(iMX6 SOC running Linux 3.0)
I need to run a few I2C transactions in my board_init function. I tried calling i2c_get_adapter, then i2c_transfer, those being available in kernel mode, but i2c_get_adapter returns NULL. It's already called imx6q_add_imx_i2c, which is a wrapper around platform_device_register_full, but that isn't enough.
I can manipulate GPIO in board_init by calling gpio_request to obtain access, and gpio_free at the end. Is there something analogous to those functions for i2c?
--- added details ---
I've got a LAN9500A USB 100Base-T Ethernet MAC connected to a LAN9303 3-port switch with a virtual PHY. The MAC has a GPIO reset line that has to be turned off before it will spring to life and enumerate on the USB. That's done in board_init because it's completely nonstandard, so we don't want to patch the stock driver to manipulate some GPIO that's not part of the device.
The problem I'm having is that even though the MAC is permanently attached to the VPHY, it's not noticing it's connected, and an "ip link show eth1" command shows NO-CARRIER. I found I can kickstart it by unmasking the VPHY's Device Ready interrupt via I2C, but I also have to mask it immediately, or I get infinite interrupts. That's not the right solution, but Microchip has been no help in showing me a better way. But we don't want to patch the MAC driver with code to fiddle with the PHY.
There is no PHY driver for this part, and the MII interface to the VPHY doesn't include any interrupt-related registers, so it must be done through I2C. Writing a PHY driver just to flip a bit on and off once seems a lot of trouble, especially for a newbie like me who's never written a driver before.
I can do it in Python in a startup script, but that, too, seems like a heavyweight solution to a lightweight problem.
That's a wrong approach. Board file supposed to register device drivers and pass important information to them, rather than act as a device driver itself. I'm not sure if what you're trying to do is even possible.
If you really need to extract something from your I2C device on a very early stage - do that in the bootloader and pass the data to kernel via cmdline (U-boot, by the way, has I2C support for a quite some time). Then later, kernel might do appropriate actions depending on what you have passed to it.
Related
I am comparing a mainline Linux kernel source with a modified copy of the same source that has many drivers added. A little background: That modified source is an Android kernel source, it contains many drivers added by the vendor, SoC manufacturer, Google etc.
I am trying to identify all drivers added in the modified source that are reachable from userspace via any syscalls. I'm looking for some systematic or ideally automatic way to find all these to avoid the manual work.
For example, char device drivers are of interest, since I could perform some openat, read, write, ioctl and close syscalls on them if there is a corresponding device file. To find new character device drivers, I could first find all new files in the source tree and then grep them for struct file_operations. But besides char drivers, what else is there that I need to look for?
I know that the syscalls mentioned above do some kind of "forwarding" to the respective device driver associated with the file. But are there other syscalls that do this kind of forwarding? I think I would have to focus on all these syscalls, right?
Is there something I can grep for in source files that indicates that syscalls can lead there? How should I go about this to find all these drivers?
Update (narrowing down):
I am targeting specific devices (e.g. Huawei P20 Lite), so I know relevant architecture and hardware. But for the sake of this question, we can just assume that hardware for whatever driver is present. It doesn't really matter in my case if I invoked a driver and it reported back that no corresponding hardware is present, as long as I can invoke the driver.
I only look for the drivers directly reachable via syscalls. By directly reachable I mean drivers designed to have some syscall interface with userspace. Yes, syscalls not aimed at a certain driver may still indirectly trigger code in that driver, but these indirect effects can be neglected.
Maybe some background on my objective clarifies: I want to fuzz-test the found drivers using Syzkaller. For this, I would create descriptions of the syscalls usable to fuzz each driver that Syzkaller parses.
I'm pretty sure there is no way to do this programmatically. Any attempt to do so would hit up against a couple of problems:
The drivers that are called in a given case depend on the hardware. For example, on my laptop, the iwlwifi driver will be reachable via network syscalls, but on a server that driver won't be used.
Virtually any code loaded into the kernel is reachable from some syscall if the hardware is present. Drivers interact with hardware, which in turn either interacts with users, external devices, or networks, and all of these operations are reachable by syscalls. People don't write drivers that don't do anything.
