Is there any way to get information about the license owner in Acumatica?
I found out that there is a PX.SM.LicenseInfo DAC which is being initialized by PX.SM.LicensingSetup.GetLicense(string licenseKey,PXLicenseReason reason) function but it's private.
PXLicenseHelper.License should have what you need. Try one of the following:
PXLicenseHelper.License.CompanyName
PXLicenseHelper.License.CustomerName
Related
We want to display customer (actually customer-group) specific information on product detail pages in Shopware 6.
There seems to be the HTTP cache and we are afraid that the page would be cached if a specific customer group displays the page and the information would be leaked to non-customers.
Is this assumption correct?
The documentation does not reveal much information about this.
Is there a way to set specific cache tags, so that the information is only displayed to the correct customer group?
Or do we need to fetch the data dynamically via AJAX?
Bonus question: Can the HTTP cache be simulated in automatic tests to ensure the functionality works?
What I found out so far:
The is annotation #httpCache for controller, which seems to control whether a page is cached or not
The cache key is generated in \Shopware\Storefront\Framework\Cache\HttpCacheKeyGenerator::generate. It take the full request URI into account, and some cacheHash which is injected. I believe it would not take the customer group into account
Maybe this generate() method could be decorated, but I am not sure if that is the right way.
There is a cookie being set sw-cache-hash which influences the caching. It takes the customer into account.
sw-cache-hash is created here:
if ($context->getCustomer() || $cart->getLineItems()->count() > 0) {
$cookie = Cookie::create(self::CONTEXT_CACHE_COOKIE, $this->buildCacheHash($context));
$cookie->setSecureDefault($request->isSecure());
$response->headers->setCookie($cookie);
} else {
$response->headers->removeCookie(self::CONTEXT_CACHE_COOKIE);
$response->headers->clearCookie(self::CONTEXT_CACHE_COOKIE);
}
So as soon you are logged in or have some items in the cart, a different cache hash is used. This depends on the following, but not on the customer group it self:
private function buildCacheHash(SalesChannelContext $context): string
{
return md5(json_encode([
$context->getRuleIds(),
$context->getContext()->getVersionId(),
$context->getCurrency()->getId(),
]));
}
Additionally there is the notion of cache-invalidation states, that describe when the caching should not be used.
You can configure that inside the shopware.yaml config file for the http-cache as a whole or on route level for the store-api routes.
From the default config inside platform:
shopware:
cache:
invalidation:
http_cache: ['logged-in', 'cart-filled']
product_listing_route: []
As you can see by default the http-cache won't be used if a user logs in or has something in his cart.
As you can see in the last code snippet, it takes into account the active Rule ids.
This means that if you create a rule (through Settings > Rule Builder) that is active on a certain group, but not on another or no group, it will be taken into account & create a different cache hash for the different customer groups.
I am trying to delete document,where conditions is...
Where the user is in Group and having the deletion rights & every users in group is able to delete the document.
But problem is when, If the name I specify is also listed explicitly in the ACL and does not have deletion rights.Then it does not check the group rights which is fair enough.
For that i am trying to give deletion rights to those users who are in group by code given below.
var acl:NotesACL=database.getACL();
var entry:NotesACLEntry=acl.getFirstEntry();
if(entry!=null)
{
var user:NotesACLEntry=acl.getEntry(#UserName());
if(user.isCanDeleteDocuments()==false)
{
user.setCanDeleteDocuments(true);
acl.save();
}
}
Where it shows error like,
Exception occurred calling method NotesACL.save() null.
Even explicitly added user is having user type=person & Access= Manager in ACL.
is there any other way to do this?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Using database as a starting point means you're getting the database as the user. Unless the user already has Manager access to the database, this will fail because the user doesn't have access to update the ACL.
You can use sessionAsSigner, but bear in mind you cannot use the getCurrentDatabase() method. Instead you must use the getDatabase(server,filePath) method in order to get the database with the signer authority. Obviously the signer also needs rights to modify the ACL.
When my app launches the map view, I request the iOS8 "When In Use" location permission. Assume user grants that.
I would like to request the Always permission only when user opts-in to my geofencing feature. But calling CLLocationManager.requestAlwaysAuthorization has no effect because the current authorization status is no longer kCLAuthorizationStatusNotDetermined.
