Suppose I execute cargo new one --bin and cargo new two --bin then add the same dependency to each project's Cargo.toml and build them.
Now there are two absolutely identical sets of libraries:
/one/target/debug/deps/ *.rlib
/two/target/debug/deps/ *.rlib
They are same files and waste storage space, but really the problem is that I have to compile these libraries again for every project. It takes a very much time. There is the same problem with cargo install.
Can I specify a place to store compiled libraries to avoid recompilation?
Several Cargo projects might share the libraries by using the same target dir.
.cargo/config
Place a ".cargo" folder in a project and create a "config" file there containing:
[build]
target-dir = "/path/to/your/shared/target/dir"
On Unix this might look like:
mkdir ~/shared_rust_target
mkdir .cargo
echo "[build]" > .cargo/config
echo "target-dir = \"$HOME/shared_rust_target\"" >> .cargo/config
CARGO_TARGET_DIR
Set the CARGO_TARGET_DIR environment variable.
On Unix this might look like:
export CARGO_TARGET_DIR = "$HOME/shared_rust_target"
See this commit for some extra target-dir documentation.
In particular, prior to Cargo 1.9 you shouldn't build several projects into the same target dir concurrently. (Here's more on how Cargo 1.9 supports concurrent builds).
target-dir is also mentioned in the Cargo docs.
Should work, according to this issue.
P.S. It is now also possible to achieve crate reuse with workspaces.
P.S. https://docs.rs/cargo-hakari/latest/cargo_hakari/ helps with keeping some of dependencies compatible between projects.
Even if there is a way to do it, you probably don't want to. Just because you happen to be using the same libraries doesn't mean that they were compiled the same. For example, Cargo supports the concept of features, compilation time configuration that changes how the crate was compiled.
Likewise, you may need to support multiple versions of Rust, such as nightly and stable. Or perhaps you need to cross-compile for a different architecture. Each of those will produce different code.
Cargo will cache the build products of a single project, so I've found the overhead not really noticeable, and I compile a lot of projects from people asking questions on Stack Overflow! :-)
I managed to piece together code from a few answers, but mainly this one.
This Dockerfile should not just cache Cargo dependancy downloads, but also their compilations and the crates.io index. All the other answers I could find only cached the downloads or the index, not both.
FROM arm64v8/rust as builder
# Capture dependencies
COPY Cargo.toml Cargo.lock /app/
# We create a dummy main.rs to build deps
WORKDIR /app
RUN mkdir src && echo "fn main() {}" > src/main.rs
# RUN rustup install nightly && rustup default nightly
# This step compiles only our dependencies and saves them in a layer. This is the most impactful time savings
# Note the use of --mount=type=cache. On subsequent runs, we'll have the crates already downloaded
RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/usr/local/cargo/registry cargo build --release && rm src/main.rs
# Copy our sources
COPY ./src /app/src
# A bit of magic here!
# * We're mounting that cache again to use during the build, otherwise it's not present and we'll have to download those again - bad!
# * Rust here is a bit fiddly, so we'll touch the files (even though we copied over them) to force a new build
RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/usr/local/cargo/registry \
set -e && \
# update timestamps to force a new build &&
touch /app/src/main.rs && \
cargo build --release
# Again, our final image is the same - a slim base and just our app
FROM debian:buster-slim as app
COPY --from=builder /app/target/release/app/app
CMD ["/app"]
Take note of the FROM arm64v8, if you are targeting x86, replace the builder and app FROMs with their respective x86 versions.
Related
I'm specifying the -Cpanic=abort and -Zbuild-std=panic_abort when compiling. Why does the linker still say it needs libunwind to compile a program?
I'm experimenting with various ways to cross-compile Rust programs as small as possible (using the min-sized-rust repo as a reference). Right now I'm trying to compile the powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl target and I'm stuck on trying to remove a dependency on libunwind.
