In Swift I can create a String variable such as this:
let s = "Hello\nMy name is Jack!"
And if I use s, the output will be:
Hello
My name is Jack!
(because the \n is a linefeed)
But what if I want to programmatically obtain the raw characters in the s variable? As in if I want to actually do something like:
let sRaw = s.raw
I made the .raw up, but something like this. So that the literal value of sRaw would be:
Hello\nMy name is Jack!
and it would literally print the string, complete with literal "\n"
Thank you!
The newline is the "raw character" contained in the string.
How exactly you formed the string (in this case from a string literal with an escape sequence in source code) is not retained (it is only available in the source code, but not preserved in the resulting program). It would look exactly the same if you read it from a file, a database, the concatenation of multiple literals, a multi-line literal, a numeric escape sequence, etc.
If you want to print newline as \n you have to convert it back (by doing text replacement) -- but again, you don't know if the string was really created from such a literal.
You can do this with escaped characters such as \n:
let secondaryString = "really"
let s = "Hello\nMy name is \(secondaryString) Jack!"
let find = Character("\n")
let r = String(s.characters.split(find).joinWithSeparator(["\\","n"]))
print(r) // -> "Hello\nMy name is really Jack!"
However, once the string s is generated the \(secondaryString) has already been interpolated to "really" and there is no trace of it other than the replaced word. I suppose if you already know the interpolated string you could search for it and replace it with "\\(secondaryString)" to get the result you want. Otherwise it's gone.
Related
My program is something like that:
func = do
text <- getLine
return text
If I read line \123\456, the result is, naturally, \\123\\456.
How can I obtain \123\456 as the result?
Based on the discussion in comments, it looks like you want to parse the string as if it was a string literal, except that it is not surrounded by quotes.
We can make use of of read :: Read a => String -> a here that for a string parses it as if it was a string literal to a string. The only problem is that this string literal is surrounded by double quotes (").
We can thus add these quotes, and work with:
read ('"' : text ++ "\"") :: String
Not every string text is however per se a valid string literal, so the above might fail. For example if the text contains a double quote itself, that is not directly preceded by a backslash (\).
I have string variable which is
temp = '1\2\3\4'
I would like to add a prefix 'r' to the string variable and get
r'1\2\3\4'
so that I can split the string based on '\'. I tried the following:
r'temp'
'r' + temp
r + temp
But none of the above works. Is there a simple to do it? I'm using python 3. I also tried to encode the string, using
temp.encode('string-escape')
But it returns the following error
LookupError: unknown encoding: string-escape
r is a prefix for string literals. This means, r"1\2\3\4" will not interpret \ as an escape when creating the string value, but keep \ as an actual character in the string. Thus, r"1\2\3\4" will have seven characters.
You already have the string value: there is nothing to interpret. You cannot have the r prefix affect a variable, only a literal.
Your temp = "1\2\3\4" will interpret backslashes as escapes, create the string '1\x02\x03\x04' (a four-character string), then assign this string to the variable temp. There is no way to retroactively reinterpret the original literal.
EDIT: In view of the more recent comments, you do not seem to, in fact, have a string "1\2\3\4". If you have a valid path, you can split it using
path.split(r'\')
or
path.split('\\')
but you probably also don't need that; rather, you may want to split a path into directory and file name, which is best done by os.path functions.
Wouldn't it just be re.escape(temp)?
Take for example the use case of trying to generate a pattern on the fly involving word boundaries. Then you can do this
r'\b' + re.escape(temp) + r'\b'
just to prefix r in variable in search, Please do this r+""+temp.
e.g.-
import re
email_address = 'Please contact us at: support#datacamp.com'
searchString = "([\w\.-]+)#([\w\.-]+)"
re.serach(r""+searchString, email_address)
I saw the operator r#"" in Rust but I can't find what it does. It came in handy for creating JSON:
let var1 = "test1";
let json = r#"{"type": "type1", "type2": var1}"#;
println!("{}", json) // => {"type2": "type1", "type2": var1}
What's the name of the operator r#""? How do I make var1 evaluate?
