Using ls -Q with --quoting-style=shell, newlines in file names (yes, I know...) are turned into ?. Is this a bug? Is there a way how to get the file names in a format that's 100% compatible with a shell (sh or bash if possible)?
Example (bash):
$ touch a$'\n'b
$ for s in literal shell shell-always c c-maybe escape locale clocale ; do
ls -Q a?b --quoting-style=$s
done
a?b
'a?b'
'a?b'
"a\nb"
"a\nb"
a\nb
‘a\nb’
‘a\nb’
coreutils 8.25 has the new 'shell-escape' quoting style, and in fact enables it by default to allow the output from ls to be always usable, and to be safe to copy and paste back to other commands.
Maybe not quite what you are looking for, but the "escape" style seems to work well with the upcoming ${...#E} parameter expansion in bash 4.4.
$ touch $'a\nb' $'c\nd'
$ ls -Q --quoting-style=escape ??? | while IFS= read -r fname; do echo =="${fname#E}==="; done
==a
b==
==c
d==
Here is the relevant part of the man page (link is to the raw source):
${parameter#operator}
Parameter transformation. The expansion is either a transforma-
tion of the value of parameter or information about parameter
itself, depending on the value of operator. Each operator is a
single letter:
Q The expansion is a string that is the value of parameter
quoted in a format that can be reused as input.
E The expansion is a string that is the value of parameter
with backslash escape sequences expanded as with the
$'...' quoting mechansim.
P The expansion is a string that is the result of expanding
the value of parameter as if it were a prompt string (see
PROMPTING below).
A The expansion is a string in the form of an assignment
statement or declare command that, if evaluated, will
recreate parameter with its attributes and value.
a The expansion is a string consisting of flag values rep-
resenting parameter's attributes.
If parameter is # or *, the operation is applied to each posi-
tional parameter in turn, and the expansion is the resultant
list. If parameter is an array variable subscripted with # or
*, the case modification operation is applied to each member of
the array in turn, and the expansion is the resultant list.
The result of the expansion is subject to word splitting and
pathname expansion as described below.
From a bit of experimentation, it looks like --quoting-style=escape is compatible with being wrapped in $'...', with two exceptions:
it escapes spaces by prepending a backslash; but $'...' doesn't discard backslashes before spaces.
it doesn't escape single-quotes.
So you could perhaps write something like this (in Bash):
function ls-quote-shell () {
ls -Q --quoting-style=escape "$#" \
| while IFS= read -r filename ; do
filename="${filename//'\ '/ }" # unescape spaces
filename="${filename//"'"/\'}" # escape single-quotes
printf "$'%s'\n" "$filename"
done
}
To test this, I've created a directory with a bunch of filenames with weird characters; and
eval ls -l $(ls-quote-shell)
worked as intended . . . though I won't make any firm guarantees about it.
Alternatively, here's a version that uses printf to process the escapes followed by printf %q to re-escape in a shell-friendly manner:
function ls-quote-shell () {
ls -Q --quoting-style=escape "$#" \
| while IFS= read -r escaped_filename ; do
escaped_filename="${escaped_filename//'\ '/ }" # unescape spaces
escaped_filename="${escaped_filename//'%'/%%}" # escape percent signs
# note: need to save in variable, rather than using command
# substitution, because command substitution strips trailing newlines:
printf -v filename "$escaped_filename"
printf '%q\n' "$filename"
done
}
but if it turns out that there's some case that the first version doesn't handle correctly, then the second version will most likely have the same issue. (FWIW, eval ls -l $(ls-quote-shell) worked as intended with both versions.)
Related
Here are a series of cases where echo $var can show a different value than what was just assigned. This happens regardless of whether the assigned value was "double quoted", 'single quoted' or unquoted.
How do I get the shell to set my variable correctly?
Asterisks
The expected output is /* Foobar is free software */, but instead I get a list of filenames:
$ var="/* Foobar is free software */"
$ echo $var
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home /initrd.img /lib /lib64 /media /mnt /opt /proc ...
Square brackets
The expected value is [a-z], but sometimes I get a single letter instead!
$ var=[a-z]
$ echo $var
c
Line feeds (newlines)
The expected value is a a list of separate lines, but instead all the values are on one line!
$ cat file
foo
bar
baz
$ var=$(cat file)
$ echo $var
foo bar baz
Multiple spaces
I expected a carefully aligned table header, but instead multiple spaces either disappear or are collapsed into one!
$ var=" title | count"
$ echo $var
title | count
Tabs
I expected two tab separated values, but instead I get two space separated values!
