I have 3 schema's like below:
User
var UserSchema = new Schema({
name: String
});
Actor
var ActorSchema = new Schema({
name: String
});
Rating
var RatingSchema = new Schema({
actor: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'Actor'
},
user: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'Actor'
},
userRating: Number
});
I want to send all actors info to the front end like [actor1, actor2 ...].
Each actor contain actor details and 'userRating' which is given by the user who is currently logged in.
A user can give ratings to multiple actors and an actor can receive ratings from multiple users. These will be stored in Ratings table.
I wrote something like this
Actor
.find({}) // get all actors and populate userRating into each actor
.populate({
path: 'userRating',
model: 'Rating',
match: { actor: {$eq: req.actor}, user: {$eq: req.user}},
select: 'userRating'
})
.exec(function(error, actors){
if(error)
res.status(501).json({error: error});
else
res.json(actors);
});
I got only actors in the result. actor object doesn't contain 'userRating'. can someone correct my query
It depends on what you are actually sending as input for the query parameters here. Also the main thing that you need to understand is that this is not a "JOIN", but in fact separate queries being issued by the mongoose software layer, so there are distinct differences in handling.
In the basic case where the "values" being supplied as parameters are actually the ObjectId values of the references, then you actually just want these directly in the main "query" rather than arguments to the .populate() action ( which is actually where the "additional queries" are happening ).
Furthermore your "relations/references" are in the Rating model, so that is where your query is issued instead:
Rating.find({
"actor": req.actor,
"user": req.user
}).populate("actor user").exec(function(err,ratings) {
// Matched ratings by actor and user supplied
})
If your parameters are instead the "name" data of each object, then since that information is not present in the Rating model until populated the only way mongoose can do this is to retrieve "all" of the Rating objects, then do the "population" with the "match" criteria, and finally filter out any results where the population was null due to un-matched items:
Rating.find().populate([
{ "path": "actor", "match": { "name": req.actor } },
{ "path": "user", "match": { "name": req.user } }
]).exec(function(err,ratings) {
// Now filter out the null results
ratings = ratings.filter(function(rating) {
return ( rating.actor != null && rating.user != null )
});
// Then work with filtered data
})
Of course that is highly inefficient since this is a "client" side operation and you are pulling in all of the Rating content "first". So what you really mean to do in this case is to actually do the "three" query operations yourself, and by getting the ObjectId values from both User and Actor models in order to apply the match to the Rating model instead:
async.parallel(
{
"user": function(callback) {
User.findOne({ "name": req.user },callback)
},
"actor": function(callback) {
Actor.findOne({ "name": req.actor },callback)
}
},
function(err,data) {
// Use returned _id values in query
Rating.find({
"actor": data.actor._id,
"user": data.user._id
}).populate("actor user").exec(err,ratings) {
// populated Rating results
});
}
)
Then the queries resolve the "only" ObjectId values you actually require and the final query on Rating only retrieves those results that actually match the conditions, rather than everything and doing a "post filter" operation.
As a final approach, if you have MongoDB 3.2 available, then you could alternately use the $lookup operation instead to perform the "JOINS" on the "server" instead:
Rating.aggregate(
[
{ "$lookup": {
"from": "users",
"localField": "user",
"foreignField": "_id",
"as": "user"
}},
{ "$unwind": "$user" },
{ "$match": { "user.name": req.user } },
{ "$lookup": {
"from": "actors",
"localField": "actor",
"foreignField": "_id",
"as": "actor"
}},
{ "$unwind": "actor" },
{ "$match": { "actor.name": req.actor } }
],
function(err,ratings) {
// populated on the server in one request
}
)
From the "client" point of view, this is just "one" request and response as opposed to what .populate() does. But it really is not more than a "server" side rendition of the "client" logic presented before.
So if looking up by values of "name", you should instead do the "three" query approach for optimal performance, since the aggregation version is still really working with a lot more data than it needs to.
Of course the "best" perspective is to simply use the ObjectId values to begin with.
Of course the main thing here is that information like "userRating" belongs to the Rating model, and that is therefore where you provide the "query" in all cases in order to retrieve that data. These are not "JOIN" operations like in SQL, so the "server" is not looking at the combined results then selecting the fields.
