In Decision Table if i have ID's and i like to represent value's instead of ID's as LookUp in Rule Designer /Decision center.
how to build the xsd xom?
I tried this solution and helped a lot. By using Domains in BOM Entry, by locating values, labels , verbalization and BOM2XOM mapping
these steps can be done using many ways, i tried Excel Sheet and database:
for excel sheet:
view this link Using dynamic domains for flexible rule authoring
For database, this article helps a lot it uses xml as a dynamic domain and you can re-implement it by extracting data from the database business rule authoring in IBM Operational Decision Manager using an XML dynamic domain , by creating new eclipse plug-in project.
Related
we have domain models described in some xml format. Given the domain models I want to generate tooling that helps the testers/domain experts to express data in text (and a domain specific test framework later). IDE support is mandatory (IDEA or eclipse).
say, i have this pseudo model
User
fn string 120 chars mandatory
ln string 120 chars mandatory
address not-mandatory
Address
street mandatory
city mandatory
A typical usage scenario:
user opens the IDE
creates a new file
when content assist invoked, should give options 'user', 'address' etc
If I choose user, furthur ctrl-space should give 'fn', 'ln', 'address' as options.
I know this can be done by xtext or jetbrains mps etc. But, I want to understand which technology lends for the following requirements.
the models are fed to the system at run time (new, updates, deletes etc).
so, I cannot have static set of grammars. How can I structure it so that the model/property assist is resolved at run time or at least the grammar is generated (may be a part of it)
when I am working with one set of 'grammars' , if I point my target server to a different version (which may have different set of models) , I want the editor validate my existing files and flag errors.
I get the data files in xml, text or via server lookups.
It is very important for me to transform the models into some other format or interpret them in java/groovy.
for ex,
I may have the following data file
user {
fn : Tom
ln : Jill
hobby : movies
}
but, when I validate this file against a server which does not know 'hobby' property, I want the editor to mark error on that property.
I have plans to add much more functionality to this dsl/toolkit.
Any hints which technology is more suitable ?
thanks
I know this can be done by xtext or jetbrains mps etc. But, I want to understand which technology lends for the following requirements.
I think Xtext is good for your requirements under the condition that you have (or can create) an XML schema for your XML domain models.
the models are fed to the system at run time (new, updates, deletes etc). so, I cannot have static set of grammars. How can I structure it so that the model/property assist is resolved at run time or at least the grammar is generated (may be a part of it)
If I understand you correctly, you don't really need specific grammar rules for each XML data model but only cross references to the data model.
EMF has support for generating EMF Java classes from XSD files and Xtext can reference XML files conforming to the XSD schema if you add them to the Xtext index using your custom indexer (Xtext interface IDefaultResourceDescriptionStrategy).
So you can create a normal Xtext project with grammar etc. for your DSL and use cross references that refer to your XML domain model.
when I am working with one set of 'grammars' , if I point my target server to a different version (which may have different set of models) , I want the editor validate my existing files and flag errors.
I get the data files in xml, text or via server lookups.
EMF uses URIs to identify resources so if you generate an Ecore model like I described, it should be possible to import the XML domain models using http:// or file:// (or whatever, it's extensible) URIs, or something that you internally resolve to URIs.
It is very important for me to transform the models into some other format or interpret them in java/groovy.
Here you have the choice between making an interpreter, an Xbase inferrer or a generator (each of which can be implemented well using Xtend), depending on your requirements.
(Disclaimer: I am an employee at itemis, which is one of the main contributors to Xtext)
We are using SonarQube 4.5.1 for our projects and are planning to provide list of rules activation/deactivation to end users.
What is best way to export/import within SonarQube in Excel?
There is option of backup in Quality Profile but it did not export description.
I looked directly in the database with rules table, but due to some HTML tag this is not working for delimited with semicolon.
I would also like to know how we can add customized rules to existing set of rules. What is the procedure?
The SonarQube interface is really going to be the best referential for your users. Based on the info in your comment, I'd suggest a simple web form rather than trying to construct a spreadsheet.
It may help to know that you can construct the URL to any rule using the repositoryKey and key returned in the XML profile backup:
http://[server]/coding_rules#rule_key=[repositoryKey]:[key]
E.G. https://sonarcloud.io/api/rules/search?rule_key=csharpsquid%3AS907
The API supports many parameters that are documented here: https://sonarcloud.io/web_api/api/rules/search (click the Parameters header above the horizontal line to open the descriptions).
