Common Lisp: check if lexical variable exists? - scope

How do I detect if a lexical variable is bound in a scope? I basically want boundp for lexical variables.
Concretely, say I have:
(defvar *dynamic* 1)
(defconstant +constant+ 2)
(let ((lexical 3))
(when (boundp '*dynamic*) ; t
(print "*dynamic* bound."))
(when (boundp '+constant+) ; t
(print "+constant+ bound."))
(when (boundp 'lexical) ; nil
(print "lexical bound.")))
So boundp correctly checks for dynamic variables (and constants), and as the hyperspec says, doesn't cover lexical bindings.
But I can't find any equivalent of boundp for lexical bindings. So how do I check them then? (Implementation-specific code for say SBCL is fine if there isn't anything portable.)

There is nothing like that in ANSI Common Lisp. There is no access to a lexical environment.
You only can check it this way:
CL-USER 8 > (let ((lexical 3))
(when (ignore-errors lexical)
(print "lexical bound."))
(values))
"lexical bound."
CL-USER 9 > (let ((lexical 3))
(when (ignore-errors lexxxical)
(print "lexical bound."))
(values))
<nothing>
There is no way to take a name and see if it is lexically bound at all. There is an extension to CL, where the function variable-information would give some information, but even in this case it would probably not work:
* (require "sb-cltl2")
("SB-CLTL2")
* (apropos "variable-information")
VARIABLE-INFORMATION
SB-CLTL2:VARIABLE-INFORMATION (fbound)
* (let ((lexical 3))
(sb-cltl2:variable-information 'lexical))
; in: LET ((LEXICAL 3))
; (LET ((LEXICAL 3))
; (SB-CLTL2:VARIABLE-INFORMATION 'LEXICAL))
;
; caught STYLE-WARNING:
; The variable LEXICAL is defined but never used.
;
; compilation unit finished
; caught 1 STYLE-WARNING condition
NIL
NIL
NIL

for cltl2:variable-information to work, it should be done in macro expansion time.
(ql:quickload :introspect-environment)
(use-package :introspect-environment) ;; also exports cltl2 functions.
(defmacro in-compile-time ((environment) &body body &environment env)
(check-type environment symbol)
(eval `(let ((,environment ,env)) (progn ,#body)))
nil) ; does not affect the expansion
(defun fn ()
(let ((lexical 2))
(in-compile-time (env)
(print (introspect-environment:variable-information 'lexical env))
(print (introspect-environment:variable-information 'lexxxxical env)))))
; compiling (DEFUN FN ...)
:LEXICAL
NIL

Related

Not overwriting *standard-input* prevents multi-threading

I have a Common Lisp program that behaves differently depending on how I use *standard-input*. Here are the details:
(if input-stream?
(process)
(with-open-file (*standard-input* up :element-type 'unsigned-byte)
(process)))
The process function starts multiple threads. Each thread reads part of the standard input, writes it in a file (all within a lock) and processes the resulting files in parallel (out of the lock). In fact it processes the resulting files in parallel only in case input-stream? is false otherwise it processes them sequentially.
(defun process ()
(let ((psize 4194304)
(stream *standard-input*)
(result-lock (bt:make-lock))
(input-stream-lock (bt:make-lock))
eof)
(flet ((add-job (fname)
(make-thread
#'(lambda ()
(do () (eof)
(when (bt:with-lock-held (input-stream-lock)
(unless eof
(setq eof (write-input-stream-to-file stream fname psize))
t))
(sleep 0.1)
(bt:with-lock-held (result-lock)
(display-progress))))))))
(mapcar
#'join-thread
(loop for i from 1 to 10
collect (add-job
(make-pathname :directory "/tmp"
:name "test"
:type (princ-to-string i))))))))
(let ((counter 0))
(defun display-progress ()
(if (zerop (mod (incf counter) 10))
(format t " ~a " counter)
(write-char #\+))))
(defun write-input-stream-to-file (stream fname psize-bytes)
(with-open-file (out fname
:direction :output
:element-type 'unsigned-byte
:if-exists :supersede)
(do ((byte (read-byte stream nil nil)
(read-byte stream nil nil))
(offset 0 (1+ offset)))
((or (= offset psize-bytes) (null byte)) (not byte))
(write-byte byte out))))
If we create a FIFO (with mkfifo), copy the file to it and run the program with it instead, we again observe parallelism.
The above program is built as a command line utility with ECL and runs on Linux. I run it in one of the following ways:
cat "bigfile" | my-program
my-program "bigfile"
Parallelism happens only in case 2.
The question is why the difference?
Update:
I had mistake in my question. Now it is OK.
Added the process function and described how I run the program

compilation unit aborted, caught 1 fatal ERROR condition?

