Restrict users permission in GitLab? - gitlab

I've a requirement, where I need to add a few users from the UI. I'm working with "developer" access to the project in GitLab. Even if already a few users are added with different access while the project is created and only users added from the UI to perform developer role without making any changes in the project.
Is it possible and how to implement it?

"Overwriting" permissions is not possible and if you want to simulate this behavior you could create a new group and share this project with another group. Then you would need to deny access to individual group members. See this permission matrix.

Related

How to Manage Access Rights for SPEAK UI Application which is on Launchpad?

I have created multiple apps in SPEAK UI and placed all quick access shortcuts on the Sitecore Launchpad.
Now, how can I restrict access for some applications while creating Users, because we have Content Area in Access Viewer?
There are a couple of ways to do this. First you need to open the desktop and switch from the Master to the Core database.
If you just want to restrict access to the shortcuts on the Launchpad - you can do this by setting access rights on the shortcut items:
Create a role that should have access to the users and give that role Read access to the button item.
Another option would be to allow access to the application. If you look at the Path Analyzer you can see that some roles are denied and some granted access:
So add security rights to roles for your SPEAK apps.
Finally when you create users make sure you give them the correct roles to match what they are able to view.

Kentico roles and ui personalization

I need to give permissions to edit/create/destroy pages in a node to a group of users.
I've created a group and added a test user to that group.
I can't seem to give permission to the Pages application so see if i can see the node.
I also added game this role permissions at the node level too.
Ideally this editor role would be able to create new sub pages, which also means being able to upload media.
Your new user must have editor privilege level (you can edit user in Users application). If you want to provide ability to see content in Pages app you have to grant the user with Browse tree and Read permission (content module). To satisfy your scenario you need to grand user with Modify and Create permissions, too (maybe Design?).
Just FYI: The approach provided by Brenden (cloning the role) is very handy but there a is chance you grant the user with permission you don`t want to provide (inappropriate permissions for original role).
I've found the most efficient method is review the out of the box roles provided by Kentico and clone the one which fits closest to your needs. Then modify your cloned role to add/remove abilities and permissions.
If you're unsure of what each role can and cannot do, create a new test user with one of the roles assigned to them and log in as them. Do the same for all the roles you want to test until you find the one closest to what you're looking for.

Is there a way to restrict adding explicit permissions to a sharepoint 2010 resource?

We want a policy whereby permissions must be managed through sharepoint groups. We want to allow site owners to add and remove users from groups in order to manage their permissions to resources, but we don't want them to be able to create the groups or to add user's explicitely to the resource. Is this possible? I don't see any permissions that relate to restricting explicit access to a resource as opposed to access via a group, but I could be overlooking something.
No, this is not possible out of the box. Either a user is able to manage permissions or not, there is no more granular settings to only allow managing in groups.
Unfortunately there also isn't an event receiver you could use e.g. PermissionAdded or PermissionModified, so the only way for you to check these things would be to write a timer job which checks every X minutes whether anything has changed you didn't want to change. Or another possibility is to not allow users to manage permissions, but write your own permission manager which only allows working with groups. Then you could use RunWithElevatedPriviliges to perform your actions.

Need a separate role for adding Users in MOSS 2007

I want to have user rights split into two. Some of the policies at the client's side mention that we should have a seperate user who has only the rights to add users and nothing else, and the Site Administrator should not be able to add users.
As of now, the Site Admin is used to Add users and to manage other configuration. Can we remove the User Addition role from Site Admin?
Is there a way to create a new User Role by writing some code?
I don't think it is possible to remove any permissions from the site administrator. You could do something wild like add security code to your master page, however. That could detect the current user and the current page, and throw an error if the site administrator were in the wrong place.
You can create a custom permission level, provided your permission sets summarise to one of the options offered by the SPBasePermissions enumeration. Unfortunately there is no specific 'add user' permission, only ManagePermissions. For reference anyway, here's a basic code sample.
I think the best approach is that given by strongopinions where a piece of code runs to check who the user is if they visit the Add User page.

SharePoint Permissions

I would like to create a folder that users who do not have privileges to view the rest of the site can see. This user group would be granted access to the site, but I only want them to be able to view one particular page.
Is this possible to do without going to every single page and removing the new user group's access?
yeah, you should be able to create a new group and add the users to that list/subweb/whatever and just that. This is assuming that you didn't grant access to all users somewhere. If you did, then hopefully the default access is granted to a default user group (like sharepoint visitors) and you can alter that group to exclude the users you only want to access the limited part of the site.
If created correctly the new group shouldn't have access to the rest of the site.
If you are getting thrown off by the fact that the user/group is listed as having "Limited Access" on the ACLs on, say, the parent site/web. That's just a placeholder SharePoint uses to make sure people have access to at least the bare minimum set of objects (e.g. theme and other UI files and the parent web itself) to get to the list or item you actually want them to have access to.
As long as the group only has access on a single list, you should have to worry about them having access to anything else.

Resources