$ var=$'key\tvalue'
$ echo $var
key value
In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:
echo "$var"
This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!
Why?
When a variable is unquoted, it will:
Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):
Before: /* Foobar is free software */
After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */
Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:
Before: /*
After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...
Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/
instead of the variable's value.
When the variable is quoted it will:
Be substituted for its value.
There is no step 2.
This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.
You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:
Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?
$foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
something much more complex:
First, take the value of the variable.
Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
contains foo * bar then the result of this step is the 3-element
list foo, *, bar.
Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
bar.
Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
"$#" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$#" is
equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $#?)
The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
`foo`. On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.
The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
-).
See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
cases when you can leave out the quotes.
Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
security
holes.
In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).
To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.
Thus:
$ vars="-e -n -a"
$ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
-a
$ echo "$vars"
-e -n -a
However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:
$ vars="-n"
$ echo "$vars"
$ ## not even an empty line was printed
...whereas it will save you with printf:
$ vars="-n"
$ printf '%s\n' "$vars"
-n
user double quote to get the exact value. like this:
echo "${var}"
and it will read your value correctly.
echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
^I$
This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.
One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :
If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.
Setting to null means setting to empty
value:
IFS=
Test:
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
^I$
[ks#localhost ~]$ var=$'key\nvalue'
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo $var
key value
[ks#localhost ~]$ IFS=
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo $var
key
value
[ks#localhost ~]$
The answer from ks1322 helped me to identify the issue while using docker-compose exec:
If you omit the -T flag, docker-compose exec add a special character that break output, we see b instead of 1b:
$ test=$(/usr/local/bin/docker-compose exec db bash -c "echo 1")
$ echo "${test}b"
b
echo "${test}" | cat -vte
1^M$
With -T flag, docker-compose exec works as expected:
$ test=$(/usr/local/bin/docker-compose exec -T db bash -c "echo 1")
$ echo "${test}b"
1b
Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.
$ echo $var | tr " " "\n"
foo
bar
baz
Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.
Here are a series of cases where echo $var can show a different value than what was just assigned. This happens regardless of whether the assigned value was "double quoted", 'single quoted' or unquoted.
How do I get the shell to set my variable correctly?
Asterisks
The expected output is /* Foobar is free software */, but instead I get a list of filenames:
$ var="/* Foobar is free software */"
$ echo $var
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home /initrd.img /lib /lib64 /media /mnt /opt /proc ...
Square brackets
The expected value is [a-z], but sometimes I get a single letter instead!
$ var=[a-z]
$ echo $var
c
Line feeds (newlines)
The expected value is a a list of separate lines, but instead all the values are on one line!
$ cat file
foo
bar
baz
$ var=$(cat file)
$ echo $var
foo bar baz
Multiple spaces
I expected a carefully aligned table header, but instead multiple spaces either disappear or are collapsed into one!
$ var=" title | count"
$ echo $var
title | count
Tabs
I expected two tab separated values, but instead I get two space separated values!
$ var=$'key\tvalue'
$ echo $var
key value
In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:
echo "$var"
This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!
Why?
When a variable is unquoted, it will:
Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):
Before: /* Foobar is free software */
After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */
Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:
Before: /*
After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...
Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/
instead of the variable's value.
When the variable is quoted it will:
Be substituted for its value.
There is no step 2.
This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.
You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:
Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?
$foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
something much more complex:
First, take the value of the variable.
Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
contains foo * bar then the result of this step is the 3-element
list foo, *, bar.
Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
bar.
Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
"$#" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$#" is
equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $#?)
The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
`foo`. On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.
The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
-).
See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
cases when you can leave out the quotes.
Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
security
holes.
In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).
To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.
Thus:
$ vars="-e -n -a"
$ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
-a
$ echo "$vars"
-e -n -a
However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:
$ vars="-n"
$ echo "$vars"
$ ## not even an empty line was printed
...whereas it will save you with printf:
$ vars="-n"
$ printf '%s\n' "$vars"
-n
user double quote to get the exact value. like this:
echo "${var}"
and it will read your value correctly.
echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
^I$
This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.
One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :
If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.
Setting to null means setting to empty
value:
IFS=
Test:
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
^I$
[ks#localhost ~]$ var=$'key\nvalue'
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo $var
key value
[ks#localhost ~]$ IFS=
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo $var
key
value
[ks#localhost ~]$
The answer from ks1322 helped me to identify the issue while using docker-compose exec:
If you omit the -T flag, docker-compose exec add a special character that break output, we see b instead of 1b:
$ test=$(/usr/local/bin/docker-compose exec db bash -c "echo 1")
$ echo "${test}b"
b
echo "${test}" | cat -vte
1^M$
With -T flag, docker-compose exec works as expected:
$ test=$(/usr/local/bin/docker-compose exec -T db bash -c "echo 1")
$ echo "${test}b"
1b
Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.
