Renew Certification Authority in OPENSSL Verify fails - security

I'm in the process of re-emit a ROOT CA (Certification Authority) to fix some information in its fields, but you can imagine that it could be the same if the root Certificate is near to caducity time.
Of course, before do it in production, I 'm doing this in a test enviroment with a easy command line test (in linux).
I used the very good information I've found here Certification authority root certificate expiry and renewal.
I modify the process to make more similar to my own.
I've create a openssl_root.cnf file. I added some fields like
countryName = optional
organizationName = optional
organizationalUnitName = optional
localityName = optional
stateOrProvinceName = optional
telephoneNumber = optional
mail = optional
serialNumber = optional
commonName = optional
and of course, the parameter to ask (for example)
[ req_distinguished_name ]
mail = Email Address
mail_max = 60
telephoneNumber = Please submit yor Telf. Number
telephoneNumber_max = 13
...
the section which is more important to me, the extensions
[root_ca]
# Extensions for a typical CA RAIZ
# It's a CA certificate
basicConstraints = critical, CA:true, pathlen:1
subjectKeyIdentifier = hash
authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid
keyUsage = cRLSign, keyCertSign
subjectAltName = DNS.1:mycompany.com,
issuerAltName = issuer:copy
# CRLs & OCSP
crlDistributionPoints = #root_section
authorityInfoAccess = #ocsp_root
certificatePolicies = #PCs
[ root_section ]
URI.1 = https://$root_ip/crl/cacrl.crl
[ ocsp_root ]
caIssuers;URI.0 = http://$root_ip/certificates/cacert.pem
OCSP;URI.1 = http://$root_ip/ocsp
[ PCs ] #Certifification Policy section
policyIdentifier = 1.3.5.8 #fake OID
CPS.1 = http://$ip_local/dpc
CPS.2 = http://$ip_local/policy
userNotice.1 = #notice
after than I do the request with this commands
openssl genrsa -out ca.key 4096
openssl req -new -key ca.key -out ca.csr -config openssl_root.cnf -extensions root_ca -sha384
here I fill the fields of the DN with the information..
and so, I sign the root authority with
openssl ca -days 3650 -in ca.csr -keyfile ca.key -selfsign -create_serial -config openssl_root.cnf -extensions root_ca -out ca.pem
I have now ca.pem (the certificate) and ca.key (the private key)
now I create a Subordinate Certification Authority
openssl genrsa -out subca1.key 4096
obviously, I create a new section in the cnf file for the subordinate authority, name v3_ca
openssl req -new -key subca1.key -out subca1.csr -config openssl_root.cnf -extensions v3_ca -sha384
fill the fields and sign by
openssl ca -days 3650 -in subca1.csr -keyfile ca.key -cert ca.pem -config openssl_root.cnf -extensions v3_ca -out
I have now subca1.pem and subca1.key
If I test it
openssl verify -CAfile ca.pem -verbose subca1.pem
subca1.pem: OK
Now, I gonna do the new (re-newed) authority..
I MUST use the same private key ca.key...
openssl req -new -key ca.key -out newca.csr -config openssl_root.cnf -extensions root_ca -sha384
I put some information "updated" in the fields when fill the questionary, and sign
openssl ca -days 3650 -in newca.csr -keyfile ca.key -selfsign -create_serial -config openssl_root.cnf -extensions root_ca -out newca.pem
if I test now
subca1.pem: C = VE, O = empresa 1, OU = Gerencia Criptografia, L = La Urbina, ST = Miranda, telephoneNumber = 02129889977, mail = pki#empresa1.com, serialNumber = J123453450, CN = PSC Subordinado Empresa 1 PRUEBA
error 20 at 0 depth lookup:unable to get local issuer certificate
I review the public key and is the same, and the SubjectKeyIdentifier and AuthorityKeyIdentifier
openssl x509 -in ca.pem -pubkey -noout
-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----
MIICIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEAxxG1bEsUyDU1X31qJJNC
7uBYQhRsNi0dgsvcrIruPiQAcg3pH8Pu/WdnDmIdn/OUV9IvMPa22BPm1zaLZ/HF
EkHJxGdThEpcCtsd2ET0KhqYQ21s78lCyQGMdJvmh/FBLuVBsd7IvxgARqTl2402
4HXv+PavFaANM5AO+UnEjXDHXI0ce560l8s+rivlDjoSZRNGBLEla0wl0Jf6oo8l
fV+m9zMbKsLvScXWsoq+aO6I5BY8WhJtU4vXRRjDVp5t4L6PCnHJpOFL6+jLxeJH
N83FEeNkjw681ZFoB6pFG2QdndzKK0hcRJb1+526GRY97sKBfCOkQgNsTjHoF2ST
SudbWarWmFZg4ofF6wNCt205q6siMJiNM9h67xFUwDFoUTav6m5GdCdgFdgBvODN
zSwc5e4V56bgh5Iyz7CZmTdAVxncy74EqJNV+PjcYnxei2Xb1BaenLyiLzZdk+OY
Wlp+6CQtebeU3nTZfNFpyV3XjkXpZJs5CGAgNTr9wRbtQxKbK/R+DOQoIk/b+g6s
3WfTJ8V7fktIX+vrdOe7vBayXh/Q5AEuNvGH4h0v+ziGZrIL68iTuQdDy/qrivtp
0AB4fVknp+q4ZOXGoLmWFDQjFBmzFFS7aZHCMhwRevp3F3jsWTgYDYEag6IeJVc/
ZH8VjHsthnkI6T/OlBVI3DsCAwEAAQ==
-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
openssl x509 -in newca.pem -pubkey -noout
-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----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-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
is exactly the same...
But it doesn't match!
I guess the trouble maybe is in the SubjectKeyIdentifier and AuthorityKeyIdentifier but its match if I review both certificates,
Any help? Thanks

