How do I automatically install New Relic extension using Azure ARM Template? - azure

I am using a azure arm template to create a web app in azure. Now I need to install New Relic Extension in the webapps which will be created using this template. So I was unable to find specific json format. Please help me out!

Please have a try to add the json code snipped in the ARM template.
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "NewRelic.Azure.WebSites",
"type": "siteextensions",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/Sites', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"properties": {
}
}
],
I created a demo for it. The following is my detail steps. About the name of the extension please refer to the NewRelic.Azure.WebSites.
1. Create an Azure Resource Group Project.
2. Select the Web App project template
3. Just demo for web site extension so I delete the unnecessary resource
4. Add the snipped code in the ARM template
5. Deploy the website via Visual Studio
6. Check the Website in the Azure portal
The demo ARM template:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "F1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "NewRelic.Azure.WebSites",
"type": "siteextensions",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/Sites', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"properties": {
}
}
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
}
}
]
}

"resources":[{
"apiVersion": "2018-11-01",
"name": "NewRelic.Azure.WebSites.Extension",
"type": "siteextensions",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('appServiceName'))]"
]
}]
The name is now NewRelic.Azure.Websites.Extension. You should give your App Service Name in the variable appServiceName in this case.

Related

Tags in ARM file not visible in Azure portal

I have multiple tags mentioned in my deployement yml file , but they are not visible inside Azure portal app service. None of the following tags visible to Azure portal. only cost-Center tag can be found.
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2016-08-01",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/slots",
"comments": "",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[variables('webAppDeployment')]"
],
"kind": "app",
"name": "[concat(parameters('siteName'),'/','staging')]",
"properties": {
"serverFarmId": "[parameters('appServicePlanResourceId')]"
},
"tags": {
"displayName": "TEST",
"Module": "MM",
"SubModule": "ABD"
}
]
To test this in our local environment, we have created a new ARM Template that will create an app service plan, web app & a staging slot to that web app with a list of tags that were shared above.
While testing the template, deployment got succeeded & we were able to see the tags of the webapp slot in the portal.
Here is the sample output for reference:
For reference , here is the sample ARM template that we have created to test this:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2019-04-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"web-appname": {
"type": "string"
},
"appservicename": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"functions": [],
"variables": {},
"resources": [
{
"name": "[parameters('appservicename')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"apiVersion": "2020-12-01",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"sku": {
"name": "S1"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('appservicename')]"
}
},
{
"name": "[parameters('web-appname')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"apiVersion": "2020-12-01",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms',parameters('appservicename'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('web-appname')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms',parameters('appservicename'))]"
}
},
{
"name":"[concat(parameters('web-appname'),'/','stagging')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/slots",
"apiVersion": "2021-02-01",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', parameters('web-appname'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "TEST",
"Module": "MM",
"SubModule": "ABD",
"Createdfor": "repro",
"depart":"test"
},
"properties": {
"httpsOnly": true
}
}
],
"outputs": {}
}

How to enable profiling for live azure web apps with application insights using an ARM template

My team wants to enable the Application Insights Live Profiler for our Web App using an ARM template. This performance feature of Application Insights is explained at the following link https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-insights/app-insights-profiler. However, I can't find any documentation on how to add the feature using an ARM template. I have tried using the following documentation (https://github.com/CawaMS/EnableProfilerForCompute/blob/master/How%20to%20enable%20Application%20Insights%20Profiler%20on%20Azure%20Compute%20resources.md) as a guide but it is geared towards enabling profiling for a VM and Azure Compute resources as opposed to an App Service.
According to your description, if you want to deploy the web app and enable the application Insights, I suggest you could try below arm template(adding the Microsoft.Insights/components resource in the template).
Template.json
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "F1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and capacity. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2014-04-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Insights/components",
"location": "East US",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-link:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "AppInsightsComponent"
},
"properties": {
"applicationId": "[variables('webSiteName')]"
}
}
]
}
Output:
Result(the web app has been already related with the appInsights)
I was able to locate a Microsoft representative via email who sent me the following response:
Hi,
We are investigating how to automatically enable the Profiler after
it’s installed with the AI site extension on an App Services resource;
Currently there is no workaround for that yet ...
Thanks
-cath

How to use a DocumentDB(MongoDB) connection string as an Environment variable in an Azure Resource Management Template