$ echo $var | tr " " "\n"
foo
bar
baz
Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.
Here are a series of cases where echo $var can show a different value than what was just assigned. This happens regardless of whether the assigned value was "double quoted", 'single quoted' or unquoted.
How do I get the shell to set my variable correctly?
Asterisks
The expected output is /* Foobar is free software */, but instead I get a list of filenames:
$ var="/* Foobar is free software */"
$ echo $var
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home /initrd.img /lib /lib64 /media /mnt /opt /proc ...
Square brackets
The expected value is [a-z], but sometimes I get a single letter instead!
$ var=[a-z]
$ echo $var
c
Line feeds (newlines)
The expected value is a a list of separate lines, but instead all the values are on one line!
$ cat file
foo
bar
baz
$ var=$(cat file)
$ echo $var
foo bar baz
Multiple spaces
I expected a carefully aligned table header, but instead multiple spaces either disappear or are collapsed into one!
$ var=" title | count"
$ echo $var
title | count
Tabs
I expected two tab separated values, but instead I get two space separated values!
$ var=$'key\tvalue'
$ echo $var
key value
In all of the cases above, the variable is correctly set, but not correctly read! The right way is to use double quotes when referencing:
echo "$var"
This gives the expected value in all the examples given. Always quote variable references!
Why?
When a variable is unquoted, it will:
Undergo field splitting where the value is split into multiple words on whitespace (by default):
Before: /* Foobar is free software */
After: /*, Foobar, is, free, software, */
Each of these words will undergo pathname expansion, where patterns are expanded into matching files:
Before: /*
After: /bin, /boot, /dev, /etc, /home, ...
Finally, all the arguments are passed to echo, which writes them out separated by single spaces, giving
/bin /boot /dev /etc /home Foobar is free software Desktop/ Downloads/
instead of the variable's value.
When the variable is quoted it will:
Be substituted for its value.
There is no step 2.
This is why you should always quote all variable references, unless you specifically require word splitting and pathname expansion. Tools like shellcheck are there to help, and will warn about missing quotes in all the cases above.
You may want to know why this is happening. Together with the great explanation by that other guy, find a reference of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters? written by Gilles in Unix & Linux:
Why do I need to write "$foo"? What happens without the quotes?
$foo does not mean “take the value of the variable foo”. It means
something much more complex:
First, take the value of the variable.
Field splitting: treat that value as a whitespace-separated list of fields, and build the resulting list. For example, if the variable
contains foo * bar then the result of this step is the 3-element
list foo, *, bar.
Filename generation: treat each field as a glob, i.e. as a wildcard pattern, and replace it by the list of file names that match this
pattern. If the pattern doesn't match any files, it is left
unmodified. In our example, this results in the list containing foo,
following by the list of files in the current directory, and finally
bar. If the current directory is empty, the result is foo, *,
bar.
Note that the result is a list of strings. There are two contexts in
shell syntax: list context and string context. Field splitting and
filename generation only happen in list context, but that's most of
the time. Double quotes delimit a string context: the whole
double-quoted string is a single string, not to be split. (Exception:
"$#" to expand to the list of positional parameters, e.g. "$#" is
equivalent to "$1" "$2" "$3" if there are three positional
parameters. See What is the difference between $* and $#?)
The same happens to command substitution with $(foo) or with
`foo`. On a side note, don't use `foo`: its quoting rules are
weird and non-portable, and all modern shells support $(foo) which
is absolutely equivalent except for having intuitive quoting rules.
The output of arithmetic substitution also undergoes the same
expansions, but that isn't normally a concern as it only contains
non-expandable characters (assuming IFS doesn't contain digits or
-).
See When is double-quoting necessary? for more details about the
cases when you can leave out the quotes.
Unless you mean for all this rigmarole to happen, just remember to
always use double quotes around variable and command substitutions. Do
take care: leaving out the quotes can lead not just to errors but to
security
holes.
In addition to other issues caused by failing to quote, -n and -e can be consumed by echo as arguments. (Only the former is legal per the POSIX spec for echo, but several common implementations violate the spec and consume -e as well).
To avoid this, use printf instead of echo when details matter.
