I have an extremely simple question. Couldn't find the answer anywhere online.
My app has a syncadapter that uses Volley to perform a request in the onPerformSync method.
My question is that when volley's Response.Lisener is triggered, does the onResponse method run on the main thread or on the same thread as the onPerformSync method?
Thank you!
on the main thread .. because of ExecutorDelivery:
mResponsePoster = new Executor() {
#Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
handler.post(command);
}
};
where: handler is created here (in the request queue):
public RequestQueue(Cache cache, Network network, int threadPoolSize) {
this(cache, network, threadPoolSize,
new ExecutorDelivery(new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper())));
}
you can override this behavior by passing your own ResponseDelivery implementation
Related
I've seen so many questions similar to mine, but no answers that quite seem to apply to my situation.
My ASP.NET MVC app with EF 6 Code first and Unity has a web service that adds something to the database, then fires off another thread that adds more stuff to the database. The reason for using the other thread is to return the original request as quickly as possible. The context class is obtained using the Unity container RegisterType().
I've got lots of repository classes all using the same context, so to make sure they get the same instance I could use the PerRequestLifetimeManager in my Unity container, and that's fine for the http request threads but that the other threads can't use the context returned by the PerRequestLifetimeManager because this is only valid on the original http request thread.
So, I can use the PerThreadLifetimeManager. This is great because now the main request thread and the other thread it kicks off get the same instance of the context returned by Unity. The trouble is that so do other requests if they get given the same thread, so this is no good either.
So how can I configure things so that the request threads get their own PerRequest Lifetime Manager created context, and other threads get a different context?
The issue is made a little more difficult by the fact that the new thread calls other classes that need to use a context instance. However, these other classes can be used from the main request thread or the new thread, so grabbing a context instance when the thread is started and then passing it around will be tricky.
Thanks in advance
No takers then...
I'm going to have a go at answering my own question, but could do with some thoughts on my approach.
So I can't use the PerRequestLifetimeManager because worker threads can't use the context that this returns, but I can't use the PerThreadLifetimeManager because the context can last the lifetime of several HTTP requests. This class attempts to provide the best of both worlds.
/// <summary>
/// For the context class the PerRequestLifetimeManager is the most suitable lifetime manager,
/// but this doesn't work when a new worker thread is started as this needs to access the context.
/// The PerThreadLifetimeManager is no good either as the context can last for more than on request.
/// This class attempts to give the best of both worlds: per request lifetime management for HTTP requests
/// and thread storage for worker threads.
/// </summary>
public class PerRequestOrThreadLifetimeManager : PerRequestLifetimeManager, IDisposable
{
private const string threadDataSlotName = "PerRequestOrThreadLifetimeManager";
public override object GetValue()
{
if (System.Web.HttpContext.Current != null)
{
return base.GetValue();
}
else
{
return getManagedObject();
}
}
public override void RemoveValue()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public override void SetValue(object newValue)
{
if (System.Web.HttpContext.Current != null)
{
base.SetValue(newValue);
}
else
{
Thread.SetData(Thread.GetNamedDataSlot(threadDataSlotName), newValue);
}
}
private object getManagedObject()
{
return Thread.GetData(Thread.GetNamedDataSlot(threadDataSlotName));
}
public void Dispose()
{
try
{
IDisposable obj = getManagedObject() as IDisposable;
if (obj != null)
{
obj.Dispose();
obj = null;
}
}
catch { }
}
}
Working Code here
static MessageSender TopicClient;
public static void SendTopicMessage(BrokeredMessage message)
{
IAsyncResult result = TopicClient.BeginSend(message, processEndSend, TopicClient);
Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
public static void processEndSend(IAsyncResult result)
{
MessageSender messageSender = result.AsyncState as MessageSender;
messageSender.EndSend(result);
}
The above code is working. But I don't know why should I put Thread.Sleep(). I dont want to keep Thread.Sleep(). But It's not working I remove that Thread.Sleep(). Any Suggestion?
I think you are calling the SendTopicMessage from a thread...
