I need to modify a line in a file. Only problem, the line appears multiple times, but in different scopes. Like in this example from wso2 configuration manual :
<KeyStore>
<Location>${carbon.home}/resources/security/wso2carbon.jks</Location>
<Type>JKS</Type>
<Password>wso2carbon</Password>
<KeyAlias>wso2carbon</KeyAlias>
<KeyPassword>wso2carbon</KeyPassword>
</KeyStore>
<TrustStore>
<!-- trust-store file location -->
<Location>${carbon.home}/repository/resources/security/client-truststore.jks</Location>
<!-- trust-store type (JKS/PKCS12 etc.) -->
<Type>JKS</Type>
<!-- trust-store password -->
<Password>wso2carbon</Password>
</TrustStore>
I would need for example to modify the <Password> entry with one value in the <Keystore> scope, and with a second different value in the <TrustStore> scope in order to have different passwords. Can the lineinfile module do that ? Or is there any other way ?
PS.
Using a template is not the solution I am looking for, as I would like to use this to modify preexisting servers and not lose any local modification.
You can't do this with lineinfile, because it handles every line of the file separately – so there's no context from other lines possible.
Regex in lineinfile is not multiline.
You can use replace – it uses multiline regex.
For example:
- replace:
backup: yes
dest: config.xml
regexp: '(<{{ item.scope }}>[\S\s]*<Password>)(?!{{ item.password }}<).*(</Password>[\S\s]*</{{ item.scope }}>)'
replace: '\1{{ item.password }}\2'
with_items:
- scope: KeyStore
password: foo
- scope: TrustStore
password: bar
Keep in mind that this solution is not bulletproof – scope names and password shouldn't have any XML special characters or regular expression sequences. Also I can't say for sure how it handles nested XML blocks with the same scope name.
But for general cases it should be fine.
There's even a try to be idempotent – it will not match a block if the password is the same.
Ansible lineinfile regex parameter can match multiple lines. There is no problem in that beside that the regex would be long and hard to understand and maintain.
As you are trying to manipulate XML ansible-xml module might be a good option to solve this problem.
Related
I am trying to parse a config, which would translate to a structured form. This new form requires that comments within the original config be preserved. The parsing tool is PLY. I am running into an issue with my current approach which I will describe in detail below, with links to code as well. The config file is going to look contain multiple config blocks, each of which is going to be of the following format
<optional comments>
start_of_line request_stmts(one or more)
indent reply_stmts (zero or more)
include_stmts (type 3)(zero or more)
An example config file looks like this.
While I am able to partially parse the config file with the grammar below, I fail to accomodate comments which would exist within the block.
For example, a block like this raises syntax errors, and any comments in a block of config fail to parse.
<optional comments>
start_of_line request_stmts(type 1)(one or more)
indent reply_stmts (type 2)(one or more)
<comments>
include_stmts (type 3)(one or more)(optional)
The parser.out mentions one shift/reduce conflict which I think arises because once the reply_stmts are parsed, a comments section which follows could mark start of a new block or comments within the subblock. Current grammar parsing result for the example file
[['# test comment ', '# more of this', '# does this make sense'], 'DEFAULT', [['x', '=',
'y']], [['y', '=', '1']], ['# Transmode', '# maybe something else', '# comment'],
'/random/location/test.user']
As you might notice, the second config block complete misses the username, request_stmt, reply_stmt sections.
What I have tried
I have tried moving the comments section around in the grammar, by specifying it before specific blocks or in the statement grammar. In the code link pasted above, the comments section has been specified in the overall statement grammar. Both of these approaches fail to parse comments within a config block.
username : comments username
| username
include_stmt : comments includes
| includes
I have two main questions:
Is there a mistake I am making in the implementation/understanding of LR parsing, solving which I could achieve what I want to ?
Is there a better way to achieve the same goal than my current approach ? (PLY-fu, different parser, different grammar)
P.S Wasn't able to include the actual code in the question, mentioned in the comments
You are correct that the problem is that when the parser sees a comment, it cannot know whether the comment belongs to the same section or whether the previous section is finished. In the former case, the parser needs to shift the comment, while in the latter case it needs to reduce the configuration section.
Since there could be any number of comments, the necessary lookahead could be arbitrarily large, in which case LR parsing wouldn't be possible. But a simple trick can reduce the lookahead to two tokens: just combine consecutive comments into a single token.
Any LR(k) grammar has an equivalent LR(1) grammar. In effect, the LR(1) grammars works by delaying all decisions for k-1 tokens, accumulating these tokens into the parser state. That's a massive increase in grammar size, but it's usually possible to achieve the same effect in other ways, and that's certainly the case here.
The basic idea is that any comment is (temporarily) accumulated into a list of comments. When a non-comment token is encountered, this temporary list is attached to that token.
This can be done either in the lexical scanner or in the parser actions, depending on your inclinations.
Before attempting all that, you should make sure that retaining comments is really useful to your application. Comments are normally not relevant to the semantics of a program (or configuration file), and it would certainly be much simpler for the lexer to just drop comments into the bit-bucket. If your application will end up reformatting the input, then it will have to retain comments. But if it only needs to extract information from the configuration, putting a lot of effort into handling comments is hard to justify.
I have inherited a cookbook that sets some attributes in the ./attributes/default.rb file as per normal.
However, we have a problem with one of the lines is, which is:
default["obscured"]["mysql"] = "#{node['jboss']['jboss_home']}/modules/com/mysql/jdbc/main"
When run, it write this into the node as:
{}/com/mysql/jdbc/main
I can confirm that the node['jboss']['jboss_home'] attribute exists and has correct values.