I want to use a DocumentDB(MongoDB) connection string as an environment variable in an Azure Resource Management Template. Forexample i have a resource group which has a wep app and a DocumentDB(MongoDB) database.
"siteConfig": {
"appSettings": [
{
"name": "db",
"value": "connection string"
}
]
}
How can i assign an environment variable to a connection string in template?
ARM template supports listKeys and list{Value} function, more details we can refer to ARM template function.
We can find DocumentDB list connection strings API, so we can use listconnectionstrings function to get documentdb connection string in the ARM template.
"appSettings": [
{
"name": "db",
"value": " [listConnectionStrings(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDb/databaseAccounts', parameters('documentdb')), '2015-04-08').connectionStrings[0].connectionString]"
}
It works correct on my side. If we want to add appsetting for WebApp, we also can do with following code
"resources": [
{
"name": "appsettings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "appsetting"
},
"properties": {
"db": "[listConnectionStrings(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDb/databaseAccounts', parameters('documentdb')), '2015-04-08').connectionStrings[0].connectionString]"
}
}
]
Check the result from the Azure portal.
Update:
ARM template demo code
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"documentdb": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "S1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]",
"docDbName": "tomdocumentdb",
"storageAccountId": "[concat(resourceGroup().id,'/providers/Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/', parameters('storageAccountName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"name": "appsettings",
"type": "config",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"tags": {
"displayName": "appsetting"
},
"properties": {
"db": "[listConnectionStrings(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDb/databaseAccounts', parameters('documentdb')), '2015-04-08').connectionStrings[0].connectionString]"
}
}
]
}
]
}
Paramter file
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentParameters.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"value": "tomtest" //your hostingplan name
},
"skuName": {
"value": "B1"
},
"documentdb": {
"value": "tomdocument" // your documentdb name
}
}
}
After a bit of a struggle:
"appSettings": [{
"Name": "DOCUMENTDB_ENDPOINT",
"Value": "[reference(concat('Microsoft.DocumentDb/databaseAccounts/', parameters('databaseAccountName'))).documentEndpoint]"
}, {
"Name": "DOCUMENTDB_PRIMARY_KEY",
"Value": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDb/databaseAccounts', parameters('databaseAccountName')), '2015-04-08').primaryMasterKey]"
}]

Azure ARM Templates, VNET Integration of a Site

I'm mamanging a creation of a whole system in Azure cloud.
It is possible to set VNET integration of a Site Resource (Webapp or Functions) within templates ?
Attaching a screenshot of the settings that I'd manage.
It is possible to set VNET integration of a Site Resource (Webapp or Functions) within templates?
The following template could be used to create website and connect it to an existing VNET, please refer to it.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "F1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
},
"vnetName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of an existing Azure VNet which has a Gateway Subnet already, and is in the resource group you are going to deploy."
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('vnetName')]",
"type": "virtualNetworkConnections",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/sites/', variables('webSiteName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"vnetResourceId": "[concat(resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/', parameters('vnetName'))]"
}
}
]
}
]
}
And then from Azure Resource Explorer, we could find there is a virtualNetworkConnections node under the site.

How do you add GitHub to an Azure Resource Manager WebSite deployment template latest with the latest API Version?

They used this resource in the previous template but this is no longer available:
{
"apiVersion": "2015-04-01",
"name": "[parameters('siteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[parameters('siteLocation')]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"serverFarmId": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-04-01",
"name": "web",
"type": "sourcecontrols",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/Sites', parameters('siteName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"RepoUrl": "[parameters('repoURL')]",
"branch": "[parameters('branch')]",
"IsManualIntegration": true
}
}
]
}
https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/blob/master/201-web-app-github-deploy/azuredeploy.json
Update:
This is what Visual Studio creates with the latest SDK and API.
{
"$schema": "http://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hostingPlanName": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1
},
"skuName": {
"type": "string",
"defaultValue": "F1",
"allowedValues": [
"F1",
"D1",
"B1",
"B2",
"B3",
"S1",
"S2",
"S3",
"P1",
"P2",
"P3",
"P4"
],
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's pricing tier and instance size. Check details at https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/"
}
},
"skuCapacity": {
"type": "int",
"defaultValue": 1,
"minValue": 1,
"metadata": {
"description": "Describes plan's instance count"
}
}
},
"variables": {
"webSiteName": "[concat('webSite', uniqueString(resourceGroup().id))]"
},
"resources": [
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/serverfarms",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "HostingPlan"
},
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('skuName')]",
"capacity": "[parameters('skuCapacity')]"
},
"properties": {
"name": "[parameters('hostingPlanName')]"
}
},
{
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]": "Resource",
"displayName": "Website"
},
"dependsOn": [
"[concat('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"name": "[variables('webSiteName')]",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', parameters('hostingPlanName'))]"
}
}
]
}
Where should I insert the "sourcecontrols" resource? The schema validation fails.
What you show in the original template will continue to work with the latest 2015-08-01 version. Just add the sourcecontrols node as a child of the Microsoft.Web/sites (i.e. add a "resources" property).
It's possible that the schema validation is not up to date, but it will still work. Nothing has changed for the sourcecontrols node.

Resources