How do I create a public virtual machine image using Azure ARM? - azure

I want to create a virtual machine that anyone can launch using the ARM REST API.
How do I do that? I cannot find instructions.

Apparently it is possible to create public virtual machine images here: https://vmdepot.msopentech.com/help/contribute/vhd.html/

There are a couple of ways you could do this. Presuming you have got a website / application etc at the frontend, and it is simply the backend communication you're looking for.
Prerequisites
The option here presumes that you have an active Microsoft Azure account, and are able to create a VM there via the portal. Once you are at a stage that you can do that, you can use the REST API to create a machine instead.
Option 1
You can either use the REST API to directly create a VM by PUTing a request to this URI -
https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscription-id}/resourceGroups/{resource-group-name}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/{vm-name}?validating={true|false}&api-version={api-version}
You would need to attach a JSON document to that request that would define the machine you are creating.
{
"id":"/subscriptions/{subscription-id}/resourceGroups/myresourcegroup1/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/myvm1",
"name":"myvm1",
"type":"Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines",
"location":"westus",
"tags": {
"department":"finance"
},
"properties": {
"availabilitySet": {
"id":"/subscriptions/{subscription-id}/resourceGroups/myresourcegroup1/providers/Microsoft.Compute/availabilitySets/myav1"
},
"hardwareProfile": {
"vmSize":"Standard_A0"
},
"storageProfile": {
"imageReference": {
"publisher":"MicrosoftWindowsServerEssentials",
"offer":"WindowsServerEssentials",
"sku":"WindowsServerEssentials",
"version":"latest"
},
"osDisk": {
"name":"myosdisk1",
"vhd": {
"uri":"http://mystorage1.blob.core.windows.net/vhds/myosdisk1.vhd"
},
"caching":"ReadWrite",
"createOption":"FromImage"
},
"dataDisks": [ {
"name":"mydatadisk1",
"diskSizeGB":"1",
"lun": 0,
"vhd": {
"uri" : "http://mystorage1.blob.core.windows.net/vhds/mydatadisk1.vhd"
},
"createOption":"Empty"
} ]
},
"osProfile": {
"computerName":"myvm1",
"adminUsername":"username",
"adminPassword":"password",
"customData":"",
"windowsConfiguration": {
"provisionVMAgent":true,
"winRM": {
"listeners": [ {
"protocol": "https",
"certificateUrl": "url-to-certificate"
} ]
},
"additionalUnattendContent": {
"pass":"oobesystem",
"component":"Microsoft-Windows-Shell-Setup",
"settingName":"FirstLogonCommands|AutoLogon",
"content":"<XML unattend content>"
}
"enableAutomaticUpdates":true
},
"secrets":[ {
"sourceVault": {
"id": "/subscriptions/{subscription-id}/resourceGroups/myresourcegroup1/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/myvault1"
},
"vaultCertificates": [ {
"certificateUrl": "https://myvault1.vault.azure.net/secrets/{secretName}/{secretVersion}"
"certificateStore": "{certificateStoreName}"
} ]
} ]
},
"networkProfile": {
"networkInterfaces": [ {
"id":"/subscriptions/{subscription-id}/resourceGroups/myresourceGroup1/providers /Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/mynic1"
} ]
}
}
}
More details about the authentication and parameters can be found at the Azure Virtual Machine Rest documentation - Create or update a virtual machine
Option 2
Alternatively you can create an Azure Resource Manager Template, such as 101-vm-simple-linux on Azure's Github template repository
Once you have a template defined for the VM you want to deploy you can PUT another request to this URI
https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscription-id}/resourcegroups/{resource-group-name}/providers/microsoft.resources/deployments/{deployment-name}?api-version={api-version}
If you copy that template file to an Azure blob, along with another file specifying any parameters it needs, and send this JSON document with the PUT request
{
"properties": {
"templateLink": {
"uri": "http://mystorageaccount.blob.core.windows.net/templates/template.json",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
},
"mode": "Incremental",
"parametersLink": {
"uri": "http://mystorageaccount.blob.core.windows.net/templates/parameters.json",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
}
}
}
You can find the documentation for this at - Create a template deployment

This is to elaborate on #Michael B's answer: To discover what images are available, you can use the VMDepot -- of course -- or you can query for all the marketplace images. Look at the publishers list first, and then from there you can decide which images you would like.
The URN value you discover will be the one you want to use in your REST call. Hope this helps...

