This was taken and improved slightly from Question that has since been deleted
For those who can see deleted posts, it was taken from here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39793322/three-dimensional-lookup-no-concatenate-or-named-ranges-excel
I'm trying to do a three dimensional lookup without named ranges or concatenates. Simplified, my data is on the form:
Column1 Column2 Column3
Scott
P 1 2 3
M 4 5 6
N 7 8 9
George
P 10 11 12
M 13 14 15
N 16 17 18
I now want to search for a specific Name and then for a specific letter within that names table, I then want to match this row number with a specific column.
I tried a simple INDEX/MATCH:
=INDEX(A:D,MATCH("M",A:A,0),MATCH("Column1",1:1,0))
And that works for the fist name but not any others as it finds the first instance of M.
How do I modify it to look for a different name?
I have answered below, but want to see if someone has a better solution.
I used an IF() statement array formula to find what the P row number was after the George row... I also needed to use the MIN() function to get the first P row number after the name.
Beyond that, it's a simple INDEX() function.... that racked my brain for over an hour :).
=INDEX($A$1:$D$9,MIN(IF((ROW(A1:A9)>MATCH($F$4,A1:A9,0))*(A1:A9=$F$5),ROW(A1:A9),"")),MATCH($F$6,$A$1:$D$1,0))
Don't Forget!
Use Ctrl+Shift+Enter when finishing the formula, so it gets evaluated as an array formula.
You can use two other INDEX/MATCH's inside the first MATCH to set the lookup range. Then you simply need to add the MATCH() to find the absolute position of the name.
=INDEX(A:D,MATCH($H$4,INDEX(A:A,MATCH($H$3,A:A,0)):INDEX(A:A,MATCH($H$3,A:A,0)+4),0)+MATCH($H$3,A:A,0)-1,MATCH($H$5,$1:$1,0))
This one works better and does not have a size constraint:
=INDEX(A:D,MATCH(F4,INDEX(A:A,MATCH(F3,A:A,0)):A1040000,0)+MATCH(F3,A:A,0)-1,MATCH(F5,A1:D1,0))
You can do this just by adding the results of two matches together. One match for the names plus one match for the letter equals the total row.
=INDEX(A:D,MATCH(G5,A3:A5,0)+MATCH(G3,A:A,0),MATCH(G4,1:1,0))
In other words: Index(All of the Data, Match(Name, In name column, exact) + Match(Letter, In letter column, exact), Match(Column name, in Column row, exact)
Screen capture of working sheet
My answer attempts the general case with only one caveat:
That a letter is single character text, and a name is more than 1 character. Otherwise i feel there is no difference logically between letters and names, and it is then impossible to really do...
RE-EDIT for better function construction:
{=INDEX($A$1:$D$17, MATCH($H$3,$A1:$A17, 0)+MATCH($H$4, INDEX($A1:$A17, MATCH($H$3,$A1:$A17, 0)):INDEX($A:$A, SMALL(IFERROR(MATCH($H$3,$A1:$A17, 0)+POWER(SQRT(IF(LEN($A$1:$A$17)>1, ROW($A$1:$A$17), 0)-MATCH($H$3,$A$1:$A$17, 0)), 2)-1, ROWS($A$1:$A$17)), 2)), 0)-1, MATCH($H$5, $A$1:$D$1, 0))}
This uses an array formula along column A, and checks if the length is > 1 and throws the row nums into an array, with letters given a 0.
Then match row of unique name(e.g. George) is subtracted from each.
We then use a min(of all other name rows, with the last data row as the final default - SMALL function with 2 parameter) to find the next name row(or last data row if there is no following name).
Rest is standard index/match etc.
It will correctly return #N/A if there is no such letter under the chosen name...
My dataset is A1:A17, and the formula could use A:A instead each time, but the array calc inside the IF needs the A1:A17 for speed.