I have some common lisp code that is behaving oddly. It's a TCP client/server application.
Unless I add (sleep 0.01) or similar at the end of my code, I get the following utterly unhelpful error message after my program completes. It is a very short-lived program, simply hosting a TCP server and testing that it can be connected to.
;; compilation unit aborted; caught 1 fatal ERROR condition
This doesn't happen every time, maybe 80% of the runs cause this. There is no context, no explanation.
Code to reproduce the problem:
(defmacro with-gensyms ((&rest names) &body body)
`(let ,(loop for n in names collect `(,n (gensym)))
,#body))
(defmacro kilobytes (qty)
(* qty 1024))
(defun is-sequence (sequence)
(or (listp sequence) (vectorp sequence)))
(defmacro append-to (seq values)
(with-gensyms (cached-values)
`(let ((,cached-values ,values))
(cond
((is-sequence ,cached-values)
(setf ,seq (append ,seq (coerce ,cached-values 'list))))
(t
(setf ,seq (append ,seq (list ,cached-values))))))))
(defmacro remove-from (seq value)
(with-gensyms (cached-value)
`(let ((,cached-value ,value))
(delete-if (lambda (value) (equalp value ,cached-value)) ,seq))))
(defclass tcp-server ()
((server-socket :initform nil)
(server-threads :initform (list))))
(defgeneric start-server (this &key port bind-address buffer-length))
(defmethod start-server ((this tcp-server) &key (port 0) (bind-address #(127 0 0 1)) (buffer-length (kilobytes 10)))
(with-slots (server-socket server-threads) this
(when server-socket
(error "Server already running"))
(let ((backlog 5))
(setf server-socket (make-instance 'sb-bsd-sockets:inet-socket :type :stream :protocol :tcp))
(sb-bsd-sockets:socket-bind server-socket bind-address port)
(sb-bsd-sockets:socket-listen server-socket backlog)
(flet ((handle-connection (client-socket)
(let ((buffer (make-array buffer-length :element-type '(unsigned-byte 8) :fill-pointer t)))
(catch 'eof
(loop
while (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-open-p client-socket)
do (let ((length (nth-value 1 (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-receive client-socket buffer nil))))
(when (eq 0 length)
(throw 'eof nil)))))
(sb-bsd-sockets::socket-close client-socket)
(remove-from server-threads sb-thread:*current-thread*))))
(sb-thread:make-thread
(lambda ()
(loop
while (and server-socket (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-open-p server-socket))
do
(let ((client-socket (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-accept server-socket))) ;; Listen for incoming connections
(append-to server-threads
(sb-thread:make-thread #'handle-connection :name "Connection handler" :arguments client-socket)))) ;; Spawn a process to handle the connection))
(remove-from server-threads sb-thread:*current-thread*))
:name "Server")))
nil))
(defun start-tcp-server (&key (port 0) (bind-address #(127 0 0 1)) (buffer-length (kilobytes 10)))
(let ((server (make-instance 'tcp-server)))
(start-server server :port port :bind-address bind-address :buffer-length buffer-length)
server))
(defgeneric stop-server (this))
(defmethod stop-server ((this tcp-server))
(with-slots (server-socket server-threads) this
(unless server-socket
(error "Server not running"))
(sb-bsd-sockets:socket-close server-socket)
(setf server-socket nil)
(loop for thread in (reverse server-threads)
; do (sb-thread:interrupt-thread thread 'sb-thread:abort-thread))
do (sb-thread:terminate-thread thread))
(loop for thread in (reverse server-threads)
do (sb-thread:join-thread thread :default nil))))
(defgeneric server-running? (this))
(defmethod server-running? ((this tcp-server))
(if (slot-value this 'server-socket) t nil))
(defgeneric server-port (this))
(defmethod server-port ((this tcp-server))
(nth-value 1 (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-name (slot-value this 'server-socket))))
(let ((server-instance nil))
(defun deltabackup-start-server (&key (port 0) (bind-address #(127 0 0 1)) (buffer-length (kilobytes 10)))
(setf server-instance (start-tcp-server :port port
:bind-address bind-address
:buffer-length buffer-length))
nil)
(defun deltabackup-stop-server ()
(unless server-instance
(error "Server not running"))
(stop-server server-instance)
(setf server-instance nil))
(defun deltabackup-server-running? ()
(server-running? server-instance))
(defun deltabackup-server-port ()
(server-port server-instance)))
(defmacro with-tcp-client-connection (address port socket-var &body body-forms)
(with-gensyms (client-socket)
`(let* ((,client-socket (make-instance 'sb-bsd-sockets:inet-socket :type :stream :protocol :tcp))
(,socket-var ,client-socket)) ; duplicate this, to prevent body-form modifying the original
(sb-bsd-sockets:socket-connect ,client-socket ,address ,port)
(unless ,client-socket
(error "Failed to connect"))
,#body-forms
(sb-bsd-sockets:socket-close ,client-socket))))
(defmacro with-running-server ( (&optional (port 0)) &body body-forms)
`(progn
(deltabackup-start-server :port ,port)
(unless (deltabackup-server-running?)
(error "Server did not run"))
,#body-forms
(deltabackup-stop-server)))
(with-running-server ()
(with-tcp-client-connection #(127 0 0 1) (deltabackup-server-port) client-socket
client-socket))
Using SBCL common lisp.
The reason you get such a vague error message is that you're running directly from the command line and the error is happening in a thread. If you can get the error to happen in EMACS under SLIME, you'll get more detailed error information.
I ran your program from SLIME like this:
CL-USER> (loop repeat 100 do (load "/tmp/stackoverflow.lisp"))
...and got the following error in SLIME:
Socket error in "accept": EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
[Condition of type SB-BSD-SOCKETS:BAD-FILE-DESCRIPTOR-ERROR]
So, something is going wrong on the server's end when you try to accept the connection. My theory is you have a race condition. In the server thread, you have this:
(loop
while (and server-socket (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-open-p server-socket))
do
(let ((client-socket (sb-bsd-sockets:socket-accept server-socket))) ;; Listen for incoming connections
....))
...and in the client thread, you do this:
(defmethod stop-server ((this tcp-server))
(with-slots (server-socket server-threads) this
(unless server-socket
(error "Server not running"))
(sb-bsd-sockets:socket-close server-socket)
It is possible for sb-bsd-sockets:socket-close to be called and to finish between the call to socket-open-p and socket-accept in the server thread, so that socket-accept gets called on a closed socket.