Related

Deployment of CosmosDB with shared autoscaling throughput fails

Trying to deploy ARM Template for a Database Account, SQL Database with two Collections where autoscale throughput setting are set at the database level (shared for collections).
I created this setup in Azure UI and then exported the template.
When importing the template from Powershell using New-AzResourceGroupDeployment it fails with message
Status Message: Entity with the specified id does not exist in the system.
ActivityId: <redacted>, Microsoft.Azure.Documents.Common/2.11.0 (Code:NotFound)
This is ridiculous because I exported the template and did not modify it and then imported. Isn't Azure recognizing it's own format?
I think the problem has to do with this fragment of template:
{
"type": "Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts/sqlDatabases/throughputSettings",
"apiVersion": "2020-04-01",
"name": "[concat(parameters('databaseAccounts_an_test_name'), '/', parameters('databaseAccounts_an_test_name'), '-db-2/default')]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts/sqlDatabases', parameters('databaseAccounts_an_test_name'), concat(parameters('databaseAccounts_an_test_name'), '-db-2'))]",
"[resourceId('Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts', parameters('databaseAccounts_an_test_name'))]"
],
"properties": {
"resource": {
"throughput": 400,
"autoscaleSettings": {
"maxThroughput": 4000
}
}
}
}
Any ideas?
Based on Mark Brown hints this is the exact solution.
{
"type": "Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts/sqlDatabases",
"name": ...
"apiVersion": "2020-04-01"
"dependsOn": ...
"properties": {
"resource": {
"id": ...
},
"options": {
"autoscaleSettings": {
"maxThroughput": 4000
}
}
}
}
Don't use the Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts/sqlDatabases/throughputSettings part of yaml from exported template. I'm not sure why Azure exports it and then doesn't allow for import.
If you are creating a new database or container resource you need to pass the throughput in the options for the resource. You can only use the throughput resource directly when updating the throughput.
Here is an example here