Related

How to extract certificate subject attribute values in ASN.1 format?

using openssl command directly on prompt I can print the subject of a certificate directly to ASN.1 format:
openssl x509 -subject -noout -nameopt rfc2253 -nameopt dump_all -nameopt oid -nameopt sep_multiline -in mycertificate.cer
The certificate is:
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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==
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
The output of the command above is:
subject=
0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=#132437323138653161662D313935662D343262352D613434622D386337383238343730663561
2.5.4.97=#132A4F464242522D37346539323964392D333362362D346438352D386261372D633134366338363761383137
1.3.6.1.4.1.311.60.2.1.3=#1302554B
2.5.4.15=#131450726976617465204F7267616E697A6174696F6E
2.5.4.5=#130E3433313432363636303030313937
2.5.4.3=#1303747070
2.5.4.10=#13134F70656E2042616E6B696E672042726173696C
2.5.4.7=#13064C4F4E444F4E
2.5.4.8=#1302524A
2.5.4.6=#13024252
I'm trying to get a similar output using NodeJS, but without success... I've tried X509Certificate from crypto, ans1js, pk1js, but haven't success.
Is there a way to get the values using Node?
Thx
As mentioned in the comment, the best way is to use https://nodejs.org/api/crypto.html#x509subject
The output is a string and is perfectly parsable
This is an ordered collection of key/values ('=' separating key from value and '\n' separating each key/value)
The ouput for your certificate is:
C=BR
ST=RJ
L=LONDON
O=Open Banking Brasil
CN=tpp
serialNumber=43142666000197
businessCategory=Private Organization
jurisdictionC=UK
organizationIdentifier=OFBBR-74e929d9-33b6-4d85-8ba7-c146c867a817
UID=7218e1af-195f-42b5-a44b-8c7828470f5a
This is the human readable form of the component subject of your certificate encoded here as an ASN.1 value (search for subject rdnSequence)
Note that ASN.1 format is not a thing ...