As a bit of self education turn on "debugging" to see how mongoose is actually issuing statements to the server. Then you will see how .populate() is actually applied:
mongoose.set("debug",true)
Related
I have two collections, User and Post. The User collection looks something like this:
{
"_id": "ObjectID(...)",
"name": "...",
"gender": "...",
"followers": [ObjectID(...), ObjectID(...), ObjectID(...), ....],
"following": [ObjectID(...), ObjectID(...), ObjectID(...), ....]
}
where the followers and following fields are arrays of users.
And the Post collection looks something like this:
{
"_id": "ObjectID(...)",
"text": "...",
"date": "...",
"user": "ObjectID(...)"
}
where the user field represents which user is the owner of the post.
Now to get all the posts of user's following list, i.e. get all the posts of a user who he is currently following I am doing this:
const user = req.user;
let posts = [];
let aggs = [];
for (let follow of user.following) {
aggs.push(
Post.aggregate([
{
$match: { user: follow.user }, //the follow.user contains the _id of the owner user
},
])
);
}
for (let agg of aggs) {
for await (let post of agg) {
posts.push(post);
}
}
res.send(posts);
where the req.user is a particular user. I know this is probably not a good solution but I don't know how do I pass an array of users to the $match option in aggregate.
This gets the job done so far. However, this returns all the posts. But if I want to do a pagination like we do in normal find() where we add a limit and skip option, I cannot do that here, because the $match operator would work on individual users' posts.
What i want is to get the cursor or pointer of all the posts and then do pagination, i.e returns the first 5 post. How do i accomplish this using mongoose queries?
I am using express v4.17.1 and mongoose v5.9.1.
Lastly, my apologies if I haven't been able to explain the question, or what I want accurately since English is not my first language. Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
you can pass a value for skip and limit for pagination
its work for me
db.getCollection('user').aggregate([
{ $match: { "_id": "enter user id" } },
{ $lookup: {
from: "post",
localField: "following",
foreignField: "user",
as: "my_docs" }
},
{ $unwind: '$my_docs' },
{$project: {"my_docs" : 1}},
{$skip: 0 },
{$limit: 10}
])
I have two collections. A 'users' collection and an 'events' collection. There is a primary key on the events collection which indicates which user the event belongs to.
I would like to count how many events a user has matching a certain condition.
Currently, I am performing this like:
db.users.find({ usersMatchingACondition }).forEach(user => {
const eventCount = db.events.find({
title: 'An event title that I want to find',
userId: user._id
}).count();
print(`This user has ${eventCount} events`);
});
Ideally what I would like returned is an array or object with the UserID and how many events that user has.
With 10,000 users - this is obviously producing 10,000 queries and I think it could be made a lot more efficient!
I presume this is easy with some kind of aggregate query - but I'm not familiar with the syntax and am struggling to wrap my head around it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
You need $lookup to get the data from events matched by user_id. Then you can use $filter to apply your event-level condition and to get a count you can use $size operator
db.users.aggregate([
{
$match: { //users matching condition }
},
{
$lookup:
{
from: 'events',
localField: '_id', //your "primary key"
foreignField: 'user_id',
as: 'user_events'
}
},
{
$addFields: {
user_events: {
$filter: {
input: "$user_events",
cond: {
$eq: [
'$$this.title', 'An event title that I want to find'
]
}
}
}
}
},
{
$project: {
_id: 1,
// other fields you want to retrieve: 1,
totalEvents: { $size: "$user_events" }
}
}
])
There isn't much optimization that can be done without aggregate but since you specifically said that
First, instead of
const eventCount = db.events.find({
title: 'An event title that I want to find',
userId: user._id
}).count();
Do
const eventCount = db.events.count({
title: 'An event title that I want to find',
userId: user._id
});
This will greatly speed up your queries because the find query actually fetches the documents first and then does the counting.
For returning an array you can just initialize an array at the start and push {userid: id, count: eventCount} objects to it.
I'm trying to use CASL for authorization check of nested items.
It uses mongoose for query data and check access.