EDIT for better function construction:
If we wanted to avoid editing the formula when the data length changes, then we could let full column references of A:A go through the entire construction(and lose speed/efficiency) with the last data row in colA calculated via ROWS(A:A):
Re-edit:
{=INDEX($A:$D, MATCH($H$3,$A:$A, 0)+MATCH($H$4, INDEX($A:$A, MATCH($H$3,$A:$A, 0)):INDEX($A:$A, SMALL(IFERROR(MATCH($H$3,$A:$A, 0)+POWER(SQRT(IF(LEN($A:$A)>1, ROW($A:$A), 0)-MATCH($H$3,$A:$A, 0)), 2)-1, ROWS($A:$A)), 2)), 0)-1, MATCH($H$5,1:1, 0))}
It really depends on the setup...
Edit again for version which takes blanks as separators for names
If you want to use blanks as the separator for names, where no blanks are in the data results, but blanks appear in columns B to D where there is a name, then a tiny change in the above formulae will result in this:
=INDEX($A$1:$D$17, MATCH($H$3,$A$1:$A$17, 0)+MATCH($H$4, INDEX($A:$A, MATCH($H$3,$A:$A, 0)):INDEX($A:$A, SMALL(IFERROR(MATCH($H$3,$A:$A, 0)+POWER(SQRT(IF($B$1:$B$17="", ROW($A$1:$A$17), 0)-MATCH($H$3,$A$1:$A$17, 0)), 2)-1, ROWS($A$1:$A$17)), 2)), 0)-1, MATCH($H$5, $A$1:$D$1, 0))
This means that the names and letters do not have to be any specified length, but just one proviso is that blanks appear in the row with the name.
A small amendment to the condition to find the end range to search for the letter by replacing this: SQRT(IF(LEN($A$1:$A$17)>1, with this:
SQRT(IF($B$1:$B$17="",
I would use the area (4th parameter) of Index(). Below is a screenshot of test data. This example assumes the same columns and keys are sorted and consistent.
This works by using (Range1,Range2) as the first parameter of index. For the 4th parameter of index, use N for which area in the () you want Index to return.
I think this may be slightly tidier, and a little easier to modify maybe.
=INDEX(OFFSET(INDIRECT("A"&MATCH($H$3,$A:$A,0),TRUE),0,0,4,4),MATCH($H$4,$A:$A,0),MATCH(H5,$1:$1,0))
Using offset to create the range first, we're able to use the name from H3 to set that up, and then beyond that we are just indexing within that new range.
Now this is still dependendent on staying in Column A for the names.
Assuming the format of the data is always Name then P, M and N this formula does the work:
=INDEX($A:$D,
MATCH($H$3,$A:$A,0)
+LOOKUP($H$4,{"P",1;"M",2;"N",3}),
MATCH($H$5,$1:$1,0))
This solution works on almost all conditions. One restriction I found is when one of the subjects (Names) does no have data for any of the details (letters), but as of now the same occurs with all the other answers.
The formula assumes the data is located at B6:F30 (in order to ensure it can be applied regardless of the source range location).
The formula uses the Index\Match functions:
First, a MATCH to retrieve the position of the Name:
MATCH($H8,$B$6:$B$30,0)
With that info it uses INDEX to build a range that is used to obtain the position of the Detail (letter) using a second MATCH Function:
+ MATCH($I8,INDEX($B$6:$B$30, 1 + MATCH($H8,$B$6:$B$30,0))
:INDEX($B$6:$B$30,ROWS($B$6:$B$30)),0),
Adding the results of the first and second MATCH functions obtains the position of the Name`Detail` combination and uses it in an Index to the entire data. The position of the Data Column required is obtained with a Match:
INDEX($B$6:$F$30, 1st.MATCH + 2nd.MATCH,
MATCH(J$6,$B$6:$F$6,0))
With the results located at G6:L30 enter this formula in J8 then copy to J8:L30:
= INDEX( $B$6:$F$30,
MATCH( $H8, $B$6:$B$30, 0)
+MATCH( $I8, INDEX( $B$6:$B$30 , 1 + MATCH( $H8, $B$6:$B$30 ,0))
: INDEX( $B$6:$B$30, ROWS($B$6:$B$30) ),0),
MATCH( J$6, $B$6:$F$6, 0)),"")
This solution works in all conditions discussed so far (let me know of any condition that it does not work and I’ll try to cover it).
