There is lotto draw (5 numbers) on each row. I have formula which calculates the most frequient numbers with their number of draws. Is it possible in end result to sort same number of draws results by row value. This means that if number is drawn on top rows will have grater value than those on bottom rows. Considering number of row to be a value. How is that possible?
Formula used:
=LET(flatten, TEXTSPLIT(TEXTJOIN(";",,A1:F27),,";"), numUq, UNIQUE(flatten), matches, XMATCH(flatten,numUq),SORT(HSTACK(numUq, DROP(FREQUENCY(matches, UNIQUE(matches)),-1)),2,-1))
In the example screenshot number 35 and number 13 have equal draws count, but 13 should be before 35.
Data:
A
B
C
D
E
F
18
35
31
13
37
10
43
47
36
13
6
19
6
12
6
35
14
1
43
24
45
7
21
16
37
39
44
24
12
40
39
8
34
28
49
46
27
44
15
46
45
12
22
0
10
5
28
28
4
7
23
6
44
41
30
22
47
13
29
29
37
9
26
44
39
10
30
17
21
20
41
22
43
35
0
22
13
9
14
22
42
20
32
21
13
38
48
6
14
2
11
47
20
20
23
6
22
26
1
25
45
31
27
39
6
44
3
24
22
45
34
17
5
13
16
23
20
7
30
16
25
21
7
34
1
35
32
34
1
9
10
32
23
35
11
3
6
12
5
30
4
20
33
15
26
10
8
28
16
11
21
14
3
38
10
42
16
3
26
48
30
28
Link to file
Here it is on a bit of the data. Here I have added a third column based on the average row of each unique number and sorted first on frequency then on row average:
=LET(range,A1:F3,uniques,UNIQUE(TOCOL(range)),rows,SEQUENCE(ROWS(range)),
avrow,BYROW(uniques,LAMBDA(uniq,SUM((range=uniq)*rows/SUM(--(range=uniq))))),
freq,DROP(FREQUENCY(range,uniques),-1),
SORTBY(HSTACK(uniques,freq,avrow),freq,-1,avrow,1))
Can 6 really occur twice in the same draw? Maybe not, but it doesn't affect the answer.
EDIT
Here is a version based on your original formula:
=LET(range,A1:F27,
flatten, TEXTSPLIT(TEXTJOIN(";",,A1:F27),,";"),
numUq, UNIQUE(flatten),
rows,SEQUENCE(ROWS(range)),
matches, XMATCH(flatten,numUq),
avrow,BYROW(numUq,LAMBDA(numUq,SUM((range=--numUq)*rows/SUM(--(range=--numUq))))),
freq,DROP(FREQUENCY(matches, UNIQUE(matches)),-1),
SORTBY(HSTACK(numUq,freq,avrow),freq,-1,avrow,1))
Full Dataset
The sorting is based on number of appearances and average row, but you could use other measures like row of first appearance if you wanted to.
Different approach:
=LET(data,A1:F27,
a,TOCOL(data),
b,MMULT(--(TRANSPOSE(a)=a),SEQUENCE(COUNTA(a),,1,0)),
c,TOCOL(IF(ISNUMBER(data),MAX(ROW(data)+1)-ROW(data)^99)),
d,MMULT(--(TRANSPOSE(a)=a),c),
s,SORTBY(HSTACK(a,b),b,-1,d,1),
UNIQUE(s))
a "flattens" the data using TOCOL.
b creates a "countif" of the drawn values in a using MMULT.
c returns the maximum row value of the data + 1 minus the row value of each value found ^99.
^99 because I want the number to be higher if it would be found in the first row only versus if it was found in each row except the first.
d returns a "sumif" of the calculated row values of c against the values of a.
We than only need a and b for the list using HSTACK, but we need them sorted by the count b descending and sorted by the sumif d ascending using SORTBY.
This will sort it as you illustrated it.