Hyperledger Fabric How to generate peer sans certificates via fabric-ca-client

I am trying to run a Hypderledger v2.0 fabric-ca-client binary file to get certificates with SANS configurations...
$ fabric-ca-client enroll -u ${CA_FULL_URL} --tls.certfiles ${CA_CERT_PATH} --csr.hosts peer0-org1 --enrollment.profile tls
So we have "--csr.hosts peer0-org1" to supposedly generate certs that include SAN(Subject Alternative Name)...
BUT when checking it with $ openssl x509 -noout -text -in certificateX123.pem
The result is:
Certificate:
Data:
Version: 3 (0x2)
Serial Number:
01:3b:4f:ea:63:1a:03:b4:61:45:e9:44:1b:29:dc:ed:e6:bc:0b:76
Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256
Issuer: C = US, ST = North Carolina, O = Hyperledger, OU = Fabric, CN = fabric-ca-server
Validity
Not Before: Jun 21 05:14:00 2020 GMT
Not After : Jun 18 05:14:00 2035 GMT
Subject: C = US, ST = North Carolina, O = Hyperledger, OU = Fabric, CN = fabric-ca-server
Subject Public Key Info:
Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey
Public-Key: (256 bit)
pub:
04:3c:3f:d9:97:7e:fc:08:e5:0a:3f:fe:b3:fe:70:
33:20:92:6c:88:78:19:35:08:00:98:97:17:8b:af:
03:44:2d:a4:4d:65:63:fc:d8:b5:4c:23:cc:e6:63:
55:a3:4f:04:62:72:8d:b2:fa:f1:9a:9d:14:9f:f9:
aa:33:ee:fe:e8
ASN1 OID: prime256v1
NIST CURVE: P-256
X509v3 extensions:
X509v3 Key Usage: critical
Certificate Sign, CRL Sign
X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical
CA:TRUE, pathlen:1
X509v3 Subject Key Identifier:
78:B7:6D:51:91:0C:9E:6C:31:C9:63:67:34:BD:CA:18:B5:C5:35:D1
Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256
30:44:02:20:6a:1a:92:cc:45:9b:c9:a5:4d:61:b9:bd:a3:94:
b2:2c:52:7a:16:36:91:12:f9:a0:1f:fe:77:29:a3:1e:05:5d:
02:20:7f:e0:5d:c9:03:4f:8e:b2:6d:66:a4:8f:04:fb:e0:e6:
52:cf:e0:e9:3a:1a:36:bc:7b:98:99:f9:c4:64:c6:7e
I don't see any SANS configurations like
SANS:
- "localhost"
- "127.0.0.1"
So WHY is there no SANS configuration in the generated certificate??? Please help. Thank you!
#Russo , As mentioned by #ChintanRajvir it is a fabric tls-ca. You don't need SANS in tls-ca. Instead check network/crypto-config/peerOrganizations/beta.com/peers/peer1.beta.com/tls/server.crt. Change the Org-name accordingly. This is the certificate which requires SANS not the tls-ca.
Snippet
openssl x509 -in crypto-config/peerOrganizations/beta.com/peers/peer1.beta.com/tls/server.crt -text -noout
Certificate:
Data:
Version: 3 (0x2)
Serial Number:
06:ca:fc:cb:29:77:d1:ff:b5:19:ac:64:67:89:26:e2:2e:28:61:00
Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256
Issuer: C = US, ST = North Carolina, O = Hyperledger, OU = Fabric, CN = ca.beta.com
Validity
Not Before: Jun 23 07:34:00 2020 GMT
Not After : Jun 23 07:39:00 2021 GMT
Subject: C = US, ST = North Carolina, O = Hyperledger, OU = peer, CN = peer1.beta.com
Subject Public Key Info:
Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey
Public-Key: (256 bit)
pub:
04:4d:d3:f8:a8:a8:0f:f9:e4:81:f9:43:ae:fe:bb:
44:d7:4f:de:c7:82:e5:29:66:22:bc:4c:49:e6:a4:
a4:f8:26:84:09:2a:51:1b:81:38:0d:9c:13:21:9b:
38:98:9d:d5:2f:45:75:d4:4b:62:45:01:74:1f:ad:
bf:5d:af:7e:47
ASN1 OID: prime256v1
NIST CURVE: P-256
X509v3 extensions:
X509v3 Key Usage: critical
Digital Signature, Key Encipherment, Key Agreement
X509v3 Extended Key Usage:
TLS Web Server Authentication, TLS Web Client Authentication
X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical
CA:FALSE
X509v3 Subject Key Identifier:
54:D6:E3:AC:54:8C:8A:A3:13:32:4A:78:30:E7:59:8A:3C:EB:EE:3C
X509v3 Authority Key Identifier:
keyid:10:4E:E0:F4:A7:86:57:01:A0:28:25:99:57:A9:F2:55:5D:CD:E0:4F
X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
DNS:peer1.beta.com, DNS:localhost
1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.1:
{"attrs":{"hf.Affiliation":"","hf.EnrollmentID":"peer1.beta.com","hf.Type":"peer"}}
Signature Algorithm: ecdsa-with-SHA256
30:44:02:20:1e:fe:18:8b:2f:7c:a3:1b:4e:1a:db:5d:96:49:
31:d5:ca:3d:e9:92:75:14:4d:38:49:a2:15:88:de:77:33:77:
02:20:33:19:ec:9c:ac:e4:43:90:b2:f6:2b:3b:f0:a8:45:d4:
a9:7e:0b:e2:80:ba:86:75:df:5a:f2:fe:90:b8:18:52

