivalent of the above command, providing the commands via stdin and using -tt, does not work properly; the session gets stuck after responding to the read prompt:
ssh -tt jdoe#server <<<'read -p "Enter something: "; echo "Entered: [$REPLY]"'
In the unlikely event that the commands you want to pass as an argument make the command line too long for your system (if its length approaches getconf ARG_MAX - see this article), consider copying the code to the remote system in the form of a script first (using, e.g., scp), and then send a command to execute that script.
In a pinch, use -T, and provide the commands via stdin, with a trailing exit command, but note that if you also need interactive features, using -tt in lieu of -T may not work.
The warning message Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. is due to the fact that no command is specified for ssh while stdin is redirected from a here document.
Due to the lack of a specified command as an argument ssh first expects an interactive login session (which would require the allocation of a pty on the remote host) but then has to realize that its local stdin is no tty/pty. Redirecting ssh's stdin from a here document normally requires a command (such as /bin/sh) to be specified as an argument to ssh - and in such a case no pty will be allocated on the remote host by default.
Since there are no commands to be executed via ssh that require the presence of a tty/pty (such as vim or top) the -t switch to ssh is superfluous.
Just use ssh -T user#server <<EOT ... or ssh user#server /bin/bash <<EOT ... and the warning will go away.
If <<EOF is not escaped or single-quoted (i. e. <<\EOT or <<'EOT') variables inside the here document will be expanded by the local shell before it is executing ssh .... The effect is that the variables inside the here document will remain empty because they are defined only in the remote shell.
So, if $REL_DIR should be both accessible by the local shell and defined in the remote shell, $REL_DIR has to be defined outside the here document before the ssh command (version 1 below); or, if <<\EOT or <<'EOT' is used, the output of the ssh command can be assigned to REL_DIR if the only output of the ssh command to stdout is genererated by echo "$REL_DIR" inside the escaped/single-quoted here document (version 2 below).
A third option would be to store the here document in a variable and then pass this variable as a command argument to ssh -t user#server "$heredoc" (version 3 below).
And, last but not least, it would be no bad idea to check if the directories on the remote host were created successfully (see: check if file exists on remote host with ssh).
# version 1
unset DEP_ROOT REL_DIR
DEP_ROOT='/tmp'
datestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)
REL_DIR="${DEP_ROOT}/${datestamp}"
ssh localhost /bin/bash <<EOF
if [ ! -d "$DEP_ROOT" ] && [ ! -e "$DEP_ROOT" ]; then
echo "creating the root directory" 1>&2
mkdir "$DEP_ROOT"
fi
mkdir "$REL_DIR"
#echo "$REL_DIR"
exit
EOF
scp -r ./dir1 user#server:"$REL_DIR"
scp -r ./dir2 user#server:"$REL_DIR"
# version 2
REL_DIR="$(
ssh localhost /bin/bash <<\EOF
DEP_ROOT='/tmp'
datestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)
REL_DIR="${DEP_ROOT}/${datestamp}"
if [ ! -d "$DEP_ROOT" ] && [ ! -e "$DEP_ROOT" ]; then
echo "creating the root directory" 1>&2
mkdir "$DEP_ROOT"
fi
mkdir "$REL_DIR"
echo "$REL_DIR"
exit
EOF
)"
scp -r ./dir1 user#server:"$REL_DIR"
scp -r ./dir2 user#server:"$REL_DIR"
# version 3
heredoc="$(cat <<'EOF'
# -onlcr: prevent the terminal from converting bare line feeds to carriage return/line feed pairs
stty -echo -onlcr
DEP_ROOT='/tmp'
datestamp="$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)"
REL_DIR="${DEP_ROOT}/${datestamp}"
if [ ! -d "$DEP_ROOT" ] && [ ! -e "$DEP_ROOT" ]; then
echo "creating the root directory" 1>&2
mkdir "$DEP_ROOT"
fi
mkdir "$REL_DIR"
echo "$REL_DIR"
stty echo onlcr
exit
EOF
)"
REL_DIR="$(ssh -t localhost "$heredoc")"
scp -r ./dir1 user#server:"$REL_DIR"
scp -r ./dir2 user#server:"$REL_DIR"
I don't know where the hang comes from, but redirecting (or piping) commands into an interactive ssh is in general a recipe for problems. It is more robust to use the command-to-run-as-a-last-argument style and pass the script on the ssh command line:
ssh user#server 'DEP_ROOT="/home/matthewr/releases"
datestamp=$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S)
REL_DIR=$DEP_ROOT"/"$datestamp
if [ ! -d "$DEP_ROOT" ]; then
echo "creating the root directory"
mkdir $DEP_ROOT
fi
mkdir $REL_DIR'
(All in one giant '-delimited multiline command-line argument).
The pseudo-terminal message is because of your -t which asks ssh to try to make the environment it runs on the remote machine look like an actual terminal to the programs that run there. Your ssh client is refusing to do that because its own standard input is not a terminal, so it has no way to pass the special terminal APIs onwards from the remote machine to your actual terminal at the local end.
What were you trying to achieve with -t anyway?
After reading a lot of these answers I thought I would share my resulting solution. All I added is /bin/bash before the heredoc and it doesn't give the error anymore.
Use this:
ssh user#machine /bin/bash <<'ENDSSH'
hostname
ENDSSH
Instead of this (gives error):
ssh user#machine <<'ENDSSH'
hostname
ENDSSH
Or use this:
ssh user#machine /bin/bash < run-command.sh
Instead of this (gives error):
ssh user#machine < run-command.sh
EXTRA:
If you still want a remote interactive prompt e.g. if the script you're running remotely prompts you for a password or other information, because the previous solutions won't allow you to type into the prompts.
ssh -t user#machine "$(<run-command.sh)"
And if you also want to log the entire session in a file logfile.log:
ssh -t user#machine "$(<run-command.sh)" | tee -a logfile.log
I was having the same error under Windows using emacs 24.5.1 to connect to some company servers through /ssh:user#host. What solved my problem was setting the "tramp-default-method" variable to "plink" and whenever I connect to a server I ommit the ssh protocol. You need to have PuTTY's plink.exe installed for this to work.
Solution
M-x customize-variable (and then hit Enter)
tramp-default-method (and then hit Enter again)
On the text field put plink and then Apply and Save the buffer
Whenever I try to access a remote server I now use C-x-f /user#host: and then input the password. The connection is now correctly made under Emacs on Windows to my remote server.