For example, the languages parameter makes it possible to search for rules that apply to one or more languages (a comma-separated list). To get the list of all C# rules, you can use https://sonarcloud.io/api/rules/search?languages=cs
To export the Rules on JSON format:
For C++ rules you can use the URL:
http://<localhost:<port/>>api/rules/search?languages=c%2B%2B
For C rules you can use the URL:
http://<localhost:<port/>>api/rules/search?languages=cs
After saving result of search API in json file, to cover entirely the question, import of json result in excel can be done with https://github.com/VBA-tools/VBA-JSON
I have a document library set up with multiple different categories of document, and I'm using a metadata column to differentiate between them.
I want to be able to display two different document library web part on a page for different categories of file side by side. This is simple for one category, I just set up a list view filtered by the metadata column, but when I add a second web part alongside the first, it breaks the first one.
I have no idea why this is happening, but it seems like SharePoint isn't happy with pulling two sets of data from the same document library.
When I am editing the web parts, I can get them to both display the documents I want, but then when I click save, the first web part empties.
Not sure what other information would be useful for diagnosing or helping with the problem, so if I haven't given enough detail let me know. I am familiar with SPD as well as developing through the web interface, so if this needs a more complex solution that's fine with me!
Having spent some more time playing around with this, it struck me that I could probably achieve what I wanted using something other than a Document web part, and I was right.
Instead of using the somewhat inflexible document web part, I created a content query web part which only searched within the document library from my site, and filtered by the metadata column.
This way I can create as many queries as I like and they don't interact with each other in weird ways. It also has the advantage of being significantly easier to customise the output without needing to resort to SharePoint Designer.
Content Queries are the answer!
I've got a tricky situation I'm trying to determine the best way to solve. I'm a VS developer who is learning SharePoint so it's a little frustrating to me when what I am trying to accomplish could easily be done with code and a db.
I have three lists, a parent and two children list that are linked through lookup columns. The client actually wanted everything in one list but due to SharePoint column type limitations I had to split the data into the three lists, there are over 300 fields. The client wants to see all the lists together in one view and be able to filter and edit groups of items.
I have successfully created a new data source linking the lists and can display that on one of my pages to view. After some research however I have learned that I can't create a datasheet view from this linked view due to limitations in the Office componets that SP uses. Which makes sense.
The business need is for the client to filter the three lists based on criteria they select from either list A AND list B and list C to get a group of items, they make the updates and save the changes back to the 3 lists. They prefer to do this in datasheet view because this mimics the excel spreadsheet that they are currently using that this website will replace. They will potentially be updating between 1-30 items at a time using this, which is why they prefer the drag and copy functionality.
I was thinking of two options: trying to create some kind of custom web part that has a gridview of all the columns in edit mode that they can filter down to their items and make their changes. Then I would have to loop through the fields and make updates programmatically. I also saw on this site jQuery.sheet, that looks like it may be a good solution if I go this route instead of gridview.
Or have a modal window with the columns listed, have the user select what they want to filter to, then redirect to a page that shows the three lists in their own DSVs. The user would have to make updates in the three separate views. Then I would use workflows to synchronize the lists after they had made their changes.
I always end up trying to do things programmatically since I am still largely unfamiliar with SP and only seem to hit its limitations instead of its strengths. Has anyone tried to do something similar to this? Or do you have any suggestions as to the best way to accomplish this? Best practices? I appreciate all thoughts and comments! FYI I've also posted this on the MS SP forums as well to cast a wider net...
Thanks,
Sabrina
In this case, you are better off going with a custom solution. A webpart would be an excellent choice for delivering your custom interface.
A dataview webpart will do the job, but if you feel comfortable with the jQuery solution it would make for a nicer interface.
In your code, treat the lists as you would a database and isolate it from the logic and interface code within the webpart.
We want to create a common document library on a certain site level and then create views on that document library in the different sub sites?
Is that possible in SharePoint?
Can it be done declaratively?
Rine
I would recommend to use the DataFormWebPart (requires SharePoint Designer to insert and customize the DFWP, the result can be exported to a feature)
The following blog entry lists a suitable SPDataSource sample:
SPDataSource and Rollups with the Data View
Good Luck!
Not out of the box. You will either need a third party "roll-up" ("roll-down") web part or you will need to write your own. OTB, views for lists/libraries are only visible at the current site level.
That being said, roll-ups (in one form or another) are probably one of the most common 3rd party seller for sharepoint (just a guess). In fact, I would bet there are several free projects out there that you could use (Check codeplex). You should have no problem finding one that meets your needs.
My suggestion would be to write your own, as this would give you some real good experience using the SharePoint object model and there really are no complicated concepts. Once you get past being able to do site navigation and accessing list data through the OM, you pretty much have all the tools you need.
Good Luck
I have found a cheep and great webpart which does a documents rollup from all subsites with search, paging and sorting functions.
http://speasysolution.miiduu.com/es-sharepoint-2010-documents-rollup
i used it, its simple and powerful