Playing a sine-wave signal using rsound

I wrote this code after reading the rsound documentation in Racket:
#lang racket
(provide (all-defined-out))
(require rsound)
(define (sunet)
(sine-wave 880))
(signal-play sunet)
(stop)
I used the "sine-wave" function on a 880 Hz frequency and stored it into the function "sunet". Then I applied on it the function "signal-play" that plays signals as sound. I got this error:
application: not a procedure;
expected a procedure that can be applied to arguments
given: #<network/s>
arguments.:
880
>
Isn't "sine-wave" a function and isn't it taking frequency as an argument?
I read more of the documentation of rsound and read about networks. Apparently you need to create a network with the input signal and the output signal that gets out to something like signal-play.
This would be the code that I needed yesterday:
(define sunet
(network ()
[A5 <= sine-wave 880]
[out = A5]))
(signal-play sunet)
(sleep 3)
(stop)
And with two signals to create a powerchord:
(define sunet
(network ()
[E2 <= sine-wave 82]
[B2 <= sine-wave 123]
[out = (+ E2 B2)]))
(signal-play sunet)
(sleep 3)
(stop)
So, I just answered my own question.
This was harder than I expected. Turns out sine-wave is not a function but a network. The following will play a sine wave.
#lang racket
(require rsound)
(define s (network ()
[a <= sine-wave 880]
[out = a]))
(signal-play s)
I do not know why the following simpler program does not work:
#lang racket
(require rsound)
(define s (network ()
[out = sine-wave 880]))
(signal-play s)

How to set the priority to thread in LISP?

