I've been fiddling around with the basic nested selection example in the documentation and I've discovered a behaviour that I cannot explain.
Here's the example with added logging (formatted as spoilers):
<!-- language: lang-js -->
var matrix = [
[11975, 5871, 8916, 2868],
[1951, 10048, 2060, 6171],
[8010, 16145, 8090, 8045],
[1013, 990, 940, 6907]
];
var tr = d3.select("body")
.append("table")
.selectAll("tr")
.data(matrix, function(d, i) {
console.log(d); // called 4 times, printing [11975, 5871, 8916, 2868] and [1951, 10048, 2060, 6171] and [8010, 16145, 8090, 8045] and [1013, 990, 940, 6907], which is nice
return i;
})
.enter().append("tr")
.attr("test", function(d) {
console.log(d); // again, called 4 times, printing [11975, 5871, 8916, 2868] and [1951, 10048, 2060, 6171] and [8010, 16145, 8090, 8045] and [1013, 990, 940, 6907], which is nice
return "test";
});
var td = tr.selectAll("td")
.data(function(d) {
console.log(d); // I'm expecting this to be called 4*4=16 times, printing 11975 and then 5871 and then 8916 and then 2868 and then 1951 and so on. Not the case! This line prints the same as above!
return d;
})
.enter().append("td")
.text(function(d) {
console.log(d); // this prints exaclty what I'm expecting: 11975 and then 5871 and then 8916 and then 2868 and then 1951 and then 10048 and then 2060 and then 6171 and so on.
return d;
});
Why is spoiler#3 printing the matrix elements instead of the matrix sub elements?
I think the short answer is: because the <td> elements haven't been created yet.
I ran your code followed by these snippets:
console.log(tr);
tr.selectAll("td").data(function(d){
console.log(d); // equivalent to spoilers 1/2/3
return d;
});
console.log(td);
td.selectAll("td").data(function(d){
console.log(d); // equivalent to spoiler 4
return d;
});
The data isn't bound to each <td> until the enter-append in the last chunk. After that, the tr variable is still 4 <tr> elements, now with 4 child <td> elements each, while the td variable is actually 4 arrays of <td> elements. They have differently structured data associated with them.
Related
The function outputs correctly on online code editors but I am not successful in replicating the output on my browser. What's the correct way of outputting it to my browser? I have tried numerous methods. Here is the function I want to output.
function countdown(i) {
console.log(i);
if (i <= 1) { // base case
return;
} else { // recursive case
countdown(i - 1);
}
}
countdown(5); // This is the initial call to the function.
Here is my most recent attempt at output on my web browser
function countDown(i) {
document.getElementById("recursiveFuncAttempt").innerHTML = i;
if (i <= 1) {
return;
} else {
cat = countDown(i - 1);
return document.getElementById("recursiveFuncAttempt").innerHTML = cat;
}
}
countDown(5);
<div>
countdown attempt
<button onclick="countDown()">click me</button>
<p id="recursiveFuncAttempt"></p>
</div>
Grouping your code and the comments together...
Your original code was correct but instead of logging to the console you should add the value to the text content of a page element.
Logging the different values in the console - line by line - gives an appearance of time passing which updating the text content of a DOM element wouldn't give you. All you would see is the last digit in the sequence because the function would work faster than your eyes can see.
Therefore a a timeout is needed to pause execution for n time before calling the function again.
You can simplify the code a little by eliminating the else part of the condition.
// Cache the element
const div = document.querySelector('div');
// Add a default value to count if a value
// is not passed into the function
function countdown(count = 5) {
// If count is zero just return
if (count < 1) return;
// Otherwise update the text content
// of the cached element
div.textContent = count;
// Wait one second (1000ms), and call the function
// with a decremented count
setTimeout(countdown, 1000, --count);
}
countdown();
div { font-size: 5em; color: blue; font-weight: 700;}
<div></div>
I have a node project using puppeteer.
