I have created a PowerView using a BISM connection in Enterprise Portal of AX. That PowerView report will be used by 100+ users. I want every user to his/her data in the PowerView instead of viewing the complete data. One option is to create 100+ security roles in SSAS (multidimentional) which is not a viable option. Please guide me how can i achieve dynamic security in PowerView so that every user sees its own view. Thanks.
Power View doesn't not offer any kind of security. You will need to do this in SSAS, but you don't need 100+ security roles. You will want to look into dynamic security. To create dynamic security, you will need some way to relate a user to the information they should see. This usually means adding a field to an existing table or creating new tables.
If all users are secured by the same attributes, they can be contained in a single role. If some users are secured based on one attribute and others based upon another attribute, then you may need multiple roles.
Here's how this might work.
Create a table that contains all users that will need access to your cube.
Create a bridge table that ties the users to the attribute on which you are securing their access. For instance, maybe users can only see certain products so you have a table of User IDs and Product IDs.
Add these tables to your DSV.
Create a user dimension.
Create a measure group based upon your security bridge table
Create a role for this user type and add an MDX statement to the Allowed Member Set. Also, set the Enable visual totals checkbox.
Populate the members for the role, preferably through an AD group rather than individually if you have 100+ users.
Your allowed member set will look something like
Exists(
{[Product].[Product ID].members},
STRTOSET("[Users].[UserName].[UserName].&[" + Username() + "]"),
"Bridge User Product"
)
You can find a good blog post here and a good video about SSAS security here (dynamic security starts around the 35 minute mark).
Related
We have a requirement in Kusto/ADX where we need to provide access to only one table and for certain records if conditions are met for a group or a User.
I have explored RLS and Restricted view Access on this, however below is my stands
RLS & Restricted view access can not be applied together on a same table
RLS can restrict user only on records basis and not table level
Restricted View access can restrict table level but not records. Also this has a pain point, I should apply restrict view policy to all other table and add restricted viewer access role to those users whom we don't restrict. For a single group/user to access one table, doing all these change seems to be painful.
Do we have any other best approach to handle this scenario?
Thank you.
Bharath Kumar B
You need to split the tables into multiple databases, and each database will have a different set of users who can view the data.
On top of that, you'll need to apply RLS (Row Level Security) on tables, where you want some users to get only some of the records.
Currently I have the following scenario. I have a report in Power BI which reads from a dataset which has data of all companies. In my ASP .NET MVC application the user will select the company for which to display the report and with Power BI Embedded the application filters the report by the ID of the company through the embed config defined in JS (filter parameters passed from server).
I am using app owns data approach where I have a master account and the embed token is generated for the master account.
The user accessing the report does not have access rights to all companies and this is being handled server-side. With this approach however, the user can easily alter the embed config in JS and display the report for a company which he is not authorized to access.
I looked into row-level security and I found the following approach https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Developer/PowerBi-Embedded-API-Works-with-RLS/td-p/231064 where there exists a role for every company and the embed token is generated for that particular company. This would be an ideal approach but in my scenario the companies are not pre-defined and can be created any time. Therefore, I would need to create a role per company. This however cannot be achieved programmatically as Power BI does not provide means to automate role creation.
The only approach I can think of is to clone a report for each new company and create a dataset specific to that report which will only have the data for that particular company. Then the generated embed token will only be valid for that particular report.
Has anyone also experienced this dilemma? Any suggestions what I should do in such scenario?
You still can use RLS, but without roles per company. Use USERPRINCIPALNAME() DAX function to find out which user is viewing the report. In the database make a table to specify which company can be seen by which user and add it to your model. Then use RLS to filter this table to only the row (or rows) where user is current one (here is where USERPRINCIPALNAME() comes into play), and let the relationship between this table and your data tables to filter out what should not be seen. This way there will be no JavaScript filters at all, so nothing can be changed by some malicious user.
See Using the username() or userprincipalname() DAX function.