Here's my setup:
# 1. Install the Rust std source code
rustup component add rust-src --toolchain nightly
# 2. Setup a simple rust repo
cargo init testing
cd testing
# 3. Download a musl toolchain
wget https://musl.cc/powerpc64-linux-musl-cross.tgz
tar xzf powerpc64-linux-musl-cross.tgz
# 4. Try to compile the project (options on the command line instead of in files for
# maximum obviousness).
# RUSTFLAGS:
# -Cpanic=abort - abort immediately on panic
# -Clink-self-contained=no - don't use rustc's builtin libraries and objects (this
# is needed because powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl is a tier 3 target)
# -Clink-arg=--sysroot and -Clink-arg=/path/to/sysroot - pass the option to the linker
# to specify the sysroot of cross-compilation toolchain
# Cargo options:
# --config target.<triple>.linker - specify the linker to use
# -Zbuild-std=std,panic_abort - build the standard library from source. Specify
# panic_abort to make the abort on panic work
RUSTFLAGS="-Cpanic=abort -Clink-self-contained=no -Clink-arg=--sysroot -Clink-arg=powerpc64-linux-musl-cross/powerpc64-linux-musl/" \
cargo +nightly build \
--config "target.powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl.linker=\"powerpc64-linux-musl-cross/bin/powerpc64-linux-musl-gcc\"" \
--target powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl -Zbuild-std=panic_abort,std --release
This fails with the following error:
error: linking with `/home/user/Projects/testing/powerpc64-linux-musl-cross/bin/powerpc64-linux-musl-gcc` failed: exit status: 1
<output snipped>
= note: /home/user/Projects/testing/powerpc64-linux-musl-cross/bin/../lib/gcc/powerpc64-linux-musl/11.2.1/../../../../powerpc64-linux-musl/bin/ld: cannot find -lunwind
From min-size-rust repository:
"Even if panic = "abort" is specified in Cargo.toml, rustc will still include panic strings and formatting code in final binary by default. An unstable panic_immediate_abort feature has been merged into the nightly rustc compiler to address this.
To use this, repeat the instructions above to use build-std, but also pass the following -Z build-std-features=panic_immediate_abort option."
Still, you will get "cannot find -lunwind", because the linker still uses libunwind, even though it's truly unneeded,why! I do not know, maybe it's a bug.(Maybe someone with fair knowledge about linkers can easily solve that.I tried a naive solution which is "cargo .... --verbose", copy , remove "libunwind" then relinking which failed)
I verified that is indeed the missing piece by build from source(--target=x86_64-unknown-linux-musl) AND using an old simple trick which is "touch libunwind.a" in the "self-contained" directory inside a target lib folder.(because the linker would still use it even though it's now truly unneeded, then I gave him a dummy libunwind.a)
In your case, I really tried to build it to your target until I got a headache, but couldn't and stopped, but here is possible solutions:
Giving that you're using "-Z build-std-features=panic_immediate_abort"
-If you can custom the linking process, then solve it (until what seems to be a bug is solved)
-Create a dummy(empty) libunwind.a where it should be in your toolchain
I have installed both nightly and stable rust toolchains and make some -Z ... compile flags for nightly, but the stable rust can't recognize it and stops compiling; is there a way or a cargo directive to conditionally switch between nightly/stable rust compiler.
In .cargo/config.toml file
[build]
rustflags = [
"-C...",
"-Z...",
]
For nightly rust read -Z and -C flags, for stable rust only read -C or ignore -Z completely. So that, we can use cargo +stable/+nightly build without modify config.toml file every time.
Thanks Ruster ~
I don't think it's possible to specify rustc unstable feature inside config.toml but you can specify cargo unstable feature. It could be nice to have.
You could create a "nightly" directory:
cd my_rust_project
mkdir my_nightly_project
cd my_nightly_project
rustup override set nightly
Then using merge feature of config file of cargo you create you can override the global config using a my_nightly_project/.cargo/config.toml file.
Consider using alias instead.
I have a workspace project with multiple packages. The two important ones are:
flowc - which is a lib and a binary
flowstdlib
flowc is a kind of compiler that I build as part of the project.
flowstdlib has a build script, that uses the flowc built binary to build that package (generate "code", files etc), so I need the flowc compiler ready when flowstdlib is to be built.
In cargo.toml of flowstdlib I define flowc as a build dependency:
[build-dependencies]
flowc = {path = "../flowc", version = "0.31.0" }`
(I've tried making it also a dependency, but no change)
in the build.rs of flowstdlib I look for it in the path, and if not found in the ../target/debug/flowc location:
let flowc = if Path::new(env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR")).join("../target/debug/flowc").exists() {
"../target/debug/flowc"
} else if Simpath::new("PATH").find_type("flowc", FileType::File).is_ok() {
"flowc"
} else {
""
};
When I run the build, it looks like it's trying to build multiple packages at the same time in parallel:
Compiling flowstdlib v0.31.0 (/Users/andrew/workspace/flow/flowstdlib)
Compiling flowsamples v0.31.1 (/Users/andrew/workspace/flow/samples)
warning: Could not find `flowc` in $PATH or `target/debug`, so cannot build flowstdlib
error: failed to run custom build command for `flowsamples v0.31.1 (/Users/andrew/workspace/flow/samples)`
and the flowstdlib build fails as flowc binary is not built yet.
