We have been trying to use a SqlConnection within a TransactionScope. When we build the site and try this database call we run into an error:
A transport-level error has occurred when receiving results from the server. (provider: TCP Provider, error: 0 - An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.)
The error involved occurs on the line cnn.Open().
using (var scope = new TransactionScope())
using (var cnn = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
cnn.Open();
int result = cnn.QuerySingle<int>("SELECT 1");
Console.WriteLine(result);
}
We created a console application to figure out what was wrong and discovered that by changing our connection string keyword 'Pooling' from 'false' to 'true' allows this to run in the console application and successfully return our result.
We made the same change to our site connection string, the same error as before returns.
Is there any reason this code is not working?
I was under the assumption that the web.config was law, as viewing the file through the Kudu service showed my expected connection string, but apparently this isn't the case in Azure.
I discovered that Azure Publish Profile is overriding our web.config connection string, this override still contained 'Pooling=false'.
Removing this now allows our code to run as intended.
This blog post explains more:
"When this code runs on a developer’s local machine, the value returned will be the one from the web.config file. However when this code runs in Windows Azure Web Sites, the value returned will instead be overridden with the value entered in the portal"
Related
I have looked through various posts related to this problem, but none provide an answer. I created a .Net 5.0 app that accesses an Azure SQL DB using EF 6.4.4 which works with .Net standard libraries. I modified the EF by adding a function that creates the connection string from appsettings.json since .Net 5 apps don't use a web.config file. This also works well in Azure with the configuration settings in an app service.
The connection string looks like this:
metadata=res://*/EF.myDB.csdl|res://*/EF.myDB.ssdl|res://*/EF.myDB.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string='Data Source=tcp:mydb.database.windows.net,1433;Initial Catalog=myDB;Integrated Security=False;Persist Security Info=False;User ID=myuserid#mydb;Password="password";MultipleActiveResultSets=True;Connect Timeout=120;Encrypt=True;TrustServerCertificate=True'
I also have a deployment pipeline that will deploy the code after a check-in instead of using the Visual Studio publish feature, but the pipeline deployed code has the same problem.
When I first created the app and published it to the app service, it worked. Recently I updated the app with no changes to the EF connection. Now I get the "Invalid Object name when I reference any table in the model. If I run the same code locally and connect to the Azure SQL DB, the DB is accessed as expected. This problem only occurs when running in the Azure app service. Note that there are no connection strings configured for the app service since the EF string is built from the config settings. I saw this post, but I don't think it applies:
Local works. Azure give error: Invalid object name 'dbo.AspNetUsers'. Why?
even though the problem is the same. I have also read various posts about the format of the EF connection string. Since my model is database first, (and the connection used to work), I'm confident the string has the correct format. I don't think the problem is in the code since it works when running locally with a connection to the Azure SQL DB. It must have something to do with the Azure app service configuration, but I'm not sure what to look for at this point. Unfortunately I don't have a copy of the code and publish files that did work to compare to, but it the pipeline build doesn't work either and that it how the code would normally be deployed. Thanks for any insight you might have!
UPDATE
metadata=res://*/EF.myDB.csdl|res://*/EF.myDB.ssdl|res://*/EF.myDB.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string='Data Source=tcp:yourdbsqlserver.database.windows.net,1433;Initial Catalog=yourdb;Persist Security Info=False;User ID=userid;Password=your_password;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Encrypt=True;TrustServerCertificate=False;Connection Timeout=30'
When the troubleshooting problem is not on the string, our easiest way is to use vs2019 to re-use the generated string.
Your connection string should be like below.
<connectionStrings>
<add name="SchoolDBEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/SchoolDB.csdl|res://*/SchoolDB.ssdl|res://*/SchoolDB.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="data source=.\sqlexpress;initial catalog=SchoolDB;integrated security=True;multipleactiveresultsets=True;application name=EntityFramework"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient"/>
</connectionStrings>
For more details, you can refer my answer in the post and the tutorial.
1. Timeout period elasped prior to obtaining a connection from the pool - Entity Framework
2. Entity Framework Tutorial
The problem was one of my config settings in Azure. The catalog parameter was missing. A simple fix, but the error message was misleading, so I thought I would note that here in case anyone else gets the same "Invalid object name" message when referencing an Azure SQL DB with EF. It would have been more helpful if the message was "catalog name invalid" or "unable to connect to database".