Even drivers that aren't directly reachable by a system call can affect execution. For example, a driver for a true RNG would be able to affect execution by changing the behavior of the system PRNG, even if it weren't accessible by /dev/hwrng.
So for a generic kernel that can run on any hardware of a given architecture, it's going to be pretty hard to exclude any driver from consideration. If your hope is to trace the execution of the code by some programmatic means without actually executing it, then you're going to need to solve the halting problem.
Sorry for the bad news.
I have a touchscreen device that is connected to a Linux board. It is an SPI based device. The display works well, but the touch screen (using an STMPE610 controller) is very unreliable - It works on different boards and systems and does not work on others. What has been discovered is that the screen fails during the device probe (Error -22). The driver probe fails.
SPI can be electrically configured/driven in various modes (there are 4), and touch controller seems to come up in a somewhat unknown state.
Furthermore the computer is also trying to configure its SPI pins that are driving the screen (either pulling them up or pulling them down, as the case may be).
The question - I need to know WHAT the practice is for Linux device drivers to delay the probing or HOW to work around race conditions so that a driver probe on a troublesome SPI slave device can work. Does the Linux DeviceTree provide any such features such as wait or delay function?
I basically need to delay the driver probe UNTIL the system has successfully configured itself electrically (the computer) and the slave device (the touch screen) has finally decided what SPI mode it is.
I had a similar problem before, that is having racing condition between two drivers. What I did is adding usleep_range(1000000, 12000000); into the probe function inside the driver. This will give you roughly 10s of delay.
In your case, you can try to put usleep_range(1000000, 12000000); into the probe function in your touchscreen driver such that the driver will be loaded 10 - 12 seconds later. You can adjust it in order to have SPI get loaded first and all resources that the touchscreen driver needs are allocated and ready to be used.
This is not a good way to solve the problem only save time because there is possibility it would fail such as for some reasons the SPI driver get loaded later than 10 seconds.
I need to count the transitions of a 50KHz binary signal using a BBB. I think using the TIMER4 triggered by the external signal connected to the pin P8.07 would be the easiest way.
So, I issued the following commands to load the proper cape and setup the pin as a timer :
./config-pin overlay cape-universaln
./config-pin P8.07 timer
Everything seems to work and nothing appears in dmesg.
My question is : How can I read the value of TIMER4 ? I looked in SysFs and find nothing interesting. Nothing in /dev as well. How can I retrieve the value of the timer counter I just setup ? I'm open to a C/C++ solution as well, but I would like to avoid doing kernel-space programming.
I'm using the latest Ubuntu Linux for BeagleBone, kernel 4.1.10-ti-r21.
With a little googling I see a pps driver for the AM335x DMTimer subsystem here: https://github.com/ddrown/pps-gmtimer
It looks like it hasn't been merged upstream and the README gives instructions on building it into the 3.8 kernel - you could revert back to 3.8, or you could adapt that for 4.1, in which case you may need to tweak the Device Tree overlay as well for the newer version of the dtc compiler that's in 4.1.
You could also write a pulse counter firmware for the PRU (with only a 50KHz input it wouldn't need to be very optimized at all to catch every pulse). You could send a signal to the ARM every so often and catch that in your userspace program.
Another option would be to directly access the DMTimer registers from userspace using mmap to map the /dev/mem file (example of this method for GPIO here), but that's a pretty "hacky" way to do it, and it's generally frowned upon in the GNU/Linux world to do that sort of stuff from userspace instead of from kernal space.
I have a rooted Sony prs900, running a linux 2.6.23 #2 PREEMPT kernel, for ARMv6. (Montavista linux kernel). I'm having problems with figuring out how power management works, both for running the system and for powering up and down the audio port.
I can neither figure out how to read the battery/powerline status information, nor get the audio chip to play sound, etc ... although I have been studying the kernel modules for a while...
It's worth a little money for help, say $100 paypal donation to an email account, (or more if this takes a long time...) for the first person able to explain to me how to do them in a way that works.
Eg: read battery status, and change some power modes like getting the audio amplifiers to power up/down so that the audio played to /dev/dsp (oss emulation) actually comes out as sound rather than just being consumed by the chip and ignored...