Enable HTTPS on Azure Front Door custom domain with ARM template deployment

I am deploying an Azure Front Door via an ARM template, and attempting to enable HTTPS on a custom domain.
According to the Azure documentation for Front Door, there is a quick start template to "Add a custom domain to your Front Door and enable HTTPS traffic for it with a Front Door managed certificate generated via DigiCert." However, while this adds a custom domain, it does not enable HTTPS.
Looking at the ARM template reference for Front Door, I can't see any obvious way to enable HTTPS, but perhaps I'm missing something?
Notwithstanding the additional information below, I'd like to be able to enable HTTPS on a Front Door custom domain via an ARM template deployment. Is this possible at this time?
Additional information
Note that there is a REST operation to enable HTTPS, but this does not seem to work with a Front Door managed certificate -
POST https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Network/frontDoors/{frontDoorName}/frontendEndpoints/{frontendEndpointName}/enableHttps?api-version=2019-05-01
{
"certificateSource": "FrontDoor",
"protocolType": "ServerNameIndication",
"minimumTLSVersion": "1.2"
}
There is also a Az PowerShell cmdlet to enable HTTP, which does work.
Enable-AzFrontDoorCustomDomainHttps -ResourceGroupName "lmk-bvt-accounts-front-door" -FrontDoorName "my-front-door" -FrontendEndpointName "my-front-door-rg"
UPDATE: This implementation currently seems to be unstable and is working only intermittently, which indicates it may not be production ready yet.
This now actually seems to be possible with ARM templates, after tracking down the latest Front Door API (2020-01-01) specs (which don't appear to be fully published in the MS reference websites yet):
https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/tree/master/specification/frontdoor/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/stable/2020-01-01
There's a new customHttpsConfiguration property in the frontendEndpoint properties object:
"customHttpsConfiguration": {
"certificateSource": "AzureKeyVault" // or "FrontDoor",
"minimumTlsVersion":"1.2",
"protocolType": "ServerNameIndication",
// Depending on "certificateSource" you supply either:
"keyVaultCertificateSourceParameters": {
"secretName": "<secret name>",
"secretVersion": "<secret version>",
"vault": {
"id": "<keyVault ResourceID>"
}
}
// Or:
"frontDoorCertificateSourceParameters": {
"certificateType": "Dedicated"
}
}
KeyVault Managed SSL Certificate Example
Note: I have tested this and appears to work.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Network/frontdoors",
"apiVersion": "2020-01-01",
"properties": {
"frontendEndpoints": [
{
"name": "[variables('frontendEndpointName')]",
"properties": {
"hostName": "[variables('customDomain')]",
"sessionAffinityEnabledState": "Enabled",
"sessionAffinityTtlSeconds": 0,
"webApplicationFirewallPolicyLink": {
"id": "[variables('wafPolicyResourceId')]"
},
"resourceState": "Enabled",
"customHttpsConfiguration": {
"certificateSource": "AzureKeyVault",
"minimumTlsVersion":"1.2",
"protocolType": "ServerNameIndication",
"keyVaultCertificateSourceParameters": {
"secretName": "[parameters('certKeyVaultSecret')]",
"secretVersion": "[parameters('certKeyVaultSecretVersion')]",
"vault": {
"id": "[resourceId(parameters('certKeyVaultResourceGroupName'),'Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults',parameters('certKeyVaultName'))]"
}
}
}
}
}
],
...
}
}
Front Door Managed SSL Certificate Example
Looks like for a FrontDoor managed certificate you would need to set:
Note: I have not tested this
{
"type": "Microsoft.Network/frontdoors",
"apiVersion": "2020-01-01",
"properties": {
"frontendEndpoints": [
{
"name": "[variables('frontendEndpointName')]",
"properties": {
"hostName": "[variables('customDomain')]",
"sessionAffinityEnabledState": "Enabled",
"sessionAffinityTtlSeconds": 0,
"webApplicationFirewallPolicyLink": {
"id": "[variables('wafPolicyResourceId')]"
},
"resourceState": "Enabled",
"customHttpsConfiguration": {
"certificateSource": "FrontDoor",
"minimumTlsVersion":"1.2",
"protocolType": "ServerNameIndication",
"frontDoorCertificateSourceParameters": {
"certificateType": "Dedicated"
}
}
}
}
],
...
}
}
I was able to successfully make an enableHttps REST Call using the Azure Management API.
I got a successful response and can see the resource results in the portal.azure.com and resource.azure.com sites.
However I am pretty sure the Management API, and PowerShell methods are the only ways supported right now. Since there is likely some validation required on the Certificate and Handling, they didn't include that yet in the ARM Templates. Given validation can be quite important, it is best you confirm your configuration is workable in the UI first, before automating it (IMHO).
According to this discussion this seems only possible via the REST API (see e.g. this answer) and not (yet) via ARM.
I managed to get this working with an ARM template. The below link shows you how to do this using Azure Front Door as a certificate source:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/blob/master/101-front-door-custom-domain/azuredeploy.json
I drew inspiration from this for deploying a certificate from Azure Key Vault for a custom domain. Here are the relevant elements from the ARM template that I am using:
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2019-04-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"hubName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Name to assign to the hub. This name will prefix all resources contained in the hub."
}
},
"frontdoorName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Name to assign to the Frontdoor instance"
}
},
"frontdoorCustomDomain": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "The custom domain name to be applied to the provisioned Azure Frontdoor instance"
}
},
"keyVaultCertificateName": {
"type": "string",
"metadata": {