For those who are curious about building an EF connection string, here is example code:
public string BuildEFConnectionString(SqlConnectionStringModel sqlModel, EntityConnectionStringModel entityModel)
{
SqlConnectionStringBuilder sqlString = new SqlConnectionStringBuilder()
{
DataSource = sqlModel.DataSource,
InitialCatalog = sqlModel.InitialCatalog,
PersistSecurityInfo = sqlModel.PersistSecurityInfo,
UserID = sqlModel.UserID, // Blank if using Windows authentication
Password = sqlModel.Password, // Blank if using Windows authentication
MultipleActiveResultSets = sqlModel.MultipleActiveResultSets,
Encrypt = sqlModel.Encrypt,
TrustServerCertificate = sqlModel.TrustServerCertificate,
IntegratedSecurity = sqlModel.IntegratedSecurity,
ConnectTimeout = sqlModel.ConnectTimeout
};
//Build an Entity Framework connection string
EntityConnectionStringBuilder entityString = new EntityConnectionStringBuilder()
{
Provider = entityModel.Provider, // "System.Data.SqlClient",
Metadata = entityModel.Metadata,
ProviderConnectionString = sqlString.ToString()
};
return entityString.ConnectionString;
}
Given what I have learned, the properties should be validated before the string is returned. If the string is created this way, all of the connection string properties can be added to the config settings in the app service. I used the options pattern to get them at runtime. Thanks to everyone for your suggestions.
I'm trying to connect to an instance of Azure Redis Cache from my local dev machine. I'm using StackExchange.Redis like so:
var lazyConnection = new Lazy<ConnectionMultiplexer>(() =>
{
return ConnectionMultiplexer.Connect(
$"{redisServerUrl},abortConnect=false,ssl=true,password={redisServerKey},connectTimeout=10000,syncTimeout=10000");
});
When lazyConnection is called I get an InvalidOperationException with the message:
"role discovery data is unavailable"
and this one-liner stack trace:
Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ServiceRuntime.RoleEnvironment.get_CurrentRoleInstance()
Why is the exception thrown and how can I avoid it?
StackExchange.Redis tries to discover the RoleInstance name under the covers if you don't specify a ConfigurationOptions.ClientName value. It is odd that you are getting this error bubbled out to your code because the code in question handles all exceptions and defaults back to returning the Computer name.
I suspect that if you add ",name=XXX" to your connection string, the error will go away because you will avoid that code path.
I can't get SqlDataProvider to work when executed in a fsx script which is running in an Azure Web Site.
I have started from the samples that Tomas Petrecek has here: https://github.com/tpetricek/Dojo-Suave-FsHome.
In short it is a FSX script that is executed using the IIS httpPlatformHandler so that all http requests to my Azure Web site is forwarded to my F# script.
The F# Script use Suave to handle the requests.
When I tried adding some database access to my HTTP handlers I got into problems.
The problematic code looks like this:
[<Literal>]
let connStr = "Server=(localdb)\\v11.0;Initial Catalog=My_Database;Integrated Security=true;"
[<Literal>]
let resolutionFolder = __SOURCE_DIRECTORY__
FSharp.Data.Sql.Common.QueryEvents.SqlQueryEvent |> Event.add (printfn "Executing SQL: %s")
// the following line fails when executing in azure
type db = SqlDataProvider<connStr, Common.DatabaseProviderTypes.MSSQLSERVER, ResolutionPath = resolutionFolder>
let saveData someDataToSave =
let ctx = db.GetDataContext(Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("SQLAZURECONNSTR_QUERIES"))
.....
/// code using the context here
This works just fine when I run it locally, but when I deploy it to the azure site it will fail at the line where the type dbis created.
The error message is (line 70 is the line that has the type db = ...:
D:\home\site\wwwroot\app.fsx(70,11): error FS3033: The type provider
'FSharp.Data.Sql.SqlTypeProvider' reported an error: A network-related
or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to
SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify
that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to
allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 52
- Unable to locate a Local Database Runtime installation. Verify that SQL Server Express is properly installed and that the Local Database
Runtime feature is enabled.)
The design-time database in the connStr is not available in the azure site, but I thought this is why we have the GetDataContext overload that takes a connection string to be used at run-time?
Is it because it is running as a script and not as compiled code that it is trying to access the database when creating the TypeProvider?
If yes, does it mean that my only option is to compile and provide the database code as a compiled assembly that I load and use in my Suave FSX script?
Reading the connection string from a config file does not work very well as this is in a azure site. I really need to get the connection string from an environment variable (which is set in the azure management interface).
Hmm, this is a bit unfortunate - as #Fyodor mentioned in the comments, the problem is that the script-based deployment to Azure actually compiles the script on the Azure machine - and so you need to have a statically-resolved connection string that works on Azure.
There are two options:
Use compiled project instead. If you compile your F# code locally and deploy the compiled code to Azure it will work. Sadly, there are no good samples for that.
Do some clever trick to make the connection string accessible to the script at compile time.
Send a PR to the SQL provider so that you can give it the name of an environment variable and it reads the connection string from there.
