According to this, wireshark is able to get the packet before it is dropped (therefore I cannot get such packets by myself). And I'm still wondering the exact location in linux kernel for wireshark to fetch the packets.
The answer goes as "On UN*Xes, it uses libpcap, which, on Linux, uses AF_PACKET sockets." Does anyone have more concrete example to use "AF_PACKET sockets"? If I understand wireshark correctly, the network interface card (NIC) will make a copy of all incoming packets and send it to a filter (berkeley packet filter) defined by the user. But where does this happen? Or am I wrong with that understanding and do I miss anything here?
Thanks in advance!
But where does this happen?
If I understood you correctly - you want to know, where is initialized such socket.
There is pcap_create function, that tries to determine type of source interface, creates duplicate of it and activates it.
For network see pcap_create_interface function => pcap_create_common function => pcap_activate_linux function.
All initialization happens in pcap_activate_linux => activate_new function => iface_bind function
( copy descriptor of device with handlep->device = strdup(device);,
create socket with socket(PF_PACKET, SOCK_DGRAM, htons(ETH_P_ALL)),
bind socket to device with bind(fd, (struct sockaddr *) &sll, sizeof(sll)) ).
For more detailed information read comments in source files of mentioned functions - they are very detailed.
After initialization all work happens in a group of functions such as pcap_read_linux, etc.
On Linux, you should be able to simply use tcpdump (which leverages the libpcap library) to do this. This can be done with a file or to STDOUT and you specify the filter at the end of the tcpdump command..
Related
As it is implied by this question, it seems that checksum is calculated and verified by ethernet hardware, so it seems highly unlikely that it must be generated by software when sending frames using an AF_PACKET socket, as seem here and here. Also, I don't think it can be received from the socket nor by any simple mean, since even Wireshark doesn't display it.
So, can anyone confirm this? Do I really need to send the checksum myself as shown in the last two links? Will checksum be created and checked automatically by the ethernet adaptor?
No, you do not need to include the CRC.
When using a packet socket in Linux using socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_ALL) ), you must provide the layer 2 header when sending. This is defined by struct ether_header in netinet/if_ether.h and includes the destination host, source host, and type. The frame check sequence is not included, nor is the preamble, start of frame delimiter, or trailer. These are added by the hardware.
On Linux, if you mention socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htobe16(ETH_P_ALL)) similar case, you don't need to calculate ethernet checksum, NIC hardware/driver will do it for you. That means you need to offer whole data link layer frame except checksum before send it to raw socket.
sock = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_ALL));
setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_FILTER, &f, sizeof (f))
With this simple BPF/LPF attach code, when I try to receive packet on the socket, will get some wrong packets that doesn't match with the filter. Seems those packets got into the socket before I call setsockopt().
Seems like should first create the AF_PACKET SOCK_RAW socket, then attach the filter, then flush the socket to get rid of those wrong packets.
So the question is, how to flush those packet?
The "bug" you're describing is real and I've seen it at multiple companies in my career. There is something like an "oral tradition" around this bug that is passed from one network engineer to another. Here are the common fixes:
Just call recv on the socket until it is empty
Double-filter by filtering packets in usermode as well as using the bpf
Use the zero-bpf technique just like libpcap where you apply an empty bpf first, then empty the socket, and then apply the real bpf.
I've written about this problem extensively on my blog to try and codify the oral tradition around this bug into a concrete recommendation and best-practice.
As it is implied by this question, it seems that checksum is calculated and verified by ethernet hardware, so it seems highly unlikely that it must be generated by software when sending frames using an AF_PACKET socket, as seem here and here. Also, I don't think it can be received from the socket nor by any simple mean, since even Wireshark doesn't display it.
So, can anyone confirm this? Do I really need to send the checksum myself as shown in the last two links? Will checksum be created and checked automatically by the ethernet adaptor?
No, you do not need to include the CRC.
When using a packet socket in Linux using socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htons(ETH_P_ALL) ), you must provide the layer 2 header when sending. This is defined by struct ether_header in netinet/if_ether.h and includes the destination host, source host, and type. The frame check sequence is not included, nor is the preamble, start of frame delimiter, or trailer. These are added by the hardware.
On Linux, if you mention socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, htobe16(ETH_P_ALL)) similar case, you don't need to calculate ethernet checksum, NIC hardware/driver will do it for you. That means you need to offer whole data link layer frame except checksum before send it to raw socket.
In the system I am testing right now, it has a couple of virtual L2 devices chained together to add our own L2.5 headers between Eth headers and IP headers. Now when I use
tcpdump -xx -i vir_device_1
, it actually shows the SLL header with IP header. How do I capture the full packet that is actually going out of the vir_device_1, i.e. after the ndo_start_xmit() device call?
How do I capture the full packet that is actually going out of the vir_device_1, i.e. after the ndo_start_xmit() device call?
Either by writing your own code to directly use a PF_PACKET/SOCK_RAW socket (you say "SLL header", so this is presumably Linux), or by:
making sure you've assigned a special ARPHRD_ value for your virtual interface;
using one of the DLT_USERn values for your special set of headers, or asking tcpdump-workers#lists.tcpdump.org for an official DLT_ value to be assigned for them;
modifying libpcap to map that ARPHRD_ value to the DLT_ value you're using;
modifying tcpdump to handle that DLT_ value;
if necessary, modifying other programs that would capture on that interface or read capture files as written by tcpdump on that interface to handle that value as well.
Note that the DLT_USERn values are specifically reserved for private use, and no official versions of libpcap, tcpdump, or Wireshark will ever assign them for their own use (i.e., if you use a DLT_USERn value, don't bother contributing patches to assign that value to your type of headers, as they won't be accepted; other people may already be using it for their own special headers, and that must continue to be supported), so you'll have to maintain the modified versions of libpcap, tcpdump, etc. yourself if you use one of those values rather than getting an official value assigned.