How would one go about requesting the Always permission AFTER user has granted When In Use permission? I would think this is a common use case because apps should avoid asking for the Always permission unless needed.
You are right, calling requestAlwaysAuthorization will not do anything if the user already granted 'when in use' permission. A workaround I used was to link the user to the settings screen and let them turn on the 'Always' setting themselves. Here are the steps to do that:
Create a new key in your app-Info.plist called NSLocationAlwaysUsageDescription and enter some reasons as to why you need to request the always permission in the value field.
Link your user to your app's settings screen (more info here)
NSURL *settings = [NSURL URLWithString:UIApplicationOpenSettingsURLString];
if ([[UIApplication sharedApplication] canOpenURL:settings])
[[UIApplication sharedApplication] openURL:settings];
Once the user taps your link they will see this:
and when they click on Location, they will be able to see both While Using the App and Always settings to choose from:
Monitor authorization changes in your app by implementing the CLLocationManager delegate method locationManager:didChangeAuthorizationStatus:
I don't know about objective-c, but it works fine for me in swift and iOS 8.4. Make sure you provide both keys in your info.plist
NSLocationAlwaysUsageDescription
NSLocationWhenInUseUsageDescription
// iOS 11 and up will require this key instead of AlwaysUsageDescription
NSLocationAlwaysAndWhenInUsageDescription
Then just call
locationManager.requestAlwaysAuthorization()
And make sure locationManager is an instance variable! A local variable will be ignored for some strange reason.
Apple Documentation
I am very new to liferay. Please help me implementing the below requirement.
Using Document and media portlet in liferay, If any new document is uploaded or uploaded document is modified(Version changed) by admin user, then
How can i identify that the particular document is modified or newly uploaded as i have to show a popup message to user based upon if any new files is uploaded or modified after log on.
That is not a little change request - this required bit more development. And here is more different variants:
Simple but nonperformance variant:
With UserLocalServiceUtil you can check the last user-login date
Similarly iterate over all documents and check last modification date
Create Liferay-Portlet that shows the list of documents with modification date after last user-login date
~
Here are the steps:
Use corresponding Document Listener i.e
DlFolderListener or DlFileEntryListener. You have to use hook to
add your listner in portal.properties.
For Example, you would need to workaround below property.
value.object.listener.com.liferay.portlet.documentlibrary.model.FileEntry
= com.my.custom.MyFileEntryListener
This class would be extending BaseModelListener<FileEntry>
Override and use onAfterUpdate method to notify appropriate audience
(users).
Now this can be done by setting this notification in user
preferences.
On user Login, check corresponding user preferences for this
notification and notify user. You can use hook LoginPostAction to read user preferences for notification.
Hope this helps.
Create customfield for user. Create table with service builder to store the fileEntry Id which modified.
Create DLFileEntry Listener and write
code on FileUpdate. Add DLFileEntryID in same table created in step 1. Set
custom field true for all the user.
Create LoginPostActionHook and on Check the user's flag and fetch the FileEntryId get info of that fileEntryId and display notification with all file's information. Set customfield Flag false for particular user and remove the fileentryid from table or mark them all as read.
Along with the thumbnail photo, I may want to display other properties in my master pages that are imported from AD such as "company" using User Profile sync
If I use SPServices.SPGetCurrentUser() (https://spservices.codeplex.com/documentation), I can get selected properties held in user profile settings. However, I can't make this call since the property does not exist here (yet).
var company = $().SPServices.SPGetCurrentUser({
fieldName: "Company",
debug: false
});
It is however, is displayed both in http://mysite.mydomain.com/_layouts/EditProfile.aspx when in Mysite and _layouts/ProfAdminEdit.aspx (Edit user properties in Central Admin). I guess my question is then to be able to use SPServices, do I somehow edit the default properties and include my "Company" attribute held in the user' mysite profile? Alternatively, is there another way to access the properties held in the user profile with JavaScript ?
Thanks
Daniel
$().SPServices.SPGetCurrentUser calls this page : http://you.site.com/_layouts/userdisp.aspx?Force=True&1376982818371. For me the function is not able to parse the page correctly, but you could simply use jQuery (or pure JS or whatever) to get by yourself the same page, and then parse it to find the data you want.
Otherwise you can use $SP().people() to query the User Profile Service and gets the info for the user. See the example from the provided link. In theory that should return you the same information or even more info.