Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Currently we are building a platform using Netflix OSS stack (Microservices). We want to use HazelCast as a caching solution. Can anyone please help me like, how can I integrate HazelCast into Netflix OSS. is it recommended ?
It depends on what parts of the stack you want to integrate Hazelcast. We have a Eureka discovery plugin which makes it possible to discover other Hazelcast nodes. You can put Hystrix in front of Hazelcast calls but remember those are fault tolerant, so they might are re-run. I never tried Governator or Zuul but I think there was a user to successfully integrate the latter one with Hazelcast.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 11 months ago.
Improve this question
I am developing a number of microservices. They will communicate through azure service bus. I would like the messages to be sent and received as strongly typed objects.
Am I violating the microservice principles by creating a bunch of classes to represent the messages?
I would probably put these classes in a nuget package, that I use in each of the microservices. Any examples or best practice you can point me to on this?
I wouldn't call this 'violation' but rather a design choice. For example, when using wear abstraction such as NServiceBus or MassTransit, you're by design using strongly typed messages. Those are contracts and are expected to be shared between services.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I recently started reading the Stripe connect doc, which I've been following, but it seems like it supports only one time. I'm creating a project where sellers can create a membership plan and user's can subscribe to them. How can I achieve this, please? (I'm using nodejs by the way.)
Yes. Stripe Billing supports Connect. There are a few different ways to set this up, so it really depends on your business model.
Here's a good starting place: https://stripe.com/docs/connect/subscriptions
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am developing an application in mean-stack. The only the difference is that I want to host my application in IIS rather than express.js. Is it possible or feasible to do so? What are possible advantages and disadvantages? Thanks in advance.
It seems to be possible: Hosting node.js applications in IIS on Windows. That site even mentions some benefits. To be honest, I have no first hand experience (or need) to run Node on IIS.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
[Thank you for answers. I am adding more information to my original question]
We have a Python App that is deployed across several customer locations. It is not feasible to set up a VPN between our servers and the client machines.As we add new features, we want to push it to our existing customers. We are looking for something similar to how on the air updates are handled. I understand this is not a new problem and was hoping to seek some ideas on how it has been handled so far..
A scalable to solution to this would be to embrace server orchestration. This will allow you to decouple the process of pushing updates to your app, from the infrastructure in which it sits.
Ansible is my favourite solution in this department. Other popular solutions are Chef of Puppet.
A common and sensible component of server orchestration is Push to Deploy. Your master branch always contains production code.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
One of the main features in my website is a simple One-to-One chat.
I'm debating whether or not I shall dedicate a server (or a cluster) for the sole purpose of this chat feature. The simpler option would be combining this feature as part of the web-servers and just scale out when necessary.
It is worth mentioning I'd like in the future to enable images transfer within the chat.
So what is the better option and why?
Well yes, Whether to use another dedicated server is not depending on how much traffic your site will have to handle. If you're dealing with images It will be a good idea to store them in another server and keep the root server clean.