The actual sony kernel, and binary packages of cross compiler tools are located on the main page. Actual kernel sourcecode is also available.
What I have learned so far myself :
The sony is using a wolfson micro WM8350 audio driver and battery charger/power management chip for all the system's power; eg: it can power down/up the SD memory cards, send more power to the cpu, power up audio amplifiers, etc. See: WM8350 Datasheet.
Pretty much, the whole problem revolves around getting the WM8350 kernel drivers to work...
Although the company brags quite a bit about it's support under linux, they don't have any application notes or examples that are actually helpful that I can find, other than the datasheet. I suspect the kernel drivers I have are beta code, because they don't seem to be behaving well (several error messages in the kernel log about wm8350 registers not being readable happen at every boot even when running only the sony's native software...).
The kernel driver's source-code of most interest are in: linux-2.6.23_091126/drivers/mxc/pmic/{core,wm8350}
Notice, the wm8350 is a competitor to the MC14783, but the linux kernel drivers use the same {core} driver source code for both chips; The sony ONLY has the wm8350 on it -- there is no MC14783 present.
The code that I most want most desperately to understand how to make operate is found in the subdirectory {wm8350}, eg: wm8350/wm8350pm/power_supply_sysfs.c.
I want the audio to fire up too, but 'm not quite sure where the pertinent audio amplifier code is yet...
Very clearly the wm8350pm code is designed to export a /sys directory interface; right now /sys is mounted and operational on the system; but I'm not very familiar with the semantics of these newer style interfaces... they aren't quite like the old APM power interfaces for Linux laptops...
First I checked the obvious:
If I do a "cat /sys/power/state" it returns the word "mem" and nothing else.
The file has permissions -rw-r--r--, so potentially it could be written -- but I don't know with what. The string "mem" does not exist anywhere in the source code for the wm8350pm drivers, so I don't even know if /sys/power/state is part of the source code.
Doing a find /sys -iname "wm8350" reveals a handful of directories with the patterns:
wm8350-rtc , wm8350-pmic , wm8350-bl , wm8350-power , wm8350-led
wm8350-hifi-dai , wm8350-codec
wm8350-imx32ads.0
So, I do an ls-l on each directory, and look for actual files rather than symbolic links or subdirectories, and what I find are stock useless writable files: bind, unbind, uevent,
and a very few read only files: pmic_reg, dapm_widget, modalias, codec_reg which aren't very helpful.
It's no surprise that:
Doing: cat /sys/devices/platform/wm8350-ebx5016-audi/modalias gives "wm8350-ebx5016-audio"
Doing: cat /sys/devices/platform/wm8350-imx32ads.0/modalias gives "wm8350-imx32ads"
and since audio is off... Doing: cat /sys/devices/platform/wm8350-ebx5016-audi/dapm_widget reveals the audio state:
Headphone Jack: Off
Line In Jack: On
Mic Bias: Off
Left DAC: Off
Right DAC: Off
... (all else off and omitted except )...
EBX5016-hifi: PM State: D3hot
The last two files, I expect should do wm8350 chip register dumps... and one did.
Doing: cat /sys/devices/wm8350-pmic/pmic-reg causes a long pause, then nothing is printed.
but:
Doing: cat /sys/devices/wm8350/platform/wm8350-ebx5016-audi/wm8350-codec/codec_reg does prints a list of registers up to e8 which is just a few bytes larger than the datasheet says the chip should be (0x00 to 0xe6).
I tried using a python program to play wav files, (works on my desktop computer), and I noticed that /dev/dsp does open, the mixers DO set volume levels, and nothing comes out. So -- the audio driver is not able to enable the sound amplifiers on it's own automatically.
There are no alsa sound files in /dev, nor are any alsa tools found on the embedded machine... so I assume Sony is strictly using OSS /dev/dsp and /dev/mixer.
There is only one other access point I can find to the ws8350:
There IS a device driver /dev/wm8350.
That driver created by the source code in subdirectory wm8350/wm8350_reg.c ; in theory it should be able to read and write to all registers using ioctls() calls from a user space. However, something appears grossly wrong with it, for I wrote a test program to read the wm8350 registers... and most of the registers return error messages rather than allowing to be read, including the most pulic ID registers (0x00, 0x01) etc.