So, I cannot see any problem with the above, except that every other declaration of this type in our cookbooks has single quotes on the attribute to be set (i.e. left side), not double quotes. I haven't heard this of as being an issue before, but I am pretty new to chef.
Is there any rule that says they must be single quotes?
The answer is that there is no rule.
Using double-quotes in something like this is completely fine:
default["obscured"]["mysql"] = blah blah
The reason I know that is that I just found one being set, with double quotes, that actually works. :-)
What you have there is fine, how are you confirming the value of node['jboss']['jboss_home'] and how are you using it in the template?
In Ruby single and double quoted literals both become Strings but single quotes are relatively literal while double quotes allow backslash escapes and #{} interpolation.
You are most likely hitting the derived attributes problem:
https://coderanger.net/derived-attributes/
The attribute code in your cookbook is getting parsed before the jboss_home attribute is being set. One way or another the solution is to move the interpolation into recipe code.
You could just use a plain old ruby variable instead of the attribute you are trying to construct -- particularly if nothing else in your system ever sets that attribute.
You also should be able to delete the declaration from your attributes file and use this in recipe code as well:
node.default_unless["obscured"]["mysql"] =
"#{node['jboss']['jboss_home']}/modules/com/mysql/jdbc/main"
Although you need to place that statement early in your run_list, before you ever use node["obscured"]["mysql"] as an argument to any resource.
i have a file with below data
this is a text file with html format $testarray['G']
i use this script but it is not work properly.
<?php $testarray=array();
$testarray['G']=100;
$result222 =file_get_contents(realpath('file.php'));
printf($result222);?>
i want this script, print out below line
this is a text file with html format 100
i do't want to use include or require function because user can insert php code in this file and i do't want user can use php codes in this file
can anybody help me?
many thanks
If you know the string you expect to perform a substitution on, you can always do it manually with str_replace(). However, it looks like you want to be able to substitute arbitrary variables into the string, which I implore you to not do. You are giving this PHP script way too much power as is. I can think of a few exploits off the top of my head, such as injecting superglobals among simply brute forcing variable names.
Edit: I realize now that I also didn't give you the straightforward answer which does as you request: the eval() function. You should be able to craft a string that assigns the contents of the file to a variable, which should perform variable substitutions by the PHP parser. Please don't use it, but if you do be very careful.
i used below script
$result222 =file_get_contents(realpath('file.php'));
$result222=str_replace(array("<?","?>")," ",$result222);
print eval("return<<<ENDEVAL\n$result222\nENDEVAL;\n");
I am using a simple looping plugin so that my template looks like this:
{exp:loop_plus start="1" end="4" increment="1"}
<h3>{slide_{index}_title}</h3>
{/exp:loop_plus}
However, I am ending up with the following output:
<h3>{slide_1_title}</h3>
<h3>{slide_2_title}</h3>
<h3>{slide_3_title}</h3>
<h3>{slide_4_title}</h3>
Is there any way I can have dynamic variable names like this? I am not looking for alternative methods for building a slider, I simply would like to know if the dynamic variable names like this is possible. Thanks!
I'm assuming that Loop Plus (http://devot-ee.com/add-ons/loop-plus) sets the {index} part, so the question is what is defining {slide_1_title}...?
Assuming you have an entry field or variable with this defined, what you have is correct, but if it's not working, it means there's a parsing order issue.
Let's assume the code you supplied is wrapped in a {exp:channel:entries} tag pair, what happens is EE will try to parse the variable first, so will see: {slide_{index}_title} which doesn't exist. The {exp:loop_plus} add-on will then parse it, converting it to {slide_1_title} (but to late as channel:entries has already tried to parse it), which is what is finally output to the template.
So what you want to ensure is that EE parses {exp:loop_plus} before {exp:channel:entries}, do this using parse="inward" tag:
{exp:loop_plus start="1" end="4" increment="1" parse="inward"}
<h3>{slide_{index}_title}</h3>
{/exp:loop_plus}
This is a global EE parameter that EE uses to control parse order - you won't find it documented under the specific add-on. By adding the parameter, it means this child tag will get parsed before it's parent.
One way you could do it is to declare a preload_replace variable in your template and use it in your custom field name.
So something like:
{preload_replace:my_var_prefix="whatever"}
And then in your loop, you could then use:
{slide_{my_var_prefix}_title}
i have something like
<s:link view="/member/index.xhtml" value="My News" propagation="none"/>
<s:link view="/member/index.xhtml" value="#{msg.myText}" propagation="none"/>
where the value of myText in the messages.properties is
myText=My News
The first line of the example works fine and replaces the text to "My News", but the second that uses a value from the resource bundle escapes the ambersand, too "My News".
I tried also to use unicode escape sequences for the ambersand and/or hash with My\u0026\u0023160;News, My\u0026#160;News and My\u0026nbsp;News in the properties file without success.
(Used css no-wrap instead of the previous used xml encoding, but would be interested anyway)
EDIT - Answer to clarified question
The first is obviously inline, so interpreter knows that this is safe.
The second one comes from external source (you are using Expression Language) and as such is not safe and need to be escaped. The result of escaping would be as you wrote, basically it will show you the exact value of HTML entity.
This is related to security (XSS for example) and not necessary i18n.
Previous attempt
I don't quite know what you are asking for but I believe it is "how to display it?".
Most of the standard JSF controls contain escape attribute that if set to false won't escape the text. Unfortunately it seems that you are using something like SeamTools which does not have this attribute.
Well, in this case there is not much to be done. Unless you could use standard control, maybe you should go and try to actually save your properties file as Unicode (UTF-16 BigEndian in fact) and simply put valid Unicode non-breaking space character. Theoretically that should work; Unicode-encoded properties files are supported in latest version of Java (although I cannot recall if it was Java SE 5 or Java SE 6)...