I can't find what it does
It has to do with string literals and raw strings. I think it is explained pretty well in this part of the documentation, in the code block that is posted there you can see what it does:
"foo"; r"foo"; // foo
"\"foo\""; r#""foo""#; // "foo"
"foo #\"# bar";
r##"foo #"# bar"##; // foo #"# bar
"\x52"; "R"; r"R"; // R
"\\x52"; r"\x52"; // \x52
It negates the need to escape special characters inside the string.
The r character at the start of a string literal denotes a raw string literal. It's not an operator, but rather a prefix.
In a normal string literal, there are some characters that you need to escape to make them part of the string, such as " and \. The " character needs to be escaped because it would otherwise terminate the string, and the \ needs to be escaped because it is the escape character.
In raw string literals, you can put an arbitrary number of # symbols between the r and the opening ". To close the raw string literal, you must have a closing ", followed by the same number of # characters as there are at the start. With zero or more # characters, you can put literal \ characters in the string (\ characters do not have any special meaning). With one or more # characters, you can put literal " characters in the string. If you need a " followed by a sequence of # characters in the string, just use the same number of # characters plus one to delimit the string. For example: r##"foo #"# bar"## represents the string foo #"# bar. The literal doesn't stop at the quote in the middle, because it's only followed by one #, whereas the literal was started with two #.
To answer the last part of your question, there's no way to have a string literal that evaluates variables in the current scope. Some languages, such as PHP, support that, but not Rust. You should consider using the format! macro instead. Note that for JSON, you'll still need to double the braces, even in a raw string literal, because the string is interpreted by the macro.
fn main() {
let var1 = "test1";
let json = format!(r#"{{"type": "type1", "type2": {}}}"#, var1);
println!("{}", json) // => {"type2": "type1", "type2": test1}
}
If you need to generate a lot of JSON, there are many crates that will make it easier for you. In particular, with serde_json, you can define regular Rust structs or enums and have them serialized automatically to JSON.
The first time I saw this weird notation is in glium tutorials (old crate for graphics management) and is used to "encapsulate" and pass GLSL code (GL Shading language) to shaders of the GPU
https://github.com/glium/glium/blob/master/book/tuto-02-triangle.md
As far as I understand, it looks like the content of r#...# is left untouched, it is not interpreted in any way. Hence raw string.
I came along this
__date__ = "$Date: 2011/06$"
and found this in the docs
$$ is an escape; it is replaced with a single $.
$identifier names a substitution placeholder matching a mapping key of "identifier". By default, "identifier" must spell a Python identifier. The first non-identifier character after the $ character terminates this placeholder specification.
${identifier} is equivalent to $identifier. It is required when valid identifier characters follow the placeholder but are not part of the placeholder, such as "${noun}ification".
but I don't understand it.
Could someone explain in plain english what's the $ for and give some examples preferably?
To Python, those dollar signs mean nothing at all. Just like the 'D' or 'a' that follow, the dollar sign is merely a character in a string.
To your source-code control system, the dollar signs indicate a substitution command. When you check out a new copy of your source code, that string is replaced with the timestamp of the last committed change to the file.
Reference:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.6/svn.advanced.props.special.keywords.html
http://www.badgertronics.com/writings/cvs/keywords.html
This has been used in the context of string replace. For ex, if you have scenario with a variable which takes different value in same string, you can use this as follows:
import string
mytext = "$dog is an animal"
replaceDogtoCat = {"dog":"cat"}
mytemplate = string.Template(mytext)
print mytemplate.substitute(replaceDogtoCat) #output: cat is an animal
replaceDogtoGoat = {"dog":"goat"}
print mytemplate.substitute(replaceDogtoGoat) #output: goat is an animal
$dog is a variable which would get replaced when substitute gets executed
How do I remove lines from a string begins with another string in Lua ? For instance i want to remove all line from string result begins with the word <Table. This is the code I've written so far:
for line in result:gmatch"<Table [^\n]*" do line = "" end
string.gmtach is used to get all occurrences of a pattern. For replacing certain pattern, you need to use string.gsub.