Since the build continues and eventually finishes building flowc, if I re-run the build, it will work the second time around (as flowc binary is now found).
So:
it looks like a build-dependency does wait for the depended-on binary to be built (maybe it waits for the library to be built, hard to tell)
Question
How I can make the build of flowstdlib wait for the completion of the flowc binary?
(without forcing a non-parallel build)
Pending the RFC landing, my workaround is to split the build into two commands (I'm using a Makefile to invoke them currently):
* cargo build -p flowc # will complete the build of the flowc binary
* cargo build # will build the entire workspace, including flowstdlib
I'm trying to run the example code from this project. Following the instructions on the Cargo docs, I did the following:
git clone https://github.com/basiliscos/rust-procol-ftp-client
cd rust-procol-ftp-client
cargo run
cargo test
cargo test should also have compiled the example according to the Rust docs.
Although cargo test executes successfully, when I change into the target/debug directory, I don't find an executable for ftp-get (which is the example code). The target/debug/examples directory is also empty.
What is the best way to go about running this example?
You can run a specific example with:
cargo run --example name_of_example
where name_of_example is the base filename (without .rs)
or to run it in release mode:
cargo run --release --example name_of_example
To pass arguments to the example:
cargo run --example name_of_example -- arguments go here
cargo run will automatically build (or rebuild) the program first if it's out of date.
Try the following:
cd rust-procol-ftp-client
cargo build --examples
./target/debug/examples/ftp-get
I created a "hello world" Rust app using cargo new. When I executed git status it showed a bunch of files:
A rust/welcomec/Cargo.lock
A rust/welcomec/Cargo.toml
A rust/welcomec/src/main.rs
A rust/welcomec/target/debug/.cargo-lock
A rust/welcomec/target/debug/.fingerprint/welcomec-2d68725c8fae6fd1/bin-welcome-2d68725c8fae6fd1
A rust/welcomec/target/debug/.fingerprint/welcomec-2d68725c8fae6fd1/bin-welcome-2d68725c8fae6fd1.json
A rust/welcomec/target/debug/.fingerprint/welcomec-2d68725c8fae6fd1/dep-bin-welcome-2d68725c8fae6fd1
A rust/welcomec/target/debug/deps/welcome-2d68725c8fae6fd1
A rust/welcomec/target/debug/welcome
A rust/welcomec/target/debug/welcome.d
Can I safely ignore any of these files and/or directories?
Summary
.gitignore for library crates
# Generated files
/target/
# The library shouldn't decide about the exact versions of
# its dependencies, but let the downstream crate decide.
Cargo.lock
.gitignore for executable crates
# Generated files
/target/
Details
You need one or two entries in your .gitignore, depending on what kind of crate you're building. The target/ folder can be ignore completely regardless of crate type; it only contains generated files (e.g. compile artifacts).
The Cargo.lock file should be included in the repository if you're writing an executable, and should be ignored if you're writing a library. You can read more about this in the FAQ. To quote the most important part:
The purpose of a Cargo.lock is to describe the state of the world at the time of a successful build. [...]
This property is most desirable from applications and projects which are at the very end of the dependency chain (binaries). As a result, it is recommended that all binaries check in their Cargo.lock.
For libraries the situation is somewhat different. [...] If a library ends up being used transitively by several dependencies, it’s likely that just a single copy of the library is desired (based on semver compatibility). If all libraries were to check in their Cargo.lock, then multiple copies of the library would be used, and perhaps even a version conflict.
Also, please note that cargo new and cargo init automatically generates a .gitignore file in the project, unless the parameter --vcs none is passed.
You can take some inspiration from GitHub's gitignore for Rust. At the time of writing, the file goes as follows:
# Generated by Cargo
# will have compiled files and executables
debug/
target/
# Remove Cargo.lock from gitignore if creating an executable, leave it for libraries
# More information here https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/guide/cargo-toml-vs-cargo-lock.html
Cargo.lock
# These are backup files generated by rustfmt
**/*.rs.bk
# MSVC Windows builds of rustc generate these, which store debugging information
*.pdb