I have an salesforce object stores which needs to be accessed by all users(logged-in and guest users). I tried in "user profiles" but later realized its only for userd logged into the system that can have profile.
So what about guest users? how do guest users view data?
I am using nodejs-nforce and didn't find anyting related to that.
Actually, Salesforce don't provide API access without authorization, so you need always use SF credentials for querying Objects.
Guest user profiles are not visible in the Setup>Profile section. Follow the below steps to go to the Guest user profile.
Navigate to Setup>Digital Experiences>All Sites>Builder
Guest User Profile section, click the profile name
Visit https://nonitechsolutions.blogspot.com/2021/06/salesforce-enable-guest-user-on-your.html
Related
We have a single-page Javascript app that makes calls to Microsoft Graph API using delegated permissions.
One of the things it does is get a list of users via the /users endpoint.
Now when the request URL was https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users?$select=id,displayName,givenName,surname,mail,userPrincipalName,
everything worked fine.
But then we changed it to include a filter.
Specifically we only want Guest users.
So we changed the request URL to https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users?$filter=userType eq 'Guest'&$select=id,displayName,givenName,surname,mail,userPrincipalName,userType.
Now some of the users get a 403 Forbidden when we try to make the query.
What is puzzling is that they can get the full list of users, but are unable to get a subset of the users.
This user is themselves a Guest user, and has the Guest Inviter directory role.
This gives them the ability to read all users.
I have a Global Admin account which is able to use the second request as well (it would be pretty stunning if it could not).
The app itself has the necessary scopes since it is able to read the users, it just depends on the user and their permissions in AAD.
My theory is that the user does not have permission to access the userType property, and this causes the 403.
It is probably part of the "full profile".
Philippe confirmed this by stating you cannot access this property through the User.ReadBasic.All scope.
If we look at the Guest Inviter role's permissions: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/users-groups-roles/directory-assign-admin-roles#guest-inviter.
We can see that they have microsoft.aad.directory/users/basic/read, a Global admin on the other hand has microsoft.aad.directory/users/allProperties/allTasks.
My question is, what do I need to do to enable this query for the user?
I would like to avoid giving them Global Admin in this case.
The application's token has the following scopes:
Directory.AccessAsUser.All
User.Read
We used a less privileged scope before,
but we needed to add features that required higher privileges.
The scope we have is the "most privileged" scope for listing users: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/docs/api-reference/v1.0/api/user_list.
The application is also registered as a Native app, if that makes a difference.
Signing out and signing back in (to refresh the token) also does not help.
This problem occurs with a fresh sign-in with the same scopes in the token.
The only difference is the role of the user in AAD.
Request id: 6079bcb2-6f90-44cc-8a57-83a8e1676333, timestamp Thu, 15 Nov 2018 06:49:59 GMT.
Unfortunately your theory is actually correct about guest users not being able to filter on userType. I have just spoken to the engineering team behind this logic on Microsoft Graph. They are looking into a fix here so that it adheres to our Roles based access control (RBAC) for this property and not the pre RBAC logic that it is doing right now. There is no time frame currently on this, they are planning it into their sprint. I'll see if I can get an update in the next few days.
You are most likely experiencing this if your application only has delegated permissions for https://graph.microsoft.com/User.ReadBasic.All. With only User.ReadBasic.All, your app doesn't have permission to read the userType property, which also means it doesn't have permission to filter on that property.
You'll probably find any user in the tenant will have the same experience, including a member or a global admin, not just your guest user. If your app requests for User.Read.All instead, the filter should work as expected for your guest user in the Guest Inviter role.
What do you have set under Azure Active Directory -> User Settings -> External collaboration settings -> Guest user permissions are limited?
If the guest permissions are limited, guest users are unable to enumerate the directory users & groups.
I am building a site on Liferay 7. By default, all the authenticated users inherit the Guest permissions (anonymous users).
There is even a label in the permissions section:
"Under the current configuration, all users automatically inherit permissions from the Guest role."
Why do I need this?
I would like to display X content only for anonymous users and when the user logs in, then I would like to display different content.
This is how my content permissions for anonymous users are configured:
Although I agree with people that say this is not the best path, yes you can do it - just to address the question at hands.
Set this to true if resources should assume that all users have the Guest role. Set this to false if resources will not assume that all users have the Guest role and, thus, do not automatically inherit permissions that belong to the Guest role.
Setting this property to false may require users to grant permissions to roles like Site Member and User.
Defaults:
permissions.check.guest.enabled=true
Why do I need this?