I’m posting this as a separated answer as the formulas applied in prior answer rightly apply to the conditions stated in them, as such they will be useful to users with those specific scenarios, so they don’t need to apply these long formulas.
This formula assumes the data is located at B6:E30 (in order to ensure it can be applied regardless of the source range location).
This formula uses the Index\Match functions and it’s a Formula Array.
FormulaArrays are entered pressing [Ctrl] + [Shift] + [Enter] simultaneously, you shall see { and } around the formula if entered correctly
Syntax:
=IFERROR(INDEX(DataRng,
MATCH(Value1,NamesRng,0)
+IFERROR(MATCH(Value2,INDEX(NamesRng,
1+MATCH(Value1,NamesRng,0))
:INDEX(NamesRng, IFERROR(MATCH(Value1,NamesRng,0)
+MATCH("#",IF((INDEX(Col1Rng,1+MATCH(Value1,NamesRng,0))
:INDEX(Col1Rng,ROWS(NamesRng)))="","#","!"),0),
ROWS(NamesRng))),0),NA()),MATCH(ValCol,DataHdr,0)),"")
Arguments:
Assuming the data is located at B6:E30.
Value1= Name to be found in Data, i.e. George, Scott, etc.
Value2= Detail to be found in Data, i.e. Detail1, Detalle2, etc.
ValCol = Column to be found in Data i.e. Column1, Column2, etc.
DataRng= $B$6:$E$30
DataHdr= $B$6:$E$6
NamesRng= $B$6:$B$30
Col1Rng= $C$6:$C$30
1st MATCH: Retrieves the position of the Name:
MATCH(Value1,NamesRng,0)
2nd MATCH: Retrieves the end position of the Name’s corresponding Details, which is determined by a blank value in column C or the end of the data range:
MATCH("#",IF((INDEX(Col1Rng, 1 + 1stMATCH)
:INDEX(Col1Rng,ROWS(NamesRng)))="","#","!"),0),
Builds a Range (vRange): With the Names's Details using the 1st and 2nd match functions. If 2nd Match returns an error then it uses the last row of the Data range:
INDEX(NamesRng, 1 + 1stMATCH )
:INDEX(NamesRng, IFERROR( 1stMATCH + 2ndMATCH, ROWS(NamesRng)))
3rd MATCH: Retrieves the position of the Detail within the vRange. It returns #NA if the combination is not present.
IFERROR(MATCH(Value2, vRange,0), NA())
Adding the results of the 1st and 3rd match functions obtains the Row index of the Name`Detailcombination or#NAif no found.
The Column index is obtained with a Match from the Header of the Data.
It then applying the INDEX function to the Data Range returns the value of theName\Detail\Columncombination.
If theName\Detail` combination is not found it returns blank.
=IFERROR( INDEX( DataRng, 1stMATCH + 3rdMATCH, MATCH(Column,DataHdr,0)),"")
With the results located at H6:L37 enter this Formula Array in J8 then copy to K8:L37 and to J9:L37:
=IFERROR( INDEX($B$6:$E$30,
MATCH($H8,$B$6:$B$30,0)
+IFERROR( MATCH($I8, INDEX($B$6:$B$30,
1+MATCH($H8,$B$6:$B$30,0))
:INDEX($B$6:$B$30, IFERROR(MATCH($H8,$B$6:$B$30,0)
+MATCH("#", IF((INDEX($C$6:$C$30,1+MATCH($H8,$B$6:$B$30,0))
:INDEX($C$6:$C$30,ROWS($B$6:$B$30)))="","#","!"),0),
ROWS($B$6:$B$30))),0),NA()),
MATCH(J$6,$B$6:$E$6,0)), "")
Wow... So many solutions already.