So, I'm quite stuck. Pointers, thoughts, hints, are quite desired.
I would like to change your question a little bit.
How does Linux ASOC (alsa system on chip) power management work?
I will answer this and then give some hints on using this specific chip.
.. If I do a cat /sys/power/state it returns the word "mem" and nothing else. The file has permissions -rw-r--r--, so potentially it could be written -- but I don't know with what. The string "mem" does not exist anywhere in the source code for the wm8350pm drivers, so I don't even know if /sys/power/state is part of the source code.
You need to get an understanding of the Linux driver model. Hardware in Linux is structured like a tree. The rational is that things must be powered up/down in specific sequences. For instance, you should not power down the PCI bus controller before powering down the PCI peripherals. Linux builds a tree of hardware and each driver (code) and device (data/actual hardware) has specific call backs/function pointers which handle some specific tasks.
probe - Are you there? Determines actual hardware/device is present.
remove - Shuts down device. Module removal, power off, etc.
suspend - going to sleep.
resume - waking up.
Three and four may look interesting to you. Now, to read about what /sys/power/state is about. The text mem, means that suspend to memory is supported by your system. In this mode, Linux does these steps,
Find first lowest level active bus.
suspend devices on that bus.
suspend bus and de-activate.
If a bus is active go to step 1.
Set CPU to low power state (suspend to RAM).
This is not quite the full story. A few devices may support a wake-up. They will have extra call-backs to enable waking the system from sleep modes. Read the documentation to find out about this.
That is general power management and driver/device structure. Now, how is the ASOC (alsa system on chip) structured?
There are typically three drivers/devices that get stitched together.
Codec - The wm8350 in your case. This includes audio amplifier drive circuitry and can include sound mixing and source controls. Supports digital to analog and analog to digital, typically through an i2s interface. The i2s is not the only interface. Usually a register bank is controlled through a secondary interface; i2c in the wm8350 case.
DAI - Refer to chapter 1.2.18.1 of the iMx31 reference manual; the hardware is called the SSI by Freescale. The next chapter on the AUDMUX is also useful to understand audio support on the iMx31/32.
Machine file - this is the board specific routing. It hooks the DAI to the codec and is the parent of both. It provides board clocking information and other specific configuration. For instance, it may use the AUDMUX to route the physical pins to the SSI block.
An i2c (or SPI) interface from the codec driver to send control commands to the coded chip. Some chips might uses a wacky i2s interface or something else for control (but not in your case).
Now if you understood this, you will see that some features of the wm8350 seem to break the Linux model. The DAI interface can be stopped (digital audio), but the i2c interface must remain alive to program the registers related to the power functionality in the codec/PMIC (power management IC).
The latest WM8350 calls the IC a multi-function device and support was introduced in 2.6.35. The initial support may not have included the WM8350 features. Unfortunately, without some details on the layout of the Sony prs900 board, it would be difficult to know how to use the WM8350 PMIC functionality. The code will involve the iMx31 CPU, the WM8350, the i2c connection, and possibly some power supply circuitry.
For certain, you can just try echo mem > /sys/power/state and see what happens. If it works, you are lucky. The power/current consumption in sleep might not be optimal, but it will probably be hard to fix with the 2.6.23 kernel. You will want to look through the /sys directories for wake-up sources and possibly register these before issuing the suspend to memory command.
I can neither figure out how to read the battery/powerline status information, nor get the audio chip to play sound, etc ... although I have been studying the kernel modules for a while...
From the above discussions, the battery and powerline status will probably be found through another device. However, the pmic_reg file may actually give the status if things are connected properly on the board.
The audio chip will use ALSA. You need to use either alsamixer or the command line amixer to set up audio routes through the codec, so the DAI channel (PCM from iMx32) is routed and sent to the speaker. To minimize power consumption, things are usually turned off by default. The /dev/dsp files are just OSS compatibility. This configuration will support ALSA natively. You are better off to use ALSA if possible.
Donate to the OSF and get a tax receipt, if this was helpful enough.