"description": "Name of the TLS certificate in the Azure KeyVault to be deployed to Azure Frontdoor for supporting TLS over a custom domain",
"assumptions": [
"Azure KeyVault containing the TLS certificate is deployed to the same resource group as the resource group where Azure Frontdoor will be deployed to",
"Azure KeyVault name is the hub name followed by '-keyvault' (refer to variable 'keyVaultName' in this template)"
]
}
},
...
},
"variables": {
"frontdoorName": "[concat(parameters('hubName'), '-', parameters('frontdoorName'))]",
"frontdoorEndpointName": "[concat(variables('frontdoorName'), '-azurefd-net')]",
"customDomainFrontdoorEndpointName": "[concat(variables('frontdoorName'), '-', replace(parameters('frontdoorCustomDomain'), '.', '-'))]",
"keyVaultName": "[concat(parameters('hubName'), '-keyvault')]",
"frontdoorHostName": "[concat(variables('frontdoorName'), '.azurefd.net')]",
...
},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Network/frontdoors",
"apiVersion": "2020-05-01",
"name": "[variables('frontdoorName')]",
"location": "Global",
"properties": {
"resourceState": "Enabled",
"backendPools": [...],
"healthProbeSettings": [...],
"frontendEndpoints": [
{
"id": "[concat(resourceId('Microsoft.Network/frontdoors', variables('frontdoorName')), concat('/FrontendEndpoints/', variables('frontdoorEndpointName')))]",
"name": "[variables('frontdoorEndpointName')]",
"properties": {
"hostName": "[variables('frontdoorHostName')]",
"sessionAffinityEnabledState": "Enabled",
"sessionAffinityTtlSeconds": 0,
"resourceState": "Enabled"
}
},
{
"id": "[concat(resourceId('Microsoft.Network/frontdoors', variables('frontdoorName')), concat('/FrontendEndpoints/', variables('customDomainFrontdoorEndpointName')))]",
"name": "[variables('customDomainFrontdoorEndpointName')]",
"properties": {
"hostName": "[parameters('frontdoorCustomDomain')]",
"sessionAffinityEnabledState": "Enabled",
"sessionAffinityTtlSeconds": 0,
"resourceState": "Enabled"
}
}
],
"loadBalancingSettings": [...],
"routingRules": [...],
"backendPoolsSettings": {
"enforceCertificateNameCheck": "Enabled",
"sendRecvTimeoutSeconds": 30
},
"enabledState": "Enabled",
"friendlyName": "[variables('frontdoorName')]"
}
},
{
"type": "Microsoft.Network/frontdoors/frontendEndpoints/customHttpsConfiguration",
"apiVersion": "2020-07-01",
"name": "[concat(variables('frontdoorName'), '/', variables('customDomainFrontdoorEndpointName'), '/default')]",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Network/frontdoors', variables('frontdoorName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"protocolType": "ServerNameIndication",
"certificateSource": "AzureKeyVault",
"minimumTlsVersion": "1.2",
"keyVaultCertificateSourceParameters": {
"secretName": "[parameters('keyVaultCertificateName')]",
"vault": {
"id": "[resourceId(resourceGroup().name, 'Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults', variables('keyVaultName'))]"
}
}
}
}
]
}
Azure Front Door classic now seems to support both managed certificates and custom certificates for custom domains. At least there are quickstart templates in the official repo from Microsoft exactly for these cases:
managed certificate
custom certificate
They both use Microsoft.Network/frontdoors/frontendEndpoints/customHttpsConfiguration subresource of the Front Door, currently with API version 2020-07-01. Only the parent subresource is documented in the templates reference, though.
The name of the customHttpsConfiguration resource is "default", so when the resource is specified as a top-level resource in the template, its complete name is something like "myfrontdoorafd/www-example-com/default".
Using Bicep (which transpiles to JSON ARM templates and which I highly recommend), the important part of the template looks like this:
param frontDoorName string
param customDomainName string
var frontEndEndpointCustomName = replace(customDomainName, '.', '-')
resource frontDoor 'Microsoft.Network/frontDoors#2020-01-01' = {
name: frontDoorName
properties: {
frontendEndpoints: [
{
name: frontEndEndpointCustomName
properties: {
hostName: customDomainName
...
}
}
...
]
...
}
...
resource frontendEndpoint 'frontendEndpoints' existing = {
name: frontEndEndpointCustomName
}
}
// This resource enables a Front Door-managed TLS certificate on the frontend.
resource customHttpsConfiguration 'Microsoft.Network/frontdoors/frontendEndpoints/customHttpsConfiguration#2020-07-01' = {
parent: frontDoor::frontendEndpoint
name: 'default'
properties: {
protocolType: 'ServerNameIndication'
certificateSource: 'FrontDoor'
frontDoorCertificateSourceParameters: {
certificateType: 'Dedicated'
}
minimumTlsVersion: '1.2'
}
}
Note that the deployment will be in progress till the certificate is actually issued and deployed to all points of presence (PoP) of Azure. This may take really long and even fail due to RequestTimeout. If you want to just start the operation and let it complete asynchronously, use e.g. the enable-https subcommand in Azure CLI. Even after the failure, the customHttpsProvisioningState is Pending and the certificate provisioning process may complete successfully.
Also note that when you have many frontend endpoints and changes happen frequently but most frontend endpoints stay unchanged, the pattern from this template cannot be generalized just by specifying multiple customHttpsConfiguration instances for multiple frontend endpoints. Such a generalization is not efficient and likely hits the rate limit of the underlying API (429 TooManyRequests) because the API is called even when the endpoint already has the HTTPS configuration.
In such a case, I was able to use nested templates and conditional deployment to deploy the customHttpsConfiguration subresource only when the frontend endpoint's property customHttpsProvisioningState has the value of Disabled. This works OK even with tens of frontend endpoints when a new frontend endpoint is added (and it should get a managed certificate). Even in deployment mode Complete, the once-applied configuration persists.