I think a simpler solution could be using offset to get a more generic answer.
=INDEX($A$1:$D$9, MATCH($G$3,OFFSET($A$1,MATCH($G$2,$A$1:$A$9,0),0,3,1),0)+MATCH($G$2,$A$1:$A$9,0), MATCH($G$4,$B$1:$D$1,0)+1)
The only variable to look for is 3 which is the number of M/N/P options present because that will affect the number of rows. Otherwise, the solution works fine in all possible scenarios and different orders.
When I have more than two inpunts for a data search I prefer to have the data organized as shown in the figure, so that I can use a pivot table and get it to organize the data in rows and columns as I like.
Then I use GETPIVOTDATA to search for a value.
Cell G9 contains this formula:
=GETPIVOTDATA("Value";$F$3;"Name";G15;"Letter";G16;"Column";G17)
Related
A
B
C
D
4
1
6
5649
3
8
10
9853
5
2
7
1354
I have two worksheets, for example column A in sheet 1 and columns B-D in sheet 2.
What I want to do is to take one value in Column A, and scan both columns B and C and it is between those two values, then display the corresponding value from column D in a new worksheet.
There could be multiple matches for each of the cell in column A and if there is no match, to skip it and not have anything displayed. Is there a way to code this and somehow create a loop to do all of column A? I tried using this formula, but I think it only matches for each row and not how I want it to.
=IF(AND([PQ.xlsx]Sheet1!$A2>=[PQ.xlsx]Sheet2!$B2,[PQ.xlsx]Sheet1!$A2<[PQ.xlsx]Sheet2!$C2),[PQ.xlsx]Sheet2!$D$2,"")
How do I do this?
Thank you.
I'm not positive if I understood exactly what you intended. In this sheet, I have taken each value in A:A and checked to see if it was between any pair of values in B:C, and then returned each value from D:D where that is true. I did keep this all on a single tab for ease of demonstration, but you can easily change the references to match your own layout. I tested in Excel and then transferred to this Google Sheet, but the functions should work the same.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-RR1UZC8-AVnRoj1h8JLbnXewmzyDQKuKU49Ef-1F1Y/edit#gid=0
=IFERROR(TRANSPOSE(FILTER($D$2:$D$15, ($A2>=$B$2:$B$15)*($A2<=$C$2:$C$15))), "")
So what I have done is FILTEREDed column D on the two conditions that Ax is >= B:B and <= C:C, then TRANSPOSED the result so that it lays out horizontally instead of vertically, and finally wrapped it in an error trap to avoid #CALC where there are no results returned.
I added some random data to test with. Let me know if this is what you were looking at, or if I misunderstood your intent.
SUPPORT FOR EXCEL VERSIONS WITHOUT DYNAMIC ARRAY FUNCTIONS
You can duplicate this effect with array functions in pre-dynamic array versions of Excel. This is an array function, so it has be finished with SHFT+ENTER. Put it in F2, SHFT+ENTER, and then drag it to fill F2:O15:
=IFERROR(INDEX($D$2:$D$15, SMALL(IF(($A2>=$B$2:$B$15)*($A2<=$C$2:$C$15), ROW($A$2:$A$15)-MIN(ROW($A$2:$A$15))+1), COLUMNS($F$2:F2))),"")
reformatted for easier explanation:
=IFERROR(
INDEX(
$D$2:$D$15,
SMALL(
IF(
($A2>=$B$2:$B$15)*($A2<=$C$2:$C$15),
ROW($A$2:$A$15) - MIN(ROW($A$2:$A$15))+1
),
COLUMNS($F$2:F2)
)
),
"")
From the inside out: ROW($A$2:$A$15) creates an array from 2 to 15, and MIN(ROW($A$2:$A$15))+1 scales it so that no matter which row the range starts in it will return the numbers starting from 1, so ROW($A$2:$A$15) - MIN(ROW($A$2:$A$15))+1 returns an array from 1 to 14.
