In a Java project we are using PrimeFaces 2.2.1 as a JSF extension. We are implementing in a register form the data of schedule as "Load hours" separated in two fields, hours and minutes. We are using the Spinner (p:spinner component) as input element. However, we need to show the current data (only integers) in the format that show at least two numbers when value is less than 10.
Current input format
Needed input format
The body of the JSF tags look as this:
<div class="form_block">
<div class="form_item">
<h:outputText styleClass="form_item_label" value="Load Hours:"/>
<div class="form_item_field">
<p:spinner id="hora" styleClass="spinnerField" style="height: 12px !important; box-shadow: none !important; border-radius: 4px 0px 0px 4px;"
value="#{hour}" min="00" max="23"><f:convertNumber pattern="00" minIntegerDigits="2" type="number"/></p:spinner>:
<p:spinner id="minutos" styleClass="spinnerField" style="height: 12px !important; box-shadow: none !important; border-radius: 4px 0px 0px 4px;"
value="#{minutes}" min="00" max="59" maxlength="2"><f:convertNumber pattern="00" minIntegerDigits="2" type="number"/></p:spinner>
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
</div>
We have also try formatting with f:convertNumber component within Spinner but seems to not work as we expect. Has anybody else had similar problems like this before? Any suggestions you might share? Thanks in advance
Note. We did not implement timepicker due to the fact we precise to handle each field (hours and minutes) separated.
Actually, I had to change the components. Instead of using p:spinner it is know implemented p:inputMask.
Related
How can I fix the width of text so that it remains splitted in two columns
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6"><ol id="AllMessages"></ol></div>
<div class="col-lg-6">
<h1>Last Broadcasted Message:</h1>
<h3
id="output"
class="float-left"
style="
margin-top: 35px;
border-top: 1px solid #dedbdb;
padding: 15px;
width: 120px;
"
></h3>
</div>
</div>
</div>
A few observations
It looks like the text in the image is put in without any space, this will usually break the layout - see the portion width:width:width etc.
Your Markup is also incorrect as it contains ol elements without li
Using inline styles on top of bootstrap is probably not a good idea as it breaks margins etc.
Most likely it's the text without non breaking text characters that is breaking your layout.
I've tried to insert a <br /> tag to break the line after fontello icon and found that it's impossible when div is styled with "display:flex". Adding white space is also disabled. Adding new lines after some character is possible, but new line starts beneath <i> tag. Why and how to fix that?
PS: I've noticed that in Chrome situation is better than in Firefox, but new line still starts beneath <i> tag.
Example:
.with_flexbox{
display:flex;
color:purple;
}
<div class="with_flexbox red">
With flexbox I can't use <br /> tag right after <i><i></i><br /> tag
</div>
<div class="without_flexbox">
Without flexbox break after <i><i></i><br />
tag works fine.
</div>
<div class="with_flexbox">
White space is also disabled right after <i><i></i> tag. <br />And why this new line starts beneath <i> tag?
</div>
In your third example contents of your flex container are split by <i> node into 3 flex items, you get 1 item that consists of:
White space is also disabled right after, second item <i><i></i> and third item tag. <br> And why this new line starts beneath <i> tag?. Everything looks fine, you get 3 nodes displayed horizontaly, there is a line break after word tag, just as you wrote it.
Wrapping text fragments into separate tags not only makes sense semantically but also helps you maintain your code.
If you want to stick to flexbox, you should name each node separately and use flex-direction: column instead of br tags, or you could set flex basis for both elements and use flex-wrap. Example snippet attached below.
.item {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
outline: 1px solid red;
}
.item__icon {
outline: 1px solid blue;
}
.item__intro {
outline: 1px solid green;
}
.item__description{
outline: 1px solid yellow;
}
<figure class="item">
<p class="item__intro">White space is also disabled right after</p>
<i class="item__icon"><i></i>
<figcaption class="item__description">tag. <br />And why this new line starts beneath <i> tag?</figcaption>
</div>
I am new to CSS and recently reading the specification and having some problems in understanding the vertical-align property.
