Perforce keeps RCS keywords unexpanded on server, but whenever you get latest it expand them. This makes it difficult when comparing changes between different branches using third-party tools.
Is it possible to disable this behavior for a particular workspace or user?
As I understand it is possible to adjust this behavior per file by modifying file type:
http://answers.perforce.com/articles/KB/3482
By I cannot modify those files on the server, so I am looking for a client-only solution.
You change the filetype from the client. From the command line, if I have, say, a text file with RCS keywords enabled and I want it disabled, I do:
p4 reopen -c default -t text //depot/path/file.txt
Or, from P4V, right-click on the file, choose "Change Filetype..." and deselect "+k RCS Keyword Expansion".
Related
If I have a workspace open in P4V and I switch workspaces is there a way to notify or detect that the switch has happened externally?
The workspace contains an editor and needs to checkout files to modify them. I'm worried that a switch via P4V would leave the editor unaware that the files are now from a different stream.
I would rather have a way to detect this in the editor rather than having to notify from P4V if possible.
Thanks,
Alex
Are you saying your editor checks out the files automatically? That's common, so you're not on your own. What editor is it, if I may ask?
Do you know how your editor talks to Perforce? Am I right thinking that it issues p4.exe (the cmdline tool) commands, e.g. p4 edit? (The other way would be using one of the P4 APIs, e.g. p4java or p4python.) If so, the p4 edit commands already do not respect the P4V workspace setting. The p4.exe cmdline tool will work with the p4 workspace specified in one of six ways. To always use the right client,
have a P4CONFIG file specifying P4CLIENT=[client name] in the root of each of your workspaces
change the p4 integration of your editor in such a way that the p4 edit command will always be run effectively from within the given workspace (in the sense of CWD); you can use the -d switch for this, e.g. when checking out C:\workspaces\wksp1\foo\bar\baz.c you would call p4 -d C:\workspaces\wksp1\foo\bar edit C:\workspaces\wksp1\foo\bar\baz.c.
If the user is using a new workspace, they will also be working with a different set of files, so there's hopefully not much chance for confusion there. (Unless they've made multiple workspaces with the same Root, in which case they're doing their very best to shoot off their own kneecaps.)
If they've switched streams within the current workspace, you can detect this with a command like "p4 info", "p4 client -o", or "p4 stream -o".
I have, in perforce, a sort of 'basic working set' of files that I keep checked out (and therefore writable) when working. However, every time I commit my changes, this list gets disrupted - some things committed, others reverted - and then I have to waste time tracking down and checking out all these files again.
So, is there some way to save the list of currently checked out files, and then later check out those same files again?
I primarily use P4V, but I have P4Win and command-line Perforce available. I'd strongly prefer a GUI solution, though.
I only want to save and restore the state of which files are checked out, not the contents of those files, so shelving is not the answer
I am aware of the 'Do not submit unchanged' and 'Check out after submit' options. They are not sufficient. For instance, frequently I will have files which are programmatically generated which register as 'changed' when the only thing that is different is the 'File generated on' timestamp; I need to prevent such spurious revisions from being submitted, and I have not found any practical method of searching for and managing such files that doesn't involve the 'revert if unchanged' command.
You can do:
p4 -ztag opened | grep depotFile | cut -d ' ' -f 3 > files.txt
to save a list of files already open in your client. (If you don't have Unix utilities for Windows, you could construct this list by whatever means you want, such as running p4 opened > files.txt and manually editing files.txt in an editor.)
Once you have a list of files, you can open all of them via:
p4 -x files.txt edit
This doesn't meet your preference for a GUI-based solution, but you could create .cmd scripts to perform these actions and then double-click on them (or on shortcuts to them).
The easiest solution would be to exclude those generated files via your workspace specification, e.g., "-//depot/files/ignorablefile.sh"
They can still reside in your local workspace, but the app will not attempt to update them or add them to source control.
You said that shelving's not the answer, but that's what I would go with as the easiest solution (i.e. the one that involves the least scripting and/or fewest manual steps) for the specific question you're asking:
Shelve your pending change (let's call this change 1000).
Move your open files to a new pending change (let's call this change 1001).
Submit change 1001.
Unshelve change 1000.
Sync and resolve.
Now you have the same exact files open (the unshelve opened them) but at the head revision (the sync and resolve does that).
Now, looking past what you asked for to what might make your life easier: rather than reverting the files you don't want to submit (and having some sort of scheme to get them back later, possibly via shelving as described above), what I'd do is move them to another changelist. So instead of:
Identify "unchanged" files.