Thus:
$ vars="-e -n -a"
$ echo $vars # breaks because -e and -n can be treated as arguments to echo
-a
$ echo "$vars"
-e -n -a
However, correct quoting won't always save you when using echo:
$ vars="-n"
$ echo "$vars"
$ ## not even an empty line was printed
...whereas it will save you with printf:
$ vars="-n"
$ printf '%s\n' "$vars"
-n
user double quote to get the exact value. like this:
echo "${var}"
and it will read your value correctly.
echo $var output highly depends on the value of IFS variable. By default it contains space, tab, and newline characters:
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
^I$
This means that when shell is doing field splitting (or word splitting) it uses all these characters as word separators. This is what happens when referencing a variable without double quotes to echo it ($var) and thus expected output is altered.
One way to prevent word splitting (besides using double quotes) is to set IFS to null. See http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_05 :
If the value of IFS is null, no field splitting shall be performed.
Setting to null means setting to empty
value:
IFS=
Test:
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo -n "$IFS" | cat -vte
^I$
[ks#localhost ~]$ var=$'key\nvalue'
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo $var
key value
[ks#localhost ~]$ IFS=
[ks#localhost ~]$ echo $var
key
value
[ks#localhost ~]$
The answer from ks1322 helped me to identify the issue while using docker-compose exec:
If you omit the -T flag, docker-compose exec add a special character that break output, we see b instead of 1b:
$ test=$(/usr/local/bin/docker-compose exec db bash -c "echo 1")
$ echo "${test}b"
b
echo "${test}" | cat -vte
1^M$
With -T flag, docker-compose exec works as expected:
$ test=$(/usr/local/bin/docker-compose exec -T db bash -c "echo 1")
$ echo "${test}b"
1b
Additional to putting the variable in quotation, one could also translate the output of the variable using tr and converting spaces to newlines.
$ echo $var | tr " " "\n"
foo
bar
baz
Although this is a little more convoluted, it does add more diversity with the output as you can substitute any character as the separator between array variables.
This question already has answers here:
Brace expansion with variable? [duplicate]
(6 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I have four files:
1.txt 2.txt 3.txt 4.txt
in linux shell, I could use :
ls {1..4}.txt to list all the four files
but if I set two variables : var1=1 and var2=4, how to list the four files?
that is:
var1=1
var2=4
ls {$var1..$var2}.txt # error
what is the correct code?
Using variables with the sequence-expression form ({<numFrom>..<numTo>}) of brace expansion only works in ksh and zsh, but, unfortunately, not in bash (and (mostly) strictly POSIX-features-only shells such as dash do not support brace expansion at all, so brace expansion should be avoided with /bin/sh altogether).
Given your symptoms, I assume you're using bash, where you can only use literals in sequence expressions (e.g., {1..3}); from the manual (emphasis mine):
Brace expansion is performed before any other expansions, and any characters special to other expansions are preserved in the result.
In other words: at the time a brace expression is evaluated, variable references have not been expanded (resolved) yet; interpreting literals such as $var1 and $var2 as numbers in the context of a sequence expression therefore fails, so the brace expression is considered invalid and as not expanded.
Note, however, that the variable references are expanded, namely at a later stage of overall expansion; in the case at hand the literal result is the single word '{1..4}' - an unexpanded brace expression with variable values expanded.
While the list form of brace expansion (e.g., {foo,bar)) is expanded the same way, later variable expansion is not an issue there, because no interpretation of the list elements is needed up front; e.g. {$var1,$var2} correctly results in the 2 words 1 and 4.
As for why variables cannot be used in sequence expressions: historically, the list form of brace expansion came first, and when the sequence-expression form was later introduced, the order of expansions was already fixed.
For a general overview of brace expansion, see this answer.
Workarounds
Note: The workarounds focus on numerical sequence expressions, as in the question; the eval-based workaround also demonstrates use of variables with the less common character sequence expressions, which produce ranges of English letters (e.g., {a..c} to produce a b c).
A seq-based workaround is possible, as demonstrated in Jameson's answer.
A small caveat is that seq is not a POSIX utility, but most modern Unix-like platforms have it.
To refine it a little, using seq's -f option to supply a printf-style format string, and demonstrating two-digit zero-padding:
seq -f '%02.f.txt' $var1 $var2 | xargs ls # '%02.f'==zero-pad to 2 digits, no decimal places
Note that to make it fully robust - in case the resulting words contain spaces or tabs - you'd need to employ embedded quoting:
seq -f '"%02.f a.txt"' $var1 $var2 | xargs ls
ls then sees 01 a.txt, 02 a.txt, ... with the argument boundaries correctly preserved.
