I use xlib. I want to remember window position and restore it to that position the next time it starts. This will help the user as he won't need to move/size the window to the desired position at every start.
It works more or less Ok, except one case. When the window is maximized, I cannot find the way to determine its true (non-maximized) size and position. Perhaps someone knows how to do it?
There isn't as far as I know a standard way to do this. If you read the source to Metacity for example you can see it keeps this unmaximized size in the MetaWindow object but I don't think it gets stored in a property, and I don't see a property for this in the EWMH or ICCCM specs.
It's possible that some specific window managers might store it in a nonstandard property.
When a window is maximized you could get a property change event with the maximization flag (libwnck is an old library to track this sort of thing, maybe there's a newer one I don't know). However I doubt it's defined whether the resizing happens before or after setting the flag. You could perhaps heuristically assume that a resize covering most of the screen within 1 second of setting the maximize flag was a maximize, or some similar hack.
All that said, I suspect the easiest way to get this feature is to implement it as a window manager extension or plugin, which many WMs support in some way.
There is an old spec for this (X session management protocol) unfortunately the spec is ridiculously broken, unclear and essentially impossible to implement. A core issue that was never addressed - and probably needs app cooperation to address - is how to recognize "the same" window across restarts in order to restore its size.
There are only flawed heuristics for that.
(I wrote metacity and worked on a couple session managers long ago so once I could have told you a lot more, but I've forgotten many details.)
Related
ReSharper's popups (such as the one from Refactor) are always extremely small and I always resize them to be able to see something. I could not find a setting for this in the interface, is there perhaps a hidden setting to at least increase the size of the popup by a factor 4-5? It's highly frustrating that they still think people run screens of 640x480 (at least it seems to be suited to them).
Unfortunately, the initial sizes can't be changed, and they don't remember the last size, either. I've created a feature request that you can vote on and track. It would be useful to add any information such as examples of which popups you mean, and if you're using high DPI or not.
I'm currently stuck with a pesky little issue. I developed an application that zeroes out the DXGI mode desc. structure and calls FindClosestMatchingMode() to, as advertised, "gravitate towards the desktop resolution".
This works fine if the laptop(s) run fully on their own display -- as soon as I plug in another monitor it goes berserk. In the case I extend my desktop it will still correctly get the laptop monitor resolution, yet the attached one (running 1080p) will yield a preference for 800*480 :) (sure, poor man's 16:10, but...)
Doing the same thing with the monitors cloned/combined (results in 1 output device), even if their resolution is equal, gives the same 800*480 crap.
What gives? And has anyone perhaps found a way to properly get a display's current mode through DXGI or a pointer for a wholly different yet functional approach to this here problem?
Life was easier back in the D3D9 days =)
-- Update
As it turns out any FindClosestMatchingMode() call made on the IDXGIOutput instance belonging to the external monitor behaves differently (and in most cases plain wrong) compared to the internal display, even though their native resolution is identical. To top it all off, other systems don't have this issue yet I can't get around supporting this particular laptop including it's drivers.
Time for a good old setup dialog.
Not the best solution but as I was constrained to these exact machines I settled for getting the monitor's current resolution through GetSystemMetrics() (SM_CXSCREEN/SM_CYSCREEN), which admittedly only works for the primary monitor but there's other ways, and feeding this resolution to the ModeToMatch structure fed to FindClosestMatchingMode().
It then settles for the correct (desktop) resolution.
Better answers are very welcome of course ;)
I want to code sth. that basically works like TiVo. Switch it on, you only see the menu or an output, so no underlying OS or anything else is directly visible to the user.
So I want to use Linux as base. Can you suggest a good base distribution?
Can I code a frontend without having a window-manager up and running?
If yes, is that possible with java-gnome or what language/gui-framework combination would you suggest?
If no, what's the minimal window manager that can handle fancy menus, etc?
What does it take to create video-overlays over a HD-stream? Are there some libraries I should take a look at?
Thanks
Yes. If you only have one window you don't need a window manager. Using X you can start some application and set it's position and size from the commandline (making it fullscreen). You might want to take a look at xinit if this is what you want. This is likely the easiest why to get something working. But another option is skip X and use DirectFB. If you want to display several windows, on the other hand, you need some sort of window manager to manage them.
As long as you run X there is no problem using java-gnome as framework if that's what you are confortable with. I guess you didn't mean to run the stock gnome applications, but code everything visible to the user yourself.
This very much depends on what you mean with fancy menus. If you mean transparancy and such you need a composite manager (if you don't just render everything yourself inside your application window). I'm not sure about this but I think you can run a composite manager independent from a window manager if you find that suitable. Again, this is if you run X. Using DirectFB transparency and such are done in a more simple way.
If you intend to write your own media player you should take a look at GStreamer. It can stream, decode and display video and also add video-overlays (among other things) and is extremly easy to use.
Minimalistic tiling window manages like Awesome, Ratpoison or XMonad may be useful as a base, otherwise you'll have to manage focus and window sizing yourself. It is normally fairly easy to make these invisible to the user.
Absolutely.
I wouldn't count on Gnome itself working without a window manager. Other than that... language doesn't matter.
Window managers only do window management. Menus and the like are the job of the widget toolkit. Anyways, Metacity.
... This one I have no clue about.
