Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I have my custom css (all Compass/SASS based) added to the site from the Master page, rather than include the CSS in the site settings. While in Design View, my custom css, has overridden the items from DesignMode.css.
My master page is loading in my compiled CSS this way:
<link href="/CMSPages/GetResource.ashx?stylesheetfile=/KFF/SalesForce/main.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />
What is the best method to isolate my CSS from the designview.css?
Might want to take a look at this article
I think you can also do something like this in your master page:
{% ViewMode == "LiveSite" ? "StyleSheet Link": "" %}
Related
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I am Creating Todo List using nodeJs but I am not able to link CSS file.
I have linked in CSS file in header.ejs and then included it in list.ejs file.
but still CSS file is not linked.
Here is the best way to go about it.
You need to create a public folder in your root app. Then you create a css folder as well, then you can now create any css file inside. So you should have something like this
public > css > file.css
So you move on to your app.js file and add this
const path = require('path');
const express = require('express');
app.use(express.static(path.join(__dirname, 'public')))
Once you've done all that, you can now add your css to any ejs file.
For example
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.css">
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Here's what the HTML looks like:
<h4>Categories</h4>
<ul>
<li>Cars</li>
<li>Bikes</li>
<li>Planes</li>
</ul>
<h4>Brands</h4>
<ul>
<li>Audi</li>
<li>BMW</li>
<li>Mercedes</li>
</ul>
<h4>FAQ</h4>
<ul>
<li>FAQ1</li>
<li>FAQ2</li>
<li>FAQ3</li>
</ul>
I'm trying to extract only the brands using Scrapy. There are no distinguishing features between the category vs. brands section except that the H4 begins the new section. Also, there are many categories and brands so it's hard to hardcode it.
You can use the following or following-sibling axis.
For instance, in order to get the brands you can get to the desired h4 element by text and then get to the next ul sibling via following-sibling:
//h4[. = 'Brands']/following-sibling::ul[1]/li/text()
Demo from the Scrapy shell:
$ scrapy shell ./index.html
>>> response.xpath("//h4[. = 'Brands']/following-sibling::ul[1]/li/text()").extract()
['Audi', 'BMW', 'Mercedes']
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
i was wondering if there is any compiler is capable of parsing a css or scss file replacing all references to *.svg files with inline svg data. i found this:
body { background-image:
url("/assest/svg/test.svg");
}
would become
body { background-image:
url("data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' width='10' height='10'><linearGradient id='gradient'><stop offset='10%' stop-color='%23F00'/><stop offset='90%' stop-color='%23fcc'/> </linearGradient><rect fill='url(%23gradient)' x='0' y='0' width='100%' height='100%'/></svg>");
}
im looking for a way to make a portable css file without any dependencies. so far i found: https://github.com/jkphl/ but my tests so far did not show that data inlining may work. any ideas?
Compass allows you to inline the image with the inline-image helper...
background-image: inline-image("/assest/svg/test.svg");
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to make sure I understand this:
This: <meta content="noindex, nofollow" name="robots" /> in the <head> of a webpage
is the same as:
Disallow: /example-page.html in the Robots.txt
Right?
in the <head> of a webpage is the same as: Yes, if you are talking about the <head> of the example-page.html. The only difference is that when you have restriction for bots in the meta tag, the page will still be requested by the spider. This might be essential if that page is generated by any server-side script and you count the number of times it was displayed or gather any other information related to the visits to this page (from access logs, for example).
The bot (the valid bot from normal search engines) will access the page, read the meta tag, and subsequently not index it, while with the record in robots.txt no request of the page will be performed by the generic spider or the one mentioned in User-agent section of robots.txt.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I just wonder how is the forward with masking really works in all the common cases.
I just found out that the manual way of doing it is that just to put this code
<html>
<head>
<title>yourname</title>
<meta name="description" content="your description">
<meta name="keywords" content="keyword1, keyword2">
</head>
<frameset rows="100%,0" border="0">
<frame src="http://yourforwardingurl" frameborder="0">
<frame frameborder="0">
</frameset>
</html>
does that mean all the provider, registrar (like godaddy) they using the same method?
because if so then I don't know why in the sake of god would I have to wait them do that for me if I can just create a subdomain and put those codes and get it done in a minute rather than wait them activate it for me for 24-48 hours.
I don't have much experience with this but I don't believe that this is a very common way of masking URLs. For one thing, it's very easy to see the actual source of the content. It also seems like it would be a pain to manage. This might be an option if you are hosting a small website and don't have access to the server or a control panel for your domain.
The more common approach is more likely to be something using Apache's mod_proxy (explained here).
Yes, the mostly used method is a simple frameset or a iframe (in less cases).
And yes you can simply set up a sub domain with a html file which loads the target in a frame.