I run the following code in console and I get 170 results back
circlenod = window.document.querySelectorAll('area[templateid="ucChart_pnlip"]');
for (var i = 0; i < circlenod.length; i++) {
console.log('circlenod --> : ', circlenod[i]);
}
However when I try to use page evaluate in puppet or $$ method, I get no results coming back
let test;
let list = await page.$$('area[templateid="ucChart_pnlip"]');
console.log('list ===> ', list); ===> this is empty
await page.evaluate(() => {
console.log('coming in ??'); ==> never see this
test = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('area[templateid="ucChart_pnlip"]'));
for (var i = 0; i < test.length; i++) {
console.log('circlenod --> : ', test[i]); ==> never see this
}
})
console.log('test', test); ==> undefined
This is an example of the element. How can I extract this information from the attribute after looping through all the <area /> fields="date|5/1/2020|14"
<area shape="poly" coords="802,235,807,233,807,241,802,243" fields="date|5/1/2020|14" templateid="ucChart_pnlip" href="../../../../../../UserControls/History/Single/#" onclick="charttip_Show(this, event);return false" alt="">
I found a solution for this, I am putting this out there for whoever needs it. when you get array of elements, you need to spicify the attribute of the element that you want
let test= await page.evaluate((sele) =>{
const elements = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll(sele))
let links = elements.map(element=>{
return element.getAttribute('fields');
})
return links;
},'area[templateid="ucChart_pnlip"]')
console.log(test)
So the way I am building pagination in Reactjs is a bit odd, but it works for me, I, How ever would like to say show me the first 5 (1-5) on the 5th page show me 5-max. But I am unclear on how to do that.
this is what I currently have:
render: function() {
// Do we have more then one page?
if (this.props.maxPages > 0){
// We have to add one to the max pages that come back.
var pageLink = this.props.maxPages + 1;
var currentPage = this.props.currentPage;
var liElements = []
// Build [<<][<] for the user.
if (pageLink > 1) {
liElements.push(<li><<</li>);
liElements.push(<li><a href={this.pageSubtraction(currentPage, pageLink)}><</a></li>);
}
// Build the individual [x][y][z] links.
for (var i = 1; i <= pageLink; i++) {
liElements.push(<li key={i} id={i}><a href={"#posts?page="+i}>{i}</a></li>);
}
// Build the [>][>>] for the user.
if (pageLink > 1) {
liElements.push(<li><a href={this.pageAddition(currentPage, pageLink)}>></a></li>);
liElements.push(<li><a href={"#posts?page="+pageLink}>>></a></li>);
}
return (<ul className="pagination">{liElements}</ul>);
}else{
// Return nothing.
return ( <div></div> );
}
}
This will build me [<<][<][1][2][3] ... [>][>>] which is great but their is no limit on it.
At this time:
pageLink = 6 (the max number of pages - I know horrible variable name)
currentPage = 1 (the current page you are on)
So what I need is:
[<<][<][1][2][3][4][5][>][>>] Select Page 5 [<<][<][5][6][>][>>] But I am not sure if my current set up will allow me to do that.
This is a somewhat complicated algorithm (and not all of the details are provided). Rather than worrying about markup here, it might be simpler to start with a pure data structure representing what should be drawn.
Pagination = function(props){
var pages = props.maxPages + 1;
var current = props.currentPage;
var links = [];
// leading arrows
if (current > 0) {
links.push([0, "<<"]);
links.push([current - 1, "<"]);
}
for (var i=current-3; i<current+4; i++) {
if (i > 0 && i < pages) {
links.push([i, i]);
}
}
// tailing arrows
if (current < pages) {
links.push([current + 1, ">"]);
links.push([pages - 1, ">>"]);
}
return JSON.stringify(links, null, 4);
};
Now we get something like this (jsbin). You could also easily write unit tests to ensure this gives the correct results.
[
[
0,
"<<"
],
[
1,
"<"
],
[
1,
1
],
[
2,
2
],
[
3,
3
],
[
4,
4
],
[
5,
5
],
[
3,
">"
],
[
7,
">>"
]
]
Once you're getting the right data here, you can map that data through a presentation function.
function PageLink(i, char){
character = character || String(i);
return (
<li key={char}>
<a href={"#posts?page="+i}>{char}</a>
</li>
);
}
Pagination = function(props){
/* same code as before */
return links.map(function(x){
return PageLink(x[0], x[1]);
});;
};
P.s. when you do get it to match your requirements, please post an answer here so others can use it as a base for their pagination.
Below is the complete code for creating a paging option.Full post is available here.
var pager = React.createClass({
render : function(){
var li = [];
var pageCount = props.Size;
for(var i = 1; i <=pageCount; i++){
if(props.currentPage == i){
li.push(<li key={i} className="active">{i}</li>);
}
else{
li.push(<li key={i} ><a href="#" onClick={props.onPageChanged.bind(null,i)}>{i}</a></li>);
}
}
return (<ul className="pagination">{li}</ul>);
}
});
var dataGrid = React.createClass({
render : function(){
return (
<tr>
<td>{props.item.Name}</td>
<td>{props.item.Address}</td>
<td>...</td>
.....