Get https://gcp.io/v2/: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority

I am trying to push my docker image to Google Cloud Registry but get a 509 error say the certificate signed by unknown authority. This never used to be a problem and I can't seem to fix the issue. Any help is appreciated.
I'm running
docker -- push gcp.io/project/registry
Error
Get https://gcp.io/v2/: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority
I'm on Mac OS.
Update: you have a typo, you need to go to gcr.io, not gcp.io.
[ Original answer ]
Looks like a certificate issue on gcp.io:
$ openssl s_client -showcerts -connect gcp.io:443 </dev/null
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, OU = PositiveSSL Wildcard, CN = *.gcp.io
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, OU = PositiveSSL Wildcard, CN = *.gcp.io
verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate
verify return:1
---
Certificate chain
0 s:OU = Domain Control Validated, OU = PositiveSSL Wildcard, CN = *.gcp.io
i:C = GB, ST = Greater Manchester, L = Salford, O = Sectigo Limited, CN = Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----
1 s:C = US, ST = New Jersey, L = Jersey City, O = The USERTRUST Network, CN = USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
i:C = SE, O = AddTrust AB, OU = AddTrust External TTP Network, CN = AddTrust External CA Root
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIIFdzCCBF+gAwIBAgIQE+oocFv07O0MNmMJgGFDNjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQwFADBv
MQswCQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLQWRkVHJ1c3QgQUIxJjAkBgNVBAsTHUFk
ZFRydXN0IEV4dGVybmFsIFRUUCBOZXR3b3JrMSIwIAYDVQQDExlBZGRUcnVzdCBF
eHRlcm5hbCBDQSBSb290MB4XDTAwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFow
gYgxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMRMwEQYDVQQIEwpOZXcgSmVyc2V5MRQwEgYDVQQHEwtK
ZXJzZXkgQ2l0eTEeMBwGA1UEChMVVGhlIFVTRVJUUlVTVCBOZXR3b3JrMS4wLAYD
VQQDEyVVU0VSVHJ1c3QgUlNBIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gQXV0aG9yaXR5MIICIjAN
BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAg8AMIICCgKCAgEAgBJlFzYOw9sIs9CsVw127c0n00yt
UINh4qogTQktZAnczomfzD2p7PbPwdzx07HWezcoEStH2jnGvDoZtF+mvX2do2NC
tnbyqTsrkfjib9DsFiCQCT7i6HTJGLSR1GJk23+jBvGIGGqQIjy8/hPwhxR79uQf
jtTkUcYRZ0YIUcuGFFQ/vDP+fmyc/xadGL1RjjWmp2bIcmfbIWax1Jt4A8BQOujM
8Ny8nkz+rwWWNR9XWrf/zvk9tyy29lTdyOcSOk2uTIq3XJq0tyA9yn8iNK5+O2hm
AUTnAU5GU5szYPeUvlM3kHND8zLDU+/bqv50TmnHa4xgk97Exwzf4TKuzJM7UXiV
