This is my GET request
var Catalog = mongoose.model('Catalog');
router.get('/catalog', function(req, res, next) {
Catalog.find(function(err, items){
if(err){
return next(err);
}
console.log(items);
res.json(items);
});
});
The model
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var CatalogSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
title: String,
cost: String,
description: String
});
mongoose.model('Catalog', CatalogSchema);
The console.log gives me a [] but there is a collection named Catalog with the parameters filled.
If you have an existing collection, created outside of Mongoose, that you wish to query you need to configure your model to use that collection.
Otherwise, Mongoose will use a utility function to create a collection name by pluralizing and lowercasing the model name (which in your case would become catalogs).
To use Catalog as a collection, use the collection option:
var CatalogSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
title: String,
cost: String,
description: String
}, { collection : 'Catalog' });
you might check again the collection name in mongodb i.e whether it is 'Catalog' or 'Catalogs'. In my experience I found that if you name the model 'Catalog', then either mongoose creates the collection with a name 'Catalogs' if it is not already there or you have to create the collection first with a name 'Catalogs'.
You might check the following line also:
Catalog.find({}, function(err, items){
// your code goes here
}
Hope it helps..
Related
This is my players model
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var playerSchema = Schema({
name: String,
password: String,
country: String
});
mongoose.model('players', playerSchema);
This is my countries model
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var countrySchema = Schema({
name: String,
isActive: Boolean
});
mongoose.model('countries', countrySchema);
And this is app.js
mongoose.model('players').find({}, function (err, players) {
console.log(players);
if (err) {
return console.error(err);
} else {
res.format({
html: function(){
res.render('players/index', {
title: 'Players List',
"players" : players
});
},
json: function(){
res.json(players);
}
});
}
});
In players model I have countryId and in countries model I have corresponding countryName. Now I want to find players with country name with same find() query.
you can use mongoose populate method
refer this link: mongoose populate
in your example, it something like this:
mongoose.model('players').find().populate('country').exec(function(err,players){
});
this will give you result of both countryID and Name
mongodb is nosql-database, not a relational database like mysql/postgre. So modelling your data is not like relationaldatabses where you can make one query that joins two tables (in mongodb, "tables" are called collections).
In MongoDB and your current Schema you will first need to find the countryId of the country you want. And then find the players that have that country.
Alternatives;
you can store the countryName directly on the player collection
you can store the playerId's in an array within the the country collection
further more, in your playerSchema, country should be a ObjectId, not a String.
Using: node/express/mongodb/mongoose
With the setup listed above, I have created my schema and model and can query as needed. What I'm wondering how to do though is, pass the express request.query object to Model.find() in mongoose to match and query the _id of a nested document. In this instance, the query may look something like:
http://domain.com/api/object._id=57902aeec07ffa2290f179fe
Where object is a nested object that exists elsewhere in the database. I can easily query other fields. _id is the only one giving an issue. It returns an empty array of matches.
Can this be done?
This is an example and not the ACTUAL schema but this gets the point across..
let Category = mongoose.Schema({
name: String
})
let Product = mongoose.Schema({
name: String,
description:String,
category:Category
})
// sample category..
{
_id:ObjectId("1234567890"),
name: 'Sample Category'
}
// sample product
{
_id:ObjectId("0987654321"),
name:'Sample Product',
description:'Sample Product Description',
category: {
_id:ObjectId("1234567890"),
name: 'Sample Category'
}
}
So, what I'm looking for is... if I have the following in express..
app.get('/products',function(req,res,next){
let query = req.query
ProductModel.find(query).exec(function(err,docs){
res.json(docs)
})
})
This would allow me to specify anything I want in the query parameters as a query. So I could..
http://domain.com/api/products?name=String
http://domain.com/api/products?description=String
http://domain.com/api/products?category.name=String
I can query by category.name like this, but I can't do:
http://domain.com/api/products?category._id=1234567890
This returns an empty array
Change your query to http://domain.com/api/object/57902aeec07ffa2290f179fe and try
app.get('/api/object/:_id', function(req, res) {
// req._id is Mongo Document Id
// change MyModel to your model name
MyModel.findOne( {'_id' : req._id }, function(err, doc){
// do smth with this document
console.log(doc);
});
});
or try this one
http://domain.com/api/object?id=57902aeec07ffa2290f179fe
app.get('/api/object', function(req, res) {
var id = req.param('id');
MyModel.findOne( {'_id' : id }, function(err, doc){
console.log(doc);
});
})
First of all increase your skills in getting URL and POST Parameters by this article.