So if you remove Sleep() here your thread Terminated once its sent your first message...If you put Sleep(5000), you are sending next messages with in the 5 sec time duration so the thread kept alive.
I think You are designing Bad Architecture. Correct me If i am wrong.
For Clear understanding of your flow... Please post enough code snippets...
Questions about threads are in no shortage, I know, but I can't seem to find a "full" example of a thread doing http work and then coming back to update the UI.
I basically call a few web services upon app launch. I obviously don't want to freeze the UI so I would want to use a separate thread, right? I have found a bunch of examples online on how to get a new thread to perform some task. But I haven't yet found one that shows how to actually update the UI when the thread's task is done.
How do I know when the web service thread is done? Is there a callback method? Can I access the UI from this callback method if one exists.
Edit: (Here is some code)
//The activate method is called whenever my application gains focus.
public void activate(){
DoSomething wsThread = new DoSomething();
wsThread.start();
}
public void wsCallBack()
{
myTabScreen.add(new ButtonField("Callback called"));
}
public class DoSomething extends Thread
{
public void run()
{
try
{
wsCallBack();
}
catch(Exception e)
{
}
}
}
Very simple. But it never creates the button.
Any ideas?
Thanks a lot.
You can set up a "callback" system to notify the UI when the threads complete. Have a class that extends Thread and pass to it a reference of the class that should be called at the end. If you have a list of such classes that needs to be notified create a Vector on the Thread implementation to hold them. Override the run function and after doing everything you need to do simply call a method on the UI class (iterating through the vector if needed). So your classes may look like:
public class commThread extends Thread{
MyUIClass callbackObj;
public commThread(MyUIClass myUiClass){
callbackObj = myUiClass;
}
public void run(){
//do stuff
callbackObj.callback();
}
}
and your UI class:
public MyUIClass{
public void callback(){
//refresh the UI
}
}
Of course if you have multiple threads running at the same time and calling the same UI object make sure to synchronize the callback method.
Hope this helps!
I am having an eclipse View. Inside the view I added a Table. Now I am calling a thread from run method of the view using asyncExec.
My View class is like -
public class SampleViewAction implements IWorkbenchWindowActionDelegate{
Thread t;
int Count;
#Override
public void run(IAction arg0) {
}
}
Now I added a thread like this -
PlatformUI.getWorkbench().getDisplay().asyncExec(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
new UDPReadThread();
}
});
Where UDPReadThread is a class extends a thread where in UDPReadThread 's constructor I started the thread.
But I am getting invalid Thread exception.
How to resolve the issue.
Similar to AWT and the EventDispatchThread, SWT must process everything in the UI thread.
Your SampleViewAction is run on the UI thread already, in response to a menu or tool item selection.
It looks like your problem comes from then using an asyncExec(*) which will post the runnable to be run on the UI thread (which delays it), and starting a new thread from that asyncExec Runnable. You may as well simply start your thread, and get rid of that asyncExec.
Your UDPReadThread is not the UI thread. If you need to update UI widgets from UDPReadThread, that's the code that needs the asyncExec:
display.asyncExec(
new Runnable() {
public void run(){
label.setText(text);
}
});
Just as an aside, you should not subclass Thread unless you really are extending threads capabilities. The normal pattern when you just want to start another thread:
UDPReadRunnable udpRunnable = ....;
Thread thread = new Thread(udpRunnable);
thread.start();
You can get more information on the display thread from http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#uithread
Could you let me know the reason for this error in SWT
"org.eclipse.swt.SWTException" Invalid Thread access ?
And How to fix such errors.
It happens when you try to act upon an interface item from a thread that's not the UI thread.
To run a code on the UI thread you have to use a Runnable and ask the display thread to run it. This way:
Display.getDefault().syncExec( new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
// Do your job here
}
} );
As stated by the syncExec method javadoc,
the thread which calls this method is suspended until the runnable completes.
Also, you might check the asyncExec method.
In SWT you can access GUI resources only from the display thread. For example when setting the text in a org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Text control you must already be in the display thread or call
final Text text = ...;
Display.getCurrent().syncExec(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
text.setText("test");
}
});