</tr>
);
}
});
var EmployeeGridTable = React.createClass({
getInitialState : function(){
return {
Data : {
List : [],
totalPage : 0,
sortColumnName : null,
sortOrder : null,
currentPage : 1,
pageSize : 3
}
}
},
componentDidMount : function(){
this.populateData();
},
populateData: function(){
var params = {
pageSize : this.state.Data.pageSize,
currentPage : this.state.Data.currentPage
}
if(this.state.Data.sortColumnName){
params.sortColumnName = this.state.Data.sortColumnName;
}
if(this.state.Data.sortOrder){
params.sortOrder = this.state.Data.sortOrder;
}
$.ajax({
url : this.props.dataUrl,
type : 'GET',
data : params,
success : function(data){
if(this.isMounted()){
this.setState({
Data : data
});
}
}.bind(this),
error: function(err){
alert('Error');
}.bind(this)
});
},
pageChanged:function(pageNumber,e){
e.preventDefault();
this.state.Data.currentPage = pageNumber;
this.populateData();
},
sortChanged : function(sortColumnName, order , e){
e.preventDefault();
this.state.Data.sortColumnName = sortColumnName;
this.state.Data.currentPage = 1;
this.state.Data.sortOrder = order.toString().toLowerCase() == 'asc' ? 'desc':'asc';
this.populateData();
},
_sortClass : function(filterName){
return "fa fa-fw " + ((filterName == this.state.Data.sortColumnName) ? ("fa-sort-" + this.state.Data.sortOrder) : "fa-sort");
},
render : function(){
var rows = [];
this.state.Data.List.forEach(function(item){
rows.push(<dataGrid key={item.EmployeeID} item={item}/>);
});
return (
<div>
<table className="table table-responsive table-bordered">
<thead>
<tr>
<th onClick={this.sortChanged.bind(this,'FirstName',this.state.Data.sortOrder)}>First Name
<i className={this._sortClass('FirstName')}></i></th>
<th onClick={this.sortChanged.bind(this,'LastName',this.state.Data.sortOrder)}>
Last Name
<i className={this._sortClass('LastName')}></i></th>
<th onClick={this.sortChanged.bind(this,'EmailID',this.state.Data.sortOrder)}>
Email
<i className={this._sortClass('EmailID')}></i>
</th>
<th onClick={this.sortChanged.bind(this,'Country',this.state.Data.sortOrder)}>
Country
<i className={this._sortClass('Country')}></i>
</th>
<th onClick={this.sortChanged.bind(this,'City',this.state.Data.sortOrder)}>
City
<i className={this._sortClass('City')}></i>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>{rows}</tbody>
</table>
<pager Size={this.state.Data.totalPage} onPageChanged={this.pageChanged} currentPage={this.state.Data.currentPage}/>
</div>
);
}
});
ReactDOM.render(<EmployeeGridTable dataUrl="/home/getEmployeeList"/>, document.getElementById('griddata'));
I was wandering if there is a way to adjust width of the math mathjax renders. Some math expression I have are longer and won't fit in a box I have created. Is there a way to squeeze it and make it fit maybe by changing the size or width? I have tried using line breaks but that isn't what I want. An example would be a mathjax like this:
2x+3+4 - /intcos(x) dx
234567897+sin(2x)+34567890987654.
Displaying the last line would be a problem because it won't fit in the box. It overflows
Well, you could use \small or \scriptsize or \Tiny (non-standard) or \tiny within the mathematics to make it appear in a smaller size.
Alternatively, you could put a <span style="font-size:70%">...</span> around the mathematics to get the math to be scaled to whatever size you need. E.g.,
<span style="font-size:70%">\(234567897+sin(2x)+34567890987654\)</span>
Note that the math delimiters must be inside the <span>.
I found a solution that doesn't require adding elements or css code:
// resize all LaTeX Display elements to they fit in on screen
function cvonk_ResizeMathJax() {
jQuery('.MathJax_Display').each(function(ii, obj) {
var latex = obj.children[0];
var w = latex.offsetWidth;
var h = latex.offsetHeight;
var W = obj.offsetWidth;
if (w > W) {
obj.style.fontSize = 95 * W / w + "%";
}
});
}
window.MathJax = {
AuthorInit: function() {
MathJax.Hub.Register.StartupHook("Begin", function() {
MathJax.Hub.Queue(function() {
cvonk_ResizeMathJax();
});
});
},
jax: ["input/TeX", "output/HTML-CSS", "output/NativeMML"],
extensions: ["tex2jax.js"]
};
window.addEventListener("resize", function() {
cvonk_ResizeMathJax();
});
From the Google Groups discussion linked to above:
function changeSize(button) {
var myeqn = document.getElementById('myeqn');
myeqn.style.fontSize = button.textContent;
MathJax.Hub.Queue(
['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, 'myeqn'],
function () {
document.getElementById('mylabel').innerHTML =
'width: ' + myeqn.offsetWidth + ", height: " + myeqn.offsetHeight;
});
}
See http://jsfiddle.net/nLyraL1f/ or http://jsfiddle.net/s2bjepk6/.