Read official Express 4.x API Documentation
Never mind I feel ridiculous. It works just as I posted above.. after I fixed an error in my schema.
I'm using nodeJS MongoDB/Mongoose to create/update/delete movies inside the database using Postman post/delete methods.
The create function is working fine, and even the remove function is working properly so when I use Postman I get the return: "Movie has been deleted!" like it should.
The only problem is that my function is emptying the entire database of movies instead of just that 1 movie, here is the remove function:
function destroy(req, res, next){
var movieID = req.body
Movie.remove(movieID, function(err,movie){
if(err){
res.status(400).send(err)
} else {
res.send("Movie has been deleted!")
db.close()
}
})
The movie object:
var movieSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
name: String,
yay: Number,
nay: Number,
release_date: Date,
in_theaters: Boolean,
released: Boolean,
buy_link: String,
imdb_link: String,
image_url: String,
description: String,
trailer_link: String
})
I want to delete a movie based on it's "name" so I only have to input the name and it will delete the entire movie.
Have you tried the findOneAndRemove query?
This query is much cleaner compared to finding a model and removing it inside the callback. Beside this I assume it's faster because you basically do 1 query instead of 2 after each other.
If you are passing direct value to Remove method, it will try to match with _id field.
As per your model, _id is ObjectId field which is managed automatically by mongodb.
In case if you enter like this. .remove("movie", callback) which is not a valid ObjectId.
Mongoose is discarding this invalid condition and executing Movie.remove({}); which is deleting all your records.
So it is better to validate whether the input is valid ObjectId or not before directly passing to Movie.remove();
I also recommend to use like this: Movie.remove({_id: movieId}, callback).
And for movie name :
Movie.remove({name: movieName}, callback);
Update:
You can take from Postman
var movieName = req.body.movieName;
Movie.remove({name: movieName}, function(err, updateObj){
});
Can you try this?
var movieName = req.body.name;
Movie.find('name': movieName, function(err, movie) {
if (err) res.send({error: err});
Movie.remove(function(err, movie){
if (err) res.send({error: err});
res.json({message: "Movie is removed", movie: movie});
});
});
I am trying to add a couple of attributes to the scaffolded MEAN.js User entity.
locationName: {
type: String,
trim: true
}
I also have created another entity Book connected with User. Unfortunately, I think I do not quite grasp the concept behind the populate method because I am not able to "populate" the User entity with the locationName attribute.
I tried the following:
/**
* List of Books
*/
exports.list = function(req, res) {
Book.find().sort('-created').populate('user', 'displayName', 'locationName').exec(function(err, books) {
if (err) {
return res.status(400).send({
message: errorHandler.getErrorMessage(err)
});
} else {
res.jsonp(books);
}
});
};
Unfortunately, I get the following error:
/home/maurizio/Workspace/sbr-v1/node_modules/mongoose/lib/connection.js:625
throw new MongooseError.MissingSchemaError(name);
^
MissingSchemaError: Schema hasn't been registered for model "locationName".
Any suggestion?
Thanks
Cheers
The error is clear, you should have a schema for the locationName.
If your location is just a string property in your user model and does not refer to separate model, you don't need and shouldn't use populate with it, it will simply be returned as a property of the returned user object from mongoose find() method.