Permissions are not the catch-all for showing different content. If a guest is not allowed to see something, but needs to log in - that's fine. It's authenticated content, and you'll need to sign in.
If an authenticated user has no permission to see certain content, but just needs to log out in order to see it: What kind of permission is that? Let me answer that for you: It's not permission. It's rather targeted content and while it might be mimicked with permissions, this mimicry is nothing more than mimicry.
One way to implement such a requirement is through structured Web Content (you sound as if you want to show different Web Content articles). The template has access to the full API and can check if the current user is signed in or not - and show different content based on this fact.
If you want to achieve role permission using code level as like in xxxlocalserviceImpl class.You can use below code for allow permission for the guest user.
In case of document and media allow permission to guest and registerUser in Liferay 7 using rest webservice you can use this code for allow permission to upload and download the document using this code.
ResourcePermissionLocalServiceUtil.setResourcePermissions(companyId,
DLFileEntry.class.getName(), ResourceConstants.SCOPE_INDIVIDUAL,
String.valueOf(dlFileEntry.getFileEntryId()), guestRole.getRoleId(),
new String[] { ActionKeys.VIEW });
To answer your question - you can not configure that per specific asset! By default an authenticated user can not have less permissions than an unauthenticated one. You can change that behavior for all assets using permissions.check.guest.enabled=false as #Victor correctly pointed out!
I'm building a sitecore 7.2 using asp.net MVC 5.0. The site will have login and each user will be roles.
We need to show/hide the site menu items based on logged in user Roles. The user detail and roles are stored in SAP backend.
Could someone please advise what's the best way to achieve above?
Essentially you will want to map the roles stored in your backend system to Sitecore Roles. Potentially look into creating a custom Role Provider (see in document below)
Once logged in, requests are made to Sitecore are made in context of that logged in user. Therefore if the user, or their role, does not have permission to view an Item, it will not be returned in the request. This effect means that your Menu will not display items they do not have permission to access.
You and Content Editors can control what users and roles can access via the Security Editor and view their access rights via the Access Viewer in the Content Editor.
This documents will have everything you need - http://sdn.sitecore.net/upload/sitecore6/sc61keywords/security_api_cookbook_usletter.pdf
http://sdn.sitecore.net/upload/sitecore6/securityadministratorscookbook-usletter.pdf
Its also worth noting that Sitecore's seucirty manages roles as Ors. So if one of the user's role has permission to see an Item, then the user can see it.
If you require the roles to be Ands; every role must have permission before its displayed to the user, check this post out - http://www.sitecore.net/learn/blogs/technical-blogs/john-west-sitecore-blog/posts/2015/03/require-membership-in-multiple-roles-in-the-sitecore-aspnet-cms.aspx
You need the roles for the current user from SAP? There is an Odata API for that: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73ehp1/helpdata/en/4c/5bde6197817511e10000000a42189b/content.htm
You could query the API in real-time, but it would of course require a login to SAP for the current user.
Or - you could use another API and connect via a service user.
I have a requirement to deactivate a user for a particular organization.In liferay we deactivate the user directly by control panel under users tool.if i deactivate,The user will deactivate in portal level so it is applicable to all organizations not to particular organization.so can i do manual code for this or is there any alternative by default?
User Management in Liferay is global - to the whole portal. You authenticate to the portal, thus a deactivated user can't be authenticated to the portal.
You can make users members of Organizations or site - and this membership (or other organization- or site-level roles) can be used to provide them with permissions.
If you want them to be able to sign in, don't deactivate them. If you don't want them to access a certain organization, make the content of that organization available to members only - and exclude the user from the members of that organization.
OK you could do this in code level ,
User singleUser=UserLocalServiceUtil.getUser(userId)
singleUser.setStatus(WorkflowConstants.STATUS_DENIED);
UserLocalServiceUtil.updateUser(singleUser);
So basically setting User Status to either WorkflowConstants.STATUS_DENIED, WorkflowConstants.STATUS_EXPIRED or WorkflowConstants.STATUS_INACTIVE will do the work of deactivating particular User.
But you need to research on the aftermath effect of these status field.
At the moment I'm running Jenkins on my Mac Mini and everybody in my local network can access the web dashboard at the address http://<JenkisIP>:8080. How can I setup username and password credentials to limit the access to it?
You want to check the enable security feature in the configure menu, select "Jenkins's own user database" as the security realm and then alter the security matrix to suit your requirements.
For the first run, give everyone full access. Allow users to sign up, create your own account (if you don't have one) and then give full privileges to that account and remove all privileges to anonymous.
All the information you need should be found here:
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Standard+Security+Setup