<div style="border: 1px solid black;">
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px; line-height: 30px;"></span>
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px;"></span>
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px; line-height: 40px;"></span>
</div>
<div style="border: 1px solid black;">
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px; line-height: 30px;"></span>
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px;"></span>
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px; line-height: 40px; vertical-align: top"></span>
</div>
<div style="border: 1px solid black;">
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px; line-height: 30px; vertical-align: bottom"></span>
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px;"></span>
<span style="border: 1px solid red; padding-left: 1px; line-height: 40px; vertical-align: top"></span>
</div>
Above code creates 3 div, each of them contains 3 empty inline boxes (spans):
In the 1st div, everything seems fine. All the 3 spans are aligned to the baseline of the line box.
In the 2nd div, after I set the vertical-align property to top for the 3rd span, the first two spans are moved up. And I get lost from here, I don't understand why they will be moved up, according to what rule.
The 3rd div is even more wired to me. I set the vertical-align property to bottom for the 1st span, and it causes the 2nd span to move slightly lower than the 3rd span (this will be noticed when zoom in enough).
The thing I can find in the specification says below, but what exactly are the multiple solutions? Could anyone shed more light on this?
In case they are aligned 'top' or 'bottom', they must be aligned so as to minimize the line box height. If such boxes are tall enough, there are multiple solutions and CSS 2.1 does not define the position of the line box's baseline.
I've also created a fiddle. Please run it in Firefox or Chrome if you are interested.
vertical-align is mostly used for inline element for example img tag, which is commonly set to vertical-align: middle; inorder to align correctly within the text.
Demo (Without the use of vertical-align)
Demo 2 (Using vertical-align)
Ok, so that was a general idea of how vertical-align works with a value of middle.
So, first lets see what are the valid values for vertical-align property.
Credits : Mozilla Developer Network
Now, lets solve your doubt step by step..
In the first example, everything's fine according to you but the answer is no, you are applying line-height to the span which varies, but the fact is line-height is actually not applied as the way you think...
Line height is actually not getting applied
Make it inline-block and it will be applied
You can read this answer for more information, that why using line-height on span is useless.
Moving on to your second doubt, you are having line-height on first span, second span but not the third span so what's happening here? As span is inline with the text and anyways line-height won't play the role there as I previously explained, they are happily aligned vertically with the text, whereas when you use vertical-align: top;, it doesn't move the other two boxes above that, instead it aligns to the top of the text.
See how the vertical-align: top; aligns at the top of the text
Coming to the last example of yours, in here, first span element is aligned to the very bottom as expected, well its correct, moving on to second, you said it's slightly in the lower than the third, because it is not aligned at all, line-height is what it makes that element align vertically center and last, moves a bit to the top, which is infact aligned to the top.
Lets make them inline-block and see how they actually behave..
So I hope you got the difference between all the three examples, but its necessary for you to understand the line-height property and inline-block property as well, also don't forget to refer the answer I shared.
I've been trying Masonry but can't get it to work exactly as I wanted. The elements I use vary in width and height, but all fit in a grid (4 different sizes, all multiple of smallest+margins). I've also calculated a distribution of elements (7 of the smallest, 4 of all the others) that can fit precisely.
However it's rare that masonry manages to fit them neatly, sometimes there's one lurking at the bottom, sometimes several are misplaced. It's always so that in one view I can see what items need to be moved for it to fit.
Is there a way to make masonry more aggressive in moving elements? Or have it go over two times to make sure there are no empty spaces?
You should probably look at masonry's "big brother" Isotope here. Mind you, if you have elements that are sorted in a certain order or fixed in a certain order - and that are wider than a single column width - they can "block" a column at narrow browser widths.
EDIT Maybe this fiddle explains it a bit better. If you look at that one and - while observing the numbers in the divs - you see that the next masonry element up (the red element 5) can not possibly fit in the white square as it must come after element 4; so where it must end up means, that, with only three rows fitting, one gets a white gap. Maybe you can use Isotope's shuffle and/or reLayout methods and sacrifice ordering your elements in a strict order? Best would be a jsfiddle with your issue.