I have a customer that owns a carpet cleaning business and we have all of his different franchisee's data in a multi-tenant database model and we would like to move this data into a data warehouse in snowflake. I don't want to have to build a separate database for each customer because then I have to keep each database up to date with the latest data model. I want to use 1 data model to rule them all. I have a tenant ID that I keep with each record to identify the franchisee's data. I want to give a set of credentials to each franchisee to where they can hook up their analytics tool of choice (tableau, power bi, etc.) and only get access to the rows that are applicable to them. Is there a way to secure the rows they see in each table based on their user. In other words some sort of row level access control similar to profiles in postgres. Are there any better methods for handling this type of scenario? Ultimately I want to maintain and manage the least number of elt jobs and data models.
This is the purpose of ether Secure Views, or Reader Accounts.
We are using both, and they have about the same technical hassle/setup costs. But we are using an internal tool to build/alter the schema's.
To expand on Simeon's answer:
You could have a single Snowflake account and create a Snowflake role & user for each franchisee. These roles would have access to a Secure View which uses the CURRENT_ROLE / CURRENT_USER context functions as in this example from the Snowflake documentation.
You'd have to have a role -> tennant ID "mapping table" which is used in the Secure View to limit the rows down to the correct franchisee.
I am editing user security and am trying to give a user access to an e.List item. I select the user using the [...] button and successfully find that user by searching in our AD domain.
After I select the user and press OK, that user does not come into the CAC, just this error The filter will only accept groups and roles. Users will not be added to the filter. I don't see any filters here at all.
Have you seen this before and is it possible to set up security by users?
Thank you,
WE
Answer from ericlfg on http://www.cognoise.com/community/index.php/board,15.0.html:
Hi William,
The message you are receiving is by design. In order to add a specific user, rather than a group or role, that use needs to be a member of some kind of hierarchy in your security provider.
Ex: If you're using cognos groups and roles with a Role called "Test". You would populate this test role with members from your namespace. In the CAC, you would then select the Test group when you click on the elipsis and then that will allow you to select your individual user (or alternatively the Test role).
The same would be true if you're trying to add members directly from your 3rd party authentication provider. The individual users need to be part of a roll-up role or group in order to add that roll-up role or group to the filter. Once added to the filter you can select the individual users.
Hope this helps.
We have a Salesforce app where we have some custom objects and want to expose the various custom object rcords to customers.
We need to ensure that customers can see only the records belonging to their Account. Because of the way these records are setup(owned by various system users at different levels of processing), we cannot use owner based sharing...and cannot use criteria based sharing since its not dynamic(I cant use criteria based sharing to say "Share this record with all customer portal users who belong to the same Account as the record" at runtime).
So I know I have to use Apex based sharing. I have read up on the sharing objects and the sharing table. But how would I approach this.
I can write a trigger which upon inserting will create a share object and get all userids who belong to the customer portal group and whose account equals the account of the record and associate them with the share object of the record.
But I feel this is overkill correct? Lets say there are 5 users from one of our customers and lets say there are 500 records created a day...that means 2500 share objects a day just for 1 customer...for 10 customers this can go upto 25000...and scale in this way...
Am I right here?
Another problem would be if a new person joined that customer team..unless another process updates the sharing on older records, he/she cannot see the older records.
So is there a better/elegant way to do this? I thought of adding a share object to the group...but there is just one group "Customer portal group" and how do I associate the group with the account of the users?
I will appreciate any thoughts about this.
You should take a look at high-volume customer portal users. They're much cheaper relative to standard customer portal users and should meet your needs. Unlike regular users they have a totally different sharing concept. In a nutshell if they own an object they can see, if not they can't. You can then extend this based on whether a contact or account lookup on the object matches the logged in user.
Read up on this documentation:
License Types (scan to High Volume Customer Portal)
Granting High-Volume Portal Users Access to Records (login required)
You can use groups for sharing to avoid creating so many sharing records. You would have one group per account and one sharing record per account. Instead of managing thousands of sharing records you would have to manage hundreds of groups.
I haven't tried this approach with this many groups, but I read some time ago that it should work (someone posted using a LOT of groups for sharing). If you do try this, please tell us if it worked OK.