Another problem is your pattern <Table [^\n]* will match all line containing the word <Table, not just begins with it.
Lua pattern doesn't support beginning of line anchor, this almost works:
local str = result:gsub("\n<Table [^\n]*", "")
except that it will miss on the first line. My solution is using a second run to test the first line:
local str1 = result:gsub("\n<Table [^\n]*", "")
local str2 = str1:gsub("^<Table [^\n]*\n", "")
The LPEG library is perfect
for this kind of task.
Just write a function to create custom line strippers:
local mk_striplines
do
local lpeg = require "lpeg"
local P = lpeg.P
local Cs = lpeg.Cs
local lpegmatch = lpeg.match
local eol = P"\n\r" + P"\r\n" + P"\n" + P"\t"
local eof = P(-1)
local linerest = (1 - eol)^1 * (eol + eof) + eol
mk_striplines = function (pat)
pat = P (pat)
local matchline = pat * linerest
local striplines = Cs (((matchline / "") + linerest)^1)
return function (str)
return lpegmatch (striplines, str)
end
end
end
Note that the argument to mk_striplines() may be a string or a
pattern.
Thus the result is very flexible:
mk_striplines (P"<Table" + P"</Table>") would create a stripper
that drops lines with two different patterns.
mk_striplines (P"x" * P"y"^0) drops each line starting with an
x followed by any number of y’s -- you get the idea.
Usage example:
local linestripper = mk_striplines "foo"
local test = [[
foo lorem ipsum
bar baz
buzz
foo bar
xyzzy
]]
print (linestripper (test))
The other answers provide good solutions to actually stripping lines from a string, but don't address why your code is failing to do that.
Reformatting for clarity, you wrote:
for line in result:gmatch"<Table [^\n]*" do
line = ""
end
The first part is a reasonable way to iterate over result and extract all spans of text that begin with <Table and continue up to but not including the next newline character. The iterator returned by gmatch returns a copy of the matching text on each call, and the local variable line holds that copy for the body of the for loop.
Since the matching text is copied to line, changes made to line are not and cannot modifying the actual text stored in result.
This is due to a more fundamental property of Lua strings. All strings in Lua are immutable. Once stored, they cannot be changed. Variables holding strings are actually holding a pointer into the internal table of reference counted immutable strings, which permits only two operations: internalization of a new string, and deletion of an internalized string with no remaining references.
So any approach to editing the content of the string stored in result is going to require the creation of an entirely new string. Where string.gmatch provides an iteration over the content but cannot allow it to be changed, string.gsub provides for creation of a new string where all text matching a pattern has been replaced by something new. But even string.gsub is not changing the immutable source text; it is creating a new immutable string that is a copy of the old with substitutions made.
Using gsub could be as simple as this:
result = result:gsub("<Table [^\n]*", "")
but that will disclose other defects in the pattern itself. First, and most obviously, nothing requires that the pattern match at only the beginning of the line. Second, the pattern does not include the newline, so it will leave the line present but empty.
All of that can be refined by careful and clever use of the pattern library. But it doesn't change the fact that you are starting with XML text and are not handling it with XML aware tools. In that case, any approach based on pattern matching or even regular expressions is likely to end in tears.
result = result:gsub('%f[^\n%z]<Table [^\n]*', '')
The start of this pattern, '%f[^\n%z], is a frontier pattern which will match any transition from either a newline or zero character to another character, and for frontier patterns the pre-first character counts as a zero character. In other words, using that prefix allows the rest of the pattern to match at either the first line or any other start-of-line.
Reference: the Lua 5.3 manual, section 6.4.1 on string patterns