My domain is that:
A "User" could has more "Vehicles"
A "Document" must have a Vehicle
Schema:
vehicle { users: [ {type: objectId, ref: 'user'} ] }
document { vehicle: {type: objectId, ref: 'vehicle' }}
To find the vehicle "by user" I do:
db.getCollection('vehicle').find(
{ users: {$in: [ ObjectId("5ae1a957d67500018efa2c9d") ]} }
)
That works.
In the documents collection, the data has records such as this:
{
"_id": ObjectId("5aeaad1277e8a6009842564d"),
"vehicle": ObjectId("5aea338b82d8170096b52ce9"),
"company": "Allianz",
"price": 500,
"date_start": ISODate("2018-05-02T22:00:00.000Z"),
"date_end": ISODate("2019-05-02T22:00:00.000Z"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2018-05-03T06:32:50.590Z"),
"updatedAt": ISODate("2018-05-03T06:32:50.590Z"),
"__v": 0
}
To find the document "by user" I do:
db.getCollection('document').find(
{ "vehicle.users": {$in: [ ObjectId("5ae1a957d67500018efa2c9d") ]} }
)
It doesn't work. Is possibile to do that in one single "find" query?
You can't do it in a simple MongoDB find() query, because the data about vehicle users exists in the vehicle collection, not the documents collection.
However, it is possible with an aggregation pipeline using the $lookup operator to link the data in two different collections. The aggregation would be something like this:
db.document.aggregate([
{$lookup: {
"from": "vehicle",
"localField": "vehicle",
"foreignField": "_id",
"as": "vehicleDetails",
}},
{$match: {"vehicleDetails.users" : ObjectId("5ae1a957d67500018efa2c9d")}}
])
You will probably need to add more stages to reshape the data the way you need it, but the key is to use $lookup to link the data from the two collections, then use $match to filter the set of results.
In order for this query to work you need to store users ids array in vehicle document. Neither Mongo nor CASL doesn't manage external references automatically.
Alternative solutions:
So, I see few ways:
Retrieve ids of all vehicles when you define rules. This works good in case if amount of vehicles not big (<= 1000)
const vehicleIds = await getVehicleIds(user)
can(['read', 'update'], 'document', { vehicle: { $in: vehicleIds } })
Denormalize your scheme. For example, add additional user_id field to vehicle document
Think whether you can embed document as subdocument to vechicle, something like this:
vehicle {
documents: [Document],
users: [ {type: objectId, ref: 'user'} ]
}
Just don't define rule per documents and enforce them in routes (REST or GraphQL doesn't matter).
app.get('/vehicle/:id/documents', async (req, res) => {
const vehicle = await Vehicle.findById(req.params.id)
req.ability.throwUnlessCan('read', vehicle)
const documents = Document.find({ vehicle: vehicle.id })
res.send({ documents })
})
In order to expand the JSON-API capabilities of my node.js application, I'm trying to sort a query based on relationships (AKA other documents), although I don't want to return them.
According to the JSON-API documentation:
a sort field of author.name could be used to request that the primary data be sorted based upon the name attribute of the author relationship.
E.g. db.collection('books').find({}) returns:
[
{
type: "book",
id: "2349",
attributes: {
title: "My Sweet Book"
},
relationships: {
author: {
data: {
type: "authors",
id: "9"
}
}
}
},
{} // etc ...
]
db.collection('authors').find({id: "9"}) returns:
[
{
type: "author",
id: "9",
attributes: {
name: "Hank Moody"
}
}
]
Now I need some way to do something similar to e.g.:
db.collection('books').find({}).sort({"author.name": -1})
I think I need to convert the query to an aggregation so I can use the $lookup operator, but I'm not sure how to use localField and foreignField.
db.collection('books').aggregate([
{$match: {}},
{$lookup: {from: "authors", localField: "attributes.author.data.id", foreignField: "id", as: "temp.author"}},
{$sort: {"$books.temp.author.name": -1}},
{$project: {temp: false}},
])
Notes
This will be a global function for fetching JSON-API data.
This means we don't know wether a sort key is an attribute or a relationship.
Most servers run LTS versions and have MongoDB 3.2
You can try below aggregation.