I need to write a program in linux (debian, to be exact) that disables a USB device if it doesn't pass specific filters. For example, the program might be set to disallow webcams, usb sticks and keyboards, enable mice and printer (through usb). The filters may change in runtime. For example, the program might receive a message to enable usb sticks and it should respond without rebooting the system. The program is written in python but embedding c code (or others) is also acceptable.
What I have tried
I have tried many methods but some of them aren't about programming.
First, I tried to mess with udev. I can monitor the activities when a device is plugged and write filters. There used to be an option "ignore_device" that ignored the filtered devices. For example, to ignore all the devices that are a member of usb subsystem, I would write this as a udev rule:
ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="usb", OPTIONS+="ignore_device"
But this option is released in this release of udev. What I get so far is that udev can currently be used mainly for monitoring. Sure, I can write additional rules for the rule above that runs a script, but I have to do the disabling elsewhere.
Second, I tried ioctl to send a DISCONNECT signal to device handle. I'm testing this with a USB mouse. This is the python code for that: (I have also tried this in C, nothing changed)
import fcntl
import sys
USBDEVFS_RESET = ord('U') << (4*2) | 20
USBDEVFS_DISCONNECT = ord('U') << (4*2) | 22
raw_name = "/dev/bus/usb/{:03d}/{:03d}"
filename = raw_name.format(1,2)
fd = open(filename, "wb")
fcntl.ioctl(fd, USBDEVFS_DISCONNECT, 0)
Here, if I would send USBDEVFS_RESET, it works, the mouse input is ignored for a second or two. But disconnect signal raises an error:
IOError: [Errno 25] Inappropriate ioctl for device
What I get from here is, I cannot send disconnect signal to a mouse. Maybe a usb stick or printer or some other devices would work, I haven't tried. I want to develop the program as generic as possible so as to prevent writing additional device-specific code, so this approach seems useless for me. And another point here is that when I manually disconnect/connect my mouse, I see events in udev monitor. But when I send reset signal, no event is sent.
The udev monitor says that the mouse was mounted to this path: /sys/bus/usb/devices/1-3 (which is a symlink for /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-3). Some documents told me that this folder contains the device's settings and setting /power/level to "off" or "suspended" would turn the device power off. But I cannot manipulate any files in /power. Come to think about it, it might not be a good idea after all.
The Question
So, the question is, what is the best way to achieve such task? I have an idea but I'm not sure whether it will work and even if it does, it might be overkill. My idea is writing a "wrapper driver" that identifies itself to linux kernel as driver for all usb devices. The "wrapper driver" reads the device information and if the device is good to go, it acts as a wrapper for real drivers in the kernel, calling their functions. If not, the "wrapper driver" just ignores the device.
I'm not sure it can even be done, I'm not experienced in kernel or driver programming.
Another way is, -somehow- getting the handle of the device programatically and telling it to power off (or making it busy forever, whatever works). I have also done some little research but couldn't find a proper-easy way. They say all devices are considered as "files" but I cannot reach those files at all.
Note:
The question is mostly about linux internals but it also involves kernel programming. I read a lot about usb manipulation/monitoring programs, I read manual pages of udevadm. But these approaches do not help me at all. I think I need to alter either kernel or device internals programatically.
I have also tried manipulating authorized file that resides in /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb1/1-4 (for a keyboard). It's default value is 1. Changing it to 0 successfully disabled the bus (NOT device, but the physical usb port. The same device can still be used when plugged in another port). But making it 0 also stopped udev events from this usb port. So, I can disable the port if the user plugs in a forbidden device but I cannot decide when to enable it since I cannot listen to remove events in udev. Would it make sense if I delve deeper to lower levels of code (possibly kernel) and listen to usb events in some other way?
I think the simplest way to solve your problem is balcklisting all usb device drivers excepting mouse, keyboard etc.
The cleanest way is whitlisting mouse etc. with udev using usb device id's
Writing a wrapper driver is an absolute overkill never chose that way.
One possible solution could be tying usb access to user permissions. here is a related link you may find handy
http://robots.mobilerobots.com/wiki/Linux_udev_USB_Device_Permissions_Configuration