We use this as the second argument in the IF clause, what to return if TRUE. For the first argument, the logical conditions, we take the same two conditions from the original formula: ($A2>=$B$2:$B$15)*($A2<=$C$2:$C$15). As before, this returns an array of true/false values. So the output of the entire IF clause is an array that consists of the row numbers where the conditions are true or FALSE where the conditions aren't met.
Take that array and pass it to SMALL. SMALL takes an array and returns the kth smallest value from the array. You'll use COLUMNS($F$2:F2) to determine k. COLUMNS returns the number of columns in the range, and since the first cell in the range reference is fixed and the second cell is dynamic, the range will expand when you drag the formula. What this will do is give you the 1st, 2nd, ... kth row numbers that contain matches, since FALSE values aren't returned by SMALL (as a matter of fact they generate an error, which is why the whole formula is wrapped in IFERROR).
Finally, we pass the range with the numbers we want to return (D2:D15 in this case) to INDEX along with the row number we got from SMALL, and INDEX will return the value from that row.
So FILTER is a lot simpler to look at, but you can get it done in an older version. This will also work in Google Sheets, and I added a second tab there with this formula, but array formulas work a little different there. Instead of using SHFT+ENTER to indicate an array formula, Sheets just wraps the formula in ARRAY_FORMULA(). Other than that, the two formulas are the same.
Since FALSE values aren't considered, it will skip those.
I am currently trying to extract the prefix of a store ID to be able to then generate a list of stores with only that prefix.
Cell D1 has that formula to extract the unique prefix :
=TRANSPOSE(UNIQUE(LEFT(C2#, MIN(FIND({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9},C2#&"0123456789"))-1)))
Cell C2 has that formula to extract the unique store ids from another sheet :
=UNIQUE(INDEX('Male Shoes'!A1#,,6))
The problem is that the formula in D1 only returns the first two characters from all the unique prefixes instead of using the correct value for each prefixes.
I have setup in column I the same formula as in D1 without the TRANSPOSE() and UNIQUE() functions and remove the # to see if that would return the correct value. I dragged it down the length of the C column.
=LEFT(C2, MIN(FIND({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9},C2&"0123456789"))-1)
In Cell J2 I put the same formula has I2 but kept the # as a control.
=LEFT(C2#, MIN(FIND({0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9},C2#&"0123456789"))-1)
I believe the MIN() function is returning the minimum for the entire array and not for each row. I haven't found how to mitigated that problem anywhere online.
In my sample data that is not a problem since all the columns in D through G gave me the lists I was expecting but as more countries get added I might end up with duplicate country prefix. (i.e.: If the prefixes get shortened to 2 characters - Germany=GE and Georgia=GE)
If it is always 2 or three a simple IF instead of FIND will work:
=TRANSPOSE(UNIQUE(LEFT(C2#,IF(ISNUMBER(--MID(C2#,3,1)),2,3))))
Edit:
If there is only one time that it switches from alpha to numeric we can use:
=TRANSPOSE(UNIQUE(LEFT(C2#,MMULT(ISNUMBER(--MID(C2#,SEQUENCE(,MAX(LEN(C2#))),1))*ISERROR(--MID("A"&C2#,SEQUENCE(,MAX(LEN(C2#))),1)),SEQUENCE(MAX(LEN(C2#))))-1)))
This does not care how many characters are in the string, only that there is only 1 time that it switches from alpha to numeric. So ABDEFGHTEV4567 will work but A3D4 will not.
I am running a small study that basically needs to match suitable people into pairs and assign them a pair number, so each can be assigned into group A or B.