If your want to make your location a stand alone entity (different mongodb document), you should have a mongoose model that defines your location object, aka have a file in your app\models name for example: location.server.model.js that contains something like:
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var LocationSchema = new Schema({
_id: String,
name: String
//, add any additional properties
});
mongoose.model('Location', LocationSchema);
Note that the _id here replaces the auto generated objectId, so this has to be unique, and this the property you should refer to in your User object, meaning if you have a location like this:
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Location = mongoose.model('Location');
var _location = new Location({_id:'de', name:'Deutschland'});
you should refer to it in your User object like this:
var _user=new User({location:'de'});
//or:
var _user=new User();
_user.location='de';
then you should be able to populate your location object with your user, like this:
User.find().populate('location').exec(function(err, _user) {
if (err) {
//handle error
} else {
//found user
console.log(_user);
//user is populated with location object, makes you able to do:
console.log(_user.location.name);
}
});
I suggest you to further read in mongodb data modeling and mongoose Schemas, Models, Population.
I want to give users the ability to create collections in my Node app. I have really only seen example of hard coding in collections with mongoose. Anyone know if its possible to create collections dynamically with mongoose? If so an example would be very helpful.
Basically I want to be able to store data for different 'events' in different collections.
I.E.
Events:
event1,
event2,
...
eventN
Users can create there own custom event and store data in that collection. In the end each event might have hundreds/thousands of rows. I would like to give users the ability to perform CRUD operations on their events. Rather than store in one big collection I would like to store each events data in a different collection.
I don't really have an example of what I have tried as I have only created 'hard coded' collections with mongoose. I am not even sure I can create a new collection in mongoose that is dynamic based on a user request.
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
mongoose.connect('localhost', 'events');
var schema = mongoose.Schema({ name: 'string' });
var Event1 = mongoose.model('Event1', schema);
var event1= new Event1({ name: 'something' });
event1.save(function (err) {
if (err) // ...
console.log('meow');
});
Above works great if I hard code 'Event1' as a collection. Not sure I create a dynamic collection.
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
mongoose.connect('localhost', 'events');
...
var userDefinedEvent = //get this from a client side request
...
var schema = mongoose.Schema({ name: 'string' });
var userDefinedEvent = mongoose.model(userDefinedEvent, schema);
Can you do that?
I believe that this is a terrible idea to implement, but a question deserves an answer. You need to define a schema with a dynamic name that allows information of 'Any' type in it. A function to do this may be a little similar to this function:
var establishedModels = {};
function createModelForName(name) {
if (!(name in establishedModels)) {
var Any = new Schema({ any: Schema.Types.Mixed });
establishedModels[name] = mongoose.model(name, Any);
}
return establishedModels[name];
}
Now you can create models that allow information without any kind of restriction, including the name. I'm going to assume an object defined like this, {name: 'hello', content: {x: 1}}, which is provided by the 'user'. To save this, I can run the following code:
var stuff = {name: 'hello', content: {x: 1}}; // Define info.
var Model = createModelForName(name); // Create the model.
var model = Model(stuff.content); // Create a model instance.
model.save(function (err) { // Save
if (err) {
console.log(err);
}
});
Queries are very similar, fetch the model and then do a query:
var stuff = {name: 'hello', query: {x: {'$gt': 0}}}; // Define info.
var Model = createModelForName(name); // Create the model.
model.find(stuff.query, function (err, entries) {
// Do something with the matched entries.
});
You will have to implement code to protect your queries. You don't want the user to blow up your db.
From mongo docs here: data modeling
In certain situations, you might choose to store information in
several collections rather than in a single collection.
Consider a sample collection logs that stores log documents for
various environment and applications. The logs collection contains
documents of the following form:
{ log: "dev", ts: ..., info: ... } { log: "debug", ts: ..., info: ...}
If the total number of documents is low you may group documents into
collection by type. For logs, consider maintaining distinct log
collections, such as logs.dev and logs.debug. The logs.dev collection
would contain only the documents related to the dev environment.
Generally, having large number of collections has no significant
performance penalty and results in very good performance. Distinct
collections are very important for high-throughput batch processing.