Z4vuPVb+DNBpDxsP8yUmazNt925H+nND5X4OpWaxKXwyhGNVicQNwZNUMBkTrNN9
N6frXTpsNVzbQdcS2qlJC9/YgIoJk2KOtWbPJYjNhLixP6Q5D9kCnusSTJV882sF
qV4Wg8y4Z+LoE53MW4LTTLPtW//e5XOsIzstAL81VXQJSdhJWBp/kjbmUZIO8yZ9
HE0XvMnsQybQv0FfQKlERPSZ51eHnlAfV1SoPv10Yy+xUGUJ5lhCLkMaTLTwJUdZ
+gQek9QmRkpQgbLevni3/GcV4clXhB4PY9bpYrrWX1Uu6lzGKAgEJTm4Diup8kyX
HAc/DVL17e8vgg8CAwEAAaOB9DCB8TAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBStvZh6NLQm9/rEJlTv
A73gJMtUGjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUU3m/WqorSs9UgOHYm8Cd8rIDZsswDgYDVR0PAQH/
BAQDAgGGMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1Ud
HwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9BZGRUcnVzdEV4
dGVybmFsQ0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGWh0
dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEMBQADggEBAJNl9jeD
lQ9ew4IcH9Z35zyKwKoJ8OkLJvHgwmp1ocd5yblSYMgpEg7wrQPWCcR23+WmgZWn
RtqCV6mVksW2jwMibDN3wXsyF24HzloUQToFJBv2FAY7qCUkDrvMKnXduXBBP3zQ
YzYhBx9G/2CkkeFnvN4ffhkUyWNnkepnB2u0j4vAbkN9w6GAbLIevFOFfdyQoaS8
Le9Gclc1Bb+7RrtubTeZtv8jkpHGbkD4jylW6l/VXxRTrPBPYer3IsynVgviuDQf
Jtl7GQVoP7o81DgGotPmjw7jtHFtQELFhLRAlSv0ZaBIefYdgWOWnU914Ph85I6p
0fKtirOMxyHNwu8=
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
---
Server certificate
subject=OU = Domain Control Validated, OU = PositiveSSL Wildcard, CN = *.gcp.io
issuer=C = GB, ST = Greater Manchester, L = Salford, O = Sectigo Limited, CN = Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA
---
No client certificate CA names sent
Peer signing digest: SHA512
Peer signature type: RSA
Server Temp Key: ECDH, P-256, 256 bits
---
SSL handshake has read 3435 bytes and written 424 bytes
Verification error: unable to verify the first certificate
---
New, TLSv1.2, Cipher is ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
Server public key is 2048 bit
Secure Renegotiation IS supported
Compression: NONE
Expansion: NONE
No ALPN negotiated
SSL-Session:
Protocol : TLSv1.2
Cipher : ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
Session-ID: A1FB2B7B405094705F0DAFCAABA63B4E1ABDE5C122F2F3E5A7DE88ECB75AB617
Session-ID-ctx:
Master-Key: A0FB112FC9A33BD96E2346627A4E99A03F5C8AA404B19215EA3226A487B034E17EAC38AE0BD79C6B51E882BDC0DECE90
PSK identity: None
PSK identity hint: None
SRP username: None
Start Time: 1588527367
Timeout : 7200 (sec)
Verify return code: 21 (unable to verify the first certificate)
Extended master secret: no
---
DONE
And I see a similar error from curl -v https://gcp.io/v2/. This will need to be resolved by Google.