Revert unchanged files.
Submit remaining files with "reopen" option.
Reopen previously reverted files (somehow).
I'd do:
Identify "unchanged" files.
Move unchanged files to another changelist N.
Submit remaining files with "reopen" option.
Move all files from changelist N back to the default changelist.
All of those except step 1 are simple one-shot commands that you can do from any client. Personally, I'd automate steps 1+2 with a script (I'm assuming it's programmatically possible to determine whether the only diff in one of these files is the timestamp) and put it into P4Win/P4V as a "custom tool".
dear all,
I am using the Perforce Windows x64 GUI 2014.1888424. Per my test, the answer is NO. It will use the assigned revision number.
I found the "integrate" and "branch" commands also don't keep the revision info.
Are these commands designed to behavior like this?
PS: I know that rename/move will keep the revision info.
Would you please give me any hint? Thank you very much!
You didn't describe precisely what test you did, so I'm speculating slightly, but: the Perforce integrate, copy, and merge commands do preserve the overall revision history of the file.
However, many of the commands which display file history do not display the full history by default; you have to specify additional commands to instruct the server to output the history across integrations.
For example, compare the output of
p4 filelog -i
versus
p4 filelog
or
p4 changes -i
versus
p4 changes
for your experiments.
The -i flag tells the server that you want to see the history of the file from prior to the integration or copy from its previous location. Here's how it's described in 'p4 help filelog':
The -i flag includes inherited file history. If a file was created by
branching (using 'p4 integrate'), filelog lists the revisions of the
file's ancestors up to the branch points that led to the specified
revision. File history inherited by renaming (using 'p4 move') is
always displayed regardless of whether -i is specified.
Note that, as you've observed, renaming is indeed handled differently than integ/copy/merge.
As for myself, when I am studying the history of a file, I tend to nearly always use the P4V tool and its supremely powerful Revision Graph and Time Lapse View tools. These tools know how to navigate all sorts of complex integration history, and make studying the history of a file much easier.
I have set vim as the svn editor.
Now, whenever I do 'svn ci', it opens up vim editor allowing me to enter the commit comments.
Below the comment section, there are set files which will be checked in. So, If I don't want certain files to be committed, I remove it from the list of files in the vim editor. But when I save and quit the vim editor, svn still checks-in the file I have removed in the editor.
Is this expected behavior? Or I need to set something in the svn configuration to make it work?
That list of files in the comments section is... well... just comments. It doesn't really do anything - it's just there to help you by letting you see what you are committing.
If you want to not commit certain files, you have to do it beforehand:
You can specify the files you want commit in the svn commit command instead of committing everything.
You can add the ignored files to your svn:ignore property.
You can use some GUI tool that'll let you visually select what to commit and what not.
There is some trick with changelists. Haven't tested it(I don't use SVN since it's crap), just found it in this answer when I googled.
Use Git with git-svn, and simply git reset HEAD the files you don't want to commit to unstage them.
The list in the editor is just informative; it tells you what will be committed but does not influence what will actually be committed (the relationship is the other way round). If that's not what you wanted, you have to kill the svn ci (typically by doing Ctrl+Z and then issuing the kill at the command line). To change what is committed, you need to list the files explicitly to svn ci; it only defaults to all known, modified files (i.e., those listed when you run svn status).
If the above way of working isn't to your taste, you might be better off getting one of the many GUIs that wrap around SVN. They almost universally make interactively selecting what to commit easier.
Is there a program (preferably available on Cygwin) which I can use to "filter" a diff file interactively? i.e. I want something like git interactive add, except that I want to operate on a diff file. I have already discovered filterdiff, but I don't think that it supports interactive editing, only inclusion/exclusion of hunks based on a pre-defined search criteria.
My usage scenario: I have a patch in MQ, which I would like to split up per the tutorial here: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/MqTutorial#Split_a_patch_into_multiple_patches. In order to do so, I have to edit a patch file so that it includes only the (many) changes I want, and doing this manually with a text editor is kind of a pain.
Thanks!
You can probably get what you want using the record extension: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/RecordExtension
Apply the patch (but don't commit it) and then selectively commit chunk by chunk using record. You could do that with or without mq in the works.
Emacs’ diff-mode has commands to (un)apply or delete individual hunks of a diff. It also allows editing the hunks (keeping the hunk headers up to date automatically), and it has a hunk-split command that is a bit more powerful than that in git add -p.