I have a bash script which i want to call from any directory, but i don't want to add the directory it is in to PATH as it is filled with lots of other scripts which will just clutter.
The script in question manipulates environment variables, so i have to source it.
I tried creating an alias
alias aliastoscript="/path/to/script"
source aliastoscript #This does not work says no such file
I also can't copy the script itself to a different location as it depends on the directory structure and other scripts in the directory.
So i tried a symlink to a location already in path:
ln -s /path/to/script /directory/already/in/path/myscript
But this does not work either:
source myscript #says no such file exists
Can anyone suggest how i achieve this? And why does the symlink approach not work?
If it makes any difference, i am using a zsh shell on ubuntu 14.04
EDIT:
The answer given below works, but i also wanted to know why the symlink approach was not working.
Here is the sequence of commands
ln -s /path/to/script /directory/already/in/path/myscript
#Now there is a symlink called myscript in a directory which is in PATH
source myscript arg1 #This throws an error saying no such file myscript,
#but it is not supposed to happen because myscript resides in a directory which is in PATH
EDIT 2:
I just figured what i was doing wrong, the symlink i created, i had used relative paths, totally stupid of me, using absolute paths it worked like a charm.
Try replacing:
alias aliastoscript="/path/to/script"
with:
export aliastoscript="/path/to/script"
You have a $ missing in front of the variable name.
source $aliastoscript
You do not need soft link for the source. The complete file name should work. Better is
source /path/to/script
Related
kdevelop provides this AppImage binary:
wget -O KDevelop.AppImage https://download.kde.org/stable/kdevelop/5.1.1/bin/linux/KDevelop-5.1.1-x86_64.AppImage
chmod +x KDevelop.AppImage
./KDevelop.AppImage
It works well. So I want to make a soft link called kd to that binary in /usr/bin, eg:
/usr/bin/sudo ln -s KDevelop-5.1.1-x86_64.AppImage kd
Now if I run kd file1, I'd expect that it would open a file name file1 in the current folder, but it always tries to open a file name file1 in my home folder - which is not where it should be.
Is there some way to fix this issue?
Some possible causes:
The application always assumes that you want to open files in your home directory, effectively or literally prepending $HOME to the path. This would be a bug in any *nix program, and should be reported.
The application behaves differently when $(basename "$0") is not KDevelop.AppImage (what #Scheff said).
You are actually running a different kd.
Possible workarounds/investigations:
Pass the full path to the file on the command line. If it tries to open /home/you//full/path/you/provided it is obviously buggy, and you have a test case. If it does not, then there might be some gotcha to what your $PWD actually is. Try checking its value before running.
Symlink with the same name, using sudo ln -s KDevelop-5.1.1-x86_64.AppImage /usr/bin, and try running that. If it behaves the same, you've at least proven that the symlink is not the problem.
Run type -a kd and verify that your /usr/bin/kd comes up first. If not there might be an alias or shell built-in which takes precedence.
That said, what is the actual error message?
I have a bash script, which I use for configuration of different parameters in text files in my wireless access media server.
The script is located in one directory, and because I do all of configurations using putty, I have to either use the full path of the file or move to the directory that contains the file. I would like to avoid this.
Is it possible to save the bash script in or edit the bash script so that I can run it as command, for example as cp or ls commands?
The script needs to be executable, with:
chmod +x scriptname
(or similar).
Also, you want the script to be located in a directory that is in your PATH.
To see your PATH use:
echo $PATH
Your choices are: to move (or link) the file into one of those directories, or to add the directory it is in to your PATH.
You can add a directory to your PATH with:
PATH=$PATH:/name/of/my/directory
and if you do this in the file $HOME/.bashrc it will happen for each of your shell's automatically.
You can place a softlink to the script under /usr/local/bin (Should be in $PATH like John said)
ln -s /path/to/script /usr/local/bin/scriptname
This should do the trick.
You can write a minimal wrapper in your home directory:
#!/bin/bash
exec /yourpath/yourfile.extension
And run your child script with this command ./NameOfYourScript
update: Unix hawks will probably say the first solution is a no-brainer because of the additional admin work it will load on you. Agreed, but on your requirements, my solution works :)
Otherwise, you can use an alias; you will have to amend your .bashrc
alias menu='bash /yourpath/menuScript.sh'
Another way is to run it with:
/bin/bash /path/to/script
Then the file doesn't need to be executable.
I want to add a small script to the linux PATH so I don't have to actually run it where it's physically placed on disk.
The script is quite simple is about giving apt-get access through a proxy I made it like this:
#!/bin/bash
array=( $# )
len=${#array[#]}
_args=${array[#]:1:$len}
sudo http_proxy="http://user:password#server:port" apt-get $_args
Then I saved this as apt-proxy.sh, set it to +x (chmod) and everything is working fine when I am in the directory where this file is placed.
My question is : how to add this apt-proxy to PATH so I can actually call it as if it where the real apt-get ? [from anywhere]
Looking for command line only solutions, if you know how to do by GUI its nice, but not what I am looking for.
Try this:
Save the script as apt-proxy (without the .sh extension) in some directory, like ~/bin.
