I have a website running on IIS 7.5.7600
We set the Session State.Time Out (In Minutes) to 900
It is getting reset to 20.
We think we have narrowed it to Sunday between noon and midnight.
Is there anything that will automatically reset this setting.
Our HW group is aware and engaged, but they have no ideas.
I do understand 900 is a long timeout. Unless there is some boundary at which IIS acts differently, the length of the timeout is not open to change. If it is too large, for a technical reason, Id appreciate a link that I can take to the decision maker.
Also, this is not an application pool issue. The value is honored... up until the point it gets reset.
This stopped getting reset.
I do not have a great answer.
I ruled out me publishing application updates
I ruled out the general app pool issues.
I ruled out reboots/updates
Something was running and causing this. It wasnt gremlins.
Possibly just raising the issue to the larger organization of those involved caused either someone to change their behavior, or to alter some process. Its a good group of guys. I don't think anyone was being less than above board.
I thought I had similar issue, until I realized that there are 3 places session state can be set:
Server Level
Default website
And the application itself
Make sure that you don't miss any!
Related
....and the site doesn't respond in that time at all. Some responses even fail.
This is giving a horrible user experience where the site suddenly stops reacting for the people that are online at that moment.
The site is completely warmed up and responsive through the temporarily url.
Here is the log:
Is there anything to speed this up?
Is this normal behaviour or is this an error that should be reported?
From the log you posted it seems that the operation that consumes a long time is "ChangeDeploymentConfigurationBySlot".
An azure configuration change by default triggers the restart of the role instance (which might explain why your clients are experiencing downtime).
You can get further details in this blog: https://alexandrebrisebois.wordpress.com/2013/09/29/handling-cloud-service-role-configuration-changes-in-windows-azure/
At certain times during the week while I'm testing my Mobile Services app I get a 503 error (Service Unavailable). It happens whether I try to call the app from localhost or live on my Azure Website. It hangs around for 10-15 minutes and then goes away on its own. It doesn't seem to be caused by anything in particular that I am doing (i.e. I have not updated any code). The 503 error occurs when I'm trying to call one of my custom APIs in my Mobile Services account. A few of the requests make it through (strangely enough) but the majority return a 503 error.
I've seen that someone had a very similar problem here (Why does Azure give me an intermittent Error 503. The service is unavailable?) without an acceptable resolution.
I am using the free version of Mobile Services but I should be no where near pushing the limits of what the free version can handle; I am the sole user of the app right now.
It will soon be time to make the service live and I'm shuddering at the thought of support calls that will come in during one of these funky states the service gets into. Any help in debugging the problem would be greatly appreciated.
EDIT:
I've narrowed this down to a database problem. I have one main query (sproc) that I use to feed data to the UI. I noticed that when I get the 503 errors the query takes about 13 seconds (when run in SSMS). When things are running "normally", the query takes less than a second.
This doesn't solve my problem though, in fact it makes it more perplexing because I am using the Business Edition of Windows Azure SQL Database and there shouldn't be a 13 second fluctuation in execution time!
This problem seems to happen randomly. Is there some kind of caching in SQL Server that could explain this? Maybe my query really does take 13 seconds to execute and the caching superficially speeds it up.
Could you try transitioning your database/server to one of the "editions"? They have resource governance to promote predictable performance. Web/Business suffer from a noisy neighbor problem. It sounds like that may be your issue, considering it is intermittent.
Here's a link to a page describing the editions. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn741340.aspx
I have a number of small MVC apps deployed as Microsoft Windows Azure websites. This has been working for several months.
Yesterday I rolled out a new one, and the deployment was unremarkable, everything worked fine. But a couple of hours later, access to the site was unavailable. The symptoms were that when the browser tried to navigate to the URL for that site, it would try to load for several minutes and then just give up with a completely blank page.
I attempted to stop and restart the site, and it worked once, but the symptoms came back several minutes later. Then I tried to stop and restart, and it didn't work.
I deployed the identical app to three additional URLs. Again, immediately on deployment, they all work fine, however, they fail at some interval in the future. They seem to not all fail at once. Sometimes restarting the site will fix the problem, and sometimes not.
IMPORTANT: If I wait for some period of time, the site may start to work again on its own.
However, deploying four versions of the app so that our users can go to a backup one if the primary one is not working is not optimal.
Any words of wisdom as to how I might go about debugging this?
ADDITIONAL INFO NOV 25, 2013:
When sites are failing, the IIS logs show either 500 or 502 Internal Service Errors. Our own MVC code is never hit, not even app_start.
You can start by checking the logs and remote debugging
http://www.drdobbs.com/windows/azure-sdk-22-supports-visual-studio-2013/240163499
Are the apps working locally?
Might not be the same problem, but from time to time our Azure instances will get the blue question mark of death as a status.
The reason we found out was that Microsoft will do upgrades on instances from time to time. If you have just one instance in a cloud service/role, then from time to time they will do maintenance and during that time it will be dead.
I have confirmed this with their support.
The only way to get around this that I know of is to create two instances. Then Microsoft guarantees ~99% availability.