If you want to robustly collect the resulting words in a Bash array first, e.g., ${words[#]}:
IFS=$'\n' read -d '' -ra words < <(seq -f '%02.f.txt' $var1 $var2)
ls "${words[#]}"
The following are pure Bash workarounds:
A limited workaround using Bash features only is to use eval:
var1=1 var2=4
# Safety check
(( 10#$var1 + 10#$var2 || 1 )) 2>/dev/null || { echo "Need decimal integers." >&2; exit 1; }
ls $(eval printf '%s\ ' "{$var1..$var2}.txt") # -> ls 1.txt 2.txt 3.txt 4.txt
You can apply a similar technique to a character sequence expression;
var1=a var2=c
# Safety check
[[ $var1 == [a-zA-Z] && $var2 == [a-zA-Z] ]] || { echo "Need single letters."; exit 1; }
ls $(eval printf '%s\ ' "{$var1..$var2}.txt") # -> ls a.txt b.txt c.txt
Note:
A check is performed up front to ensure that $var1 and $var2 contain decimal integers or single English letters, which then makes it safe to use eval. Generally, using eval with unchecked input is a security risk and use of eval is therefore best avoided.
Given that output from eval must be passed unquoted to ls here, so that the shell splits the output into individual arguments through words-splitting, this only works if the resulting filenames contain no embedded spaces or other shell metacharacters.
A more robust, but more cumbersome pure Bash workaround to use an array to create the equivalent words:
var1=1 var2=4
# Emulate brace sequence expression using an array.
args=()
for (( i = var1; i <= var2; i++ )); do
args+=( "$i.txt" )
done
ls "${args[#]}"
This approach bears no security risk and also works with resulting filenames with embedded shell metacharacters, such as spaces.
Custom increments can be implemented by replacing i++ with, e.g., i+=2 to step in increments of 2.
Implementing zero-padding would require use of printf; e.g., as follows:
args+=( "$(printf '%02d.txt' "$i")" ) # -> '01.txt', '02.txt', ...
For that particular piece of syntax (a "sequence expression") you're out of luck, see Bash man page:
A sequence expression takes the form {x..y[..incr]}, where x and y are
either integers or single characters, and incr, an optional increment,
is an integer.
However, you could instead use the seq utility, which would have a similar effect -- and the approach would allow for the use of variables:
var1=1
var2=4
for i in `seq $var1 $var2`; do
ls ${i}.txt
done
Or, if calling ls four times instead of once bothers you, and/or you want it all on one line, something like:
for i in `seq $var1 $var2`; do echo ${i}.txt; done | xargs ls
From seq(1) man page:
seq [OPTION]... LAST
seq [OPTION]... FIRST LAST
seq [OPTION]... FIRST INCREMENT LAST
There are many ways to expand an escaped string, but how can a shell command be made to take a string as an argument and escape it?
Here are some examples of different ways of expansion:
$ echo -e '\x27\\012\b34\n56\\\aa7\t8\r 9\0\0134\047'
'\0134
9\'7 8
$ echo $'\x27\\012\b34\n56\\\aa7\t8\r 9\0\0134\047'
'\0134
9\a7 8
$ PS1='(5)$ ' # At least tab-width - 3 long; 5 columns given typical tab-width.
(5)$ printf %b '\x27\\012\b34\n56\\\aa7\t8\r 9\0\0134\047'
'\0134
9\'(5)$
Note: there's actually a tab character between the 7 and 8 above, but the markup rendering seems to break it.
Yes, all sorts of craziness in there. ;-)
Anyway, I'm looking for the reverse of such escape expansion commands. If the command was called escape, it would satisfy these properties:
$ echo -ne "$(escape "$originalString")"
Should output the verbatim value of originalString as would ‘echo -n "$originalString"’. I.e. it should be an identity.
Likewise:
$ escape "$(echo -ne "$escapedString")"
Should output the string escaped again, though not necessarily in the same way as before. E.g. \0134 may become \\ or vice versa.
Don't use echo -e -- it's very poorly specified in POSIX, and considered deprecated for all but the simplest uses. Bash has extensions to its printf that provide a better-supported approach:
printf -v escaped_string %q "$raw_string"
...gives you a shell-escaped string from a raw one (storing it in a variable named escaped_string), and
printf -v raw_string %b "$escaped_string"
...gives you a raw string from a backslash-escaped one, storing it in raw_string.
Note that the two escape syntaxes are not equivalent -- strings escaped with printf %q are ready for eval, rather than for printf %b.
That is, you can safely run:
eval "myvar=$escaped_string"
...when escaped_string has been created with printf %q as above.
That said: What's the use case? It's strongly preferred to handle raw strings as raw strings (using NUL terminaters when delimiting is necessary), rather than converting them to and from an escaped form.