Add ~/bin to your PATH, typing export PATH=$PATH:~/bin
If you need it permanently, add that last line in your ~/.bashrc. If you're using zsh, then add it to ~/.zshrc instead.
Then you can just run apt-proxy with your arguments and it will run anywhere.
Note that if you export the PATH variable in a specific window it won't update in other bash instances.
You want to define that directory to the path variable, not the actual binary e.g.
PATH=$MYDIR:$PATH
where MYDIR is defined as the directory containing your binary e.g.
PATH=/Users/username/bin:$PATH
You should put this in your startup script e.g. .bashrc such that it runs each time a shell process is invoked.
Note that order is important, and the PATH is evaluated such that if a script matching your name is found in an earlier entry in the path variable, then that's the one you'll execute. So you could name your script as apt-get and put it earlier in the path. I wouldn't do that since it's confusing. You may want to investigate shell aliases instead.
I note also that you say it works fine from your current directory. If by that you mean you have the current directory in your path (.) then that's a potential security risk. Someone could put some trojan variant of a common utility (e.g. ls) in a directory, then get you to cd to that directory and run it inadvertently.
As a final step, after following the solution form proposed by #jlhonora (https://stackoverflow.com/a/20054809/6311511), change the permissions of the files in the folder "~/bin". You can use this:
chmod -R 755 ~/bin
make an alias to the executable into the ~/.bash_profile file and then use it from anywhere or you can source the directory containing the executables you need run from anywhere and that will do the trick for you.
adding to #jlhonora
your changes in ~./bashrc or ~./zshrc won't reflect until you do
source ~./zshrc or source ./bashrc , or restart your pc
I tried running a script file using bash but it showed an error
bash-3.2$ example.sh : command not found
I also tried
ls -l example.sh
I found that it was not executable, so I used
sudo chmod 777 example.sh
I again tried running it but same error was coming. I double checked that I am in the same folder as the file using ls. But still I am not able to execute the script file.
I finally tried making a dummy script file and running it , and found the same error
I think there is some problem with BASH. Can some one help me with what is the problem?
I am working on redhat, bash was already installed in my system
Since I am newbie on linux any help would be appreciated
bash search for commands in your $PATH. Apparently the current directory, ., is not in your $PATH. (This is a good thing; having . in your $PATH is insecure.)
You'll need to specify a directory name. Just type:
./example.sh
Incidentally, doing:
sudo chmod 777 example.sh
is two kinds of overkill. First, you don't need to use sudo; use sudo only when you actually need to. Presumably your personal account owns the file, so you can just use chmod directly.
Second, 777 is way too permissive. It allows anyone on the system to read, execute, or modify example.sh. (If you're the only person on the system it may not matter much, but it's still a bad habit.) Typically you should use 755 for directories and for files that need to be executable, and 644 for files that don't need to be executable.
Or just use
chmod +x example.sh
to set execute permission (your umask will prevent that from setting the permissions too loosely).
. (the current directory) is probably not on your path. Try ./example.sh or bash example.sh. You could also add . to your PATH environment variable, but that's generally frowned upon.
Your bash PATH probably doesn't include ., try running it by typing:
./example.sh
When you type a command, your shell searches your path to try to find the command, if the current directory (e.g. .) isn't part of the path, the script that you are trying to run won't be found. You'd have to explicitly give it the path to where this command is. And since it's in your current directory, you can just add ./ in front of the command.
first confirm the bash path
to check the path of bash use:
which bash
if you get "/bin/bash"
then add
#!/bin/bash
...
...
or whatever is the path on first line of your bash script
I want to make the following kind of reference:
"ls" command, for example, is universally available in most *nix environments. User can type in from anywhere to execute the scripts.
So, I write script "x". I want to make sure that from wherever the user type in x, the actual script "x" is referenced.
Thus, if I have script "x" stored in home/user/Desktop directory, I should not have to reference the script as follow:
home/user/Desktop/x
I should be able to do:
x
Thanks!
You want to add the directory to your PATH. E.g.
PATH="$PATH:/home/user/someDirectory"
You can add this line to .bash_profile to do it on startup. However, you probably shouldn't add Desktop to the path because some browsers download to there by default (though it shouldn't be executable by default).
You can also put your script in an existing directory that's already in your path such as /usr/local/bin or create a symlink there to your script's location.
cp /home/user/Desktop/x /usr/local/bin
or
mv /home/user/Desktop/x /usr/local/bin
or
ln -s /home/user/Desktop/x /usr/local/bin
Don't mean to be obnoxiously repetitive, but this is my first time answering a question, I can't reply to someone's already-good answer, and I think they are missing some important bits.
First, if you want to make sure everyone can access the script, you'll need to be sure everyone has execute permissions:
chmod a+x /path/to/script.sh
You'll also want to make sure it's in somewhere $PATH references (as the other answers mentioned):
echo $PATH # place the script in one of these directories
I would personally prefer /usr/local/bin, since that's considered the place for custom global scripts. Something the other answers didn't mention is that, if you do want to use a directory besides one in $PATH (say, /opt/myscriptfolder/) you'll want to add another PATH entry at the end of /etc/profile:
PATH="$PATH:/opt/myscriptfolder/"
By putting this in the end of /etc/profile, all users will receive this modified PATH variable on their next login.