(defvar firstnumber)
(defvar secondnumber)
(defvar length1)
(defvar mulb)
(defvar var1)
(defvar num1)
(defvar num2)
(defvar addition)
(defvar subs)
(defvar muls)
(defvar divs)
(defun acceptnumber()
(write-line "Enter the first number:")
(force-output t)
(setf firstnumber(read))
(write-line "Enter the second number:")
(force-output t)
(setf secondnumber(read))
(setf length1(integer-length secondnumber))
)
(defun add(num1 num2)
(setf addition(+ num1 num2))
(write-line "Addition of two numbers:")
(write addition)
(write-line " " )
)
(defun sub(num1 num2)
(setf subs(- num1 num2))
(write-line "Substraction of two numbers:")
(write subs)
(write-line " ")
)
(defun mul(num1 num2)
(setf muls(* num1 num2))
(write-line "Multiplication of two numbers:")
(write muls)
(write-line " ")
)
(defun div(num1 num2)
(setf divs(/ num1 num2))
(write-line "Division of two numbers:")
(write divs)
(write-line " ")
)
(defun binarymul(num1 num2)
(setf mulb 0)
(
loop for i from 1 to length1 do
(
if(= 1 (logand num2 1))
(setf mulb(+ mulb num1))
)
(setf num2(ash num2 -1))
(setf num1(ash num1 1))
)
(write-line "Binary Multiplication ::")
(write mulb)
(write-line " ")
(write-line "In binary form::")
(setf var1(format nil "~B" mulb ))
(write-line var1)
)
(acceptnumber)
(sb-thread:make-thread(lambda()(binarymul firstnumber secondnumber)))
(sb-thread:make-thread(lambda()(add firstnumber secondnumber)))
(sb-thread:make-thread(lambda()(sub firstnumber secondnumber)))
(sb-thread:make-thread(lambda()(mul firstnumber secondnumber)))
(sb-thread:make-thread(lambda()(div firstnumber secondnumber)))
I started learning with LISP concurrent programming. I wrote a simple calculation program with sb-thread. Now i want to set the priority for each thread. Ex like set priority higher ti binarymul function etc.
Can I set priority of sb-thread ? If yes How?
SBCL's manual says (emphasis added):
12 Threading
SBCL supports a fairly low-level threading interface that maps onto
the host operating system’s concept of threads or lightweight
processes. This means that threads may take advantage of hardware
multiprocessing on machines that have more than one CPU, but it does
not allow Lisp control of the scheduler. This is found in the
SB-THREAD package.
I think that thread priority would typically require some access to the scheduler, so you won't have the ability to set thread priority with SBCL.

Which programming languages allow default values for method parameters?

I'm curious which languages allow you to do something like this:
method foo(String bar = "beh"){
}
If you call foo like this:
foo();
bar will be set to "beh", but if you call like this:
foo("baz");
bar will be set to "baz".
almost all Lisps
Ruby
Python
C++
C#
Visual Basic.NET
Tcl
Visual Basic
Ioke
Seph
Cobra
Nemerle
Mirah
Delphi
Groovy
PHP
Fancy
Scala
PHP:
function foo($var = "foo") {
print $var;
}
foo(); // outputs "foo"
foo("bar"); // outputs "bar"
Python:
def myFun(var = "foo"):
print var
Ruby:
def foo(var="foo")
print var
end
Groovy:
def foo(var="foo") {
print var
}
Ones I can think of
C# 4.0
C++
VB.Net (all versions)
VB6
F# (members only)
Powershell
IDL
Ruby
Racket provides this, as well as keyword arguments:
(define (f x [y 0]) (+ x y))
(f 1) ; => 1
(f 10 20) ; => 30
(define (g x #:y [y 0]) (- x y))
(g 1) ; => 1
(g 10 #:y 20) ; => -10
They're described in the documentation.
Delphi has allowed this since about version 5 - released in 1999
procedure foo(const bar: string = 'beh');
begin
...
end;
foo;
foo('baz');
Perl does with Method::Signatures.
Python:
def foo(bar = value):
# This function can be invoked as foo() or foo(something).
# In the former case, bar will have its default value.
pass
as of c# 4.0 you can now have default params. Finally!
Also C++, Ruby and VB
TCL provides this functionality
proc procName {{arg1 defaultValue} {arg2 anotherDefaultValue}} {
# proc body
}
D:
void foo(int x, int y = 3)
{
...
}
...
foo(4); // same as foo(4, 3);
Fantom:
class Person
{
Int yearsToRetirement(Int retire := 65) { return retire - age }
Int age
}
Java has a workaround.
You can have the foo method with no parameters that calls the foo method with parameters setting the default value, like this:
void foo() {
foo("beh");
}
void foo(String bar) {
this.bar = bar;
}
Add to the list Realbasic (indeed Realbasic has almost every nice feature of every language I can think of, including introspection and sandboxed scripting).
Python. (But watch out for mutables per http://effbot.org/zone/default-values.htm )
And plenty of languages, including C, allow variable numbers of parameters which effectively lets you do the same thing.
In many modern scripting languages, including PHP, JavaScript, and Perl, a better idiom for handling such things is to allow an associative array or object as a parameter, and then assign defaults if needed.
e.g.
function foo( options ){
if( options.something === undefined ){
options.something = some_default_value;
}
...
}
This eliminates the necessity of putting the defaultable values at the end of the list of parameters and remembering all the stuff you don't want to override.
As always -- use in moderation.
You can do it in PL/SQL.
I know Python allows this, while C,C++ don't.

Resources