$lookup to join to authors collection followed by $unwind to flatten the book_author array for applying $sort on name field and $project with exclusion to remove book_author field ( only works starting Mongo 3.4 version ). For lower versions you have to include all the other fields you want to keep and excluding book_author field in the $project stage.
db.collection('books').aggregate([{
$lookup: {
from: "authors",
localField: "relationships.author.data.id",
foreignField: "id",
as: "book_author"
}
}, {
$unwind: "$book_author"
}, {
$sort: {
"book_author.attributes.name": -1
}
}, {
$project: {
"book_author": 0
}
}])
I have a group object, which is included an members property. The members property is an array of objects. That object is having following properties.
{"id" : "1", "status" : 1}
My requirement is to get the list of users, who are having status 1, of a given group object (by a given id).
This is possible to do, with a simple get by ID query and a foreach. But want to know, is there any advance query to do this.
My overall Group object as follows.
var UserSchema = new Schema({
user_id:{
type : Schema.ObjectId,
ref : 'User',
default : null
},
status:{
type : Number,
default : null /* 1 - pending | 2 - rejected | 3 - accepted*/
},
});
var GroupSchema = new Schema({
type:{
type : Number,
default : 1 /* 1 - group | 2 - community*/
},
name:{
type:String,
default:null
},
members:[UserSchema]
},{collection:"groups"});
Thank You in advance.
You can use the aggregation framework to filter the documents in the groups collection by the given group id and the members array status field. This will be your initial pipeline stage which is $match operator-driven.
The next pipeline step should be the $filter operator which selects a subset of the members array based on a given condition. This is necessary since the previous pipeline only filters at document level, not at array/field level.
Once you get the filtered array you can then apply the $lookup function as means to "populate" your members list. However, since localField is an array and you want to match the elements inside it against a foreignField which is a single element, you'll need to $unwind the array as one stage of the aggregation pipeline before applying the $lookup operator.
The following example demonstrates how you can apply all the above steps in your case:
Group.aggregate([
{
"$match": {
"_id": groupId,
"members.status": 1
}
},
{
"$filter": {
"input": "$members",
"as": "member",
"cond": { "$eq": ["$$member.status", 1] }
}
}
{ "$unwind": "$members" },
{
"$lookup": {
"from": "users"
"localField": "members.user_id",
"foreignField": "_id",
"as": "member"
}
}
]).exec(function(err, results) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(results);
});
The results will contain a list of documents which have both the group and user attributes.
If your MongoDB version does not support the $filter and $lookup operators introduced in version 3.2. X and newer, then consider using the $setDifference and $map operator combo to filter the array elements in a $project pipeline.
The $map operator in essence creates a new array field that holds values as a result of the evaluated logic in a subexpression to each element of an array. The $setDifference operator then returns a set with elements that appear in the first set but not in the second set; i.e. performs a relative complement of the second set relative to the first. In this case it will return the final members array that has elements not related to the parent documents via the status property.
Execute the aggregate operation after the $project pipeline step and since the documents returned are plain javascript objects, not Mongoose Documents (any shape of document can be returned), you need to cast the results to Mongoose Documents so that you can use populate function on the field with the results.
The following example demonstrates the above workaround:
Group.aggregate([
{
"$match": {
"_id": groupId,
"members.status": 1
}
},
{
"$project": {
"type": 1, "name": 1,
"members": {
"$setDifference": [
{
"$map": {
"input": "$members",
"as": "member",
"in": {
"$cond": [
{ "$eq": [ "$$member.status", 1 ] },
"$$member",
false
]
}
}
},
[false]
]
}
}
}
]).exec(function(err, result) {
if (err) throw err;
var docs = result.map(function(doc) { return new Group(doc) });
Group.populate(docs, { "path": "members" }, function(err, results) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(JSON.stringify(results, undefined, 4 ));
res.json(results);
});
});
Assuming your collection name is groups, you can query like this :
db.groups.find({"members.status":1}, {"members":1});
This will fetch all the users that has status 1. If you want to query based on a specific user_id (assuming user id as "1A" here) , you can add in the object like this :
db.groups.find({"members.status":1, "members.user_id":"1A"}, {"members":1});