Of course I also confirmed with them that this means twice the cost. =/
If that's not the issue I would enable RDP and get onto the machine to see what the problem is. Microsoft has these tools to help debug problems: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kwill/archive/2013/08/26/azuretools-the-diagnostic-utility-used-by-the-windows-azure-developer-support-team.aspx
First, you should always run multiple instances of your web role with more than 1 upgrade domain. This is configurable in the service definition (CSDEF). Without this, you don't get an SLA from Microsoft, so you can't really complain that the VMs go down.
Second, to figure out what might be going on with these boxes, you should have both logs (my preference is to roll my own with page blobs or table storage), AND you should always have RDP access to a pre-production environment (production as well if you're not too fussed about security). Once on the box, look through the event viewer for errors.
Third, when an outage occurs check out the azure service dashboard (http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/support/service-dashboard/) for outages.
Lastly, contact Microsoft support. It may take a few hours, but they are pretty good.
That it is happening repeatedly and for extended periods of time (more than 5 minutes), I would be there's something wrong with your hosted service. Again, RDP in and poke around. Good luck.
To debug your sites try to enable diagnostic logs:
http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/develop/net/common-tasks/diagnostics-logging-and-instrumentation/
Another nice way to look around your site is using the debug console:
https://github.com/projectkudu/kudu/wiki/Kudu-console
I have two free subscriptions for windows azure and because I exceeded the limit on the first one, Microsoft closed it down. So I tried to deploy my application from the other subscription, and changed a few settings, and it seems to take a lot longer and the dns name of the depolyed application (in production area) does not seem to work. (I've been waiting for about 15 minutes.. in the other subscription it was almost immediate that the link started to work..). Also my webrole seems to be in a state of busy for a very long time..
The application always worked fine and now I'm getting all this trouble just by switching subscription?? I'm getting really frustrated with this especially because I all worked perfectly before. Now I have to 'waste' my time getting all the things to work again and I can't start with anything new. I don't think this is normal but I can't seem to find the solution to this either.
edit:
Over half an hour the dns finally started working but this still does not fix the problem with the extreme slow deploying and the busy state of the webrole..
Please study the discussion below to understand why the time to deploy an application could vary between 10-30 minutes:
Is there a way to reduce time between Azure deployment start and role OnStart() code being invoked?
Above details will helped you to get the answer about your statement ".. this still does not fix the problem with the extreme slow deploying and the busy state of the webrole.."..
To add more about that, when your application is deployment phase it goes through several state and in some cases the time taken in one state could be longer then expected and during this time you will see status as "Busy", "Initializing", "Starting.." etc and these state actually explain which level you are during your deployment. I hope this helps you to understand the time taken during deployment.
Application pools in IIS are recycled very frequently and I can't figure out why. I remember reading about a possible issue in IIS6 that meant you were forced to recycle but a quick search now turns up empty. On IIS6 or 7 you can turn off the idle time, duration and specific time recycle options so no problems there.
So why does every .net site recycle the application pool? If a site didn't have any memory leaks could you set up a site that never needed to recycle?
Also failing this, what would be the best way to ensure background tasks are called, is there any auto restart modules for IIS or should an external service be used to make those calls?
It sounds like it is possible to do if you really wanted/needed to?
Websites are intended to keep running (albeit in a stateless nature). There are a myriad of reasons why app pool recycling can be beneficial to the hosting platform to ensure both the website and the server run at optimum. These include (but not limited to) dynamically compiled assemblies remaining in the appdomain, use of session caching (with no guarantee of cleanup), other websites running amok and resources getting consumed over time etc. An app pool can typically serve more than one website, so app pool recycling can be beneficial to ensure everything runs smoothly.
Besides the initial boot when the app fires up again, the effect should be minimal. Http.sys holds onto requests while a new worker process is started so no requests should be dropped.
From https://weblogs.asp.net/owscott/why-is-the-iis-default-app-pool-recycle-set-to-1740-minutes
You may ask whether a fixed recycle is even needed. A daily recycle is
just a band-aid to freshen IIS in case there is a slight memory leak
or anything else that slowly creeps into the worker process. In theory
you don’t need a daily recycle unless you have a known problem. I used
to recommend that you turn it off completely if you don’t need it.
However, I’m leaning more today towards setting it to recycle once per
day at an off-peak time as a proactive measure.
My reason is that, first, your site should be able to survive a
recycle without too much impact, so recycling daily shouldn’t be a
concern. Secondly, I’ve found that even well behaving app pools can
eventually have something sneak in over time that impacts the app
pool. I’ve seen issues from traffic patterns that cause excessive
caching or something odd in the application, and I’ve seen the very
rare IIS bug (rare indeed!) that isn’t a problem if recycled daily. Is
it a band-aid? Possibly, but if a daily recycle keeps a non-critical
issue from bubbling to the top then I believe that it’s a good
proactive measure to save a lot of troubleshooting effort on something
that probably isn’t important to troubleshoot. However, if you think
you have a real issue that is being suppressed by recycling then, by
all means, turn off the auto-recycling so that you can track down and
resolve your issue. There’s no black and white answer. Only you can
make the best decision for your environment.
There's a lot more useful/interesting info for someone relatively unlearned in the IIS world (like me), I recommend you read it.