Thanks Guy Harris for providing very helpful answers to my original question!
I am adding this as an answer/note to a follow up question I asked in the comments.
Basically my question was what is the status of the packet received by PF_PACKET/SOCK_RAW.
For an software device(no queue), dev_queue_xmit() will call dev_hard_start_xmit(skb, dev) to start transmitting skb buffer. This function calls dev_queue_xmit_nit() before it calls dev->ops->ndo_start_xmit(skb,dev), which means the packet PF_PACKET sees is at the state before any changes made in ndo_start_xmit().
Ok, I realize this situation is somewhat unusual, but I need to establish a TCP connection (the 3-way handshake) using only raw sockets (in C, in linux) -- i.e. I need to construct the IP headers and TCP headers myself. I'm writing a server (so I have to first respond to the incoming SYN packet), and for whatever reason I can't seem to get it right. Yes, I realize that a SOCK_STREAM will handle this for me, but for reasons I don't want to go into that isn't an option.
The tutorials I've found online on using raw sockets all describe how to build a SYN flooder, but this is somewhat easier than actually establishing a TCP connection, since you don't have to construct a response based on the original packet. I've gotten the SYN flooder examples working, and I can read the incoming SYN packet just fine from the raw socket, but I'm still having trouble creating a valid SYN/ACK response to an incoming SYN from the client.
So, does anyone know a good tutorial on using raw sockets that goes beyond creating a SYN flooder, or does anyone have some code that could do this (using SOCK_RAW, and not SOCK_STREAM)? I would be very grateful.
MarkR is absolutely right -- the problem is that the kernel is sending reset packets in response to the initial packet because it thinks the port is closed. The kernel is beating me to the response and the connection dies. I was using tcpdump to monitor the connection already -- I should have been more observant and noticed that there were TWO replies one of which was a reset that was screwing things up, as well as the response my program created. D'OH!
The solution that seems to work best is to use an iptables rule, as suggested by MarkR, to block the outbound packets. However, there's an easier way to do it than using the mark option, as suggested. I just match whether the reset TCP flag is set. During the course of a normal connection this is unlikely to be needed, and it doesn't really matter to my application if I block all outbound reset packets from the port being used. This effectively blocks the kernel's unwanted response, but not my own packets. If the port my program is listening on is 9999 then the iptables rule looks like this:
iptables -t filter -I OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 9999 --tcp-flags RST RST -j DROP
You want to implement part of a TCP stack in userspace... this is ok, some other apps do this.
One problem you will come across is that the kernel will be sending out (generally negative, unhelpful) replies to incoming packets. This is going to screw up any communication you attempt to initiate.
One way to avoid this is to use an IP address and interface that the kernel does not have its own IP stack using- which is fine but you will need to deal with link-layer stuff (specifically, arp) yourself. That would require a socket lower than IPPROTO_IP, SOCK_RAW - you need a packet socket (I think).
It may also be possible to block the kernel's responses using an iptables rule- but I rather suspect that the rules will apply to your own packets as well somehow, unless you can manage to get them treated differently (perhaps applying a netfilter "mark" to your own packets?)
Read the man pages
socket(7)
ip(7)
packet(7)
Which explain about various options and ioctls which apply to types of sockets.
Of course you'll need a tool like Wireshark to inspect what's going on. You will need several machines to test this, I recommend using vmware (or similar) to reduce the amount of hardware required.
Sorry I can't recommend a specific tutorial.
Good luck.
I realise that this is an old thread, but here's a tutorial that goes beyond the normal SYN flooders: http://www.enderunix.org/docs/en/rawipspoof/
Hope it might be of help to someone.
I can't help you out on any tutorials.
But I can give you some advice on the tools that you could use to assist in debugging.
First off, as bmdhacks has suggested, get yourself a copy of wireshark (or tcpdump - but wireshark is easier to use). Capture a good handshake. Make sure that you save this.
Capture one of your handshakes that fails. Wireshark has quite good packet parsing and error checking, so if there's a straightforward error it will probably tell you.
Next, get yourself a copy of tcpreplay. This should also include a tool called "tcprewrite".
tcprewrite will allow you to split your previously saved capture files into two - one for each side of the handshake.
You can then use tcpreplay to play back one side of the handshake so you have a consistent set of packets to play with.
Then you use wireshark (again) to check your responses.
I don't have a tutorial, but I recently used Wireshark to good effect to debug some raw sockets programming I was doing. If you capture the packets you're sending, wireshark will do a good job of showing you if they're malformed or not. It's useful for comparing to a normal connection too.
There are structures for IP and TCP headers declared in netinet/ip.h & netinet/tcp.h respectively. You may want to look at the other headers in this directory for extra macros & stuff that may be of use.
You send a packet with the SYN flag set and a random sequence number (x). You should receive a SYN+ACK from the other side. This packet will have an acknowledgement number (y) that indicates the next sequence number the other side is expecting to receive as well as another sequence number (z). You send back an ACK packet that has sequence number x+1 and ack number z+1 to complete the connection.
You also need to make sure you calculate appropriate TCP/IP checksums & fill out the remainder of the header for the packets you send. Also, don't forget about things like host & network byte order.
TCP is defined in RFC 793, available here: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc793.html
Depending on what you're trying to do it may be easier to get existing software to handle the TCP handshaking for you.
One open source IP stack is lwIP (http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lwip/) which provides a full tcp/ip stack. It is very possible to get it running in user mode using either SOCK_RAW or pcap.
if you are using raw sockets, if you send using different source mac address to the actual one, linux will ignore the response packet and not send an rst.