Invoking Webhook from GitLab returns SSL error

When creating a Webhook in GitLab 11.0.2 and testing it, I get this back this error:
Hook execution failed: SSL_connect returned=1 errno=0 state=SSLv2/v3 read server hello A: tlsv1 alert internal error
The Webhook URI is using HTTPS with a public certificate (not self signed).
SSL verification is disabled for this Webhook.
Update
I upgraded openssl1.0.2g to openssl1.0.2o but the error remains.
Then I tried to run:
openssl s_client -connect mywebhookhost:443
That resulted in:
depth=1 C = BE, O = GlobalSign nv-sa, CN = GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
Update 2
/opt/gitlab/embedded/bin/ruby -ropenssl -e 'puts OpenSSL::OPENSSL_VERSION'
returns
OpenSSL 1.0.2o 27 Mar 2018
Update 3
GlobalSign CA certs are installed
awk -v cmd='openssl x509 -noout -subject' '
> /BEGIN/{close(cmd)};{print | cmd}' < /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt | grep GlobalSign
results in
subject=OU = GlobalSign ECC Root CA - R4, O = GlobalSign, CN = GlobalSign
subject=OU = GlobalSign ECC Root CA - R5, O = GlobalSign, CN = GlobalSign
subject=C = BE, O = GlobalSign nv-sa, OU = Root CA, CN = GlobalSign Root CA
subject=OU = GlobalSign Root CA - R2, O = GlobalSign, CN = GlobalSign
subject=OU = GlobalSign Root CA - R3, O = GlobalSign, CN = GlobalSign
From this thread, it looks like your openssl is too old
Have been fighting with TLS for a few days, realised my GitLab was running on an old debian8, upgraded to debian9. So now.
python -c "import ssl; print ssl.OPENSSL_VERSION"
OpenSSL 1.1.0f 25 May 2017
So start checking/upgrading openssl, for your webhook script to run properly.
I have the same problem and to solve that i need to install root certificates on gitlab server.
See here how to.

Express Can Use .pfx file with encrypted private key without the private key's password

I have an express instance and an unencrypted pfx which contains my cert and an encrypted private key. When I load the pfx in express, I do not need to provide any sort of password, and it works. How is the node.js instance getting access to the private key? Isnt access to the unencrypted private key needed for https to work?
express code:
var httpsOptions = {
'pfx': fs.readfileSync('./cert.pfx'),
'passphrase': ''
};
https.createServer(httpsOptions, expressApp).listen(443, 'example.com');
My .pfx info from openSSL looks like the following:
openssl pkcs12 -in cert.pfx -info
MAC Iteration 2048
MAC verified OK
PKCS7 Encrypted data: XXXXXXXXXXXX, Iteration 2048
Certificate bag
Bag Attributes
localKeyID: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
subject=/OU=Domain Control Validated/CN=*.example.com
issuer=/C=US/ST=Arizona/L=Scottsdale/O=GoDaddy.com,
Inc./OU=http://certs.godaddy.com/repository//CN=Go Daddy Secure
Certificate Authority - G2
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
XXXXXXXXXXX=
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
PKCS7 Data
Shrouded Keybag: pbeWithSHA1And3-KeyTripleDES-CBC, Iteration 2048
Bag Attributes
localKeyID: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
Key Attributes: <No Attributes>
Enter PEM pass phrase:
Verifying - Enter PEM pass phrase:
-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
Proc-Type: 4,ENCRYPTED
DEK-Info: DES-EDE3-CBC,XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX==
-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----
Turns out both the pfx itself and the private key within the pfx were stored unencrypted.
I mistakenly thought the private key within the pfx was encrypted because 1.) I was told it was and
2.) and because the openSSL package will not display the raw private key unless explicitly told to with the -nodes option
when openssl displays Enter PEM pass phrase: as it did above, it was asking for how to encrypt the displayed output: not how to decrypt the stored key, as I originally thought
The correct command I was looking for above was
openssl pkcs12 -in cert.pfx -info -nodes

Resources