If it's a tie (36 and 19 in the data) it will show the first in row first.
on excel I did a two way ANOVA with replication (is this the same as two way repeated measures ANOVA?) and need to do a post hoc Tukey. How do I do this in excel 2016?
days represent the score on the day the measurement was taken
treatment
day6
day7
day10
day11
1
20
30
500
490
1
2
400
900
500
1
3
32
1000
145
2
67
56
45
89
2
54
67
67
23
2
78
77
68
90
3
32
32
34
99
3
56
58
103
23
3
17
45
115
1043
How can I get a chart in Excel with:
x-as is equal to the combination of JM and location
y-as are the %-values from Occupied next or on top of empty
So in month 201801 I can see the 2 (or more max 30) locations with both %-values
next to month 201802 and so on.
(Eventualy I can set a trendline on Occupied)
Hopefully my question is clear
The is a short example table:
JM location Occupied% Empty%
201801 A 80 20
201801 B 54 46
201802 A 64 36
201802 B 89 11
201803 A 50 50
201803 B 89 11
201804 A 99 1
201804 B 67 33
201805 A 100 0
201805 B 78 22
201806 A 98 2
201806 B 86 14
201807 A 93 7
201807 B 58 42
201808 A 67 33
201808 B 79 21
201809 A 67 33
201809 B 57 43
201810 A 98 2
201810 B 97 3
201811 A 65 35
201811 B 68 32
201812 A 87 13
201812 B 99 1
Very easy with a pivottable. Select Insert, Pivottable and drag JM to the row field area and Location to the column field area and Occupied to the sigma area. Then insert a line pivot chart.
Two columns, one with ID and one with values. I want to calculate average per ID. The number of rows per ID is not constant. What i have:
ID Value
1 22
1 31
1 34
1 23
1 31
34 67
34 65
34 55
12 44
12 46
12 43
12 35
I want a formula which will calculate third column:
ID Value Average per id
1 22 28.2
1 31 28.2
1 34 28.2
1 23 28.2
1 31 28.2
34 67 62.3
34 65 62.3
34 55 62.3
12 44 42.0
12 46 42.0
12 43 42.0
12 35 42.0
I have tried AVERAGEIF function but i cant figure it out.
Just use these formulas:
=AVERAGEIF(A:A,A2,B:B)
or
=SUMIF(A:A,A2,B:B)/COUNTIF(A:A,A2)
This question already has answers here:
Calculate Percentile in Excel 2010
(3 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I am trying to calculate how many calls came back in 95 percentile of time. Below is my Result Set. I am working with Excel 2010
Milliseconds Number
0 1702
1 15036
2 14262
3 13190
4 9137
5 5635
6 3742
7 2628
8 1899
9 1298
10 963
11 727
12 503
13 415
14 311
15 235
16 204
17 140
18 109
19 83
20 72
21 55
22 52
23 35
24 33
25 25
26 15
27 18
28 14
29 15
30 13
31 19
32 23
33 19
34 21
35 20
36 25
37 26
38 13
39 12
40 10
41 17
42 6
43 7
44 8
45 4
46 7
47 9
48 11
49 12
50 9
51 9
52 9
53 8
54 10
55 10
56 11
57 3
58 7
59 7
60 2
61 5
62 7
63 5
64 5
65 2
66 3
67 2
68 1
70 1
71 2
72 1
73 4
74 1
75 1
76 1
77 3
80 1
81 1
85 1
87 2
93 1
96 1
100 1
107 1
112 1
116 1
125 1
190 1
356 1
450 1
492 1
497 1
554 1
957 1
Just some background what does above information means-
1702 calls came back in 0 milliseconds
15036 calls came back in 1 milliseconds
14262 calls came back in 2 milliseconds
etc etc
So to calculate the 95th percentile from the above data, I am using this formula in excel 2010-
=PERCENTILE.EXC(IF(TRANSPOSE(ROW(INDIRECT("1:"&MAX(H$2:H$96))))<=H$2:H$96,A$2:A$96),0.95)
Can anyone help me whether the way I am doing in Excel 2010 is right or not?
I am getting 95th percentile as 10 by using the above scenario.
Thanks for the help.
that's essentially the same question you asked here and the formula I suggested. As per my last comments in that question - that formula should work OK as long as you use CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER correctly. I get 10 as the answer for this example using that formula.
I think you can verify manually that that is indeed the correct answer. If you have a running total in an adjacent column then you can see where the 95th percentile is reached......