I'm currently designing my first ever GUI for Windows. I'm using MFC and Visual Studio 2008. The monitor I have been designing my program on has 1680x1050 native resolution. If I compile and send my program to one of my coworkers to run on their computer (generally a laptop running at 1024x768), my program will not fit on their screen.
I have been trying to read up on how to design an MFC application so that it will run on all resolutions, but I keep finding misleading information. Everywhere I look it seems that DLUs are supposed to resize your application for you, and that the only time you should run into problems is when you have an actual bitmap whose resolution you need to worry about. But if this is the case, why will my program no longer fit on my screen when I set my monitor to a lower resolution? Instead of my program "shrinking" to take up the same amount of screen real estate that it uses at 1680x1050, it gets huge and grainy.
The "obvious" solution here is to set my resolution to 1024x768 and redesign my program to fit on the screen. Except that I've already squished everything on my dialogs as much as possible to try and get my program to fit on screen running at 1024x768. My dialog fonts are set to Microsoft Sans Serif 8 but still appear huge (much larger than 8 points) when running at 1024x768.
I know there HAS to be a way to make my program keep the same scaling... right? Or is this the wrong way to approach the problem? What is the correct/standard way to go about designing an MFC program so that it can run on many resolutions, say 800x600 and up?
I assume your application GUI is dialog based (the main window is a dialog)?
In that case you have a problem, because, as you discovered, MFC has no support for resizing a dialog correctly. Your options are:
Redesign your GUI to use a SDI or MDI GUI.
Use a dialog resize extension. There are many available, for some very good suggestions see this question. Another options are this one and this one.
Don't use MFC. wxWidgets has much better support for dialog resizing.
MFC is only a thin wrapper over the Windows API. They both make an assumption which is hardly ever true: if you have a higher resolution screen, you'll adjust the DPI or font size in Windows to get larger characters. Most of the time, a larger screen size means a larger physical monitor, or a laptop where you want to squeeze as much information into a small screen as possible; people value more information over greater detail. Thus the assumption fails.
If you can't squeeze your entire UI into the smallest size screen you need to support, you'll have to find another way to make it smaller. Without knowing anything about your UI, I might suggest using tabs to group the controls into pages.
I've had good luck making my windows resizable, so that people with larger screens can see more information at once. You need to do this the hard way, responding to the WM_SIZE message to the window and deciding which controls should be made larger and which ones should just move.
There is no automatic way to resize the content of your dialogs when resolution changes. So, you need to set some boundaries.
Option 1.
If you are developing your app for customers, pick one minimum resolution (like 1024x7678), redesign you dialogs so that everything fits. Maybe break up some into several, or use tab strip control.
Option 2.
Create separate dialog forms for each resolution you'd like to support, but use the same class to handle it. At runtime detect resolution and use the appropriate form.
Option 3.
Write your own resizing functionality, so that user could adjust the size of your dialogs to his liking.
I find the concept of the programmable, tiling, keyboard-focuessed window manager ion3 very appealing, but I think it takes some time to customize it to your needs until you can really evaluate this totally different UI-concept.
Therefore, I would like to read reviews of people who tried it for a longer time as environment for programming (in particular using emacs/gcc).
(The policies of the ion3-author concerning linux-distros are not easy to follow for me, but this should not be the point here...)
I use ion3 daily. It's a wonderful window manager. The tiling interface really enables you maximize real estate. Once you get it setup to your liking, it is much more efficient to navigate via the keyboard. Even moving applications between tiles isn't that hard once you get used to the tag/attach key sequence.
With ion3, Vimperator and the various shells I have open during the day -- I barely use the rodent.
The author's opinions aside -- a good resource for configuring/extending Ion to your liking can be found at:
Configuring and Extending Ion3 with Lua
I've been using Ion daily for nearly two years now. Good things:
Easy to use from the keyboard.
Handles multiple screens (Xinerama) very well (once you have the mod_xinerama plugin), especially as in my case the screens are different sizes.
Very predictable where windows will appear.
Splitting, resizing and moving windows is very easy.
Multiple, independent workspaces on each screen.
Very fast and reliable.
Bad things:
Too many different shortcuts. e.g. there are separate keys for moving to the next tab, next frame, next screen, and next workspace.
Applications that use lots of small windows together work really badly (e.g. the Gimp) because it maximises all of them on top of each other initially.
Sub-dialogs can cause trouble. Sometimes they open in a separate tab when you want them in the same tab, or sometimes the open in the same tab and take the focus when you want to continue interacting with the main window.
These things can probably be changed in the config files, but I haven't got around to it yet. Also, the actual C code is easy to read, and on the few occasions where I've wanted to fix something it has been very easy. I don't feel tempted to go back to a non-tiling WM, anyway.
I've used it off and on for the last few years, I think its a great window manager, but I keep crawling back to kde3 whatever I use.
Its however difficult to put into quantifiable terms why this happens, but its right up there with the gnome-vs-kde battle. Neither side can understand the other.
I would also just love to have kicker + ion3, but they don't gel awfully well.
Moving applications between tiles ( something I tend to do lots ) also is a bit inefficient ( too addicted to the mouse )
( Kicker + Evilwm is a good combination, but evilwm just can't handle stacking in a user-friendly way )