I have a customization project where I'm importing an Excel file content into the Lot/Ser No. Allocation grid. This works fine on my machine, but I had to download the DocumentFormat.OpenXml dll and include a reference in my class library project in order to do this. I've created a customization project, but when someone else tries to use it, that reference and that file are not there. I've tried to include it in the files section of the customization manager, but I have no way of doing that (can't browse to a file) - not that that would make any difference anyway, since that's the bin folder of the website, and not the class library.
Bottom line: Is there a way to include a dll file that's used in the class library project references in a customization package?
Add the dll file in Bin folder of your local website -> the file should appear in the Add Files dialog inside Customization Project Manager
Select the dll file in the Add Files dialog and click Save
After that, DocumentFormat.OpenXml.dll becomes a part of your customization package, which will always deploy it together with your extension library
Ruslan provided a good answer explaining how to include your custom DLL, however you might want to know that there are built in functions to read Excel files which make inclusion of third-party libraries unnecessary. Please refer to the following article: http://asiablog.acumatica.com/2016/03/reading-excel-file-acumatica.html?m=1
Related
In azure functions I uploaded private dll's to bin folder using following instructions
If you need to reference a private assembly, you can upload the assembly file into a bin folder relative to your function and reference it by using the file name (e.g. #r "MyAssembly.dll").
but I when run the function, I am getting this error for every dll. "Metadata file could not be opened -- PE image doesn't contain managed metadata"
Looks like you're adding references to native binaries as well. Your references must be .NET assemblies. If you're deploying native indirect dependencies, you don't need to reference those from your function script.
UPDATE: There as a defect in the last portal deployment causing the content of files uploaded in the portal to be prefixed and suffixed with multipart form data, invalidating files.
The issue has been fixed and is being rolled out, but in the meantime, please upload the files using Kudu to workaround this issue. You can find more information about the problem here (and by following the issue link)
I also faced the same issue while building MAUI app in android platform. A native module was present in the project with .so extension. But a windows native DLL also present in the project for the purpose for running the same project in windows. Excluding the windows native DLL while building running in android fixed the issue. Sometimes I have to close the project and delete bin and obj folder and then rebuild the project to get rid of this issue.
I'm new to C++/COM. I have created a ATL COM Project with a callback mechanism to send messages to managed side. It has one idl file (sample1.idl) which expose 'n' number of methods, hence managed environment can access it. Now i would like to add another .idl(sample2.idl) file to that project.
.tlb is created for both sample1 & sample2 and build succeeded. On browsing the .dll , I couldn't find the sample2.idl related stuffs. I suspect that .tlb generated from ‘sample2.idl’ is not reflected in the .dll.
Can we have more than one IDL’s in the ATL (COM) project ?
The default for ATL, as with many native build environments, is to embed the type library as a resource in the DLL. Something you can see in Visual Studio (retail edition required), use File + Open + File and select the DLL. Open the "TYPELIB" node, you'll see one type library with resource ID #1. This is the one that Visual Studio sees when you use Add Reference.
Most any build tool that consumes type libraries will only ever look for that one resource. Visual Studio is no exception. It also can encode only one type library in its project files. You perhaps can make it work by selecting the 2nd .tlb file with the Add Reference dialog. Albeit that it is very likely that you'll now get exposed to more problems in your ATL project, like forgetting to register that 2nd type library in your .rgs file.
Very hard to give proper advice without any hint what that second IDL file might contain. Stay out of trouble by merging them or by using the existing support in IDL to import other .idl files or type libraries.
How does Visual Studio process the App_Code folder when a change is made or detected in it? Not IIS or ASP.NET.
I want to gain a better understanding of why Visual Studio freezes for long periods of time whenever I save a code file inside a large App_Code folder of a website project. Alternatively, I could ask: why does Visual Studio not exhibit these same freezes when processing a file inside a class library that is equally large?
Ideally I would like to see official documentation cited from Microsoft of the issue at hand of processing the App_Code folder in Visual Studio and what happens that differs from processing a class library for example.
The App_Code folder is not explicitly marked as containing files
written in any one programming language. Instead, the ASP.NET infers
which compiler to invoke for the App_Code folder based on the files it
contains. If the App_Code folder contains .vb files, ASP.NET uses the
Visual Basic compiler; if it contains .cs files, ASP.NET uses the C#
compiler, and so on.
If the App_Code folder contains only files where the programming
language is ambiguous, such as a .wsdl file, ASP.NET uses the default
compiler for Web applications, as established in the compilation
element of the application Web.config file or the machine-level
Web.config file. Compilers are named build providers and a build
provider is specified for each file extension in an extension
element.
See the documentation here.
It recompiles all code in this folder in a separate assembly, then reference this assembly in your project.
You should be aware that a double reference could occur if you include these files as compilable in your project. In this latter case, the files are at the same time compiles in a separate assembly (with a temp name) which is referenced, and also compiled in the bin folder. This is the start of the horror show ...