Say I have 20 different events. Each event has 1 million entries... As such if this is all in one collection I will have to filter the collection by event for every CRUD op.
I would suggest you keep all events in the same collection, especially if event names depend on client code and are thus subject to change. Instead, index the name and user reference.
mongoose.Schema({
name: { type: String, index: true },
user: { type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'User', index: true }
});
Furthermore I think you came at the problem a bit backwards (but I might be mistaken). Are you finding events within the context of a user, or finding users within the context of an event name? I have a feeling it's the former, and you should be partitioning on user reference, not the event name in the first place.
If you do not need to find all events for a user and just need to deal with user and event name together you could go with a compound index:
schema.index({ user: 1, name: 1 });
If you are dealing with millions of documents, make sure to turn off auto index:
schema.set('autoIndex', false);
This post has interesting stuff about naming collections and using a specific schema as well:
How to access a preexisting collection with Mongoose?
You could try the following:
var createDB = function(name) {
var connection = mongoose.createConnection(
'mongodb://localhost:27017/' + name);
connection.on('open', function() {
connection.db.collectionNames(function(error) {
if (error) {
return console.log("error", error)
}
});
});
connection.on('error', function(error) {
return console.log("error", error)
});
}
It is important that you get the collections names with connection.db.collectionNames, otherwise the Database won't be created.
This method works best for me , This example creates dynamic collection for each users , each collection will hold only corresponding users information (login details), first declare the function dynamicModel in separate file : example model.js
/* model.js */
'use strict';
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Schema = mongoose.Schema;
function dynamicModel(suffix) {
var addressSchema = new Schema(
{
"name" : {type: String, default: '',trim: true},
"login_time" : {type: Date},
"location" : {type: String, default: '',trim: true},
}
);
return mongoose.model('user_' + suffix, addressSchema);
}
module.exports = dynamicModel;
In controller File example user.js,first function to create dynamic collection and second function to save data to a particular collection
/* user.js */
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
function CreateModel(user_name){//function to create collection , user_name argument contains collection name
var Model = require(path.resolve('./model.js'))(user_name);
}
function save_user_info(user_name,data){//function to save user info , data argument contains user info
var UserModel = mongoose.model(user_name) ;
var usermodel = UserModel(data);
usermodel.save(function (err) {
if (err) {
console.log(err);
} else {
console.log("\nSaved");
}
});
}
yes we can do that .I have tried it and its working.
REFERENCE CODE:
app.post("/",function(req,res){
var Cat=req.body.catg;
const link= req.body.link;
const rating=req.body.rating;
Cat=mongoose.model(Cat,schema);
const item=new Cat({
name:link,
age:rating
});
item.save();
res.render("\index");
});
I tried Magesh varan Reference Code ,
and this code works for me
router.post("/auto-create-collection", (req, res) => {
var reqData = req.body; // {"username":"123","password":"321","collectionName":"user_data"}
let userName = reqData.username;
let passWord = reqData.password;
let collectionName = reqData.collectionName;
// create schema
var mySchema = new mongoose.Schema({
userName: String,
passWord: String,
});
// create model
var myModel = mongoose.model(collectionName, mySchema);
const storeData = new myModel({
userName: userName,
passWord: passWord,
});
storeData.save();
res.json(storeData);
});
Create a dynamic.model.ts access from some where to achieve this feature.
import mongoose, { Schema } from "mongoose";
export default function dynamicModelName(collectionName: any) {
var dynamicSchema = new Schema({ any: Schema.Types.Mixed }, { strict: false });
return mongoose.model(collectionName, dynamicSchema);
}
Create dynamic model
import dynamicModelName from "../models/dynamic.model"
var stuff = { name: 'hello', content: { x: 1 } };
var Model = await dynamicModelName('test2')
let response = await new Model(stuff).save();
return res.send(response);
Get the value from the dynamic model
var Model = dynamicModelName('test2');
let response = await Model.find();
return res.send(response);