I think (3) would actually be quite nice and useful feature.
I'm not necessarily sure what the best way to do (2) would be. But I think you might be able to modify app.azure.fsx so that it creates a file (say connection.fsx) that contains something like:
module Connection
let [<Literal>] ConnString = "<Contents of SQLAZURECONNSTR_QUERIES>"
Then app.fsx could load this script and use Connection.ConnString in the argument of SQL type provider.
I am having problems getting the Microsoft.Azure.Documents library to initialize the client in an azure worker role. I'm using Nuget Package 0.9.1-preview.
I have mimicked what was done in the example for azure document
When running locally through the emulator I can connect fine with the documentdb and it runs as expected. When running in the worker role, I am getting a series of NullReferenceException and then ArgumentNullException.
The bottom System.NullReferenceException that is highlighted above has this call stack
so the nullReferenceExceptions start in this call at the new DocumentClient.
var endpoint = "myendpoint";
var authKey = "myauthkey";
var enpointUri = new Uri(endpoint);
DocumentClient client = new DocumentClient(endpointUri, authKey);
Nothing changes between running it locally vs on the worker role other then the environment (obviously).
Has anyone gotten DocumentDb to work on a worker role or does anyone have an idea why it would be throwing null reference exceptions? The parameters getting passed into the DocumentClient() are filled.
UPDATE:
I tried to rewrite it being more generic which helped at least let the worker role run and let me attached a debugger. It is throwing the error on the new DocumentClient. Seems like some security passing is null. Both the required parameters on initialization are not null. Is there a security setting I need to change for my worker role to be able to connect to my documentdb? (still works locally fine)
UPDATE 2:
I can get the instance to run in release mode, but not debug mode. So it must be something to do with some security setting or storage setting that is misconfigured I guess?
It seems I'm getting System.Security.SecurityExceptions - only when using The DocumentDb - queues do not give me that error. All Call Stacks for that error seem to be with System.Diagnostics.EventLog. The very first Exception I see in the Intellitrace Summary is System.Threading.WaitHandleCannotBeOpenedException.
More Info
Intellitrace summary exception data:
top is the earliest and bottom is the latest (so System.Security.SecurityException happens first then the NullReference)
The solution for me to get rid of the security exception and null reference exception was to disable intellitrace. Once I did that, I was able to deploy and attach debugger and see everything working.
Not sure what is between the null in intellitrace and the DocumentClient, but hopefully it's just in relation to the nuget and it will be fixed in the next iteration.
unable to repro.
I created a new Worker Role. Single instance. Added authkey & endoint config to cscfg.
Created private static DocumentClient at WorkerRole class level
Init DocumentClient in OnStart
Dispose DocumentClient in OnStop
In RunAsync inside loop,
execute a query Works as expected.
Test in emulator works.
Deployed as Release to Production slot. works.
Deployed as Debug to Staging with Remote Debug. works.
Attached VS to CloudService, breakpoint hit inside loop.
Working solution : http://ryancrawcour.blob.core.windows.net/samples/AzureCloudService1.zip
I am attempting to obtain a data feed from yahoo finance. I am doing this with the following code:
System.Net.WebRequest request = System.Net.WebRequest.Create(http://download.finance.yahoo.com/download/quotes.csv?format=sl&ext=.csv&symbols=^ftse,^ftmc,^ftas,^ftt1x,^dJA);
request.UseDefaultCredentials = true;
// set properties of the request
using (System.Net.WebResponse response = request.GetResponse())
{
using (System.IO.StreamReader reader = new System.IO.StreamReader(response.GetResponseStream()))
{
return reader.ReadToEnd();
}
}
I have placed this code into a console application and, using Console.WriteLine on the output I receive the information I require. I have used the 'Run as..' command to execute this using a specific domain account.
When I use this code from within a Page load I receive the following error message "No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it 76.13.114.90:80".
This seems to suggest that the call is reaching yahoo (is this true?) and that there is something missing.
This would suggest there is an identity difference in the calls between the console application and application pool.
Environment is: Windows Server 2003, IIS 6.0, .net 4.0
"Target machine actively refused it" indicates that the TCP connection itself is not succeeding. This could be due to the fact that the Proxy settings when run under IIS are not the same as those that apply when you run in the console.
You can fix this by setting a WebProxy on your request, that points to the proxy server being used in the environment.
Yes, an active refusal is indication that the target machine is receiving the request and the information in the headers is either incorrect or insufficient to process the request. It is entirely possible that if you had to run this call using a "run as" command in console that the application pool's identity user does not have the appropriate permission or username. You can attempt to change the identity user to this specific domain account to see if that alleviates the problem, but you may have to isolate this particular function into its own application pool in order to protect the rest of the website from having this specification.