They basically need to be from the same Medical Clinic, same gender, and either below 80, or 80+ years of age.
I'm not sure if this is even possible with excel, but basically I have a sheet with a form that you enter the new participants information. I need a formula that basically checks these 3 criteria against previous entries to find someone who matches on all 3, then assign the same pair number. If it can't find a suitable match, it needs to assign a new pair number.
In the above sample data set, I want I3 to realise that C3, D3 and E3 all match C2, D2 and E2, then put a 1 in I3.
Then for I4, it would assign a 2 as it doesn't match any entries above it. Same for I5. Then I6 would realise the match in I4 and put a 2.
Not sure if this makes sense. Also there can't be more than 2 of each pair #, but I can deal with that after I am able to get the numbers generating.
If you can change column D to Age group, (71-80, 81-90 etc.) the following formula would do what you want as a first step (more than 2 people grouped together). Paste the following formula in I3 and hit cntrl+shift+enter as it is a array formula. Copy it down to other cells below.
=IFERROR(INDEX(F$1:F2,MATCH(C3&D3&E3,C$1:C2&D$1:D2&E$1:E2,0)),MAX(F$2:F2)+1)
This matches a combination of strings in columns C, D and E in the current row to array of string combination in previous rows and assigns the same Pair number, if there is no match it gets the next new number.
Try this modified formula (array formula) to not put more than two entries in a group. I have created another column G which is G2 = C2&D2&E2
=IF(COUNTIF(G$1:G2,G3)<2,IFERROR(INDEX(F$1:F2,MATCH(C3&D3&E3,C$1:C2&D$1:D2&E$1:E2,0)),MAX(F$2:F2)+1),MAX(F$2:F2)+1)
This response expands on your original requirements by returning the actual PT ID numbers of the matched pairs as well as a unique 'paired group' identifier.
The original criteria age brackets (e.g. 70-80, 81+) are used and no matched pair is used more than once.
If you already have a match from further up the data then you will want to return the paired PT ID. A simple INDEX/MATCH function pair can do that. If a match has not already been made then the IFERROR function can pass processing over to a nested INDEX function that uses the AGGREGATE¹ function rather then MATCH to return the appropriate row number.
AGGREGATE is used with its SMALL sub-function. This allows the COUNTIFS function to increment to the second, third, etc. pairing by examining the matches³ made previously.
With expanded sample data the formula in I2:K2 are,
'formula for I2
=IFERROR(IFERROR(INDEX(B$1:B1, MATCH(B2, I$1:I1, 0)),
INDEX(B:B, AGGREGATE(15, 6, ROW(B$1:INDEX(B:B, MATCH(1E+99, B:B)))/
((B:B<>B2)*(C:C=C2)*(E:E=E2)*IF(D2>80, D:D>80, (D:D>=70)*(D:D<=80))),
COUNTIFS(C$1:C1, C2, E$1:E1, E2, D$1:D1, IF(D2>80, ">80", ">=70"), D$1:D1, IF(D2>80, ">80", "<=80"))+1))),
"NO MATCH")
'formula for J2
=IFERROR(INDEX(J$1:J1, MATCH(I2, B$1:B1, 0)), MAX(J$1:J1)+1)
'formula for K2 (volatile and random - see footnote ⁴)
=IFERROR(IF(INDEX(K$1:K1, MATCH(J2, J$1:J1, 0))="A", "B", "A"), IF(ISNUMBER(I2), CHAR(RANDBETWEEN(65, 66)), ""))
Fill down as necessary.
¹ The AGGREGATE function was introduced with Excel 2010. It is not available in earlier versions.
² While AGGREGATE-based formulas are entered as conventional formulas (i.e. without CSE), AGGREGATE does apply cyclic array-style processing. Try and reduce your full-column references to ranges more closely representing the extents of your actual data. Array processing chews up calculation cycles logarithmically so it is good practise to narrow the referenced ranges to a minimum. See Guidelines and examples of array formulas for more information.