Azure Front Door - How to add geo filtering policy?

I want to apply a geo filter to azure front door for countries that are outside of the US.
I've applied a waf policy (following the microsoft docs), but I'm not getting the desired result. All traffic appears to be denied. If I try a different country code, all traffic seems to be allowed.
Here's an example of a deny policy I'm trying to get working. If I apply this rule and test via locabrowser, the traffic is allowed.
I'm testing this theory by using locabrowser to simulate traffic from different locations.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2015-01-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"frontdoorwebapplicationfirewallpolicies_DenyChinaWafPolicy_name": {
"defaultValue": "DenyChinaWafPolicy",
"type": "String"
}
},
"variables": {},
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Network/frontdoorwebapplicationfirewallpolicies",
"apiVersion": "2018-08-01",
"name": "[parameters('frontdoorwebapplicationfirewallpolicies_DenyChinaWafPolicy_name')]",
"location": "Global",
"properties": {
"policySettings": {
"enabledState": "Enabled",
"mode": "Prevention"
},
"customRules": {
"rules": [
{
"name": "geoFilterRule",
"priority": 1,
"ruleType": "MatchRule",
"rateLimitDurationInMinutes": 1,
"rateLimitThreshold": 0,
"matchConditions": [
{
"matchVariable": "RemoteAddr",
"operator": "GeoMatch",
"negateCondition": false,
"matchValue": [
"CH"
]
}
],
"action": "Block"
}
]
},
"managedRules": {
"ruleSets": []
}
}
}
]
}
Geo-filtering in AFD is currently broken. It includes all the country instead of specific location. Fix is made and will be released soon. Will update here once the fix is updated.
This also does not work for me. Whatever I set the action to allow or block with matchVariable": "RemoteAddr" and "operator": "GeoMatch", It seems that this policy did not rely on the "matchValue", just works depending on the action. It seems that Geo filtering with WAF is still not available.
Please note that the Azure web application firewall (WAF) for Azure Front Door is currently in public preview.
You could give your voices or vote these feedback1 and feedback2 about geo-filtering.

Possible to get an Azure Function systemkey in an ARM template?

I know that I can get the host key and trigger_url of an Azure Function in an ARM template by using the listKeys/listSecrets method.
But I need the systemkey, I'm deploying an Event Grid Subscription and it needs the Azure Function endpoint url which contains the system key:
"resources": [
{
"type": "Microsoft.Storage/StorageAccounts/providers/eventSubscriptions",
"name": "[concat(concat(parameters('publisherName'), '/Microsoft.EventGrid/'), parameters('name'))]",
"apiVersion": "2018-01-01",
"properties": {
"destination": {
"endpointType": "[parameters('endpointType')]",
"properties": {
"endpointUrl": "[parameters('endpointUrl')]"
}
},
"filter": {
"subjectBeginsWith": "[parameters('subjectBeginsWith')]",
"subjectEndsWith": "[parameters('subjectEndsWith')]",
"subjectIsCaseSensitive": "[parameters('subjectIsCaseSensitive')]",
"includedEventTypes": "[parameters('includedEventTypes')]"
},
"labels": "[parameters('labels')]"
}
}
]
where endpointUrl is in the form of:
https://<function-app-name>.azurewebsites.net/admin/extensions/EventGridExtensionConfig?functionName=<function-name>&code=XZvGU0ROPxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxaaieD89gPQ==
The parameter named 'code' is the systemkey, which can be retrieved by doing a GET on
http://<function-app-name>.azurewebsites.net/admin/host/systemkeys/eventgridextensionconfig_extension?code=<master_key>
Is there a way to retrieve this systemkey (or the entire endpointurl) in the ARM template without resorting to bash scripts that inject it or other external systems?
The documentation does say: "However, you cannot use list operations that require values in the request body." So I don't think I'll be able to with a 'list' operation.
Yes, it is now possible:
"destination": {
"endpointType": "WebHook",
"properties": {
"endpointUrl": "[concat(variables('functionUrl'), listKeys(resourceId(variables('functionResourceGroupName'), 'Microsoft.Web/sites/host/', variables('functionAppName'), 'default'),'2016-08-01').systemkeys.eventgrid_extension)]"
}
},
Where functionUrl ends with &code=. Tested that on runtime ~2.
This is not possible right now. You can return only function keys using the ARM template.
Same described here:
https://blog.mexia.com.au/list-of-access-keys-from-output-values-after-arm-template-deployment#functions