These performance notes about the App_Code folder are slightly dated but likely still apply to the project type:
2) Keep the number of files in your /app_code directory small. If you
end up having a lot of class files within this directory, I'd
recommend you instead add a separate class library project to your VS
solution and move these classes within that instead since class
library projects compile faster than compiling classes in the
/app_code directory. This isn't usually an issue if you just have a
small number of files in /app_code, but if you have lots of
directories or dozens of files you will be able to get speed
improvements by moving these files into a separate class library
project and then reference that project from your web-site instead.
One other thing to be aware of is that whenever you switch from source
to design-view within the VS HTML designer, the designer causes the
/app_code directory to be compiled before the designer surface loads.
The reason for this is so that you can host controls defined within
/app_code in the designer. If you don't have an /app_code directory,
or only have a few files defined within it, the page designer will be
able to load much quicker (since it doesn't need to perform a big
compilation first).
-- http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/09/22/Tip_2F00_Trick_3A00_-Optimizing-ASP.NET-2.0-Web-Project-Build-Performance-with-VS-2005.aspx
When I publish a ClickOnce application, one of the references that is included in one of my projects is missing.
If I go to my project's Properties -> Application Files, this missing reference is not even listed here.
My bin/Release folder has an .exe.manifest file, and I noticed it that it is also missing from here.
However, when I build the project, the DLL is in fact copied to my bin/Release folder.
How can I ensure it also deploys this required dependency?
I finally found a solution for this problem and I hope it will solve your problem to.
In my case, I'm editing an old application at work which have multiple projects, but the main project and it's back end project are the most important here.
The back end is added in the References section of the main project.
In the back end, a third party dll was imported, but this dll requires 2 other dlls.
So those 3 dlls were added in the References section of the back end project.
At that point, one of the 2 other dlls was not showing in the Application Files section for ClickOnce.
I've come up with a couple of ways of fixing it, but the most elegant one was to add this dll in the Reference section of the main project.
As stated in How to: Specify Which Files Are Published by ClickOnce, change the Copy Local property value on the reference to True.
References to assemblies (.dll files) are designated as follows when you add the reference: If Copy Local is False, it is marked by default as a prerequisite assembly (Prerequisite (Auto)) that must be present in the GAC before the application is installed. If Copy Local is True, the assembly is marked by default as an application assembly (Include (Auto)) and will be copied into the application folder at installation. A COM reference will appear in the Application Files dialog box (as an .ocx file) only if its Isolated property is set to True. By default, it will be included.
I know is this an old question, but for anybody having similar issues. I think this is a cleaner way around the problem.
I had a similar issue and everything I did to get ClickOnce to deploy with the offending .dll failed.
Eventually, I had to deploy manually.
See walk-through here.
That worked for perfectly for me. But, for the life of me, I still wonder why that process can't be added to VS (I'm using 2017 community).
I am working on a sharepoint feature which includes a couple of list definitions, 2 webparts, a feature receiver assembly and an InfoPath form.
I have to use WSPBuilder to package these, and the requirement is to package all these features into a single WSP solution file.
Now, WSP builder requires the deployment files in a particular folder structure, same as the 12 Hive of sharepoint.
My problem is that all my features were developed separately, and consist of multiple project files, and these are not necessarily in the same folder structure..
How do I use WSP Builder to package multiple features into a single WSP solution?
Maybe this will help: http://www.codeplex.com/wspbuilder/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=43125
Ultimately, I think you gain a lot of flexibility by building your own wsp files by using a tool like NANT.
There's no particular action you need to undertake in wspbuilder to have multiple features in the same solution package.
All you need to do is create a new folder for each feature under the 12\TEMPLATE\FEATURES folder inside your solution in Visual Studio and place the appropriate feature.xml file in that folder. For example, you may have:
12\TEMPLATE\FEATURES\FancyFeature\feature.xml
12\TEMPLATE\FEATURES\ReallyCoolFeature\feature.xml
... and so on.
Upon building the solution, wspbuilder will read the entire tree structure of your 12 folder and append the corresponding nodes in the wsp's manifest.xml file. The same goes for any other possible subfolders inside the "TEMPLATE" folder, including IMAGES, LAYOUTS, etc: at deployment time they will all be copied in the correct folder inside the real 12 hive, because the 12 folder inside your solution is meant to be a replica of the original one.
For a better understanding, create some folders and files inside your 12 folder in the visual studio solution, compile your project and look inside the generated manifest.xml file.
The simple answer is that you are going to have to copy all the files form the individual projects into one master project for your solution. As long as all your individual feature files are in the correct location in your '12' folder then you'll be good to go.
Note: You'll need to check all your references to any assemblies as this solution will create 1 assembly for all your custom logic.
I had trouble adding dlls to the wsp so I wrote a short article about it: How to Add DLLs to a WSP Solution
I usually have one project in the solution designated as the "main" one. I set the dependencies so that this "main" project is built last. Then for the other projects that I want to be included in the wsp package, I edit the "Post Build Events" to xcopy the contents of the 12 folder and that dlls built by the projects into corresponding folders for the main project. Then after I build the whole solution, I can build the wsp package for the main project and know that it contains everything.