³ Your original narrative stated '... either between 70 and 80 or above 80 years of age.' while your subsequent comment stated 'Under 80 or 80+'. These are not the same thing. I've used the former original description since you never edited the question for clarification.
⁴ The formula destined for K2 is volatile and uses the RANDBETWEEN function. Once you are happy with the results, use Copy, Paste Special, Values to revert the formula to its underlying values. Leaving the formula intact with RANDBETWEEN means the values could change with any change throughout the workbook. Only the initial A/B value for each matched pair is random; the match in the pair will always be the A or B counterpart.
First, you can create a new column (J) that concatenates the 3 values you are comparing, you can do this with a formula like this:
=C2&IF(D2>80,"YES","NO")&D3
The you can fill I2 with a formula that checks is the concatenated value repeats in the data set with a fomula like this:
=COUNTIFS($J$2:$J$6,J2)>1
So I've looked up tutorials on how to do this, and I'm still struggling, so I could use some expert help. I know it involves a very complex nested formula with things like SMALL, ROW, INDEX, etc...
So here are two screenshots that provide a sample of what I'm looking for. In realities there is over 1000 rows, but this makes it easier for you guys.
So here is my first example, lets call this Sheet1!:
Code, ID_1 and ID_2. So as you can see (and just focus on the input in A2) there will be two separate IDs in the linked workbook. That sheet, or at least a tiny sample of it, looks like this:
In the first column we see the code we're looking for (which is what we have in A2 of the first one), each of them with different IDs. So as I'm sure you can tell by now, I'm looking for a formula that will allow me to return those values in ID_1 and ID_2 in the first sheet.
I have been going at this for an hour and I'm stumped, so I would greatly appreciate any help provided!
This is a more generic code if the ids are NOT listed consecutively: Obviously I have done this as an example to take in a more general case where the ids occur anywhere throughout the second dataset, AND where there are potentially several.
IFERROR(INDEX($V$2:$V$15, SMALL(IF($U$2:$U$15=$M2, ROW($U$2:$U$15), FALSE), COLUMNS($N2:N2))-ROW($V$1), 1), "")
This formula must be entered with Ctrl-Shift-Enter before copying across and down! Note all absolute and relative referencing/locking ($ signs)
The logical steps in constructing such a formula:
1) We use IF function to test if the values in the column U match the value in column M.
2) In the 'value-if-true' parameter, we will get the corresponding row number of values in column U. These numbers will be fed later in the SMALL function.
3) In the value-if-false part, we just return false, as that will later be used as a non-number in the SMALL function
Above 3 steps in the part: IF($U$2:$U$15=$M2, ROW($U$2:$U$15), FALSE)
4 ) We have now an array of mixed row numbers and FALSE values, which we want to feed to the INDEX function to simply get the corresponding value in column V(our second datset). BUT as we wish to retrieve the different row matches for each code, we have to fish them out of the mixed array with the SMALL function.
5) using our columns as an incrementer, we apply the SMALL function to the array with a varying k parameter. We USE the COLUMNS function (note carefully the different $ sign usage), so that as we drag the formula across, the column count increments: COLUMNS($N2:N2) - giving K values of 1, 2, 3, 4 as we drag the formula across from column N to column Q. Note that it is useful that the SMALL function disregards FALSE values when looking through the array for the values by size.
6) There is an adjustment to account for the fact that the rows are relative to the 'Ids' range which we will feed into the INDEX function to retrieve the different ids. SMALL(IF($U$2:$U$15=$M2, ROW($U$2:$U$15), FALSE), COLUMNS($N2:N2))-ROW($V$1).
This can be avoided if we use the entire column V as the look-up array parameter in the INDEX function, but that's another way...
7) This resulting value can now be passed to the INDEX function to obtain the various ids. The column_num parameter of 1 which I put in the function isn't necessary in a single-column look-up array, but is there for completeness.