How to set the connection string for a Service Bus Logic App action in an ARM template?

I'm attempting to deploy an Azure Logic App that includes an action to Send a message on a Service Bus using an ARM template.
In addition to deploying the Logic App, the ARM template deploys a Service Bus Namespace, a Queue and two AuthorizationRule (one for sending and one for listening).
I want to dynamically set the connection information for the Send Service Bus Message action to use the Connection string generated for the AuthorizationRule that supports sending.
When I create this in the portal editor (specifying the connection string for sending), I noticed the following is generated in code view...
"Send_message.": {
"conditions": [
{
"dependsOn": "<previous action>"
}
],
"inputs": {
"body": {
"ContentData": "#{encodeBase64(triggerBody())}"
},
"host": {
"api": {
"runtimeUrl": "https://logic-apis-westus.azure-apim.net/apim/servicebus"
},
"connection": {
"name": "#parameters('$connections')['servicebus']['connectionId']"
}
},
"method": "post",
"path": "/#{encodeURIComponent(string('<queuename>'))}/messages"
},
"type": "apiconnection"
}
},
I assume that the connection information is somehow buried in #parameters('$connections')['servicebus']['connectionId']"
I then used resources.azure.com to navigate to the logic app to see if I could get more details as to how #parameters('$connections')['servicebus']['connectionId']" is defined.
I found this:
"parameters": {
"$connections": {
"value": {
"servicebus": {
"connectionId": "/subscriptions/<subguid>/resourceGroups/<rgname>/providers/Microsoft.Web/connections/servicebus",
"connectionName": "servicebus",
"id": "/subscriptions/<subguid>/providers/Microsoft.Web/locations/westus/managedApis/servicebus"
}
}
}
}
But I still don't see where the connection string is set.
Where can I set the connection string for the service bus action in an ARM template using something like the following?
[listkeys(variables('sendAuthRuleResourceId'), variables('sbVersion')).primaryConnectionString]
EDIT: Also, I've referred to was seems to be a promising Azure quick start on github (based on the title), but I can't make any sense of it. It appears to use an older schema 2014-12-01-preview, and the "queueconnector" references an Api Gateway. If there is a newer example out there for this scenario, I'd love to see it.
I've recently worked on an ARM Template for the deployment of logic apps and service bus connection. Here is the sample template for configuring service bus connection string within the type "Microsoft.Web/connections". Hope it helps.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/connections",
"apiVersion": "2016-06-01",
"name": "[parameters('connections_servicebus_name')]",
"location": "centralus",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.ServiceBus/namespaces/AuthorizationRules', parameters('ServiceBusNamespace'), 'RootManageSharedAccessKey')]"
],
"properties": {
"displayName": "ServiceBusConnection",
"customParameterValues": {},
"api": {
"id": "[concat(subscription().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/locations/centralus/managedApis/servicebus')]"
},
"parameterValues": {
"connectionString": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.ServiceBus/namespaces/authorizationRules', parameters('ServiceBusNamespace'), 'RootManageSharedAccessKey'), '2017-04-01').primaryConnectionString]"
}
}
}
As you know connections is a resource so it needs to be created first did you refer this https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/logicapps/2016/02/23/deploying-in-the-logic-apps-preview-refresh/. Quick start link you are referring is for older schema.

Resources