Any idea how to exclude sharebutton.to sharebutton.to keywords referral?
I tried to exclude it by Admin -> Filters - > New Filter - > Non-standard and putting campaign refferal but it`s still appearing in GA
Don't create simple exclude filters, or you will have to create a new one each time a spammer shows up.
Instead, create an Include filter with your valid hostnames, this will block all Google Analytics Spam of this type, no matter if it shows as a referral, keyword, page, etc.
Here is a related thread https://stackoverflow.com/a/28354319/3197362
Related
We have monorepo, my team responsible for 3 of 20 packages/folder of repository, but sometimes we need to touch others packages/folders.
For reviewing teammates changes every member should add “team_label” for ability to filter by this label or to keep opened several tabs with merge requests for each author/team member.
Preferable could be filtering MRs something like this by one of the author:
author: username1 OR author:username2 OR author:username3
We are using GitLab Enterprise Edition 12.6.2-ee
upd:
discussed in gitlab docs comments and there is no ability to filter merge requests even with advanced search
Advanced Search does currently not have the facets available that you use in the dedicated issue or MR search
https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/search/index.html#comment-4776091890
Feature proposal:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/issues/7826
To filter merge request and all the other kind of thing you want to search for you can read this guide on how to search with filters:
GitLab Filter Guide
Anyway if you want a quick suggestion you have to go in the "Merge request" section of your sidebar menu. After that, you can see on the upper part of the tables where all the merge request are listed a little search bar that says "Search or filter results..." if you click on that a little dropdown opens up to suggest you how to use the search bar.
To search in a list of all the authors you have to input the following: author: (this will let you see a little dropdown with all the authors) or you can search directly with an author name putting a "#" before his name.
If you want to concatenate more filter criteria you have to put AND or OR as you would do in a SQL query. But anything is well explained in the guide.
Unfortunately to date you can't search merge requests with an OR query - and although gitlab states that successive clauses should be ANDed together a quick test suggests that in fact an arbitrary single clause is applied.
See e.g. https://forum.gitlab.com/t/mr-filtering-by-multiple-authors/33864
I've been tasked with setting up an advanced filter for a customer facing portal - as part of this, I have filters set up for various tags such as Priority, Site, Application, Reference. I've come up with a way to generate a URL that goes to the list and sets the filters to the selections given, by giving an html navigation command using a JavaScript function to splice together the URL.
This works fine for use within my team, however customers shouldn't have full access to our lists, and we have a customer-facing portal that currently has a limited view of these lists displayed to them, with much fewer details and none of our internal notes. These limited views are done through a web part that displays the Soaped in view - this is where I'm wanting to have the filtered list show up, as it's a more user-friendly way to search the list for information that the customer would want.
You can add a Query String (URL) Filler Wepart to the page, configure it for the param in the URL and configure connection or the List WebPart to receive filter value from the Query String Filler.
Add QSF webpart:
Configure the WP:
Establish Connection (go to the WP Edit mode first)
Test the URL param: ...sharepoint.com/sites/dev/SitePages/TestPage.aspx?Disp=1
I'm using OpenSearchServer to provide search functionality on a web site. I want to crawl all pages on the site for links to follow but I want to exclude some pages from the index. I can't work out how to do this.
Specifically the website includes a shop that has its own product search and I am keeping this search for products and categories. The product pages have URLs like http://www.thesite/p/123 so I don't want to include any page like this in the search results. However some product pages reference background info pages and I want these to be included in the search index.
The problem I have is that the filter has no effect on the results - it doesn't filter out the /p/ and /c/ results. If I change the filter by unticking the negative box I get no results so it seems to be either the contents of the field or the filter criteria that is causing the problem.
I've tried adding a negative filter to the default query called search in the Query > Filter tab on the index with url:"http://www.thesite/p/*"
but it seems that wildcards are not supported for query filters although they are supported for Crawler > Exclusion list filters.
I've tried adding a new field called urlField in Schema > Fields and populating it using an analyzer configured using the Whitespace Tokenizer and a regular expression (http://www.thesite/(c|p)/). When I use the Test button it seems to generate two tokens for my test URL http://www.thesite/p/123:
http://www.thesite/p/
p
I'd hoped to be able to use the first one in a Query > Filter to exclude all the shop results and optionally be able to use the p (for product) or c (for category) if I need to search the product pages sometime in the future.
The urlShop field in the schema is set up as follows:
Indexed: yes
Stored: no (because I don't need the field back, just want to be able to filter on it)
TermVector: No
Analyzer: urlShop
Copy of: url
I've added urlFilter:"http://www.thesite/p/" to Query > Filters with the negative box ticked.
This seems to have no effect on the results when I use the default renderer.
To see whether it affects the returned results I unticked the negative box in the query filter I get no results in the default renderer. This leads me to believe that the urlShop field is not being populated but I'm not sure how to check this directly.
I would like to know whether there is an easier way to do this but if my approach makes sense in the context of OpenSearchServer please can you help me identify what's wrong?
The website is running under IIS and OpenSearchServer will be configured on the same server running in Tomcat.
Finally figured this out...
Go to query and hit edit for your configured query. Then go to the filters tab. Add a query filter like this:
urlExact:"http://myurltoexclude*"
Check the "negative" box. Click add.
Now make sure to click "save in the tiny little button on the right hand side. This is the part I missed. The URLS are still in the DB and crawl, but at least they aren't returned in results.
I have started learning CRM 2011 some couple of weeks ago as my job requires me to get in to it. I am from SharePoint and SQL background. Know other of ASP.NET or oData etc...
My question is, I have dynamic marketing list and our head od marketing want to use that but wants to exclude a static list of customers. We have some bad data and they are bouncing back in email marketing.
Is there any way to create a dynamic marketing list and then exclude a static marketing list from it? Any help will be gratful (links would be awsome!)
Many thanks
I don't think this is possible, I've played for a while, I was able to create a dynamic marketing list which included the results of a static list, but I couldn't get it to exclude a static list.
My suggestion would be to find a commonality (or create one, e.g. a new field or possibly using the marketing preferences) between those contacts and add that filter into your dynamic list.
This might be too late but I thought let me add the solution I now use for this issue.
Out of box this is not possible as mentioned by others. This is what I did to fix it:
1. Add temp flag in crm
2. Create a basic Windows form application where you search for a static market list that you would like to exclude (drop down menu was too big)
3. once selected the correct static marketing list, hit the button that will set the temp flag value of all contacts in this marketing list to '1'.
4. When creating dynamic list, add extra criteria, where temp flag is != 1.
Once the campaign is sent, reset temp flag to 0.
So there's this nifty _trackPageview() api method on a tracker object, but is there a corresponding method that can be used to manually track a search? In other words, _trackPageview() reports to GA that a user hit a page. I want something like _trackSearch("terms") that would report to GA that a user searched for something.
Though not exactly what I was looking for, it seems that one can generate virtual page views to track search results programatically.
Suppose that you've set up a Site Search parameter called "q", so that when a URI is tracked that contains q=these+are+some+terms, GA will mark it as a search hit. One can use the _trackPageview() method to generate virtual search hits like so:
pageTracker._trackPageview('/custom/search?q=These+are+some+terms')
I pass search parameters by GET, so the URL for a search on "TEST" is
http://www.example.com/search?q=TEST
Selecting Content -> Site Search from my analytics account gives me a list of all keywords searched.
To learn more, check the documentation, especially the How do I set up Site Search for my profile? page.