8) The entire construction is then wrapped in an IFERROR function to give an empty string if there is no match, but some people may wish to have error outputs there...
well if the two ID will be consecutive in the second list try this:
=index('workbookname'SheetName!columnrangeofserialnumbers,match(A2,'workbookname'Sheetname!columnrangeofIDs,0))
Assuming your other workbook is called Serials, and all the info is on sheet1 you would enter the follow in B2:
=index('serials'sheet1!$B$2:$B$1000,match(A2,'serials'sheet1!$B$2:$B$1000,0))
in C2 enter the following (assuming ids will show up consecutively)
=index('serials'sheet1!$B$2:$B$1000,match(A2,'serials'sheet1!$B$2:$B$1000,0)+1)
This only works if the other workbook is open as far as I know and with the understanding that the two ID will be listed consecutively in the list.
I am currently drawing up a spreadsheet that will automatically remove duplicates and alphabetize a list:
I am using the COUNTIF() function in column G to create a sort order and then VLOOKUP() to find the sort in column J.
The problem I am having is that I can't seem to get my SortOrder column to function properly. At the moment it creates an index for two number 1's meaning the cell highlighted in yellow is missed out and the last entry in the sorted list is null:
If anyone can find and rectify this mistake for me I'll be very grateful as it has been driving me insane all day! Many thanks.
I'll provide my usual method for doing an automatic pulling-in of raw data into a sorted, duplicate-removed list:
Assume raw data is in column A. In column B, use this formula to increase the counter each time the row shows a non-duplicate item in column A. Hardcord B2 to be "1", and use this formula in B3 and drag down.
=if(iserror(match(A3,$A$2:A2,0)),B2+1,B2)
This takes advantage of the fact that when we refer to this row counter in our revised list, we will use the match function, which only checks for the first matching number. Then say you want your new list of data on column D (usually I do this for display purposes, so either 'group-out' [hide] columns that form the formulas, or do this on another tab). You can avoid this step, but if you are already using helper columns I usually do each step in a different column - easier to document. In column C, starting in C3 [C2 hardcoded to 1] and drag down, just have a simple counter, which error-checks to the stop at the end of your list:
=if(C2<max(B:B),C2+1," ")
Then in column D, starting at D2 and dragged down:
=iferror(index(A:A,match(C2,B:B,0)),"")
The index function is like half of the vlookup function - it pulls the result out of a given array, when you provide it with a row number. The match function is like the other half of the vlookup function - it provides you with the row number where an item appears in a given array.
Hope this helps you in the future as well.
The actual reason that this is going wrong as implied by Jeeped's comment is that you can't meaningfully compare a string to a number unless you do a conversion because they are stored differently. So COUNTIF counts numbers and text separately.
20212 will give a count of 1 because it is the only (or lowest) number.
CS10Z002 will give a count of 1 because it is the first text string in alphabetical order.
Another approach is to add the count of numbers to the count if the current cell contains text:-
=COUNTIF(INDIRECT("$D$2:$D$"&$F$3),"<="&D2)+ISTEXT(D2)*COUNT(INDIRECT("$D$2:$D$"&$F$3))
It's easier to show the result of three different conversions with some test data:-
(0) No conversion - just use COUNTIF
=COUNTIF(D$2:D$7,"<="&D2)
"999"<"abc"<"def", 999<1000
(1) Count everything as text
=SUMPRODUCT(--(D$2:D$7&""<=D2&""))
"1000"<"999"
(2) Count numbers before text
=COUNTIF(D$2:D$7,"<="&D2)+ISTEXT(D2)*COUNT(D$2:D$7)
999<1000<"999"
(3) Count everything as text but convert numbers with leading zeroes
=SUMPRODUCT(--(TEXT(D$2:D$7,"000000")<=TEXT(D2,"000000")))
"000999" = "000999", "000999"<"001000"