<article>
<div class="tile blue"><p>1</p></div>
<div class="tile black"><p>2</p></div>
<div class="tile tall yellow"><p>3</p></div>
<div class="tile grey"><p>4</p></div>
<div class="tile wide red"><p>5</p></div>
<div class="tile green"><p>6</p></div>
<div class="tile grey"><p>7</p></div>
<div class="tile blue"><p>8</p></div>
<div class="tile green"><p>9</p></div>
</article>
$('article').isotope({
itemSelector : '.tile',
masonry: {
columnWidth: 100
}
});
article .tile {
display: block;
float: left;
box-sizing: border-box;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
font-size: 3em;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 0 6px;
color: #fff;
text-shadow: -1px 0 black, 0 1px black, 1px 0 black, 0 -1px black;
border:1px dotted black;
}
article .tile.wide {
width: 200px;
}
article .tile.tall {
height: 200px;
}
.tile.yellow { background: yellow; }
.tile.red { background: red; }
.tile.blue { background: blue; }
.tile.black { background: black; }
.tile.grey { background: grey; }
.tile.green { background: green; }
To expand on Dan's answer, having just had this problem myself, it seems that Packery is a more up to date; much more maintained version of Masonry - from the same author. It's not clear to me why both projects exist as separate entities, with only typos fixed in the latter.
The good news is - it's almost totally a drop-in replacement. The only change I had to make (other than names masonry->packery where used) was to remove an option, because it is the default and only option in Packery.
That was isFitWidth: true, my feeble attempt to make Masonry pack things something close to how nicely Packery does without any options at all.
Another nice change with Packery is that gutter: x applies to vertical as well as horizontal gutters. In Masonry, this was horizontal only - though trivial with margin-bottom in CSS, this felt like a needless hack.
I have a div with some inner content that I need to have an ellipsis when it overflows. I've done this many times on other elements but for some reason this is not behaving as expected.
Also, I left white-space:nowrap; out on purpose because the content then does not break to the next line within the span, as a result I only see 2-3 words before the ellipsis starts. I would like the text to span the entire height of the parent container then have the ellipsis start for content that exists beyond those bounds.
Here is a working Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/sadmicrowave/DhkSA/
CSS:
.flow-element{
position:absolute;
font-size:12px;
text-align:center;
width:75px;
height:75px;
line-height:70px;
border:1px solid #ccc;
}
.flow-element .inner{
position:absolute;
width:80%;
height:80%;
border:1px solid blue;
top:0px;
bottom:0px;
left:0px;
right:0px;
margin:auto;
text-align:center;
}
.flow-element .long{
float:left;
height:50px;
width:100%;
line-height:12px;
border:1px solid red;
text-overflow:ellipsis;
overflow:hidden;
}
HTML:
<a class='flow-element' style='top:100px; left:50px;'>
<div class='inner'>
<span class='long'>Box 1 and some other content that should wrap and do some other stuff</span>
</div>
</a>
Can someone please help. I need to display as much text as possible within the red outlined span while having an ellipsis when text content overflows the container...
Thanks in advance
you can't apply text-overflow: ellipsis to inline elements (span), it can be used with block elements only (div)
and also use white-space:nowrap; when using text-overflow: ellipsis;
check this, i have converted your inner span to div, just for proof of concept
http://jsfiddle.net/3CgcH/5/
i don't know why you have used span, but as per your logic you can make changes as i suggested
Update:
someone will think that in the question if i put white-space: nowrap; to span element then the text-overflow: ellipsis: is working so may be i am wrong, but it is not the case because questioner has used float: left in the span tag that means the span tag will be converted to a box block and work like a normal block level element, which is also wrong thing to do because if you need the block element behavior then use a block level element
Reference:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visuren.html#propdef-float
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-ui/#text-overflow
Add this:
white-space:nowrap;
to .flow-element .long
then the overflow-ellispsis works.
I think you will find the problem is caused by having text-align: center;
In my case it helped to set display: block;
Add white-space:nowrap; to your .inner div.