This is also nice because it gets the width and height of the rendered latex, useful for things like rendering it as an element positioned over a canvas since you can draw things on the canvas around it.
Hi this is an example of the code i want to run:
$('#search1').submit(function(){
var date = $('#date').val();
var location = $('#location').val();
var datastring = 'date=' + date + '&location=' + location;
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
cache: "true",
url: "search.php",
dataType:"json",
data: datastring,
success: function(data){
$('#main').html('')
for ($i = 0, $j = data.bus.length; $i < $j; $i++) {
//Create an object for each successful query result that holds information such as departure time, location, seats open...
$('#main').append(html);
}
How would I go about coding the success function? I want the object to store each bus' information so that the info can be displayed in the search result as well as being able to be referenced when the user confirms his RSVP later on. Thanks ahead of time
You can declare an object to use as a map in the containing scope:
var busInfo = {};
...and then if the bus entries have some form of unique identifier, you can record them like this:
success: function(data){
var $i, $j, bus;
$('#main').html('')
for ($i = 0, $j = data.bus.length; $i < $j; $i++) {
// Remember this bus by ID
bus = data.bus[$i];
busInfo[bus.id] = bus;
$('#main').append(html);
}
}
And then later, when the user chooses a bus, use the chosen ID to get the full bus information:
var bus = busInfo[theChosenId];
This works because all JavaScript objects are key/value maps. Keys are always strings, but the interpreter will happily make strings out of what you give it (e.g., busInfo[42] = ... will work, 42 will become "42" implicitly).
If you just want an array, your data.bus already is one, right?
var busInfo = [];
// ....
success: function(data){
var $i, $j;
// Remember it
busInfo = data.bus;
$('#main').html('')
for ($i = 0, $j = data.bus.length; $i < $j; $i++) {
$('#main').append(html);
}
}
(Note that JavaScript arrays aren't really arrays, they too are name/value maps.)
Update: I dashed off a quick example of the keyed object (live copy):
HTML:
<input type='button' id='btnLoad' value='Load Buses'>
<br>...and then click a bus below:
<ul id="busList"></ul>
...to see details here:
<table style="border: 1px solid #aaa;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>ID:</th>
<td id="busId">--</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Name:</th>
<td id="busName">--</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Route:</th>
<td id="busRoute">--</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
JavaScript with jQuery:
jQuery(function($) {
// Our bus information -- note that it's within a function,
// not at global scope. Global scope is *way* too crowded.
var busInfo = {};
// Load the buses on click
$("#btnLoad").click(function() {
$.ajax({
url: "http://jsbin.com/ulawem",
dataType: "json",
success: function(data) {
var busList = $("#busList");
// Clear old bus info
busInfo = {};
// Show and remember the buses
if (!data.buses) {
display("Invalid bus information received");
}
else {
$.each(data.buses, function(index, bus) {
// Remember this bus
busInfo[bus.id] = bus;
// Show it
$("<li class='businfo'>")
.text(bus.name)
.attr("data-id", bus.id)
.appendTo(busList);
});
}
},
error: function() {
display("Error loading bus information");
}
});
});
// When the user clicks a bus in the list, show its deatils
$("#busList").delegate(".businfo", "click", function() {
var id = $(this).attr("data-id"),
bus = id ? busInfo[id] : null;
if (id) {
if (bus) {
$("#busId").text(bus.id);
$("#busName").text(bus.name);
$("#busRoute").text(bus.route);
}
else {
$("#busId, #busName, #busRoute").text("--");
}
}
});
});
Data:
{"buses": [
{"id": 42, "name": "Number 42", "route": "Highgate to Wycombe"},
{"id": 67, "name": "Old Coach Express", "route": "There and Back"}
]}
Off-topic: Note that I've added var $i, $j; to your success function. Without it, you're falling prey to The Horror of Implicit Globals, which you can tell from the name is a Bad Thing(tm).